AP Accuses Obama Artist Shepard Fairey Of Copyright Infringement

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - AP Accuses Obama Artist Shepard Fairey Of Copyright Infringement stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

HILLEL ITALIE | 02/ 4/09 10:39 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
A poster of President Barack Obama, right, by artist Shepard Fairey is shown for comparison with this April 27, 2006 file photo of then-Sen. Barack Obama by Associated Press photographer Mannie Garcia at the National Press Club in Washington. Fairey has acknowledged, the poster is based on the AP photograph. (AP Photo/Mannie Garcia/ Shepard Fairey)

NEW YORK — On buttons, posters and Web sites, the image was everywhere during last year's presidential campaign: a pensive Barack Obama looking upward, as if to the future, splashed in a Warholesque red, white and blue and underlined with the caption HOPE.

Designed by Shepard Fairey, a Los-Angeles based street artist, the image has led to sales of hundreds of thousands of posters and stickers, and has become so much in demand that copies signed by Fairey have been purchased for thousands of dollars on eBay.

The image, Fairey has acknowledged, is based on an Associated Press photograph, taken in April 2006 by Mannie Garcia on assignment for the AP at the National Press Club in Washington.

The AP says it owns the copyright, and wants credit and compensation. Fairey disagrees.

"The Associated Press has determined that the photograph used in the poster is an AP photo and that its use required permission," the AP's director of media relations, Paul Colford, said in a statement. "AP safeguards its assets and looks at these events on a case-by-case basis. We have reached out to Mr. Fairey's attorney and are in discussions. We hope for an amicable solution."

"We believe fair use protects Shepard's right to do what he did here," says Fairey's lawyer, Anthony Falzone, executive director of the Fair Use Project at Stanford University and a lecturer at the Stanford Law School. "It wouldn't be appropriate to comment beyond that at this time because we are in discussions about this with the AP."

Fair use is a legal concept that allows exceptions to copyright law, based on, among other factors, how much of the original is used, what the new work is used for and how the original is affected by the new work.

Legal experts offered differing views on the Obama image.

Story continues below

Jane Ginsburg, a Columbia University law professor who specializes in copyright cases, questioned whether Fairey has a valid fair-use claim and says that he should have at least credited the AP.

"What makes me uneasy is that it kind of suggests that anybody's photograph is fair game, even if it uses the entire image, and it remains recognizable, and it's not just used in a collage," Ginsburg said. "I think that's pretty radical."

Robin Gross, an intellectual property attorney who heads IP Justice, an international civil liberties organization, believes that Fairey had the right to use the photo, saying that he intended it for a political cause, not commercial use.

"Fairey's purpose of the use for the photo was political or civic, and this will certainly count in favor of the poster being a fair use," said Gross, based in San Francisco. "Nor will the poster diminish the value of the photo, if anything, it has increased the original photo's value beyond measure, another factor counting heavily in favor of fair use."

A longtime rebel with a history of breaking rules, Fairey has said he found the photograph using Google Images. He released the image on his Web site shortly after he created it, in early 2008, and made thousands of posters for the street.

As it caught on, supporters began downloading the image and distributing it at campaign events, while blogs and other Internet sites picked it up. Fairey has said that he did not receive any of the money raised.

A former Obama campaign official said they were well aware of the image based on the picture taken by Garcia, a temporary hire no longer with the AP, but never licensed it or used it officially. The Obama official asked not to be identified because no one was authorized anymore to speak on behalf of the campaign.

The image's fame did not end with the election.

It will be included this month at a Fairey exhibit at the Institute of Contemporary Art in Boston and a mixed-media stenciled collage version has been added to the permanent collection of the National Portrait Gallery in Washington.

"The continued use of the poster, regardless of whether it is for galleries or other distribution, is part of the discussion AP is having with Mr. Fairey's representative," Colford said.

A New York Times book on the election, just published by Penguin Group (USA), includes the image. A Vermont-based publisher, Chelsea Green, also used it _ credited solely to Fairey_ as the cover for Robert Kuttner's "Obama's Challenge," an economic manifesto released in September. Chelsea Green President Margo Baldwin said that Fairey did not ask for money, only that the publisher make a donation to the National Endowment for the Arts.

"It's a wonderful piece of art, but I wish he had been more careful about the licensing of it," said Baldwin, who added that Chelsea Green gave $2,500 to the NEA.

Fairey also used the AP photograph for an image designed specially for the Obama inaugural committee, which charged anywhere from $100 for a poster to $500 for a poster signed by the artist.

Fairey has said that he first designed the image a year ago after he was encouraged by the Obama campaign to come up with some kind of artwork. Last spring, he showed a letter to The Washington Post that came from the candidate.

"Dear Shepard," the letter reads. "I would like to thank you for using your talent in support of my campaign. The political messages involved in your work have encouraged Americans to believe they can help change the status quo. Your images have a profound effect on people, whether seen in a gallery or on a stop sign."

At first, Obama's team just encouraged him to make an image, Fairey has said. But soon after he created it, a worker involved in the campaign asked if Fairey could make an image from a photo to which the campaign had rights.

"I donated an image to them, which they used. It was the one that said "Change" underneath it. And then later on I did another one that said "Vote" underneath it, that had Obama smiling," he said in a December 2008 interview with an underground photography Web site.

___

Associated Press writer Philip Elliott in Washington contributed to this report.

NEW YORK — On buttons, posters and Web sites, the image was everywhere during last year's presidential campaign: a pensive Barack Obama looking upward, as if to the future, splashed in a Warhole...
NEW YORK — On buttons, posters and Web sites, the image was everywhere during last year's presidential campaign: a pensive Barack Obama looking upward, as if to the future, splashed in a Warhole...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
532
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last » (15 pages total)
photo

How much did the AP pay for this picture? This case is a hopeless muddle.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 AM on 02/05/2009
- Oilygarch I'm a Fan of Oilygarch 5 fans permalink
photo

Probably not much. It was taken by a temp (Manny Garcia), who has since been laid OFF!

So, after all this notoriety, AP didn't even have the decency to hire him back on.

Manny, this is Miguel Palacio from KPIK, if you read this, please let me know if you're unemployed.

Best wishes to all, except I don't have much sympathy right now for AP for trying to get a piece of the action at this late stage of the game.

How many city murals have had Martin Luther King's image on it? How many of these murals were painted by an artist's personal recollection of MLK? No, instead, they got it from a picture that was in the public domain, such as the one here stated from AP.

Give artists a expletive break!!

Just like you should also be giving Manny Garcia a break. The light is shining back on you AP. What have you been doing to reach back out to Manny Garcia??? Please let us know.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:59 AM on 02/05/2009
- Servility I'm a Fan of Servility 12 fans permalink

In this case, the picture of Obama was NOT in the public domain - it was copyrighted by the AP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 AM on 02/05/2009
- JZ735 I'm a Fan of JZ735 22 fans permalink

Sorry, it obviously is...pay up, Fairey, you're DONE!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 AM on 02/05/2009
- OverIt I'm a Fan of OverIt 79 fans permalink

Why don't y ou do a Wikipedia search on on "Fair Use" and then get back to us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 AM on 02/05/2009
- Tulka2 I'm a Fan of Tulka2 296 fans permalink
photo

Oh what rot.

Mashup! Mashup! Mashup!

"Something is happening here and you don't know what it is....do you, Mr. Jones?"

How will they keep us all in straight lines with cropped hair and alarm clocks and great big weights hanging off our souls?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 AM on 02/05/2009

Here is a quick photo composite I made showing the original Garcia photo, along with Fairey's poster. It's a dead on match.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v664/Shtick/Fairey-HopeOriginalcopy.jpg

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 AM on 02/05/2009
- Daughter I'm a Fan of Daughter 2 fans permalink

Now try the same thing using the Jim Young (Reuters) photo. I've seen a Jim Young composite. The result is exactly the same.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 AM on 02/05/2009

Actually, they aren't. Take a look.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/25105505@N07/3212113517/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 AM on 02/05/2009
- OverIt I'm a Fan of OverIt 79 fans permalink

The issue is not whether or not the Fairey pic is inspired by Garcia BUT whether or not Fairey's work is a transformative use of the picture. The fact that Garcia admits that he never recognized that his work was the basis of this popular image, the fact that the medium is so different from a picture, and the icon status of the piece all support Fairey's argument of fair use.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:40 AM on 02/05/2009

I have no comments as to the copyright issue. I'm just showing that the Garcia photo was the inspiration, rather than the Young photo.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 AM on 02/05/2009

SHepherd is from where I live and got his start with the posse posters/stickers here a long time ago. The subversive advertising thing was clever and unique idea to his credit then, but really, he is just know in the mainstream now primarily through graffiti folklore and obviously now this Obama stuff. He's an alright guy, but this is all retarded, AP probably benefited from the design, they're just getting a copyright judgment in now so they can try to control and collect proceeds form the sale when this image becomes ubiquitous in the future.

Side note, Shepherd was on Charlie Rose the other night pulling his pants down (embarrassing himself) while 'explaininng his art'. He's got sharp aesthetic talents, in the ideas dept though he's a little fish in a big pond now. So uh, get your hands off his nuts and put them to work

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 AM on 02/05/2009

I think AP would have a better case if they had paid Obama. It's his likeness. If it was fair use to shoot him at the National Press Club, as part of a story, then it is certainly fair use to apply computer techniques to that widely distributed photo, and re-distribute it. Did he add value? I think the market place has already determined that-at least for the time being. Keep in mind that AP doesn't have the right to "re-sell" the photo as a poster. Unless Obama signs off. They have the right to use it for news support. If anyone has a claim against the artist it's Obama. And, I think he's spoken.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 AM on 02/05/2009
photo

you have no clue about copyright.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 AM on 02/05/2009
- Luvial I'm a Fan of Luvial 17 fans permalink

Roy Lichtenstein did the exact thing with Marilyn Monroe's photograph. What grade are you in?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 AM on 02/05/2009
- socalgal59 I'm a Fan of socalgal59 13 fans permalink

"...which charged anywhere from $100 for a poster..." the operative word is "charged". The Obama inauguration people immediately charged the credit cards and pocketed the money, but have yet to deliver the posters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 PM on 02/04/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

They didn't pocket my wife's money. She got a chargeback.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 AM on 02/05/2009
- Luvial I'm a Fan of Luvial 17 fans permalink

Did Campbell Soup sue Andy Warhol? Hello. Insert lawyer joke here >

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 PM on 02/04/2009
photo

Do you know why lawyers wear neckties?



To hold the fore skin back.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 PM on 02/04/2009
- Luvial I'm a Fan of Luvial 17 fans permalink

I called my lawyer the other day and asked him how it was going? He said, "Great, I just made $500."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 AM on 02/05/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

What do you call a country without lawyers? A gulag.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 AM on 02/05/2009

I'm glad the AP is going after this guy.

He has stolen from prolific artists that have passed and cannot defend their work's integrity. Shepard defiles original artwork to create suburbanite faux resistance propaganda.

I recommend a critique that exposes Shapard's plagiarism as well as some really good, original art.

Obey Plagiarist Shepard Fairey
A critique by artist Mark Vallen
http://www.art-for-a-change.com/Obey/index.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 PM on 02/04/2009
photo

Fantastic!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 PM on 02/04/2009
- lolcopter I'm a Fan of lolcopter 2 fans permalink

It's too bad the author of that article for with Fairey.

http://www.myartspace.com/blog/2009/02/jamie-oshea-obeys-shepard-fairey-by.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 AM on 02/05/2009
photo

Anybody familiar with Shepard Fairey's work knows he's never claimed some of the images he uses to be 'his'...too bad Mr. Vallen failed to educate himself about Mr. Fairey before his so-called critique. Stop your smear campaign because it shows your ignorance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 PM on 02/04/2009
- karen1p I'm a Fan of karen1p 50 fans permalink
photo

F*** You ChiProgressive.

This artist had this image on his website for anyone to download. He was extremely generous with this image.

He gave the campaign a great image and HOPE.

So, F*** you and F*** off!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 AM on 02/05/2009
photo

what is your malfunction?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 AM on 02/05/2009
- JZ735 I'm a Fan of JZ735 22 fans permalink

You need to take your meds.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 AM on 02/05/2009
- Luvial I'm a Fan of Luvial 17 fans permalink

Original art? Like painting a vase of flowers? Art is art is art. What he did was art.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 AM on 02/05/2009
- JadedAggie I'm a Fan of JadedAggie 10 fans permalink

AP is going to lose this case badly. Even if you somehow could prove that he infringed on the copyright you would never be able to prove any damages. As has been noted if anything they suffered large gains from his use of the image.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 PM on 02/04/2009
photo

++++++++++#@++++++++++++
+++++++########++++++++++
++++++#####++###+++++++++
+++++##++++++++##++++++++
+++++#++++++++++##+++++++
++++#+++++++++++###++++++
++++#++++++++++++##++++++
+++#+++++++++######++++++
+++#++++##+ ########+++++
+++#+++#+#+++++++++#+++++
+++#++###++++++++++##++++
+++#+++++++++++++++#+++++
++++#++++++++##@++##++++
++++++++++@###++++##++++
+++#+#+++++++++++++#+++++
+++#++++++++####+++#+++++
++++++#++++#--#+++##+++++
++++#+#++++++++++###+++++
+++++#+#+++++++++#####+++
++++++++++++++++########+
++++++++##++++##########+
++++++++++@#######+#####+
++++++####++#####++#####+
++++######++++##++######+
+++#######+++##+++######+
+######### ++#++++######+
+#########+++++++##+++##+
+##########+++#++##+##+#+
+##########++++#+##+++##+
+##########+++#+####+###+
+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Sue Me too. AP has enough money. I'm an artist myself and I hate corporate greedy scumbags. Fairey I hope you win.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 PM on 02/04/2009
photo

May I chip in for your defense? I love Shepard Fairey and hope he wins too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 PM on 02/04/2009
photo

fairey steals from a fellow artist and you side with fairey.. shame on you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 PM on 02/04/2009
- karen1p I'm a Fan of karen1p 50 fans permalink
photo

You ROCK, PoliticalRockChick!

Scumbags they are!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 AM on 02/05/2009
- baddadd47 I'm a Fan of baddadd47 3 fans permalink

Hey its George Bush

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 AM on 02/05/2009
- JZ735 I'm a Fan of JZ735 22 fans permalink

The law is not on Fairey's side...
You can hate corporate scumbags all you like, as one should, but the law is not on Fairey's side because the image is Obama...makes it no more special than any other.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 AM on 02/05/2009

Quite nice!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 AM on 02/05/2009

Shepard the rip-off Fairey does not tend to exhibit much artistic creativity. Check this article http://www.art-for-a-change.com/Obey/index.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:32 PM on 02/04/2009
- Daughter I'm a Fan of Daughter 2 fans permalink
    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 PM on 02/04/2009
- wrenny I'm a Fan of wrenny 6 fans permalink

FASCINATING! Thank you!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:21 PM on 02/04/2009
- Luvial I'm a Fan of Luvial 17 fans permalink

Fairey is now the premier artist of the new "rip-off" school of art.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 AM on 02/05/2009
- JZ735 I'm a Fan of JZ735 22 fans permalink

Nothing special about taking a photo and trying to make it your own...it's nothing like what Roy Lichtenstein or Andy did...this is just mediocrity he creates.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 AM on 02/05/2009
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 41 fans permalink
photo

Excuse me. But doing an artist's rendering based on or inspired by a photo is not copyright infringement.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 02/04/2009
photo

Yes it is, especially if the photo is expressly copyrighted. It's like when I have to do projects in my graphic design class. If we get a photo to use in class, it can't be copyrighted unless it allows fair use.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:07 PM on 02/04/2009
- Luvial I'm a Fan of Luvial 17 fans permalink

Hey. Look up at the top of this blog. Did you notice that the entire article reprinted here was written by AP. It is copyrighted by AP. Are they sueing HuffPost? No. It is called fair use.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:45 PM on 02/04/2009
- Daughter I'm a Fan of Daughter 2 fans permalink

How does Warhol fit into this theory?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 PM on 02/04/2009
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 41 fans permalink
photo

No it's not. It's fair use.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 PM on 02/05/2009

Actually, it is. And there is legal precedent favoring the original work, in this case also a photograph. See Rogers v. Koons 1992 http://www.ncac.org/art-law/op-rog.cfm
The court did find in favor of the plaintiff and I believe the jury ordered Koons to pay 1M or so in damages, and to cease and desist distribution of the work. Fairey may not be able to win this case. The image is not significantly different from the original, and the AP is going to lawyer-up BIG time on this one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 02/05/2009
- Daughter I'm a Fan of Daughter 2 fans permalink

However, in Blanch v. Koons 2005, the court found in favor of the defendant (Koons), citing tranformative use.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:42 AM on 02/05/2009
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 41 fans permalink
photo

No, it's not. It's fair use. NPR had an interview today. Look it up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 PM on 02/05/2009

I thought the original photo was by Jim Young of Reuters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:17 PM on 02/04/2009
- Daughter I'm a Fan of Daughter 2 fans permalink

You're right. But I guess they changed their mind. The two images of Obama taken by two different photgraphers (Young and Garcia) are very, very similar. Once a judge sees the two photographs side by side, this case will be summarily dismissed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:01 PM on 02/04/2009

Turns out that was not the original source. I've made this composite of the actual photo along with the poster. Perfect match.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v664/Shtick/Fairey-HopeOriginalcopy.jpg

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:15 AM on 02/05/2009
- SPQR1052 I'm a Fan of SPQR1052 17 fans permalink
photo

So sue me, in the meanwhile, you knew it was coming. -)

http://www.barackobama-joebiden2008.com/bam-espere-44.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:09 PM on 02/04/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last » (15 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect