Katie Couric Interview On CNN: "It's Not A Lot Of Fun Being Pummeled In The Press" (VIDEO)

Huffington Post   |  Nicholas Graham
First Posted: 02- 8-09 02:08 PM   |   Updated: 03-11-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

Katie Couric called into CNN's "Reliable Sources" for an interview with Howard Kurtz. They discussed a wide range of topics, including her scoop of a first interview with US Airways pilot Chesley Sullenberger, her interview with President Obama, and her recent uptick in ratings after more than two years in the anchor chair.

Couric, addressing her ratings, said that she doesn't necessarily think that two years is such a long time to get comfortable behind the desk and that she worries less about ratings than the quality of the work. She admitted "it's not a lot of fun being pummeled in the press," but that she does not take it personally: "I think that there are a lot of unhappy, sort of insecure, vitriolic people out there, and I always sort of feel bad for them, that this is how they spend their time."

Watch a clip of Couric's interview below. Transcript is below the video.

KURTZ: And Katie Couric joins me now by phone from New York. And Katie, we appreciate you calling in. You were so anxious to be on the program that you called in early. We had to call you back.

COURIC: Well, I didn't want to be late, Howie. I got nervous, because I've been on the receiving end of late calls, so I didn't want to do that to you.

KURTZ: Yes.

COURIC: But it's nice to talk to you.

KURTZ: Same here.

Story continues below

When you sat down with Sully, he seems like such a self-effacing guy. Was he reluctant to take a lot of credit for what he had done?

COURIC: Yes, very much so. You know, he is -- I mean, I think you look up "self-effacing" in the dictionary, and it has a picture of Sully Sullenberger. He is extremely humble, extraordinarily modest, and he is very quick to point out that there were five crew members on that plane that day. And in fact, when I asked him about the label of "hero," he said he thought the first responders were the heroes because they were at the ready in about four minutes, all surrounding that plane as it floated in a very surreal fashion on the Hudson River. And he said if they hadn't been there as quickly as they were, it would have been complete disaster. I said, "Yes, but you're the one that landed the plane, and the plane was intact." And, of course, that was an extremely part of the story. But he is extremely understated and humble about the whole thing.

KURTZ: And you were careful to include the entire crew, so the program is not just about Sullenberger.

COURIC: No. Well, you know, his co-pilot played an important role as well, Jeff Skiles. He had just trained, by the way, Howie, to fly the Airbus 320. And I think that was actually fortuitous, because he was very familiar with sort of the procedures, so as Sully Sullenberger took over the controls -- because it was Jeff's turn. They alternate who flies the plane at any given time when they are on a four-day trip like this. And when he said, "My aircraft," Jeff Skiles said, "Your aircraft," and then proceeded to help kind of go down the checklist for an emergency landing of this kind.

And by the way, the flight attendants are fascinating, too, because it's almost as if there were two situations or two separate accidents on that plane. In the back of the plane, it was a much more violent landing. The water was coming through and into the plane.

KURTZ: Right.

COURIC: And at one point, the flight attendant in the back thought it was over for her. So I think you'll really be interested in the sort of dual accounts inside that cabin.

KURTZ: Right, everybody having a different perspective on those horrendous moments.

COURIC: Right.

KURTZ: Was it difficult to get Sully to talk about the emotions he felt during those pressure-packed moments?

COURIC: Yes. You know, I mean, I think he is the consummate professional.

He's been an Air Force fighter pilot, he's been flying commercially for 30 years. And I think, you know, he didn't allow himself -- quite frankly, he didn't have the time to indulge himself into any feelings of panic.

I think what he said in that clip you ran, and the fact that it was first a feeling of feeling incredulous that this was happening. After that he realized, you know, he had a lot to do.

He had to figure out where they were going to land, you know, knowing that LaGuardia and Teterboro eventually would not be possibilities, and then prepare for a landing, a water landing, which is extremely difficult to do. So, you know, he did -- I think he wasn't all that emotional during the process.

In fact, at one point I said, "Did you pray at any moment?" And he said, "There were a lot of people in the cabin doing that for me. I had to fly the airplane."

KURTZ: Right. You know, even in normal circumstances, I guess, to be a successful pilot, you have to be able to tune out just about every distraction and focus on the job at hand.

COURIC: Yes. He said it took enormous concentration and focus to kind of remove those feelings of fear, and obviously he did what he needed to do to get the job done.

KURTZ: Right. Right.

Now your former partner, Matt Lauer, had announced that "The Today Show" was going to do the first interview with Sully. I don't want to use the word "steal," but how did you lure Sully over to do the interview with you in "60 Minutes?"

COURIC: Well, you know, in fairness, I think they might have jumped the gun a bit, because this whole interview -- really, I think maybe Matt was told by one person, but it was really a lot of people involved in the decision-making process, including the entire crew, Sully and his family, the Airline Pilots Association, the flight attendants. There were a couple of people helping them out from a PR perspective.

And so we did it like anybody else does these things. We talked to them, we told them we thought that "60 Minutes" was a good venue for them, it was more controlled. And we thought we could craft and produce a really excellent piece. And, you know, I think ultimately they all got together and they made that decision, and that's what happened.

KURTZ: Earlier in the show, Katie, we played clips of interviews with the network anchors that President Obama did. You were at the White House this week, talked to the president.

Did he seem ready to just admit that he had screwed up on the Daschle nomination? In other words, that it didn't take much prodding on your part?

COURIC: Oh, yes. I mean, I think that the administration definitely decided before we even, you know, arrived in Washington that this was going to be a mea culpa moment.

I don't think -- when they arranged for these interviews to take place, I think it was designed to really focus on the stimulus package.

But then Tom Daschle withdrew at about noon, I believe.

KURTZ: Right.

COURIC: And the woman from OMB, the deputy director who is going to be head of performance review, she pulled out because of tax issues.

And so I think they realized that the focal point of the interviews had changed pretty radically from when they had invited us down to the Oval Office. So, yes, he was very, very quick to say that.

The one question I wish I had followed up with -- you know, sometimes you think about these a half an hour later...

KURTZ: Of course.

COURIC: ... is, when you say, "I'm sorry, I screwed up, I made a mistake," was it a mistake that you actually chose Tom Daschle knowing he had tax issues and you underestimated the impact it would have, or was it a mistake that he hadn't about as thoroughly vetted as he might have been?

KURTZ: Right. What is the nature of the mistake.

COURIC: So I still think that's a bit of a question mark.

KURTZ: I think that's something we need to explore further.

You've been getting some pretty good press lately for your work on the "CBS Evening News." You're still in third place, but the ratings have ticked up a little bit.

After two and a half years in the anchor chair, why do you think it's taken so long?

COURIC: Well, I think by many people's standards, that wouldn't be taking so long at all. I think these things move glacially, actually, and viewer habits are pretty firmly entrenched.

KURTZ: Right.

COURIC: You know, I know it's been taking you a while for you to get a big audience on CNN.

KURTZ: It's taken a little while.

(LAUGHTER)

COURIC: So I just think it's one of those things that I think, first of all, people had to get used to me in the job. You know, a face that had not been familiar to CBS viewers. And then I also think that, you know, I had to get used to the job, and we had to sort of find the right balance of me getting out in the field and doing interviews, which is what I really enjoy doing, and reporting. And I just think it took a while to sort of be operating on all four cylinders.

But Rick Kaplan is doing a fantastic job. I think the show has been really high quality. I was really proud of the show from the get-go...

KURTZ: Right.

COURIC: ... but I think these things just take time. And that's OK. And, you know, I don't really look at the ratings. I look at the quality of the work. And I really think our newscast is as good or better than any of our competitors, and I'm really proud of the work that all of the correspondents and producers do on a nightly basis.

KURTZ: Right.

Some of the early criticism, you know, turned kind of personal, and is a woman really right for evening news anchor? And I just wonder whether that was a painful period for you at all?

COURIC: I mean, you know, listen, it's not a lot of fun being pummeled in the press. But on the other hand, I've always had enough confidence in my abilities and my work to know that sometimes there are larger issues at work here about the role of women in society and, you know, sort of -- I didn't really take it that personally. I think that there are a lot of unhappy, sort of insecure, vitriolic people out there, and I always sort of feel bad for them, that this is how they spend their time.

KURTZ: Right.

We're going to put up some pictures of you over the years, and I'm going to ask you whether the you think at all a factor in your recent success could be this new hairstyle.

COURIC: I don't know. You know, you should ask Charlie Gibson about how he's changed his part a little bit, or how Brian looks more tan on the air. I really don't know, Howie.

KURTZ: While we have you, we're seeing you on "The Today Show."

Oh, that's an interesting one. You'll have to see a tape of this.

COURIC: I was pregnant. I actually am watching these.

KURTZ: OK. You've got the TV on.

COURIC: Yes. I kind of like the John King shot of me feeding him grapes the best.

KURTZ: Yes. Do you have an explanation for that before we go?

COURIC: I don't really remember, but I do remember being over there with John. And he's a great reporter, and I'm so happy for his success.

KURTZ: Well, it was so nice of you to treat him royally the way you did.

Katie Couric, thanks so much for calling in.

COURIC: OK, Howie. Good to talk to you. Bye.

KURTZ: Nice to talk to you this morning.

Katie Couric called into CNN's "Reliable Sources" for an interview with Howard Kurtz. They discussed a wide range of topics, including her scoop of a first interview with US Airways pilot Chesley Sul...
Katie Couric called into CNN's "Reliable Sources" for an interview with Howard Kurtz. They discussed a wide range of topics, including her scoop of a first interview with US Airways pilot Chesley Sul...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
82
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
- NotMcCain I'm a Fan of NotMcCain 81 fans permalink
photo

Maybe she -should- take it personally.

She's not very good as a journalist/anchor and doesn't fill the "Managing Editor" role that a CBS anchor should.

They should have kept Schieffer, who actually had -improved-their ratings (and had genuine journalistic chops as well)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:04 PM on 02/08/2009
- Mabo I'm a Fan of Mabo 16 fans permalink
photo

Haha...she apparently doesn't have a problem pummeling people AS the press, though...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 PM on 02/08/2009
- omahajim I'm a Fan of omahajim 5 fans permalink
photo

she apparently will never have any journalistic ethics problems. because she is not a journalist.

check her record, she has a degree in AMERICAN STUDIES, for chrissakes. my cocker spaniel could get one of those. you get that degree when you have been the lacrosse team chew toy for so long that your flavor has all run out. then the coaches get together with the dean and they give you a piece of paper and you have no chance of getting a graduate degree. because none is offered.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:49 PM on 02/08/2009

Katie is more at home if CBS Evening News were to throw a wedding segment or if she was reporting on celebrity gossip.

She's very happy doing the specials interviewing stars before the Grammys and very uncomfortable about people with problems and no hope in Africa.

Katie wanted the job as head of a news organization and as head anchor. She made her choice now she should embrace it and not look back at the Today Show with their fashion shows, funny segments and quips and stars talking about their latest movie or song as the good old days.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 02/08/2009
photo

Katie:
Poor bab-ee.
Just another example if the unbelievably mediocre medi aand society we live in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 02/08/2009
- ivyj I'm a Fan of ivyj 3 fans permalink

She's right about the insecure, vitriolic people (who criticize her). Many seem to be commenting on this article. Come on, she's intelligent, hard-working, and seems like a good person. Please stop it, people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 02/08/2009
- provgrays I'm a Fan of provgrays 35 fans permalink

It's tremendous fun making 15 million a year to read a Teleprompter.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:01 PM on 02/08/2009
photo

...but then I look at my bank statement and laugh till my stomach hurts, " said the ridiculously over-paid talking head.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 02/08/2009
- lizziekw I'm a Fan of lizziekw 39 fans permalink

Dear Katie,

I know you're trying to hold on to your job in the tough economic days ahead. I appreciate that. However, two years is *more* than enough time to "get comfortable" with an anchor chair - IF YOU'RE A REAL ANCHOR PERSON - which you are not. You're not even a real news person.

The Palin thing was fun but you're not going to make this and you should go back to breakfast TV with Matt Lauer. Oh no wait, Lauer won't have you back because you just stomped on his head and stole his exclusive with that Sully the Hero Pilot guy. Um... well whatever - try "The View" they have a fairly high turnover rate.

Sorry, Perky McPerkison, that's just the way it goes.

Love,
The Viewing Public

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 02/08/2009
- Karl Jonas I'm a Fan of Karl Jonas 6 fans permalink

my my aren't we snarky. jealous much?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 02/08/2009
- VegasBabe I'm a Fan of VegasBabe 202 fans permalink
photo

I feel the exact same way....and I am NOT being snarky. I'm just not into Ms. Couric. She did a decent job of interviewing SP, but at $15mil a year, shouldn't we viewers expect as much if not more?

Snarky? Sheesh. Can't have an opinion apparently without being called snarky and jealous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 02/08/2009

Snarky and jealous? Hardly. Because here's the cold hard truth...

CBS recently had to let people go in the news division citing budget cuts and the economy. The usual excuses. Meanwhile, Couric keeps her job AND gets paid $15 million a year, which is literally HALF of the CBS news division budget.

Even if we allow her to stay somewhat rich, consider this. If she cut her salary to $2 million a year (which in these troubled times would surely be enough to get by, not counting all the other millions that she's already pocketed) that $13 million in immediate savings could allow for over THREE HUNDRED news people -- at a moderate salary of 40K a year -- to keep their jobs instead of being let go.

So ask yourself this: Is Couric...for coming in LAST in the ratings for 2 (now going on 3 years) actually worth 300 OTHER people losing their jobs?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:19 PM on 02/08/2009
- Dwjackson I'm a Fan of Dwjackson 16 fans permalink
photo

lol. Good comments. The way I see it, if she was a real journalist instead of an "entertainer", which is why she was hired as the lead anchor for CBS evening news to begin with, she would not be making some 16 million dollars per year.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:21 PM on 02/08/2009
- Hoisin I'm a Fan of Hoisin 2 fans permalink

She is not as cute as she used to be so I dont watch her any more. The next time a news outlet decides to captain a sinking ship with a cute blond, her hair better not change color in an attempt to make her seem "smarter". Further, they neext to pump up a female who is at the beginning of her youth, not over the hill.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 02/08/2009
- lizziekw I'm a Fan of lizziekw 39 fans permalink

You have to be over 40 to anchor the evening news. I can't think of anyone under 40 who does it, or ever has done it.

Maybe Baba Wawa was under 40 when she did that short-lived stint as co-anchor, I'm not sure.

In general - only middle-aged white guys need apply. In that sense, Couric's made some progress for women but she's terrible at the job so it's not much of an advance.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:30 PM on 02/08/2009
- Tom Payned I'm a Fan of Tom Payned 94 fans permalink
photo

How sexist can you two be? I don't watch the news to view the anchors, male or female. If that was my criteria Fox has some of the best looking female news readers.

Now this isn't to say I watch Katie, in fact I don't watch any of the network news broadcasts as I don't think you can do a thorough job of reporting the news in the 20 minutes between commercials.

Besides, I find the BBC America broadcasts to be much more thorough and cover stories that are global, such as killings in Uganda, famine in Darfur, border wars in Kashmir, the resurgence of Russia as a major player.

They were also the only news broadcasts to cover Bush's unpopularity early leading up to and after the war in Iraq, to question his WMD claims, and mention torture and rendition.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:03 PM on 02/08/2009
- Dwjackson I'm a Fan of Dwjackson 16 fans permalink
photo

WaWa was not over 40 when she co-anchored then news with the late Harry Reasoner. But age has nothing, NOTHING to do with whether or not Wa Wa or anyone else is a good journalist. Barbara Walters was a terrible journalist then, and she's a terrible journalist now. She also a terrible interviewer which is primarily her claim to fame. And it was her fame, in fact, nothing more and nothing less that contributed to her success....not the other way around. Katie is better than Walters but she, like Walters before her, was not given a position of eliteness hardly because of her journistic prowness. Both of them were given their positions because of their celebrity status and supposed ability to pull in ratings. There are hundreds, perhaps thousands, of better, much less renowned, journalists, both female and male and both younger and older than Couric who will never enjoy the celebrity status...but then again, they don't necessarily want it. They prefer to be good journalists and actually work for a living.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 02/08/2009
- Dwjackson I'm a Fan of Dwjackson 16 fans permalink
photo

Sorry, I stand corrected. Barbara Walters co-anchored with Reasoner between '76-78. She's 80, or close to it, now making her around 47 or 48 when she starte with Reasoner...which was, by the way, one of the most disasterous news partnerships, next to Dan Rather and Connie Chung, in history. Co-anchorships have never worked on the major network newscasts Howard K. Smith and Frank Reynolds/Harry Reasoner notwithstanding.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:20 PM on 02/08/2009
photo

oh criminey

what she is saying about it taking a while for viewers to come around

is exactly what David Gregory is going to say about his MTP role

but the fact is that we don't like them on the show

I still have yet to watch Couric

stop trying to shove your career down our throats,

have some respect for the viewer

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 02/08/2009
photo

Respect? For viewers? Network television?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 02/08/2009
- HC4BO I'm a Fan of HC4BO 43 fans permalink
photo

She feels pummeled huh ...

Well I guess now she knows how President Obama feels every single waking day ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:58 PM on 02/08/2009
- anthonylee I'm a Fan of anthonylee 4 fans permalink
photo

Is this me or does anyone else feel that we're being "spun" on Katie's talent or the program's popularity?

I'm not buying and still not watching . . . . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:46 PM on 02/08/2009
- plzchuteme I'm a Fan of plzchuteme 37 fans permalink
photo

I do, I do! I don't get it. I'm not buying it, and I'm not watching either.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 02/08/2009

Couric ain't so bad. And it/s hardly a "gotcha" question to ask a Vice Presidential candidate what newspapers she reads. It's hard to believe that folks are STILL making excuses for SP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 02/08/2009
- callmemara I'm a Fan of callmemara 12 fans permalink
photo

I think it's funny that McCain camp assumed since Couric is so softspoken that she would give Palin a free ride. Actually her questions weren't difficult. Palin has given me a reason to keep busy in politics. She is always good for a laugh. And how all the male repubs act about her! HA! They just make it easier and easier for the Dems. She cannot complete sentences and she cannot talk without her sentences being broken...it's like she speaks broken English! She is a trip. By the way, I'm a Yank in Texas, too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 02/08/2009

The worst words ever uttered on broadcast television:

"... And I'm Katie Couric. Those stories and Andy Rooney tonight on 60 Minutes."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 02/08/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect