US Missile Strike Kills 27 In Pakistan

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

STEPHEN GRAHAM | February 14, 2009 11:37 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Pakistani Imran Zargul, 71, from the tribal region of Bajur wait to get donated food during a distribution at the Jalozai refugee camp near Peshawar, Pakistan, Friday, Feb. 13, 2009. Economic woes complicating Pakistan's struggle against Islamic militants are easing thanks to a tough rescue plan backed by the International Monetary Fund, but the program needs more than a year to succeed, the country's finance chief said Friday. (AP Photo/Emilio Morenatti)

ISLAMABAD — Dozens of followers of Pakistan's top Taliban commander were in a compound targeted by a U.S. missile strike that killed 27 near the Afghan border, intelligence officials said, while insurgents freed a kidnapped Chinese engineer elsewhere in the northwest region.

The missile strike Saturday appeared to be the deadliest yet by the American drone aircraft that prowl the frontier. It defied Pakistani warnings that the tactic is fueling extremism in the nuclear-armed Islamic nation.

The release of the Chinese man held by the Taliban since August was a rare bit of good news in Pakistan following the apparent beheading of a kidnapped Polish engineer and threats to kill an abducted American U.N. official. The exact terms of his Saturday release were not immediately clear, but a Chinese official said he was doing well.

In an unrelated interview, President Asif Ali Zardari said the Taliban had expanded their presence to a "huge amount" of Pakistan and were even eyeing a takeover of the state.

"We're fighting for the survival of Pakistan. We're not fighting for the survival of anybody else," Zardari said, according to a transcript of his remarks that CBS television said it would air Sunday.

Many Pakistanis believe the country is fighting Islamist militants, who have enjoyed state support in the past, only at Washington's behest.

Remotely piloted U.S. aircraft are believed to have launched more than 30 attacks over the past year, and American officials say al-Qaida's leadership and ability to support the insurgency in Afghanistan has been significantly weakened. But Pakistani officials say the vast majority of the victims are civilians.

After Saturday's strike, Taliban fighters surrounded the flattened compound in the village of Shrawangai Nazarkhel and carried away the dead and wounded in several vehicles. The village is in South Waziristan, part of the tribally governed area along the Afghan frontier considered the likely redoubt of al-Qaida chief Osama bin Laden.

Story continues below
advertisement

The victims included about 15 ethnic Uzbek militants and several Afghans, said Pakistani intelligence officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the media. The seniority of the militants was unclear.

Two of the officials said dozens of followers of Pakistan's top Taliban leader, Baitullah Mehsud, were staying in the compound when it was hit. There was no indication that Mehsud was present.

Pakistan's former government and the CIA have named Mehsud as the prime suspect behind the December 2007 killing of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. Pakistani officials accuse him of harboring foreign fighters, including Central Asians linked to al-Qaida, and of training suicide bombers.

The accounts of Saturday's strike could not be verified independently. The tribally governed region is unsafe for reporters. The U.S. Embassy had no comment, while Pakistan's army spokesman was unavailable.

The new U.S. administration has brushed off Pakistani criticism that the missile strikes fuel extremist and anti-American sentiment and undercuts the government's own counterinsurgency strategy.

As overall security has deteriorated in Pakistan, foreigners have become prime targets. In recent months, Chinese, American, Iranian, Afghan and Polish citizens have been victims of abductions and killings.

Chinese engineer Long Xiaowei was kidnapped last August in the Dir region of northwest Pakistan. He was released on Saturday, and by Sunday he was at the Chinese embassy in Islamabad meeting with the ambassador, China's state-run Xinhua news service reported.

Long was in good health, Yao Jing, the deputy head of China's mission told The Associated Press.

He said he did not know if any ransom was paid or exactly how Long's release was secured. Muslim Khan, spokesman for the Pakistani Taliban in the northwest's Swat Valley, also confirmed the engineer's release.

Fears for foreign kidnap victims escalated this month after authorities received a video purportedly showing the beheading of Polish engineer Piotr Stanczak by Pakistani militants. Polish authorities believe the video is authentic.

On Friday, the kidnappers of an American employee of the United Nations threatened to kill him within 72 hours and issued a 20-second video of blindfolded John Solecki saying he was "sick and in trouble."

Gunmen seized Solecki on Feb. 2 in Quetta, a southwestern city near the Afghan border. The kidnappers identified themselves as the previously unknown Baluchistan Liberation United Front, indicating a link to separatists rather than to Islamist militants.

The kidnappers have demanded the release of 141 women allegedly held in Pakistan.

___

Associated Press writers Munir Ahmad, Nahal Toosi and Asif Shahzad in Islamabad, Abdul Sattar in Quetta and John Heilprin at the United Nations contributed to this report.

ISLAMABAD — Dozens of followers of Pakistan's top Taliban commander were in a compound targeted by a U.S. missile strike that killed 27 near the Afghan border, intelligence officials said, while...
ISLAMABAD — Dozens of followers of Pakistan's top Taliban commander were in a compound targeted by a U.S. missile strike that killed 27 near the Afghan border, intelligence officials said, while...
 
Comments
877
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (10 pages total)

Does anybody want me to post something about the chances of two foes of Bush to lose their lives in p lane accidents?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 PM on 02/14/2009
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1581 fans permalink
photo

Yes, yes. I liike science fiction.

But can you post pictures to go with it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 PM on 02/14/2009
- Ramirez I'm a Fan of Ramirez 267 fans permalink
photo

The majority of the world's citizens are foes of Bush. It wouldn't be that unlikely for a plane accident to include a couple of them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:41 PM on 02/14/2009
- chaos4700 I'm a Fan of chaos4700 85 fans permalink
photo

Heh. I have to admit, that was a good one. :)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 PM on 02/14/2009
- Episcopagan I'm a Fan of Episcopagan 141 fans permalink

Liberals in the United states were able to organize and make sure Bush's successor was not elected.

Wonder why liberals in Canada can't get rid of Harper?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 02/14/2009
- Brickyard I'm a Fan of Brickyard 2 fans permalink

THE QUEE n just suspended parliment because they were going to ....

Showing whos really in control...­..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 02/14/2009
- chaos4700 I'm a Fan of chaos4700 85 fans permalink
photo

Well. From what I understand of Canadian Politics the "Office of the Queen" doesn't actually coordinate with the Queen of England in any political fashion. So it can be squarely blamed on political machinations by Harper.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 PM on 02/14/2009
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 575 fans permalink
photo

Do you really expect that i.diot to know ANYTHING about Canadian (or non-American in general) politics?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 PM on 02/14/2009
- Episcopagan I'm a Fan of Episcopagan 141 fans permalink

The Governor General, acting on the advice of Harper, prorouged Parliament, Bbbbbbbbburl.

While the Governor General is Elizabeth's representative in Canada, Elizabeth has no say in who the GG will be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:23 PM on 02/14/2009
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1581 fans permalink
photo

I'm sure they would. It's the w00w00s who keep f*ck!ng up their credibility. Just read the ones present on this thread.

Theye are kooks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:22 PM on 02/14/2009
- Episcopagan I'm a Fan of Episcopagan 141 fans permalink

Perhaps they spend too much time telling Americans what to do and what to think.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:24 PM on 02/14/2009
- chaos4700 I'm a Fan of chaos4700 85 fans permalink
photo

The irony of the above post is... almost painful, really.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 PM on 02/14/2009

Is that the best you can do? Why are they always right? They were right about Vietnam. They were right about IranContra. They were right about the Iranian host ages. They were right about the syphilis experiments. They were right about the biased banks. There has to be something seriously wrong with a country that has never brought its top leaders to justice. Name one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 PM on 02/14/2009
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1581 fans permalink
photo

babymonster See Profile I'm a Fan of babymonster I'm a fan of this user permalink

Could you stop using the word woo-woo? There are far too many of them to be ignored. In fact, they are growing everyday despite the fact that we have had a controlled p-ganda machine working to ...

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:07 PM on
----------­----------­----------­----------­--------

"Could you stop using the word woo-woo? "

The answer is "No".

And I chose to ignore the remainder of your post, w00w00.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:11 PM on 02/14/2009
- chaos4700 I'm a Fan of chaos4700 85 fans permalink
photo

Threadspammer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:15 PM on 02/14/2009
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 575 fans permalink
photo

That's a very "intelligent" answer. Just accuse anyone who disagrees with you of being a "w00w00", then insult him/her and then deny you ever use ad hominems.

That's what every "rational" person would do...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:15 PM on 02/14/2009
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1581 fans permalink
photo

Not anyone, Amanda. That would be unfair to non-w00w00s.

I am a very fair person.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 02/14/2009

Melt down anyone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:18 PM on 02/14/2009
- Brickyard I'm a Fan of Brickyard 2 fans permalink

Back to the broom closet Hume...the­res a clean up in isle 3

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 02/14/2009
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 575 fans permalink
photo

HumeSkeptic:

"And there was no ad hominem"

----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------

"Are you having some mental problems?"
"My posts are meant for people with IQ higher than 90."
"The rest of your post is nothing but w00w00 nonsense."
""Don't you feel stupid"
"I have never seen you behave like a two year old"
""Are we there yet, daddy?"

Two words come to my mind: li.ar and hy.pocrite­.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:45 PM on 02/14/2009
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1581 fans permalink
photo

The first is a question. A simple yes or no would suffice.
The second one was not to you. Therefore, it cannot be an ad hominem directed at you
The third is just a staement of fact, and it refers to your post, not you. Hence, not an ad hominem.
The fourth is again a question. Yes, or no?
The fifth is just an observation, complimenting you on your good behavior of past
The sixth is realted to the fifth, just to give an explanatory example

So, you see? There was no ad hominem. :-)

You got upset for no good reason. And you failed to gain sympathy for being a victim of personal attacks.

.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:52 PM on 02/14/2009
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 575 fans permalink
photo

"So, you see? There was no ad hominem. :-)"

Sure, Mr. O'Reilly, spin it however you like it.

Meanwhile, in the **REAL** world, this is what you said:

"Are you having some mental problems?"
"My posts are meant for people with IQ higher than 90."
"The rest of your post is nothing but w00w00 nonsense."
""Don't you feel stupid"
"I have never seen you behave like a two year old"
""Are we there yet, daddy?"

And it's pretty self-expla­natory...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 PM on 02/14/2009
photo

I like the "Are we there yet, daddy" the best.

(Just an objective, non-w00w00 opinion. Also a non-female opinion. There is some cross-poll­ination.)

Great cat fight, please continue. :o)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:59 PM on 02/14/2009
- Episcopagan I'm a Fan of Episcopagan 141 fans permalink

Not often that one is able to watch a demanda meltdown on two threads simultaneously.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:34 PM on 02/14/2009
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 575 fans permalink
photo

Still obsessed with me, loser?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:36 PM on 02/14/2009
- Episcopagan I'm a Fan of Episcopagan 141 fans permalink

Your meltdowns are an inexpensive amusement.

Much more enjoyable than a veal roast or mink coat.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:56 PM on 02/14/2009
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1581 fans permalink
photo

I haven't had this much fun in a long time, on HP, that is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 PM on 02/14/2009
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1581 fans permalink
photo

AmandaBC See Profile I'm a Fan of AmandaBC I'm a fan of this user permalink
"They attacked us on 911"

Prove it.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:56 PM on 02/14/2009
------------

By they, I meant al Qaeda, of course. There is ducumented and video evidence of al Qaeda leaders admitting and celebrating the 911 attacks.

Of course, w00w00s would say that all those are fake. Some like you have claimed that no airplanes ever hit the towers, it was all an optical illusion.

Now, I cannot have a rational discussion with someone who belives in nonsense like that.

Find some other w00w00 to satisfy your morbid needs for nonsensical dialogue.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 PM on 02/14/2009
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 575 fans permalink
photo

"There is ducumented and video evidence of al Qaeda leaders admitting and celebrating the 911 attacks."

Then go ahead and post links.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 02/14/2009
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 575 fans permalink
photo

*** CRICKETS ***

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:11 PM on 02/14/2009
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1581 fans permalink
photo

I could post links, Amanda, if I took the time to do it. (Which I won't just to satisfy a w00w00). But video tapes of OBL have been broadcast so many times that I refuse that even you might have missed those. And there have been several audio tapes broadcast by al Jazeera and other Middle-East media. There have been numerous reports by Pakistani and Indian journalists who have actually interacted with al Qaeda members (look up archives in asiatimes.com, for example). And the list can go on and on.

I am certain that you would reject all that even if I did go through the trouble, and ask me to prove that not all that is fake, and that all journalists are not lying.

So, there is no end to it.

And, I am sure that you would claim that this post of mine didn't provide the "proof" you asked for.
That is fine.
You have every right to believe anything you want. Just don't expect rational people to agree with you.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 02/14/2009

I'll say it again. i can't believe you are posting on this topic with a straight face hypocrit.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 PM on 02/14/2009
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1581 fans permalink
photo

Find another leg to hump on, little puppy. I'm sure someone would give you the attention you crave.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:20 PM on 02/14/2009

Have you heard that those schools were paid with SA money. Did you know that the redacted parts of the official report says that SA played a critical role in helping them? Did you know about Tenet swimming in a prince's pool drunk, yelling, "They sold me out." Are you aware of the U.S. governments extensive studying into the practice of b rain washing? Are you aware that German intelligence came on a show in Canada and said it was an inside job? Do you know that the and tracks went only to people investigating the event? Were you aware that they did not want an investigation and that the B administration stuffed many of the chairs of the people on the commission? Did you know that a senator resigned in protest? Were you aware that lying to go to w a r is a worse crime than the event in NY? Were you aware that the third edifice stored all the information of the CIA and was about to be released in the freedom of information act. There were things in there that had never been investigated correctly from w a t e r g a t e to IranContra. And, finally, do you know who J e r o m e H a u e r is?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:17 PM on 02/14/2009
photo

http://www.counterpunch.org/downing02132009.html
Brian M. Downing on some Pakistan History and Current Events.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:59 PM on 02/14/2009

"We're fighting for the survival of Pakistan. We're not fighting for the survival of anybody else,
President of Pakistan Asif Ali Zardar

Occasional and effective drone strikes are good to get the enemy to spend more effort on personal survivial than planning attacks.
However, in the end, nothing short but massive amount of NATO boots on the ground will solve this conflict.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 PM on 02/14/2009
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 575 fans permalink
photo

Yeah, sure...mas­sive amount of Soviet boots on the ground surely did the job...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 02/14/2009
- Ramirez I'm a Fan of Ramirez 267 fans permalink
photo

"...in the end, nothing short but massive amount of NATO boots on the ground will solve this conflict."


ML: I shudder while I write this but Amanda may have a point. The Bush administration took pains to avoid landing armies in A-stan, due in large part to the Russian model. Instead we invaded A-stan using Special Forces A-Teams and teams of CIA carrying suitcases full of cash. If we needed an infantry company, we hired one. When Kabul fell we had less than 500 Americans on the ground.

Even though it probably is the right thing to do (I guess) there is a strategic risk to escalating our presence in Afghanistan because it could unify our enemies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:06 PM on 02/14/2009
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 575 fans permalink
photo

Your enemies are in Washington DC.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:10 PM on 02/14/2009
- chaos4700 I'm a Fan of chaos4700 85 fans permalink
photo

I'm impressed. You're demonstrating at least a modicum of rationality here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:25 PM on 02/14/2009
- skialethia I'm a Fan of skialethia 141 fans permalink
photo

Obama said he would strike in Pakistan only if he had actionable intelligence that OBL was in striking range, and he also said that he wanted more boots on the ground to avoid these senseless airstrikes that k i l l civilians and create more animosity towards Americans.

Soooo, I guess Betrayus must be calling the shots then, right?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 02/14/2009
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1581 fans permalink
photo

Not really. The OBL reference was made as an example. He laways supported strikes within Pakistan to hit al Qaeda and their supporters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:46 PM on 02/14/2009

What ever happened to this ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLlyjGjeZIY

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 02/14/2009

I support this bombing, and any other that we conduct.

These Pakistanis have the audacity to claim that WE are creating extremism in their country!

The ISI created, funded, and still does support extremist militants to further their own aims in Kashmir.

This is THEIR PROBLEM that THEY MADE. The fact that we have to deal with it because their toys got out of their control and are now running amok does not give me any sympathy for them.

They better HOPE that one of their nuclear devices aren't used to attack anyone, or else all deals are off as far as I am concerned and an eye for an eye should be exacted.

It's about time we gave this war in Afghanistan the attention that it deserves, and frankly, should have gotten from September 12th onward.

Keep the predators going, get more troops to the border, seal it (staellites, electronic surveillance, etc.) and start cleaning things out. For crying out loud, it's not rocket science - funds, troops, intel and resolve will work - the afghani people will embrace us once we can stick around and help defend them from the Taliban.

I don't believe their stories that EVERY time we are ONLY bombing innocent civilians - if they were not attached to the Taliban, then why did the Taliban come and pick up the bodies?! B.S.

KEEP IT UP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 02/14/2009

AGREED. INSTEAD OF HAVING THE UNECESSARY WAR THAT IS IRAQ OUR EFFORTS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DIRECTED TOWARDS PAKISTAN AND SAUDI ARABIA,BUT THE BUSHES WOULDNT STAND FOR THAT. IF WERE GOING TO HAVE AN ILLEGAL WAR ,HAVE IT WITH THE RIGHT COUNTRY

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 02/14/2009
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 575 fans permalink
photo

"the afghani people will embrace us"

No doubt they'll greet you as "liberator­s."

Funny how so many dems suddenly turned into neocons...

"I don't believe their stories"

Sure, you believe the US government. They never lie. And, of course, you don't need to actually see PROOF that OBL is actually responsible for 911. They US government would never pull a false flag. How about Gladio/Stay Behind? Right, 99.9% of Americans have no clue what it was...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 02/14/2009

FYI - I am as "Liberal" as they come.

Liberal does not mean letting people attack and kill you with impunity - that's called stupid.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:26 PM on 02/14/2009

Love to see total left wing t00l hypocrits like Hume post on this topic. For years now he has been calling for Bush's prosecution for this exact same thing, but now that obama is picking up where Bush left of the stance is he should try to find a way to minimize civillian casualties. What a frickin joke you are hume.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 02/14/2009
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 575 fans permalink
photo

Hume isn't "left wing" by any reasonable international standard. "Moderate conservative" would be more appropriate. True leftists cannot justify American aggression on a soveraign nation. True leftists don't trust the US government. True leftists want to see proof that OBL is really responsible for 911, because true leftists know the US government has been pulling false flag operations since the end of WWII. And finally true leftists know that anyone who was talking about Gladio/Stay Behind was addressed as a cra.zy con.spirac­y theorist in the US. That is until the whole thing became public. And of course true leftists around the world never received any apology from any democrat or republican for being RIGHT all along...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:41 PM on 02/14/2009
- AmandaBC I'm a Fan of AmandaBC 575 fans permalink
photo

Sorry typo. Soveraign = sovereign

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:43 PM on 02/14/2009
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1581 fans permalink
photo

For the first time, you have managed to really disappoint me with your thinking. Somehow I seem to have given you more credit in the past than you deserve.

Personally, I don't care what people call me or where they place me in their political spectrum. I say what I consider to be true. I'm not deriven by your or anyone else's ideology.

Now show me by what definition a leftist must be opposed to only AMerican aggression?

The rest of your post is nothing but w00w00 nonsense.
.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 02/14/2009
photo

Obama said he would go after the terrorists in Pak
and he is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 02/14/2009

how do you know they were t er r o r ists? Where yo there? And what did they have to do with 9.11. those guys d i e d in the c r a sh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 02/14/2009

We dare you. Just try and hit us again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 02/14/2009
- Brickyard I'm a Fan of Brickyard 2 fans permalink

who hit us first?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 02/14/2009
- Nobrun I'm a Fan of Nobrun 7 fans permalink

Bush once said 'bring it on'. They are still bringing it on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:19 PM on 02/14/2009

Who the freedom fighters? Don't worry they will.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:41 PM on 02/14/2009
- skialethia I'm a Fan of skialethia 141 fans permalink
photo

Topper24 See Profile I'm a Fan of Topper24 I'm a fan of this user permalink

Ah, well dear, he is the prez isn't he?

- + skialethia See Profile I'm a Fan of skialethia I'm a fan of this user permalink

That means nothing when you need the blessing of AI PAC to get elected in this country! Why do you think so many congresspeople were falling all over themselves to show their support for the m a s s a c r e taking place in Gaza???

Because they are either bribed, anointed or bla ckmailed by AIPAC! So don't give me this: He's the prez b. s.! As far as I'm concerned he's still in SHACKLES!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:11 PM on 02/14/2009
- larce1948 I'm a Fan of larce1948 14 fans permalink

Don't care who is President. Winning hearts and minds one dead civilian
at a time does not seem to be a smart strategy. That targeting is carried out
by drone aircraft guided by former slacker gamers in Nevada is additionally repulsive.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:06 PM on 02/14/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (10 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect