iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

GOP Governors Consider Turning Down Stimulus Money

MELINDA DESLATTE   02/18/09 09:37 PM ET   AP

Mark Sanford

BATON ROUGE, La. — A handful of Republican governors are considering turning down some money from the federal stimulus package, a move opponents say puts conservative ideology ahead of the needs of constituents struggling with record foreclosures and soaring unemployment.

Though none has outright rejected the money available for education, health care and infrastructure, the governors of Texas, Mississippi, Louisiana, Alaska, South Carolina and Idaho have all questioned whether the $787 billion bill signed into law this week will even help the economy.

"My concern is there's going to be commitments attached to it that are a mile long," said Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who considered rejecting some of the money but decided Wednesday to accept it. "We need the freedom to pick and choose. And we need the freedom to say 'No thanks.'"

U.S. Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., the No. 3 House Democrat, said the governors _ some of whom are said to be eyeing White House bids in 2012 _ are putting their own interests first.

"No community or constituent should be denied recovery assistance due to their governor's political ideology or political aspirations," Clyburn said Wednesday.

In fact, governors who reject some of the stimulus aid may find themselves overridden by their own legislatures because of language Clyburn included in the bill that allows lawmakers to accept the federal money even if their governors object.

He inserted the provision based on the early and vocal opposition to the stimulus plan by South Carolina's Republican governor, Mark Sanford. But it also means governors like Sanford and Louisiana's Bobby Jindal _ a GOP up-and-comer often mentioned as a potential 2012 presidential candidate _ can burnish their conservative credentials, knowing all the while that their legislatures can accept the money anyway.

Jindal said he, like Perry and Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, is concerned about strings attached to the money even though his state faces a $1.7 billion budget shortfall next year.

Barbour spokesman Dan Turner, for example, cited concerns that accepting unemployment money from the stimulus package would force states to pay benefits to people who wouldn't meet state requirements to receive them.

In Idaho, Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter said he wasn't interested in stimulus money that would expand programs and boost the state's costs in future years when the federal dollars disappear _ a worry also cited by Jindal and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

A spokesman said Sanford, the new head of the Republican Governors Association, is looking at the stimulus bill to figure out how much of it he can control.

"We're going through a 1,200-page bill to determine what our options are," Spokesman Joel Sawyer said. "From there, we'll make decisions."

But state Democratic Party chairwoman Carol Fowler says Sanford's hesitation is driven by his political ambition rather than the best interests of a state that had the nation's third-highest unemployment rate in December.

"He's so ideological," Fowler said. "He would rather South Carolina do without jobs than take that money, and I think he's looking for a way not to take it."

Not all Republican governors are reticent about using the federal cash.

Florida Gov. Charlie Crist lobbied for the stimulus plan and Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue has embraced it as he looks to close a $2.6 billion deficit in the state's budget this year. Alabama Gov. Bob Riley has already figured the money into his state's budget.

Pearson Cross, a political scientist at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette, said fiscally conservative governors may be able to give themselves political cover by turning down small portions of the stimulus money, like health care dollars requiring a state match, that they might not fully use anyway.

But in the end, he said, they will likely take most of the available money because their states need it so badly.

"Ideology usually takes second place for governors," he said. "And that's going to mean that most governors are going to go ahead and take the money even though they have misgivings about it."

___

Associated Press writers Seanna Adcox, Mary Clare Jalonick, Shannon McCaffrey, John Miller, Emily Wagster Pettus, Phillip Rawls, Anne Sutton and Jim Vertuno contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

BATON ROUGE, La. — A handful of Republican governors are considering turning down some money from the federal stimulus package, a move opponents say puts conservative ideology ahead of the needs...
BATON ROUGE, La. — A handful of Republican governors are considering turning down some money from the federal stimulus package, a move opponents say puts conservative ideology ahead of the needs...
Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,374
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (62 total)
11:33 AM on 02/28/2009
For Rick Perry:
Try personally standing in the UNEMPLOYMENT LINE for a few hours, try worrying about where the next mortgage payment is going to come from, which credit card bill should you pay first, spend 2 to 3 hours shopping for grocery searching for bargains.......

If you represent the state of Texas, stop playing politics for your own personal gain and CARE for the PEOPLE of TEXAS. And if you really really care, look deep into the unemployeds lives and see how many sleepless nights they spend worrying about how to feed their children and keep the roof over their family's head. This is not the time to worry about "strings attached" but "people of Texas".

Just remember, what goes around comes around.............
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
retroredux
10:44 AM on 02/20/2009
As to Rick Perry:
He is only doing this as it's big talk here in TX that Kay Bailey Hutchinson is going up against him for reelection and there's talk that she'll win, so he's putting himself out there now as "Mr. Big Ba lls look at me I can be a fiscally conservative Republican too".

I'm not very happy that our states fiscal future is being used by him as a election sound bite. He's needs to be voted OUT
11:47 PM on 02/19/2009
And Mark Sanford and these other guys want to run for president in 2012 against President Obama !!!!

LOL HA HA HA HA !!!!!!! Oh please ! Re-election for Obama is going to be a walk in the park with anyone of these L O S E R S on the ticket !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
toppergem
11:37 PM on 02/19/2009
This is just a bunch of bull. These governors will be knocking each other down so that they can stand at the front of the line with their hands out waiting for their piece of the pie. Personally, I wouldn't give them a dime. They don't deserve any of the stimulus money since they voted against the plan.
11:30 PM on 02/19/2009
Please turn it down, please don't tease us, turn it down, really we won't be mad! Come on, what are you waiting for..turn it down!

RIP!
11:14 PM on 02/19/2009
That'd be fun to watch -- a governor telling his/her constituents that they'll be paying more taxes to cover a shortfall to make a political point. Political suicide to even propose, much less do.
11:06 PM on 02/19/2009
I hope they do turn down the stimulus money. A few more Republicans voted out of office sounds good to me.
10:40 PM on 02/19/2009
The Gov. from Florida doesn't care about what his party think about him. He needs help for his people. I think that's nice. He's doing what he's suppose to do. The other Republican Gov. need to take notes.
10:31 PM on 02/19/2009
They'll turn it down just like the Republicans running the banks, and AIG, and Wall Street, and the auto makers, turned down the money from the government. Wait. What?
10:17 PM on 02/19/2009
This is so sad. There are so many people that need help and the republicans doesn't want to help. I think they are so selfish. I've been trying to see their point of view but I still don't get it. They're selfish. They are so busy trying to tear down President Obama and the Democrats that they're not thinking about the people that needs help.
photo
GravitonX
10^300 bosons could care less.
10:31 PM on 02/19/2009
Don't worry. The governors aren't the gatekeepers to the state. The money is available on a local level, thus bypassing the governor. That means that blue areas locked in Red states can get aid.
10:51 PM on 02/19/2009
That's good. I still can't believe how people can be that way.
11:16 PM on 02/19/2009
I have mixed feelings about this...because they are getting an easy out...."geez, we fought taking the money on principle because we think it's just pork, but it was forced on us by our state legislature." So they get the "pork" they need anyway, while they will use this to bash their legislators and Congress. I am glad that the people who need the money will get help (or at least some of it), but on the other hand, I hate that these Governors are getting a Get out of Jail Free card.
photo
GravitonX
10^300 bosons could care less.
09:55 PM on 02/19/2009
Any Republican that takes the money is a hypocrit.
10:35 PM on 02/19/2009
I agree!
photo
GravitonX
10^300 bosons could care less.
09:54 PM on 02/19/2009
Turn it down.

More for the rest of us.
09:51 PM on 02/19/2009
If these governors refuse the money, their ideology is more important to them then the people who are suffering in their states.

This refusal would be tragic for those people and could mean a total movement against the Republican party. As an Independent, I have been ready for another party to rise to the top for more than 15 years now.

Let's begin the change now.
photo
GravitonX
10^300 bosons could care less.
10:05 PM on 02/19/2009
Anyone notice that the poorest states in the Union are talking about turning the money down?
10:29 PM on 02/19/2009
I wonder how the people that live in those states feel about that? what about the people that are for them turning it down? Scary!
09:33 PM on 02/19/2009
If a hand out is not needed, don't take it. Maybe all citizens should stop paying their bills or taxes so they can qualify for the aid.
09:14 PM on 02/19/2009
This is total BULL... I would like to see the ReThuglican Govenors refuse any of these benefits (see items 1-9) from the Stimulus plan. It won't happen... These are too good for ****the common person*** in addition to the corporate interests that will benefit from the dollars being put back into to U.S. economy. ASK THE GOVS WHAT THEY WILL REFUSE! I bet a $1000.00 they can't tell you.

1. the thousands of dollars of Pell grant increases for students and schools

2. the payroll tax deducttion for citizens ($400 per individual/$800 per couple)

3. the $250 per person - ***for the people*** receiving Social Security income

4. the approx. $25 per week increase in unemployment benefits - ***for the people*** (and the training dollars for new job training)

5. the $100s of dollars per week per person for extend WEEKS of unemployment benefits - ***for the people***
6. the money for health care (research, IT, programs) - ***for the people***

7. the money for highway and other building/construction work - ***for the people***

8. the tax deductions ($8000, I believe) - ***for the people***

9. the tax deductions ($1500) - ***for the people***

etc. Need I write more???