Lofty Biofuels Goals Rest On Investor Leaps Of Faith

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Lofty Biofuels Goals Rest On Investor Leaps Of Faith stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DIRK LAMMERS | February 10, 2009 12:02 PM EST | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. — The U.S. could produce enough ethanol to displace nearly a third of all gasoline use by 2030, but gas would have to cost more than it does today for the plan to work, according to a study released Tuesday by Sandia National Laboratories and General Motors Corp.

The researchers found that annual ethanol production from plant waste and energy crops could reach 90 billion gallons by that date, with 75 billion gallons coming from cellulosic feedstocks such as switchgrass, corn stover, wheat straw and woody crops.

Cole Gustafson, a biofuels economist at North Dakota State University in Fargo, N.D., said the 90 billion figure is the most aggressive he's heard to date, far surpassing a federal mandate calling for 36 billion gallons of renewable fuel to be blended into gasoline by 2022.

"I really question if we can even make that," Gustafson said. "This technology has been very slow to evolve."

The government would need to protect the industry from low-priced competitors.

"What we end up finding is that we're going to have some significant challenges with regard to competing with very low priced petroleum products," said Art Pontau, Sandia's deputy director of combustion and industrial technologies.

The "seed to station" floor cost of ethanol without taxes is $1.50 per gallon, and gasoline will undercut it if it's priced below $2.25 per gallon without taxes, or $2.65 at the pump, the study found.

The average national retail cost for a gallon of gasoline on Tuesday was about $1.93. One year ago at this time a gallon cost about $2.95.

Story continues below
advertisement

The cost of E85 ethanol was $1.655 per gallon Tuesday.

The study took a value-chain approach to cellulosic ethanol, accounting for the variety of feedstocks and processes to convert crops to fuel, as well as storage, transport and distribution issues, Pontau said.

"We didn't pick the most optimistic assumptions or the most pessimistic," Pontau said. "We tried to pick something that we thought would be manageable in this sort of environment and time scale."

Pontau said the study is designed as an evolving model that the industry can use to identify places where investment in research and development makes sense.

It found that cellulosic ethanol could compete with $90-per-barrel oil, assuming 91 gallons of ethanol could be produced from a dry ton of biomass, building a cellulosic ethanol plant would cost $3.60 per gallon of capacity and plants would pay an average of $40 per dry ton of feedstock.

Government incentives including carbon taxes, excise tax credits and loan guarantees could help draw investors by mitigating risk, Pontau said,

The study found no fundamental barriers to large-scale production of biofuels, assuming the technology matures as projected.

"We anticipate that there'll be an ever increasing efficiency in both the processing approaches and ability to get more yield per acre of the feedstock," he said.

Gustafson is not so sure.

"The challenges that we face in doing this are almost insurmountable," he said.

Existing corn ethanol plants have consistent performance benchmarks that translate well to a balance sheet, but the cellulosic industry is experimenting with a broad range of feedstocks that can be confusing to investors.

"Those variances are very unsettling to Wall Street, because they aren't assured that the technology in one place is going to work in another," Gustafson said.

On Tuesday, Vancouver-based Lignol Energy Corp. said it was putting on hold its plans to build a Colorado cellulosic plant that was to convert wood residues into ethanol. The biorefinery, a joint project with Suncor Energy, had been awarded a $30 million Department of Energy grant.

"They had technology that was looking very promising. The federal government thought so because they kicked in the dollars," Gustafson said. "But obviously, because of both market conditions and logistics, they're having a very difficult time going forward."

David Pimentel, a Cornell University ecology and agriculture professor and longtime ethanol critic, called the 90 billion gallon number "off the wall."

Unlike corn, cellulosic feedstocks have much fewer starches and sugars, and they're held tightly by a plant's lignin. Companies are working on ways to improve the process, but they're having difficulty making cellulosic ethanol cost competitive, he said.

A more reasonable goal would be 10 billion gallons a year from cellulosic ethanol within the next 10 years, Pimentel said.

Filed by Dave Burdick

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. — The U.S. could produce enough ethanol to displace nearly a third of all gasoline use by 2030, but gas would have to cost more than it does today for the plan to work, accordi...
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. — The U.S. could produce enough ethanol to displace nearly a third of all gasoline use by 2030, but gas would have to cost more than it does today for the plan to work, accordi...
 
Comments
8
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- TJCole I'm a Fan of TJCole 162 fans permalink
photo

Industrial Hemp..!

Don't get stuck on stupid..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:08 PM on 02/12/2009
- ptobe I'm a Fan of ptobe 5 fans permalink

Good Night! When we people understand that the solution to our energy problems is NOT going to come from any process that involves BURNING THINGS!?!?!?!

Geez.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 02/11/2009
- mamacat I'm a Fan of mamacat 138 fans permalink

In the relative short run, I believe that there is an important role for ethanol, as long as food crops (esp. corn) are not grown intentionally for the purpose of turning them into fuel. To not use surpluses, wastage, and weeds for ethanol, when we pay $700 billion per year for foreign oil, seems foolish.

In the long run, I think we need to get off of CO2-producing fuels as much as humanly possible, before we ruin the biosphere for humanity. Whether we switch to PHEVs, EVs, Hydrogen powered cars, or something else, we need to do it before it is too late.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 PM on 02/11/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

This stuff is never "wasted", it is turned back into the soil and used as fertilizer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 PM on 02/11/2009
- tao53nyc I'm a Fan of tao53nyc 3 fans permalink

Ethanol fuel is a crock, and I wish we'd get over our unhealthy fascination with it. A gallon of E-85 only has about 65% of the energy (in BTUs) contained in a gallon of gasoline. Biodiesel is more competitive in this regard. We shouldn't be subsidizing ethanol at all, and NEVER make it from corn that could instead be used to feed hungry people. This is just another political boondoggle that will do no good, and put subsidy cash (YOUR money) into big farming companies like ADM.

Want to help the environment? Google on "thermal depolymerization" - you can make gas and diesel from stuff that would normally pile up in landfills.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 AM on 02/11/2009
- niko73 I'm a Fan of niko73 2 fans permalink

You are 100% correct that CORN ethanol is a crock. The rate of return for 1 part energy invested is 1 to 1.3 parts energy produced. This by itself should be enough for us to leave corn alone, not to mention all the impacts of growing corn and not using it to feed people, the subsidies, the agricultural impacts etc.

However, other kinds of ethanol like switchgrass and cane give much better rates of return (like 13 to 1 or more). These fuels hold enough promise, even with agricultural impacts, to present a real opportunity for us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 AM on 02/11/2009
- PaiaGirl I'm a Fan of PaiaGirl 116 fans permalink
photo

You are correct -- although we are still left with impacts on water. Here on Maui water use for cane growing is affecting our reefs, taking water from our taro farmers and creating a fight for water entitlements for development.

For Maui, at least, it makes much more sense to use photovoltaics and go for electric cars, reserving our biodiesel for freight trucks. (We generate biodiesel from waste cooking oil and other waste oils but there is only a limited amount).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 02/11/2009
- blake510 I'm a Fan of blake510 2 fans permalink
photo

Absolutely, I couldn't agree more.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 AM on 02/11/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect