AP Accuses Obama Artist Shepard Fairey Of Copyright Infringement

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - AP Accuses Obama Artist Shepard Fairey Of Copyright Infringement stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

HILLEL ITALIE | 02/ 4/09 10:39 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
A poster of President Barack Obama, right, by artist Shepard Fairey is shown for comparison with this April 27, 2006 file photo of then-Sen. Barack Obama by Associated Press photographer Mannie Garcia at the National Press Club in Washington. Fairey has acknowledged, the poster is based on the AP photograph. (AP Photo/Mannie Garcia/ Shepard Fairey)

NEW YORK — On buttons, posters and Web sites, the image was everywhere during last year's presidential campaign: a pensive Barack Obama looking upward, as if to the future, splashed in a Warholesque red, white and blue and underlined with the caption HOPE.

Designed by Shepard Fairey, a Los-Angeles based street artist, the image has led to sales of hundreds of thousands of posters and stickers, and has become so much in demand that copies signed by Fairey have been purchased for thousands of dollars on eBay.

The image, Fairey has acknowledged, is based on an Associated Press photograph, taken in April 2006 by Mannie Garcia on assignment for the AP at the National Press Club in Washington.

The AP says it owns the copyright, and wants credit and compensation. Fairey disagrees.

"The Associated Press has determined that the photograph used in the poster is an AP photo and that its use required permission," the AP's director of media relations, Paul Colford, said in a statement. "AP safeguards its assets and looks at these events on a case-by-case basis. We have reached out to Mr. Fairey's attorney and are in discussions. We hope for an amicable solution."

"We believe fair use protects Shepard's right to do what he did here," says Fairey's lawyer, Anthony Falzone, executive director of the Fair Use Project at Stanford University and a lecturer at the Stanford Law School. "It wouldn't be appropriate to comment beyond that at this time because we are in discussions about this with the AP."

Fair use is a legal concept that allows exceptions to copyright law, based on, among other factors, how much of the original is used, what the new work is used for and how the original is affected by the new work.

Legal experts offered differing views on the Obama image.

Story continues below
advertisement

Jane Ginsburg, a Columbia University law professor who specializes in copyright cases, questioned whether Fairey has a valid fair-use claim and says that he should have at least credited the AP.

"What makes me uneasy is that it kind of suggests that anybody's photograph is fair game, even if it uses the entire image, and it remains recognizable, and it's not just used in a collage," Ginsburg said. "I think that's pretty radical."

Robin Gross, an intellectual property attorney who heads IP Justice, an international civil liberties organization, believes that Fairey had the right to use the photo, saying that he intended it for a political cause, not commercial use.

"Fairey's purpose of the use for the photo was political or civic, and this will certainly count in favor of the poster being a fair use," said Gross, based in San Francisco. "Nor will the poster diminish the value of the photo, if anything, it has increased the original photo's value beyond measure, another factor counting heavily in favor of fair use."

A longtime rebel with a history of breaking rules, Fairey has said he found the photograph using Google Images. He released the image on his Web site shortly after he created it, in early 2008, and made thousands of posters for the street.

As it caught on, supporters began downloading the image and distributing it at campaign events, while blogs and other Internet sites picked it up. Fairey has said that he did not receive any of the money raised.

A former Obama campaign official said they were well aware of the image based on the picture taken by Garcia, a temporary hire no longer with the AP, but never licensed it or used it officially. The Obama official asked not to be identified because no one was authorized anymore to speak on behalf of the campaign.

The image's fame did not end with the election.

It will be included this month at a Fairey exhibit at the Institute of Contemporary Art in Boston and a mixed-media stenciled collage version has been added to the permanent collection of the National Portrait Gallery in Washington.

"The continued use of the poster, regardless of whether it is for galleries or other distribution, is part of the discussion AP is having with Mr. Fairey's representative," Colford said.

A New York Times book on the election, just published by Penguin Group (USA), includes the image. A Vermont-based publisher, Chelsea Green, also used it _ credited solely to Fairey_ as the cover for Robert Kuttner's "Obama's Challenge," an economic manifesto released in September. Chelsea Green President Margo Baldwin said that Fairey did not ask for money, only that the publisher make a donation to the National Endowment for the Arts.

"It's a wonderful piece of art, but I wish he had been more careful about the licensing of it," said Baldwin, who added that Chelsea Green gave $2,500 to the NEA.

Fairey also used the AP photograph for an image designed specially for the Obama inaugural committee, which charged anywhere from $100 for a poster to $500 for a poster signed by the artist.

Fairey has said that he first designed the image a year ago after he was encouraged by the Obama campaign to come up with some kind of artwork. Last spring, he showed a letter to The Washington Post that came from the candidate.

"Dear Shepard," the letter reads. "I would like to thank you for using your talent in support of my campaign. The political messages involved in your work have encouraged Americans to believe they can help change the status quo. Your images have a profound effect on people, whether seen in a gallery or on a stop sign."

At first, Obama's team just encouraged him to make an image, Fairey has said. But soon after he created it, a worker involved in the campaign asked if Fairey could make an image from a photo to which the campaign had rights.

"I donated an image to them, which they used. It was the one that said "Change" underneath it. And then later on I did another one that said "Vote" underneath it, that had Obama smiling," he said in a December 2008 interview with an underground photography Web site.

___

Associated Press writer Philip Elliott in Washington contributed to this report.

NEW YORK — On buttons, posters and Web sites, the image was everywhere during last year's presidential campaign: a pensive Barack Obama looking upward, as if to the future, splashed in a Warhole...
NEW YORK — On buttons, posters and Web sites, the image was everywhere during last year's presidential campaign: a pensive Barack Obama looking upward, as if to the future, splashed in a Warhole...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
532
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next › Last » (15 pages total)

Let me get this straight, the AP wants to claim copyright of a photo of an elected official. What am I missing here? Doesn't every image of the President go to public domain?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 02/04/2009
- NickCatal I'm a Fan of NickCatal 2 fans permalink
photo

No... the only pictures of the president that go into the public domain are those taken by agents of the federal government doing the job of taking pictures. So any picture the official white house photographer takes is in the publc domain, but if I took a picture of Obama I would retain all copyrights to that picture and could sue anyone who uses it.

But there are a million holes here. The AP has every right to enforce their copyrights, but they have to realize they really have nothing to win here and everything to loose.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 PM on 02/04/2009

So what if you took a picture of Obama. Your still taking a picture of an elected official. I understand that if you take a picture of someone in your family that you would own the copyright of the image.

Like it or not we all own President Obama now, he was elected by we the people.

Isn't the purpose of press photography to be part of public record?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:12 PM on 02/05/2009

Money makes the world go 'round,
the world go 'round,
the world go 'round,
the world go 'round.

Money makes the world go 'round,
That clinking, clrnking sooooouuuuuund.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:55 PM on 02/04/2009

No, it's

Gangsta's makes das world go 'round

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 PM on 02/04/2009
photo

Good Going AP - maybe Obama should charge you for using his image - I suppose he could just ban your people from his press conferences.

My understanding is all the money made was donated to charity and he made the art free.

Credit is one thing riding anther's coat tails for profit off a public figure....

AP uses the public air waves and the public wires for free - how about we start charging them for the license to broadcast and transmit?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 02/04/2009
- benne I'm a Fan of benne 10 fans permalink

Didn't they let him have the image, pretty much, for the election? Why shouldn't he get permission now and pay the photographer, etc. the money they deserve.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 02/04/2009
- Gladys1963 I'm a Fan of Gladys1963 56 fans permalink
photo

I wonder if AP would have said anything if Obama had lost the election.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 PM on 02/04/2009
- Oilygarch I'm a Fan of Oilygarch 5 fans permalink
photo


Sue me!

++++++++++­#@++++++++­++++
+++++++###­#####+++++­+++++
++++++####­#++###++++­+++++
+++++##+++­+++++##+++­+++++
+++++#++++­++++++##++­+++++
++++#+++++­++++++###+­+++++
++++#+++++­+++++++##+­+++++
+++#++++++­+++######+­+++++
+++#++++##+ ########+++++
+++#+++#+#­+++++++++#­+++++
+++#++###+­+++++++++#­#++++
+++#++++++­+++++++++#­+++++
++++#+++++­+++##@++##­++++
++++++++++­@###++++##­++++
+++#+#++++­+++++++++#­+++++
+++#++++++­++####+++#­+++++
++++++#+++­+#--#+++##­+++++
++++#+#+++­+++++++###­+++++
+++++#+#++­+++++++###­##+++
++++++++++­++++++####­####+
++++++++##­++++######­####+
++++++++++­@#######+#­####+
++++++####­++#####++#­####+
++++######­++++##++##­####+
+++#######­+++##+++##­####+
+######### ++#++++######+
+#########­+++++++##+­++##+
+#########­#+++#++##+­##+#+
+#########­#++++#+##+­++##+
+#########­#+++#+####­+###+
++++++++++­++++++++++­+++++

LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 PM on 02/04/2009
- Daughter I'm a Fan of Daughter 2 fans permalink

ROTFLMAO!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 PM on 02/04/2009
- Gladys1963 I'm a Fan of Gladys1963 56 fans permalink
photo

That is the coolest!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:50 PM on 02/04/2009
- daingel I'm a Fan of daingel 2 fans permalink

That rocks!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:58 PM on 02/04/2009
- DotCalm I'm a Fan of DotCalm 6 fans permalink
photo

eggggggggsalent

oh no, the simpsons writers are gonna come after me ......

great oily!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 02/04/2009
- OverIt I'm a Fan of OverIt 73 fans permalink

Touche!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:08 PM on 02/04/2009
- Anastasia I'm a Fan of Anastasia 72 fans permalink
photo

Countless numbers artists over the centuries, have dome re-mixes and re-imaginings of of other artists work.

The number of times that photos of JFK and MLK been used as the basis for art work, whether commercially successful or nut, is legion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 PM on 02/04/2009
- Luvial I'm a Fan of Luvial 17 fans permalink

Andy Warhol - Campbell Soup cans. The list goes on...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 PM on 02/04/2009
photo

Just another reason to hate the freaking AP. They used to be a reliable source for news but in the past few years they have become a joke. I'd be embarrassed to work for them. This latest move is shameful. It is as ridiculous as Prince suing his fans for using his image on fan pages..just stupid.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 PM on 02/04/2009
- JayeSF I'm a Fan of JayeSF 24 fans permalink

jeez....Fairey's in the right here...he didn't infringe on anything as the image was the basis of the artwork, but is not a copy of the photo...it's in a different medium, done with different intent, etc...

this is stooooopid....and AP should REALLY be ashamed of themselves...

AP lawyers: "the AP has determined that the photo used in his poster is an AP photo and required permission"

read this statement a few tiumes...it's just lame. And innacurrate. "the photo used in the poster"...what does that mean..exactly ? Because 'using' an image..if it means basing a new work on the image... is not copyright infringement...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 PM on 02/04/2009

Copyright, and IP concepts in general, are broken.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 PM on 02/04/2009
photo

Yipee ...more work for the lawyers. So if I write an article based on facts (not the words) from a published source now it's copyright infringement?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 02/04/2009
photo

If you don't source where you got your facts from, yeah. You get a pass on stuff like gravity and the Capital of the United States.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 PM on 02/04/2009

Simple solution. President Obama should buy the rights for the image from AP. End the insanity of copyright "infringement".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:26 PM on 02/04/2009
- Daughter I'm a Fan of Daughter 2 fans permalink

The AP charges that Shepard Fairey copied its photograph. Why doesn't the article inform us that the original published photo was in fact a two shot of both Barack Obama and George Clooney, taken at a press conference in 2006? Ooh yes, of course, the AP wrote this article.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:21 PM on 02/04/2009

WHAT A CROCK . . . I own a camera and I want to sue AP because I COULD have shot that picture if the AP had NOT rejected my application as a photographer . . . it is an ARTISTIC interpretation based on an ACKNOWLEDGED source . . . did Campbels sue WARHOL, did Chevron sue RUSHA, or Van Gogh sue Manet???
AP has as much "right to sue' as anyone . . . also the courts have the SAME right to tell them to FO . . . if AP was so "creative" why DID THEY CREATE the work?

Nothing WORSE than a sulking Republican . . . AP, real classy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 02/04/2009
- ohmetoo I'm a Fan of ohmetoo 28 fans permalink
photo

I have a grand photo of Obama that I would give to Shepard Fairey for absolutely no charge. It is an original and he's welcome to it!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 PM on 02/04/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next › Last » (15 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect