Ruth Madoff Withdrew $15.5 Million Before Husband's Arrest

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Ruth Madoff Withdrew $15.5 Million Before Husband's Arrest stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

GLEN JOHNSON | February 11, 2009 09:17 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2009 file photo, Bernard L. Madoff, the accused mastermind of a $50 billion Ponzi scheme, leaves Federal Court in New York. The Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday announced an agreement with Madoff that could eventually force him to pay a civil fine and return money raised from investors. (AP Photo/Stuart Ramson, file)

BOSTON — The wife of disgraced money manager Bernard Madoff withdrew more than $15 million from a firm co-owned by her husband _ including $10 million on the day their children turned her husband over to authorities for overseeing an alleged $50 billion Ponzi scheme, the top securities regulator in Massachusetts said Wednesday.

Secretary of State William Galvin said Ruth Madoff, 67, withdrew $5.5 million on Nov. 25 and $10 million on Dec. 10 _ the day before Bernard Madoff was arrested _ from Cohmad Securities Corp., a New York firm co-owned by her husband.

The secretary cited wire transfer records produced by Cohmad as proof of the withdrawals. They came as Madoffs' scheme was unraveling as investors filed $7 billion worth of redemption requests.

They also appeared to follow what authorities consider a disturbing trend on the part of the Madoffs to hide money that could be used to reimburse burned investors.

Prosecutors have already said investigators found 100 signed checks worth $173 million that Madoff was ready to send out to his closest family and friends at the time of his arrest in December. Two weeks later, during the Christmas holidays, Madoff sent more than $1 million in jewelry and heirlooms to family and friends.

"We're not accusing her of anything wrong," Galvin spokesman Brian McNiff said of Ruth Madoff. "It's just one of the things that came out in the response, such as it was, from Cohmad" to a subpoena from Massachusetts officials. "Now, what someone in New York or the feds may think of it may be entirely different."

A telephone number listed to Ruth Madoff in Palm Beach, Fla., rang busy and a number in New York had been disconnected. A Cohmad spokeswoman in New York said the company had no comment. Ira Sorkin, a lawyer for Bernard Madoff, said he had no comment on the withdrawals.

In New York, meanwhile, the government and lawyers for Madoff agreed to a 30-day delay in the Wednesday deadline for obtaining a grand jury indictment against the money manager.

Story continues below
advertisement

The new deadline is March 13.

As he had during a similar extension a month ago, Assistant U.S. Attorney Marc Litt wrote that the government requested the extension "for the purpose of allowing time to conduct additional discussions regarding a possible disposition of this case."

It has been widely anticipated the case will be resolved before trial through an agreement between the government and Madoff's lawyers.

Since Madoff's arrest Dec. 11, investigators have been assessing the financial damage inflicted on thousands of people who lost money investing with him.

The victims identified so far have included ordinary people and Hollywood celebrities, along with large hedge funds, international banks and charities in the U.S., Europe and Asia.

Madoff was arrested after investigators said he confessed to his sons that he had swindled investors of a mammoth Ponzi scheme in which early investors are paid with money raised from new investors. The scheme collapses when there is no money to repay the last investors.

Madoff, a 70-year-old former Nasdaq stock market chairman, remains confined to his Manhattan penthouse under house arrest.

Galvin made his disclosure in a complaint asking Massachusetts state regulators to stop Cohmad _ a brokerage firm apparently named by merging the last names of co-founders Maurice Cohn and Madoff _ from doing business in Massachusetts because it failed to provide information to Galvin about its relationship with Madoff.

Galvin said Cohmad officials have ignored subpoenas or given incomplete responses as part of the state's probe of how Massachusetts investors lost money in the Madoff scheme.

An associate of Madoff, Robert Jaffe, appeared last week before officers of the Massachusetts Security Division, but the complaint says he repeatedly invoked his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination. Galvin has described Jaffe as a registered agent and principal of Cohmad, which is in the same New York City building as Madoff's firm.

Jaffe's lawyers have said he had no knowledge of Madoff's actions and was himself a victim who lost millions of dollars.

Galvin said the discovery of Ruth Madoff's withdrawals raises questions about whether there was a broader conspiracy behind Bernard Madoff's actions. Madoff has projected himself as someone who acted alone.

"As you know, the tale is being told that it was just Mr. Madoff who apparently worked 24 hours a day, shooting out false invoices and statements to people," Galvin told The Associated Press in an interview.

"It would seem as if some of the facts that we've discovered would raise, at least, some questions on that. I certainly am not questioning the thoroughness of my colleagues in other jurisdictions, but I think our findings, which we're sharing with them, would hopefully spur them on to be very thorough in looking over all the parties involved here and not to accept facile explanations about how this happened," Galvin added.

He also cited a $526,000 Cohmad payment to a woman he said was associated with Madoff _ but not licensed in Massachusetts or ever a Cohmad employee _ as more potential evidence of a conspiracy.

"It suggests to us that this is one big entity," Galvin said.

___

Associated Press Writers Russell Contreras in Boston and Larry Neumeister in New York contributed to this report.

BOSTON — The wife of disgraced money manager Bernard Madoff withdrew more than $15 million from a firm co-owned by her husband _ including $10 million on the day their children turned her husban...
BOSTON — The wife of disgraced money manager Bernard Madoff withdrew more than $15 million from a firm co-owned by her husband _ including $10 million on the day their children turned her husban...
 
Comments
363
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (14 pages total)
photo

Ruth Madoff is absolutely in on the scheme. She also applied for "homestead" declaration of her $15 million Palm Beach mansion in 2006 and was declined. She reapplied and was granted "homestead" status just weeks ago, which offers protection from court seizure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:55 AM on 02/12/2009

In Florida, if you have money, you can get away with anything! Someone has to pay for that good 'ol boy network of "law makers."

The person who granted her "homestead" status should be in jail... yet we, here in America, know this will never heappen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 02/12/2009

Since Madoff & his wife will apparently be allowed to stay under Penthouse Arrest forever, I have an idea about how to make them suffer. Nadya Suleman, mother of the Octuplets + 6, should move in with them -- forever.

The place may be big enough for everyone, the Madoffs have plenty of needed extra money (Ruth made sure they had an extra $15 Mil). The nutty mother would have help and should also be under house arrest so there will be no #15.

The Madoffs will go crazy and there will be no way out unless they opt for life in prison for both.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:54 AM on 02/12/2009

It is a complete fantasy that Bernie and Ruth didn't talk about this stuff. OF course she knew and of course they were getting their hands on anything they could DO you think that somehow they had a change of heart after so many years of ripping off friends and fellow Jews. Please ..lets not be stupid! They should both be living in prison awaiting trial.. NOT Manhattan ... but white collar crime committed by the rich and famous is rarely punished appropriately. If Bernie were of color and poor he would be in jail so fast it would make your head spin.
Bernie and Ruth... say your prayers.. only God can help you now!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:25 AM on 02/12/2009

They hate us for the Madoffs' freedom -- BOTH of 'em.

Cherchez les guillotines!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 AM on 02/12/2009
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 37 fans permalink
photo

$10 million the day before.

Don't tell me she didn't know.

Maybe Martha Stewart's old cell is still available.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:03 AM on 02/12/2009
- Girl28 I'm a Fan of Girl28 12 fans permalink

Sorry for commenting without actually reading the article, but if this guy is still under some sort of house arrest and not in jail I don't want to read about it. It'll p.iss me off for two seconds and I don't need that right now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:57 AM on 02/12/2009
- a68deville I'm a Fan of a68deville 3 fans permalink
photo

They both should consider themselves fortunate , that they are not in china . Justice comes swift , and harsh , over there .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 AM on 02/12/2009
- solarian I'm a Fan of solarian 15 fans permalink

get that money back and jail her

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:37 AM on 02/12/2009

I love Bernie Madoff. He proved beyond a doubt that people in Hollywood are idiots

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 AM on 02/12/2009

I am just afraid that Madoff will plea down his sentence and the victims will never receive any money back or any sense of justice for this criminal and his wife (who incidentally looks like she should be arrested, too).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 AM on 02/12/2009

The TAX PAYERS are going to pay!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:20 AM on 02/12/2009
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 37 fans permalink
photo

I'd like to see him charged with manslaughter for the death by suicide of his investors. Their deaths were directly related to his ponzi scheme. That makes him a murderer. I'll bet New York has a law to prosecute him. And since it appears his wife was in on it, she's an accessory.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 AM on 02/12/2009
- evan la I'm a Fan of evan la 5 fans permalink
photo

Yes, Yes, and Yes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:05 AM on 02/12/2009
photo

Their accounts should have been frozen/seized. Wondering.­..does a drug dealer get to keep the profits, property, goods, etc. he makes from illegal activities? Why does Madoff get to keep his?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 PM on 02/11/2009
photo

That is the entire idea behind ill gotten goods, except the clients of drug dealers usually get what they have paid for.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 AM on 02/12/2009
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 37 fans permalink
photo

They should both go to prison and everything they own should be seized and liquidated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 AM on 02/12/2009
- tkondaks I'm a Fan of tkondaks 20 fans permalink

All those attempts at transfers of funds out of Madoff's estate -- be it by check or jewellery -- to family members and friends are considered under the law as "gifts".

As an estate-planner, my understanding is that there is a 5-year lookback for any gifts out of an estate. That means that try as the Madoffs might, creditors (including the federal government) can go to any giftees up to 5 years after the gift took place and demand that the gifts be put back into the estate for creditors to have access to them.

This rule was instituted as a way to discourage seniors from transferring some or all of their estates to friends or relatives in order to qualify for Medicaid. 40% of everyone over the age of 65 will go into a nursing home and the average stay is 3 years. The current average annual cost in the U.S. for a nursing home stay is about $75,000.00­. So you can see the incentive for seniors to divest themselves of their assets -- usually to their children -- and then once technically "poor" the seniors are able to qualify for Medicaid, which would then pay the heavy cost of nursing home care.

So this lookback rule would also apply to Madoff's gifts, including the jewellery transfers he attempted (although admittedly much harder to catch than money transfers).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 PM on 02/11/2009
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 37 fans permalink
photo

And isn't it a shame our seniors have to make themselves destitute in order to receive needed care?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 AM on 02/12/2009
photo

amen and hallelujah.
good post!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 AM on 02/12/2009
- 2876 I'm a Fan of 2876 14 fans permalink

throw her sorry behind in jail

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 PM on 02/11/2009
- triplbee I'm a Fan of triplbee 25 fans permalink

Revoke their bond and send them both to jail.If they are stashing away that kind of cash, they are both flight risks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 PM on 02/11/2009

Ok, so wheres the $49,984,500,000.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 02/11/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (14 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect