Obama Administration Halts Bush Expansion Of Offshore Drilling

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

H. JOSEF HEBERT | February 10, 2009 07:32 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has rejected a Bush administration plan to open vast waters off the Pacific and Atlantic coasts to oil and gas drilling, promising "a new way forward" in offshore energy development including new wind projects.

Salazar at a news conference Tuesday criticized "the midnight timetable" for new oil and gas development on the country's Outer Continental Shelf proposed by the Bush administration four days before President Barack Obama took office Jan. 20.

The secretary said the previous administration's plan did not take into consideration the views of states and coastal communities, nor a need to better understand what energy resources are at stake, especially off the Atlantic coast where oil and gas estimates are more than three decades old.

"We need to ... restore an orderly process to our offshore energy planning program," declared Salazar, criticizing "foot dragging" by the Bush administration in pushing for renewable energy development in coastal waters.

Salazar did not rule out expanded offshore drilling, but criticized "the enormous sweep" of the Bush proposal, which envisioned energy development from New England to Alaska including lease sales in areas off California and in the North Atlantic that have been off-limits for a quarter century.

Congress last fall ended the broad drilling ban, dating back to 1981, that has kept energy companies from even exploring or conducting seismic studies across 85 percent of the offshore federal waters.

But it remains up to the Interior Department to issue specific plans for drilling leases. And Salazar indicated Tuesday he is in no rush to open vast expanses of long-protected waters, promising "to create our own timetable."

Salazar directed Interior Department scientists to produce new reports on how much oil and gas might be found off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts and extended the public comment period on a new five-year leasing plan to September. He said he will hold regional meetings to get comments from the public before continuing with an offshore energy plan.

Story continues below
advertisement

Offshore drilling became a contentious issue during the presidential campaign as Republican John McCain made it a pivotal part of his energy agenda. Obama has said he's not opposed to drilling in some waters that have been off limits, but insisted it should be part of a broader energy plan.

Salazar said any offshore energy plan must include a push for more renewable energy, principally wind power.

"The Bush administration was so intent on opening new areas for oil and gas offshore that it torpedoed offshore renewable energy efforts," maintained Salazar. "It was not their priority."

He promised to move aggressively to complete a new regulation on offshore renewable energy programs including wind, solar and wave energy projects.

But Salazar did not rule out an expansion off offshore oil and gas drilling. Some issues such as revenue sharing from offshore energy development must still be worked out in Congress, which also is likely to have a say on what specific waters might again be put off limits.

Salazar, however, has not abandoned a proposal for oil and gas leasing off Virginia, which is included in the current drilling plan scheduled to expire in 2012, nor has he indicated a desire to cancel leasing plans off Alaska including in the Chukchi Sea and Bristol Bay where drilling leases are facing court challenges.

Nevertheless, Salazar's announcement was hailed by environmentalists and some drilling opponents in Congress as a new direction in U.S. offshore energy development.

It's "a new way of doing business" at the Interior Department, said Wesley Warren at the Natural Resources Defense Council, citing Salazar's emphasis on renewable energy development.

Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., said Salazar was "bringing ... regulatory sanity back into our energy policy.

But Jack Gerard, president of the American Petroleum Institute, which represents the large oil companies, said Salazar's announcement "means that development of our offshore resources could be stalled indefinitely."

At an energy conference in Houston on Tuesday, BP chief executive Tony Hayward and Royal Dutch Shell CEO Jeroen van der Veer urged the government to open more offshore regions to exploration and production. "We have the know-how and technology to tap these resources safely and with minimal impact to the environment," Hayward said.

The Interior Department estimates _ using 30-year-old studies _ that offshore waters recently lifted from drilling bans contain at least 18 billion barrels of oil, about half of it off California.

___

AP reporter John Porretto in Houston contributed to this story.

___

Interior Department: . http://www.doi.gov

(This version CORRECTS spelling of Porretto in contributing line.)

WASHINGTON — Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has rejected a Bush administration plan to open vast waters off the Pacific and Atlantic coasts to oil and gas drilling, promising "a new way forward"...
WASHINGTON — Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has rejected a Bush administration plan to open vast waters off the Pacific and Atlantic coasts to oil and gas drilling, promising "a new way forward"...
 
Comments
127
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- gmlaster I'm a Fan of gmlaster 35 fans permalink

Yay!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 PM on 02/11/2009
- sleeperd I'm a Fan of sleeperd 13 fans permalink


It sholud be obvious to even the dolts on this site that energy production is now a matter of national security.
The actions of this "administration" to once again increase our dependence on foreign oil should be looked upon as treasonous.
You left-wing socialists won't be happy until gas reaches $10 per gallon.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 PM on 02/11/2009
- missviv I'm a Fan of missviv 8 fans permalink
photo

left wing socialists? i almost cried laughing!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 PM on 02/11/2009
- acacia72 I'm a Fan of acacia72 3 fans permalink

"It sholud be obvious to even the dolts on this site that energy production is now a matter of national security.
The actions of this "administration" to once again increase our dependence on foreign oil should be looked upon as treasonous.
You left-wing socialists won't be happy until gas reaches $10 per gallon."
----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­---------
sleeperd HERE ARE THE FACTS, feel free to check for yourself. Even if we allowed the oil companies free rein in ANWAR, off shore, national parks, oil shale, etc,

1. Refined light, sweet crude goes to the WORLD OIL MARKET, NOT where it is pumped out ot the ground! THEN the U.S. buys from the WORLD OIL MARKET, where all the oil is "pooled". It DOESN'T MATTER where the oil originally came from.

2. Even if ALL the oil pumped by the "American" oil companies stayed in America, it would be a mere DROP IN THE BUCKET as the U.S. consumes 25% of the worlds oil!

3. Unless you work for one of the oil companies, do you REALLY want to give them free rein after all of the price gouging at the pump and the record profits they've been raking in??? (Even a lot of die-hard conservatives are pretty pissed about this).

sleeperd, with all due respect, PLEASE educate yourself before posting again!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 AM on 02/12/2009
- Forester I'm a Fan of Forester 92 fans permalink
photo

I don't fit that description - but there is some merit to your comment.
If you added up the actual cost of fuel, including all the subsidies to energy companies and military costs, $10 would be a bargain. This is commonly called called corporate welfare, and imperialism.
Reliance on foreign supplies will always be part of a larger more diversified energy plan that W never had any intention of developing. Oil purchases from certain strategic allies are economic transactions that have other values you may not be aware of.
You need to do a little research on the subject and not fall back on the old labels and arguments. It is time to get smart about this stuff, both short and long term.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 PM on 02/12/2009
- sleeperd I'm a Fan of sleeperd 13 fans permalink


"corporate welfare"? "imperialism"?? Actually, Mr. Forester, you DO fit the description to a T. These are nothing but socialist, left-wing code words.

American companies pay the highest corporate tax rates in the world. If they do get a subsidy, it's simply returning a small part of the earnings that are confiscated from them in the first place. I realize "earnings" and "profits" may be a foreign concept to you but actually it's what makes the world go round. I'm sure you don't work for free. Who do you think winds up paying these horrendous taxes???

While I would certainly agree that military costs are a part of our energy costs, your time-worn trite suggestion that we shed our blood and tears simply for oil is one more example of left-wing socialist blather.

Mr. Acacia, the psychology of free markets reflects the perception not the reality. Anyone remotely in touch with world events knows that the price of oil fluctuates daily with the slightest notion of good or bad news. Ergo, when Pres. Bush approved offshore drilling, the price dropped immediately. When the bad guys take over an oil well in Nigeria, or a hurricane threatens the Gulf, prices go up immediately. If we were to commit to policies that would dramatically increase the supply of oil, the price would plummet immediately.
Educate yourselves before pontificating.

At least the oil companies are actually producing something we can all use - unlike the government.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:07 PM on 02/12/2009
- linton I'm a Fan of linton 3 fans permalink
photo

Exxon, Texaco etc are still fleecing us despite the drop in oil prices on the world market. Hope someone with some clout will ask them a question or two.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 PM on 02/11/2009
- blaising I'm a Fan of blaising 18 fans permalink
photo

'Bout time.

While you're at it, serve that war criminal a supoena, will ya?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 02/11/2009

This really is good news.... but it's just a start... I would review anything Bush had his hands on...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 02/11/2009
- Swatantra I'm a Fan of Swatantra 21 fans permalink

Good. One by one, Barack is reversing the mess left by those F ckers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 02/11/2009
photo

I was really gratified to see wave technology included in the list of renewable resources. There's some big developments going on there, especially slow-wave.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 02/11/2009
- frantaylor I'm a Fan of frantaylor 22 fans permalink

Where does this energy come from? Are we slowing the earth's rotation about its own axis, or are we slowing its revolution about the sun?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 02/11/2009
- dutchman I'm a Fan of dutchman 331 fans permalink
photo

Your question is silly, but in a small sense you're right there's no such thing as a completely free lunch. The energy captured by wave technology is no different, but I'd say any impact is infinitesimally smaller than the crap we're dumping into our biosphere each and every day.

Wave energy is overwhelmingly created by the moon's gravitational pull, and to a much lessor extent the earth's rotation.

Anyway, I'm more convinced that spin cycle in my European low water usage washing machine creates far greater gyroscopic distortions to the earth's rotation about its axis. Such a mighty spin cycle I've never experienced before.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:53 PM on 02/11/2009
photo

Actually, the wave I'm talking about is ocean wave and slow river flow. The new technology was reported here on Huffington. I don't know what impact it will have on ocean waves and rivers, but it's a lot less invasive than power dams, which need high flow to be effective.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:01 PM on 02/12/2009
photo

"Obama Administration Halts Bush Expansion Of Offshore Drilling" -- yay yay yay yay yay yay YAY!!!! Now, on with green public transportation ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 PM on 02/11/2009
- Forester I'm a Fan of Forester 92 fans permalink
photo

Never mind that any new offshore oil would be placed in the world market and sold anywhere for the highest price - I think Americans SHOULD have oil wells off their precious beaches so they can absorb the full impact of their oil consumption. They should also have jails in their neighborhoods and have to periodically slaughter a large farm animal. We have become so insulated from the real impacts of our consumption culture that even the most earnest bumper sticker environmentalist is now an oblivious part of the problem.

In addition - Wall street must be regulated to prevent influencing oil futures. This is one of the major reasons fuel prices are so volatile, allowing oil companies to capitalize on consumer fears.

Oh, and let's not forget the Trillion dollar war in Iraq for oil - we paid for that too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:32 PM on 02/11/2009
- jennbeez I'm a Fan of jennbeez 12 fans permalink
photo

...AND didn't get any oil. The whole war from the time they began calling it Operation Iraqi Liberation (quickly changed to Operation Iraqi FREEDOM heh heh) to now has been one huge cluster f ck.

Let us hope that Obama can set things right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:24 PM on 02/11/2009
- gmlaster I'm a Fan of gmlaster 35 fans permalink

Dude, I will NEVER forget the summer of $4.00 gas. The price of oil was higher during that freakin' war than at any time in history!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 PM on 02/11/2009
- acacia72 I'm a Fan of acacia72 3 fans permalink

"I think Americans SHOULD have oil wells off their precious beaches so they can absorb the full impact of their oil consumption. They should also have jails in their neighborhoods and have to periodically slaughter a large farm animal."

Forester; damn good points. A couple of things that have always bugged me are the ways people waste water (even tho their water bills may be sky high) and dispose of things(oh, the trash truck just comes and hauls it away and that's that!).

However, I have also seen people living practically in their own waste right here in the USA. They just take their garbage out back of their house and DUMP IT. The wind blows and crap is EVERYWERE. I guess some people just don't mind living like pigs, morally OR physically.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:28 AM on 02/12/2009
- ChiGuy I'm a Fan of ChiGuy 316 fans permalink
photo

Considering how much of a lynch-pin this topic was for those on the right during the election, their complete lack of outrage now tells you what was behind their ardent support in the fall.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 02/11/2009
photo

Great point.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 02/11/2009

Considering how much revisionist history is going on here, maybe people would do well to remember who introduced the offshore oil bill, who voted for it, and who changed his mind and voted for it.

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/08/17/11037

I hate Bush, I oppose offshore oil drilling and lies. How is this the "Bush" offshore oil drilling?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/17/washington/17cong.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:31 PM on 02/11/2009
- 4Q-N4Q2 I'm a Fan of 4Q-N4Q2 7 fans permalink

I wish the government would HURRY UP and GIVE ME an electric car so I won't have to worry about getting around the next time we're hit with a run-up in gas prices. It'd be nice if they'd let me have the electricity FREE too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 AM on 02/11/2009
- HLL I'm a Fan of HLL 72 fans permalink

Hooray. Thank you, President Obama. What a relief.

I live in a Coastal California Town. There are off-shore oil rigs in the waters. The thought of adding MORE oil rigs was horrible to the residents here and up the coast, mainly due to great concern for the health of the Pacific ocean and ocean-life, which, as has been established, was never of any interest to Bush.

BTW - I'd estimate that more than half the community drives hybrids or 100% electric cars.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 AM on 02/11/2009
- JulieSA I'm a Fan of JulieSA 159 fans permalink
photo

More production would help CA balance its budget. I would like to see that, so that fiscally responsible states like mine don't have to bail out spendthrift states like CA. We're seeing the transfer of wealth from the responsible to the irresponsible accelerate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 AM on 02/11/2009
photo

Complete silliness as usual.

You ignore the transfer of wealth from the hardworking middle class to the wealthy during 8 years of Bush.

More oil production will help California and the rest of us experience global warming .

Have you been reading about the fires in Australia?

Do you think the daily grass fires we're having here in Texas, in FEBUARY could be due to climate change? Gosh here in Central Texas, the land is black and brown and cooked and highly prone to catching fire. It's not summer yet. When we have this dryness and days of 100 degree plus baking heat, how much do you think we're gonna look like Australia?

This is real!!!

If we don't stop our emissions, NOW, we're screwed. I actually think we're already screwed but maybe we can affect a change.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 AM on 02/11/2009
photo

And the republicans here in California just recently gave a big tax break to the oil companies in California. So it's not going to help here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:46 PM on 02/11/2009
- dutchman I'm a Fan of dutchman 331 fans permalink
photo

Back up there, Julie. California pays far more into the federal government than it gets back out. Same goes for Mass, Connecticut and New York State.

You red state folks have a great racket going. You're receiving hugely positive cashflows from most of the Blue States, and then demand tax cuts so that you get to keep even more of it. Talk about sucking on the proverbial teat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:57 PM on 02/11/2009

First of all, I'm very glad Salazar has put the temporary breaks on off shore development. However , let me play devil's advocate for a minute.

Why should my community in Colorado have to suffer the impacts from oil and gas development? Why should WY, MT, UT, NM and CO (and others) be the only states to sacrafice for our nation's energy needs? Why are rich communities in CA and NY and MA listened to when they scream NIMBY (not in my back yard) and not our communities in the energy states in the Rocky Mountains?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 02/11/2009
- acacia72 I'm a Fan of acacia72 3 fans permalink

Start screamin' niko!! Maybe the rich folks in your area will join in!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:21 AM on 02/12/2009
- mmgbizgirl I'm a Fan of mmgbizgirl 20 fans permalink
photo

Thank you Mr. President!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:54 AM on 02/11/2009
- bayside I'm a Fan of bayside 35 fans permalink
photo

I have to admit, I was skepical of appointing Salazar but am very pleased at his performance so far..We have experienced our wishes being ignored for the gratification of those who are in the center of greed and uncontrolled power grab..They have tried to build empires and changed our constitution for their sole benefit..Not anymore ,..Notice no apathy , no I cant do anything about it. We did it..A quiet revolution ..Its only going to get better .....We did good..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 02/11/2009
- JulieSA I'm a Fan of JulieSA 159 fans permalink
photo

"Its only going to get better"

The Dem congress just put several future generations deeply in debt.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 AM on 02/11/2009
- roshni I'm a Fan of roshni 144 fans permalink

No, YOUR president did that as a parting gift.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:22 AM on 02/11/2009
- dutchman I'm a Fan of dutchman 331 fans permalink
photo

I'm curious, were you upset at the Republicans for passing the Medicare Prescription Drug benefit. You know, the one whose unfunded liabilities total $7 trillion? An amount even bigger than the Social Security deficit? Or how about a war in Iraq whose visible costs have amounted to a figure much more than the stimulus program, with no end in sight and swamped by the vastly larger invisible costs (veterans health, etc) that our society will have to endure for decades?

The total US debt if you (properly) include all of our unfunded liabilities is about $55 TRILLION!!! You critics of the stimulus have lost all sense of proportion when you complain about the debt Obama is adding to the pile your team worked so hard to create,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 PM on 02/11/2009
- gmlaster I'm a Fan of gmlaster 35 fans permalink

As if the trillions of dollars of debt that Bush left us didn't do that ten times over. Please, stop listening to Rush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 PM on 02/11/2009
photo

We did do good!!! Amazingly, Americans stood up and voted for themselves. We voted in such huge numbers we were able to overcome republican politization of our government and fraudulent disenfranchisement of voters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:48 AM on 02/11/2009
- gmlaster I'm a Fan of gmlaster 35 fans permalink

Amen. And we're not even one month into this new administration. I can't wait to see what other destructive Bush legislation our new administration manages to overturn.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:29 PM on 02/11/2009

hell yes, get rid of oil based gasoline. There are better sources of fuel and a lot less destructive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:32 AM on 02/11/2009
- hildutus I'm a Fan of hildutus 6 fans permalink

Absolutely true and I agree 100%. Unfortunately, the big oil conglomerates haven't squeezed the last drop of money out of America yet, so we'll be saddled with oil until (1) our Corporate State is abolished or (2) we run out of oil. Since our Corporate State does not want to be abolished regardless of which party happens to think it's in power, we'll probably have to wait until the oil runs out -- and that won't come ill we trash the coasts to get the last drop.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:28 PM on 02/11/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect