More

Bankers vow to build trust with increased lending

JIM KUHNHENN   02/11/09 09:54 PM ET   AP

Congress Financial Meltdown

WASHINGTON — The nation's top bankers came to account for themselves Wednesday to a wary public, displaying a blend of financial might and humility as they pledged to build public trust with greater lending and fewer perks. "We're Americans first and bankers second," John Stumpf, president and chief executive of Wells Fargo & Co., told a House committee.

"As an industry, we clearly made mistakes," added John Mack, chairman and CEO of Morgan Stanley.

Eight chief executives sat at a witness table for more than six hours Wednesday assuring lawmakers that an infusion last fall of $165 billion in taxpayer money to their banks was good for consumers. The money was part of a $700 billion financial rescue approved by Congress in October.

Lending has increased, they told the House Financial Services Committee, and CEO bonuses have been eliminated.

And while some lawmakers said they hoped that by their testimony the bankers could gain some credibility, some of their inquisitors weren't convinced.

"America doesn't trust you anymore," declared Rep. Michael Capuano, D-Mass.

Added committee Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass: "There has to be a sense of the American people that you understand their anger."

The financial sector was also in law enforcement's cross hairs. FBI Deputy Director John Pistole told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that the FBI was conducting more than 500 investigations of corporate fraud amid the financial meltdown. Pistole said the bureau may reassign to the fraud cases some of the positions that were reallocated to anti-terrorism work after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

To a man _ and, yes, all eight CEOs are male _ the executives at the House hearing said they would pay back the taxpayer money by 2012 and sooner if they could help it.

As they made that pledge, Senators on the other side of the Capitol were pressing Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner without success to reveal how much more money the federal government would have to inject into the financial system to improve lending and reverse the escalation of mortgage foreclosures. Geithner only conceded that further requests could be possible.

"So you have no clue," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.

Geithner, a day after he outlined an overhaul to the government bailout, continued to face questions about the lack of details in his plan and promised specifics "as quickly as we can."

The blunt treatment of the financial sector and its Obama administration overseer came as the House and Senate reached agreement on a $790 billion economic stimulus package that represented the other major component of President Barack Obama's response to the economic crisis.

At the House Financial Services Committee, the bankers represented the eight firms that received capital injections last fall in hopes that the money would unfreeze credit and lead to more lending. Joining Stumpf and Mack were CEOs from The Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., JP Morgan Chase & Co., State Street Corp. and the Bank of New York Mellon.

Treasury chose those banks for infusions because they were relative healthy banks that could spur more banking activity and eliminate the stigma of taking taxpayer money for other financial institutions.

Frank urged them to impose a moratorium on foreclosures until Geithner comes up with a plan to spend at least $50 billion of the bailout funds on foreclosure mitigation. The Office of Thrift Supervision, a government bank regulator, issued a similar call on Wednesday on the nation's savings associations.

Time and again, lawmakers asked whether money from the program, formerly known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program, had helped extend credit. Without exception, the executives said it had.

"We are still lending, and we are lending far more because of the TARP," said Kenneth Lewis, the chief executive at Bank of America.

Still, committee members appeared to have trouble squaring the bankers' answers with the experiences of their constituents.

"We hear voices from the other world, people who can't get loans, can't refinance their homes, can't send their children to college," said Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y. "It seems to me, and some of us, that this money hasn't reached the street."

Repeatedly, lawmakers prodded the executives to respond to questions about perks and policies by raising their hands. Rep. Dennis Moore, D-Kan., got the CEOs to disclose, one by one, how much each had been paid in 2008. Their salaries ranged from $600,000 to $1.5 million annually, without bonuses.

Later, they were asked what bonuses or incentives they had received in 2007. The answers were in the millions of dollars, though much was in shares of stock that have lost much of their value.

Citigroup's Vikram Pandit stood out as something of a renegade within his millionaire peers. He was the only one to agree to a proposal that would let bankruptcy judges alter home loans in an effort to prevent foreclosures.

He also said he has asked his board of directors to pay him a $1 annual salary, with no bonuses, until Citigroup returns to profitability. No other banker said they would take a lower salary.

Meanwhile, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo accused Merrill Lynch & Co. executives of corporate irresponsibility by secretly and prematurely awarding $3.6 billion in bonuses as taxpayers were bailing out the industry.

Cuomo made the claims in a letter to Frank, saying that Bank of America, which acquired Merrill last year, was apparently complicit in the move to award bonuses before Merrill's dismal fourth quarter earnings were announced.

Lewis, pressed about the bonuses at the hearing, said Bank of America was aware of the bonuses, but said they were set by pre-exisitng Merrill Lynch contract.

"They were a public company until the first of this year," Lewis said. "We had no authority to tell them what to do, just urge them what to do."

___

Associated Press writers Liz Sidoti, Chris Rugaber and Devlin Barrett contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

WASHINGTON — The nation's top bankers came to account for themselves Wednesday to a wary public, displaying a blend of financial might and humility as they pledged to build public trust with gre...
WASHINGTON — The nation's top bankers came to account for themselves Wednesday to a wary public, displaying a blend of financial might and humility as they pledged to build public trust with gre...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,328
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (26 total)
03:42 PM on 03/11/2009
What an inovative Idea; loaning the taxpayer his own money and charging him interest. The Federal Reserve has taught them well as far as generating capital from thin air. The public is so turned off they aren't going to use the big banks any more.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:30 AM on 02/13/2009
quote:
Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit said his salary would be set at $1 with no bonus until the company makes money again.
/quote

Make $1 your total annual remuneration from all sources, not your salary, Vik.
07:34 AM on 02/12/2009
HELP!

Did anyone else here get letters from Citibank raising the interest rates on their credit cards? I have 3 cards with them and got letters on two of them telling me that they are raising the rate to 9% plus prime with a minimum of 14.99%. My rate now is 7.15% tied to prime and with prime at .25% that gives me a great interest rate, but prime isn't always that low.

I play by THEIR rules that THEY set up with NEVER a late payment and a very high limit on one of them (that I have never remotely approached) and they screw me to the wall all the while paying ridiculous bonuses to the asses at the top?

I can opt out of the new interest rate and keep the 7.15%, but when the current cards expire I have to pay the (very low) balances off in full and they close the accounts.

Yes I know they reserve the right to raise rates at any time, but in the 10 years that I have had these 2 cards with never a rate increase, never a late payment and lots of increases in the amount that they want me to put on them, it just seems a bit suspicious.

Any suggestions? I have written to my Congressman and called Citibank.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:28 AM on 02/13/2009
Dump Citi like a cheating gf/bf and take your business elsewhere. You don't need Congress for that.
11:51 PM on 02/11/2009
"eliminate the stigma of taking taxpayer money for other financial institutions". What stigma? Not one bank or financial institution has shown any shame or hesitation in putting both their hands out to grab as much loot as they can carry away.
ThinkGlobal
Americans Unite Save the Middle Class
09:46 PM on 02/11/2009
Bankers/Financial Frauds stole the first bailout funds...where did our taxpayer dollars go?
Bankers are the new loan sharks...not only can you not get a decent loan but our credit card interest rates are going up...
The sky is falling because of these theives ...
They all need to be proscecuted for the frauds, thieves, liars and con men that they are...WAKE UP AMERICA
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:35 PM on 02/11/2009
Bring me a borrower, any borrower, the banker cried.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:09 PM on 02/11/2009
I don't often fault Barney Frank for understatement, but in this case, I require more of these CEOs than he describes.

quote:
"America doesn't trust you anymore," declared Rep. Michael Capuano, D-N.J.

Added committee Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass: "There has to be a sense of the American people that you understand their anger."
/quote

I require full, accurate root cause analysis of the credit crisis these crooks oversaw and I require it before I give them any more of our money. These should be the words of Secretary Geithner, Senator Frank, President Obama, and frankly everybody in both parties. The fact that we are not unanimous about needing to thoroughly understand the causes of the problem, and based on that how and why the bailouts are expected to work, of itself stinks of intent to defraud us some more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EHarold
09:06 PM on 02/11/2009
The rest of the world is in the streets in rage over this kind of crap.. Why aren't we America?
08:52 PM on 02/11/2009
Now let me get this straight. The people who charge me $18 per month to keep MY money in THEIR bank and charge Me $35 per month if SOMEONE ELSE bounces a check on ME vow to earn MY Trust??!! PALEEEZZZZEEEE!
09:06 PM on 02/11/2009
I agree. Fund new banks and regulate these chumps. They have had their way in DC for too long. It's time for change.
08:52 PM on 02/11/2009
When do the R.othschilds have to testify----????----snark
08:32 PM on 02/11/2009
Having the time to watch the hearing today I felt like I was watching a college fraternity being question about a hazing gone bad. Each CEO acting like a frat boy claiming to be innocent of the illegal acts and looking for way to explain why they were not responsible. They stated that they are American first and Bankers second, could this change in attitude be explained by taking away their multi-million dollar bonuses and hoping the smell of greed is covered up through the guise of Patriotism. Where was the concern when the financial meltdown became the domination topic of the day? Where was the concern when they were collecting fee on exotic financial instrument, issuing subprime mortgages based on no documentation and lack of standard to qualify families and speculator just to collect their commission - refinancing mortgages to get the commission over and over again. Can you understand why we have lost our trust in bankers? It easy understand why we don't believe that there doing everything possible to correct the problems. Let hope there will be some accountability by the banks so that the public can understand how the money is being spent to benefit the American people and maybe we can learn to trust bankers again, but I'm sure it won’t be anytime soon.

'
08:39 PM on 02/11/2009
Frat-boy antics of the good-old-boys club-------no remorse--no real answers---sociopathic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:22 AM on 02/12/2009
Dollarpathic, maybe?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:05 PM on 02/11/2009
There have been no banks for years now, SteveNichols. A bank is where you take cash money to a living teller and deposit it personally. As you wait in line, you can see all of the bank officers out in the open dealing with borrowers. The bank keeps the promissory note until paid after qualifying the borrower as worthy to repay. We have been banking from a distance with numbers on a computer screen without any idea who we were dealing with, if anybody at all, for a long time now. We have to go back to deal with people again in order to bank. The computer banking doesn't work any more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
08:28 PM on 02/11/2009
Very clear from today’s testimony by Banksters in Congress that Congress needs a session a week to be able to get to the facts. Right now Congress is having a hard time understanding how these Banks operate due since very little if any light has ever been shown on these Banksters!

More preparation and testimony is needed to get to the bottom of what they did and to unfold the TRUTH and understand the Scheme so they can prevent repeats!

A full Congressional Inquiry like that done in the 1930's could provide lots of details including Banks financial conditions "ON and OFF Balance Sheet."

We know how they used a HOUSING HYPER-INFLATION Ponzi Scheme that nearly ruined America, but more facts are needed to make sure we can fix it and prevent a recurrence.

From Bankers testimony it became clear WS Banks have NO TOOLS or credit facility to help REBUILD AMERICA’S Main Street Economy!

Banksters (used by FDR/others in 1930's) contributed a small percentage to Obama's Campaign! Certainly NOT enough for Obama to give WS BANKS Bailouts. But individual Americans contributed over 85% of his Campaign Funding so he cares more about Middle America!

So lets hear from them why Taxpayers should Bailout Corrupt Banksters?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolab
Walking an 87-year-old in the sand isn't easy
09:01 PM on 02/11/2009
Submit it to the Populist Caucus!

http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=10365
08:15 PM on 02/11/2009
Ok everyone. If you want to show these bankers how angry you really are, take all your assets out of their banks and put them in a local bank (if you can find one) or your local Credit Union. That will tell them loud and clear what we think of their business practices.
08:51 PM on 02/11/2009
Better to publish a list of their names, addresses, and photographs.....so that an incensed public is able to mete out some "rough justice," this lot so RICHLY deserves!!!
09:06 PM on 02/11/2009
I agree, what a terrific idea. Find a good credit union.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Tom Joad
"While there is a lower class, I am in it "
08:15 PM on 02/11/2009
I wish I could have been in the hearing room today. I wish I had an opportunity to give each one of these so-called CEOs a good slapupsidethehead. just one slapupsidethehead for each one of them. That's all I ask...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DAE
08:14 PM on 02/11/2009
If only they all had to be bailed out of jail.
08:40 PM on 02/11/2009
there`s still time for that gig----hopefully