iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama's Foreclosure Plan Seeks To Save Millions From Losing Homes

First Posted: 03/21/09 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:05 PM ET

Housing Obama

MESA, Ariz. — President Barack Obama says his $75 billion plan to tackle "a crisis unlike any we've ever known" in home foreclosures is necessary to help save the economy.

Obama unveiled the plan in Arizona, hard-hit by the housing crunch. More expensive than expected, it aims to keep 9 million people from losing their homes.

One part will ease refinancing for people who owe more on their mortgages than their homes are currently worth. Another provides incentives for mortgage lenders to help those on the verge of foreclosure.

Speaking at a high school outside Phoenix, Obama said the plan won't save every home but it will prevent "the worst consequences of this crisis from wreaking even greater havoc on the economy."

THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.

PHOENIX (AP) _ President Barack Obama marshaled $75 billion on Wednesday to tackle the foreclosure crisis in an effort to prevent up to 9 million Americans from losing their homes.

In tandem, the Treasury Department said it would double the size of its lifeline to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The government, which seized the mortgage finance companies last fall, said it would absorb up to $200 billion in losses at each company.

The plan is more ambitious than initially expected _ and more expensive. It aims to aid borrowers who owe more on their mortgages than their homes are currently worth, and borrowers who are on the verge of foreclosure.

The initiative is designed to help up to 5 million borrowers refinance _ if their mortgages are owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. It also provides incentive payments to mortgage lenders in an effort to convince them to help up to 4 million borrowers on the verge of foreclosure.

"All of us are paying a price for this home mortgage crisis," Obama said in remarks prepared for delivery at a ceremony announcing the program at a Phoenix area high school.

The housing industry has been devastated by the nation's recession. Construction of new homes and applications for future projects both plunged to record lows in January as all parts of the country showed big declines in building activity. Analysts hope that a boost from government programs, including the efforts to stem foreclosures, will help stop the slide.

Headlining Obama's plan was a $75 billion Homeowner Stability Initiative, which would provide a set of incentives to lenders to cut monthly mortgage payments to sustainable levels. It defines this at no more than 31 percent of a homeowners income. Funding would come from the $700 billion financial industry bailout passed by Congress last fall.

Another key component: a new program aimed at helping homeowners said to be "under water" _ with dwellings whose value have sunk below the principal still owing on their mortgages. Such mortgages have traditionally been almost impossible to refinance. But the White House said its program will help 4 to 5 million families do just that.

Obama said this change would come at "roughly zero" cost to taxpayers.

Of the nearly 52 million U.S. homeowners with a mortgage, about 13.8 million, or nearly 27 percent, owe more on their mortgage than their house is now worth, according to Moody's Economy.com

Announcing his plan in a state hard hit by the housing crunch, Obama said that stemming the tide of foreclosures is key to turning around the recession-bound economy.

"In the end, all of us are paying a price for this home mortgage crisis. And all of us will pay an even steeper price if we allow this crisis to deepen," he said, according to the advance text.

The plan also seeks to bolster confidence in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage giants effectively taken over by the government last year. The White House said the Treasury will be able to increase its funding commitment to the two by using money Congress set aside last year, and will continue purchasing mortgage-backed securities from them.

The Treasury said the increased support for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac didn't reflect projected losses at the two companies, which were seized by government regulators last September. The two companies are currently projected to need a combined government subsidy of about $66 billion, well short of the new promise of up to $400 billion.

But Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said in a statement that the support "will provide forward-looking confidence in the mortgage market and enable Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to carry out ambitious efforts to ensure mortgage affordability for responsible homeowners."

The biggest players in the mortgage industry already had halted foreclosures pending Obama's announcement.

The president's announcement was coming a day after he signed into law a $787 billion economic stimulus plan he hopes will spark an economic turnaround and create or save 3.5 million jobs.

At the same time, the administration was grappling with the darkening prospects for the U.S. auto industry.

Even as Detroit carmakers submitted restructuring plans to qualify for continued government loans, General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC asked for another $14 billion in bailout cash.

Explaining the plan, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told reporters, ""This is necessary policy. It's smart economics. And it's just and fair."

Asked why the cost had jumped to $75 billion, Geithner said, "We think that's necessary to make a program like this work."

Asked about the doubling of the guarantees for Fannie and Freddie, he said: "This is not a judgment about the expected losses ahead. It underscores commitment, and that is very important to help keep mortgage rates low."

Geithner said most not all of the money would come the financial bailout fund.

And he said relief would be almost instantaneous, basically as soon as rules are published March 4. "You'll start to see the effects quite quickly", Geithner said.

FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair said that previous efforts had largely flopped. "We've not attacked the problem at the core," she told reporters. "We are woefully behind the curve."

Added Geithner: "The cost of inaction has been very severe."

Housing Secretary Shaun Donovan stressed that homeowners don't need to be delinquent in order to get help.

___

Alan Zibel reported from Washington; Associated Press Writers Liz Sidoti and Martin Crutsinger also contributed to this report.


TEXT OF OBAMA'S FORECLOSURE PLAN SPEECH AS PREPARED FOR DELIVERY


I'm here today to talk about a crisis unlike any we've ever known - but one that you know very well here in Mesa, and throughout the Valley. In Phoenix and its surrounding suburbs, the American Dream is being tested by a home mortgage crisis that not only threatens the stability of our economy but also the stability of families and neighborhoods. It is a crisis that strikes at the heart of the middle class: the homes in which we invest our savings, build our lives, raise our families, and plant roots in our communities.


So many Americans have shared with me their personal experiences of this crisis. Many have written letters or emails or shared their stories with me at rallies and along rope lines. Their hardship and heartbreak are a reminder that while this crisis is vast, it begins just one house - and one family - at a time.

It begins with a young family - maybe in Mesa, or Glendale, or Tempe - or just as likely in suburban Las Vegas, Cleveland, or Miami. They save up. They search. They choose a home that feels like the perfect place to start a life. They secure a fixed-rate mortgage at a reasonable rate, make a down payment, and make their mortgage payments each month. They are as responsible as anyone could ask them to be.

But then they learn that acting responsibly often isn't enough to escape this crisis. Perhaps someone loses a job in the latest round of layoffs, one of more than three and a half million jobs lost since this recession began - or maybe a child gets sick, or a spouse has his or her hours cut.

In the past, if you found yourself in a situation like this, you could have sold your home and bought a smaller one with more affordable payments. Or you could have refinanced your home at a lower rate. But today, home values have fallen so sharply that even if you made a large down payment, the current value of your mortgage may still be higher than the current value of your house. So no bank will return your calls, and no sale will return your investment.

You can't afford to leave and you can't afford to stay. So you cut back on luxuries. Then you cut back on necessities. You spend down your savings to keep up with your payments. Then you open the retirement fund. Then you use the credit cards. And when you've gone through everything you have, and done everything you can, you have no choice but to default on your loan. And so your home joins the nearly six million others in foreclosure or at risk of foreclosure across the country, including roughly 150,000 right here in Arizona.

But the foreclosures which are uprooting families and upending lives across America are only one part of this housing crisis. For while there are millions of families who face foreclosure, there are millions more who are in no danger of losing their homes, but who have still seen their dreams endangered. They are families who see "For Sale" signs lining the streets. Who see neighbors leave, and homes standing vacant, and lawns slowly turning brown. They see their own homes - their largest single assets - plummeting in value. One study in Chicago found that a foreclosed home reduces the price of nearby homes by as much as 9 percent. Home prices in cities across the country have fallen by more than 25 percent since 2006; in Phoenix, they've fallen by 43 percent.

Even if your neighborhood hasn't been hit by foreclosures, you're likely feeling the effects of the crisis in other ways. Companies in your community that depend on the housing market - construction companies and home furnishing stores, painters and landscapers - they're cutting back and laying people off. The number of residential construction jobs has fallen by more than a quarter million since mid-2006. As businesses lose revenue and people lose income, the tax base shrinks, which means less money for schools and police and fire departments. And on top of this, the costs to a local government associated with a single foreclosure can be as high as $20,000.

The effects of this crisis have also reverberated across the financial markets. When the housing market collapsed, so did the availability of credit on which our economy depends. As that credit has dried up, it has been harder for families to find affordable loans to purchase a car or pay tuition and harder for businesses to secure the capital they need to expand and create jobs.

In the end, all of us are paying a price for this home mortgage crisis. And all of us will pay an even steeper price if we allow this crisis to deepen - a crisis which is unraveling homeownership, the middle class, and the American Dream itself. But if we act boldly and swiftly to arrest this downward spiral, every American will benefit. And that's what I want to talk about today.

The plan I'm announcing focuses on rescuing families who have played by the rules and acted responsibly: by refinancing loans for millions of families in traditional mortgages who are underwater or close to it; by modifying loans for families stuck in sub-prime mortgages they can't afford as a result of skyrocketing interest rates or personal misfortune; and by taking broader steps to keep mortgage rates low so that families can secure loans with affordable monthly payments.

At the same time, this plan must be viewed in a larger context. A lost home often begins with a lost job. Many businesses have laid off workers for a lack of revenue and available capital. Credit has become scarce as the markets have been overwhelmed by the collapse of securities backed by failing mortgages. In the end, the home mortgage crisis, the financial crisis, and this broader economic crisis are interconnected. We cannot successfully address any one of them without addressing them all.

Yesterday, in Denver, I signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act which will create or save three and a half million jobs over the next two years - including 70,000 in Arizona - doing the work America needs done. We will also work to stabilize, repair, and reform our financial system to get credit flowing again to families and businesses. And we will pursue the housing plan I am outlining today.

Through this plan, we will help between seven and nine million families restructure or refinance their mortgages so they can avoid foreclosure. And we are not just helping homeowners at risk of falling over the edge, we are preventing their neighbors from being pulled over that edge too - as defaults and foreclosures contribute to sinking home values, failing local businesses, and lost jobs.

But I also want to be very clear about what this plan will not do: It will not rescue the unscrupulous or irresponsible by throwing good taxpayer money after bad loans. It will not help speculators who took risky bets on a rising market and bought homes not to live in but to sell. It will not help dishonest lenders who acted irresponsibility, distorting the facts and dismissing the fine print at the expense of buyers who didn't know better. And it will not reward folks who bought homes they knew from the beginning they would never be able to afford. In short, this plan will not save every home.

But it will give millions of families resigned to financial ruin a chance to rebuild. It will prevent the worst consequences of this crisis from wreaking even greater havoc on the economy. And by bringing down the foreclosure rate, it will help to shore up housing prices for everyone. According to estimates by the Treasury Department, this plan could stop the slide in home prices due to neighboring foreclosures by up to $6,000 per home.

Here is how my plan works:

First, we will make it possible for an estimated four to five million currently ineligible homeowners who receive their mortgages through Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac to refinance their mortgages at lower rates.

Today, as a result of declining home values, millions of families are "underwater," which means they owe more on their mortgages than their homes are worth. These families are unable to sell their homes, and unable to refinance them. So in the event of a job loss or another emergency, their options are limited.

Right now, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - the institutions that guarantee home loans for millions of middle class families - are generally not permitted to guarantee refinancing for mortgages valued at more than 80 percent of the home's worth. So families who are underwater - or close to being underwater - cannot turn to these lending institutions for help.

My plan changes that by removing this restriction on Fannie and Freddie so that they can refinance mortgages they already own or guarantee. This will allow millions of families stuck with loans at a higher rate to refinance. And the estimated cost to taxpayers would be roughly zero; while Fannie and Freddie would receive less money in payments, this would be balanced out by a reduction in defaults and foreclosures.

I also want to point out that millions of other households could benefit from historically low interest rates if they refinance, though many don't know that this opportunity is available to them - an opportunity that could save families hundreds of dollars each month. And the efforts we are taking to stabilize mortgage markets will help these borrowers to secure more affordable terms, too.

Second, we will create new incentives so that lenders work with borrowers to modify the terms of sub-prime loans at risk of default and foreclosure.

Sub-prime loans - loans with high rates and complex terms that often conceal their costs - make up only 12 percent of all mortgages, but account for roughly half of all foreclosures.

Right now, when families with these mortgages seek to modify a loan to avoid this fate, they often find themselves navigating a maze of rules and regulations but rarely finding answers. Some sub-prime lenders are willing to renegotiate; many aren't. Your ability to restructure your loan depends on where you live, the company that owns or manages your loan, or even the agent who happens to answer the phone on the day you call.

My plan establishes clear guidelines for the entire mortgage industry that will encourage lenders to modify mortgages on primary residences. Any institution that wishes to receive financial assistance from the government, and to modify home mortgages, will have to do so according to these guidelines - which will be in place two weeks from today.

If lenders and homebuyers work together, and the lender agrees to offer rates that the borrower can afford, we'll make up part of the gap between what the old payments were and what the new payments will be. And under this plan, lenders who participate will be required to reduce those payments to no more than 31 percent of a borrower's income. This will enable as many as three to four million homeowners to modify the terms of their mortgages to avoid foreclosure.

So this part of the plan will require both buyers and lenders to step up and do their part. Lenders will need to lower interest rates and share in the costs of reduced monthly payments in order to prevent another wave of foreclosures. Borrowers will be required to make payments on time in return for this opportunity to reduce those payments.

I also want to be clear that there will be a cost associated with this plan. But by making these investments in foreclosure-prevention today, we will save ourselves the costs of foreclosure tomorrow - costs borne not just by families with troubled loans, but by their neighbors and communities and by our economy as a whole. Given the magnitude of these costs, it is a price well worth paying.

Third, we will take major steps to keep mortgage rates low for millions of middle class families looking to secure new mortgages.

Today, most new home loans are backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which guarantee loans and set standards to keep mortgage rates low and to keep mortgage financing available and predictable for middle class families. This function is profoundly important, especially now as we grapple with a crisis that would only worsen if we were to allow further disruptions in our mortgage markets.

Therefore, using the funds already approved by Congress for this purpose, the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve will continue to purchase Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage-backed securities so that there is stability and liquidity in the marketplace. Through its existing authority Treasury will provide up to $200 billion in capital to ensure that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can continue to stabilize markets and hold mortgage rates down.

We're also going to work with Fannie and Freddie on other strategies to bolster the mortgage markets, like working with state housing finance agencies to increase their liquidity. And as we seek to ensure that these institutions continue to perform what is a vital function on behalf of middle class families, we also need to maintain transparency and strong oversight so that they do so in responsible and effective ways.

Fourth, we will pursue a wide range of reforms designed to help families stay in their homes and avoid foreclosure.

My administration will continue to support reforming our bankruptcy rules so that we allow judges to reduce home mortgages on primary residences to their fair market value - as long as borrowers pay their debts under a court-ordered plan. That's the rule for investors who own two, three, and four homes. It should be the rule for ordinary homeowners too, as an alternative to foreclosure.

In addition, as part of the recovery plan I signed into law yesterday, we are going to award $2 billion in competitive grants to communities that are bringing together stakeholders and testing new and innovative ways to prevent foreclosures. Communities have shown a lot of initiative, taking responsibility for this crisis when many others have not. Supporting these neighborhood efforts is exactly what we should be doing.

Taken together, the provisions of this plan will help us end this crisis and preserve for millions of families their stake in the American Dream. But we must also acknowledge the limits of this plan.

Our housing crisis was born of eroding home values, but also of the erosion of our common values. It was brought about by big banks that traded in risky mortgages in return for profits that were literally too good to be true; by lenders who knowingly took advantage of homebuyers; by homebuyers who knowingly borrowed too much from lenders; by speculators who gambled on rising prices; and by leaders in our nation's capital who failed to act amidst a deepening crisis.

So solving this crisis will require more than resources - it will require all of us to take responsibility. Government must take responsibility for setting rules of the road that are fair and fairly enforced. Banks and lenders must be held accountable for ending the practices that got us into this crisis in the first place. Individuals must take responsibility for their own actions. And all of us must learn to live within our means again.

These are the values that have defined this nation. These are values that have given substance to our faith in the American Dream. And these are the values that we must restore now at this defining moment.

It will not be easy. But if we move forward with purpose and resolve - with a deepened appreciation for how fundamental the American Dream is and how fragile it can be when we fail in our collective responsibilities - then I am confident we will overcome this crisis and once again secure that dream for ourselves and for generations to come.

Thank you, God Bless you, and God bless America.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

MESA, Ariz. — President Barack Obama says his $75 billion plan to tackle "a crisis unlike any we've ever known" in home foreclosures is necessary to help save the economy. Obama unveiled the pl...
MESA, Ariz. — President Barack Obama says his $75 billion plan to tackle "a crisis unlike any we've ever known" in home foreclosures is necessary to help save the economy. Obama unveiled the pl...
Filed by Katharine Zaleski  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,112
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (40 total)
03:02 PM on 02/19/2009
Congress should have passed bankruptcy reform instead. This bill pours money into the home real estate market. It is too similar to the bubble management of the economy that Bush and Clinton and Greenspan built.

Every case is different, and only the judge can tell whether to force the banks to reduce the balance due on the mortgage or find some other solution.
06:40 PM on 02/19/2009
Mr Already,
You may be right, but my experience in a business Chapter 11 is that I don't trust bankruptcy judges either. I had a guy who owed me a judgment of $700,000, he went out and ran up $15000 in credit card debt so I wasn't his only creditor, then he declared bankruptcy, and the judge in New Jersey approved it. So he dodged a legitimate judgement and got $15000 in free merchandise. His wife was a top executive and they lived in a $6 million house in New Jersey.
12:50 PM on 02/19/2009
Xcuz me while I peruse the constitution for the part about my RIGHT to a house...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
redkim
Wounded by beauty, I am one who struggles with God
04:50 PM on 02/19/2009
LOL....good luck on that. Tell me what amendment it's under.
12:47 PM on 02/19/2009
I love this...the DemocRats are hoisting themselves on their own petards...LMAO!
10:30 AM on 02/19/2009
I called my mortgage company (EMC ie JPMorgan ie Chase Bank) to ask for a loan modification.
I was told that EMC is just a loan servicing co and that they do not do modifications or refinance. What is all the hupla about Obama's program if the mortgage companies are still going to give the same run around as before.My loan was an ARM that adjusted to 10% when interest rates were at an all time low. I guess if I had not struggled to make my payments on time I would be a canidate for the President's NEW program.
07:40 AM on 02/19/2009
Only banks are being bailed out, not home owners. Obama and the banks have conspired to keep borrowers paying for under water, worthless home investments. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer. Don't listen to Obama or the banks. Send the keys of your under water house to the banks, stop rewarding their scams.
03:29 AM on 02/19/2009
Hey, when you've already spent over a trillion on one stimulus deal, what's another $75 billion among friends? No but seriously, I'd like to hear a good argument as to why those who did not allow themselves to be suckered by predator lenders into buying houses they obviously couldn't afford, should help pay for those saps who did.
08:14 AM on 02/19/2009
Because when the "suckers" next door to you walk, or when the "In Foreclosure" sign goes up on their properties, your own property value plummets, and you lose too, big time.
12:37 PM on 02/19/2009
Tough...don't you people have any principles???
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:28 AM on 02/19/2009
If the housing market was a supply/demand free market, what would be the price of what today is a $300,000 house?
Any guesses?
03:52 AM on 02/19/2009
The problem wasn't the free market, it was the intervention into the free market by the government when they wanted to get more low-income families into housing they couldn't afford in the first place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tangelan
You will not cast aspersions on my asparagus.
07:57 AM on 02/19/2009
Do you have something against low-income families? Maybe they weren't low income when they bought their house. Maybe they lost their jobs. Anyone who can afford to live in an apartment should be able to afford a house. Man (of course you're a man), you are a smug one. I bet you're fun at parties.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:42 AM on 02/19/2009
Where on earth is this "free market" I keep hearing about? In which country does it operate? It must be nearby, 'cause folks are always referring to it, but they never say where...
02:31 AM on 02/19/2009
Next some of you guys will want to kill all the poor people because they are not "responsible"! God we are smug when we have a job, have some savings, have health insurance and still have our houses, aren't we?

Do you know how quickly that can change? You would be surprised. One super serious illness in our familly or one job loss with nothing on the horizon can change that for any of us.

I am amazed at the refusal to see the common good as benefitting each of us in the future. OMG, aren't we becoming self-centered and all about me!

If we have our jobs and too many people are too poor to buy our services, we won't have our jobs for much longer.

President Obama has a sensible plan. He IS borrowing, but what matters is what he is borrowing for and the fact that the outcome can actually put us in a position to pay our debt and further profit.

He is not just borrowing for borrowing sake. He is investing in America's future with a real vision that is grounded in the world five and ten and twenty years from now. Not one that is still mired in the 80's. It must be difficult for him- having vision and so many talking heads and Repubs are too blinkered to see. I like a leader with vision. Not one who can't think outside the box.

Shut up talking heads. Stop and think.
12:42 PM on 02/19/2009
My first responsibility is to myself and my family...that is responsibility. No, in this instance, I am not my brother's keeper.
01:03 AM on 02/19/2009
I just heard Chris Matthews say that Obama isn't sure about this deal. 1st of all he didn't create this mess & if Chris can't say anything positive he should shut THU. Obama has only been in office 3 weeks and is trying to help us. I lost my job last month & I have never been laid off since 1984. Thank God I don't live beyond my means & thank God John McCain isn't president.
01:22 AM on 02/19/2009
I hear Mathews too and was shocked to hear him bully the Dem and cheer on the GOP rep just to forward his own unsubstantiated view that Obama is clueless as to what to do with the banks. I guess now, everyone is an economic expert huh...even those who have not spent one day really focusing on the facts to understand indepth of the problems we're facing.! That Mathews has not done that has been quite clear in his redundant and superficial commentary for the past few weeks! Do you think for a second that he or any of this guests read H.R.1 before deriding it?

Besides Mathews and ALL those so called pundits on commercial media would be out of a job if they didn't constantly raise doubts and stirr up conflict , even at a grave disservice to our country. IF it is true that capitalism relies upon CONFIDENCE then the MEDIA is doing more than any other entity to make the economy worse!

I on the other hand, appreciate a Pres. who is not rushing for the sake of political expedience or to cater to these know-nothing shallow heads. If you've ever suffered want you'll understand -- it does take longer to make the most of limited bucks when I have to consider all angles before deciding on the best items to put into my basket!
01:28 AM on 02/19/2009
" I guess now, everyone is an economic expert huh...even those who have not spent one day really focusing on the facts to understand indepth of the problems we're facing!" Yes, that's the one thing that *is* for sure these days. I'm continually amazed to hear and read the things being blurted out like expert opinion by people who have never ever studied a thing about economics or any of the related issues.
12:45 PM on 02/19/2009
He helped to create this mess while he was in congress supporting Fannie and Freddie. He knew what he was getting into, tired of hearing him whine about inheriting the mess. Man up and do the job responsibly or bow out.
12:52 AM on 02/19/2009
As usual, the hardworking people who play by the rules are screwed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:11 AM on 02/19/2009
No - they get to hold their heads up high and feel superior to people who aren't as perfect as they...
12:36 AM on 02/19/2009
Only a comprehensive plan that applies to all homeowners makes sense.

Obama thinks he has identified a cancer and will yank it out. Too late, the cancer has spread to the whole economy.

This plan does not distinguish between someone, even with best intentions on their part, who stupidly got into an expensive house with a sub-prime and someone who bought a house within their means that can't make their payments because they lost their job. Or the same person who can't quite make the mortgage. And anyone with a mortgage over the Fannie/Freddie max of $417,000. By the way Alaksa and Hawaii get a much higher cap but not California........screwed again.
01:48 AM on 02/19/2009
The government is not a "morality" police! Moreover, the plan does help us ALL -- arresting foreclosures will check the falling prices of the whole housing market, thereby securing the bulk of the US bank holdings. Without cleaning out specifically the weak mortgages out of the piles and piles of you know what these real estate agents and speculators have left behind for us all, the banks cannot return to profitability, and hence cannot restore credit to the economy, without which we're all screwed!
After my husband has gone through two lay offs in the past two years plus my job has been frozen by our CA governor, we have managed to hold on to our property, but not without refinancing. As a result, we came face to face with the same kind of unscrupulous people who have caused this mess -- ours were Chase agents who tried their best to dupe us at several turns. Good thing I happen to be very wary of salesmen in suits and like to read and know how to research for myself! So -- when I hear all these critics on TV and self congratulatory, responsible beings on blogs stooping to name calling fellow Americans who are in the hole and need refinancing -- for their good and the good of the whole economy -- I find them either clearly ignorant of reality and the facts or simply too blinded by ideology and intolerance to participate in this discussion.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:05 AM on 02/19/2009
I've already posted on this topic but have been thinking about this.

I don't like the idea that housing prices will be kept inflated by this. If, even though it is the "responsible" people, do get to renegotiate their mortgages, and others get to do a cram down, then housing prices need to STILL fall down to the amount of the cram downs in the surrounding neighborhood.

Housing prices are still over inflated and need to come down.
02:30 AM on 02/19/2009
I agree. can't have both hyperinflated home prices and a healthy economy...

Started the latest social network: Depression 2.0 in anticipation of the eventual full meltdown...

http://depression20.ning.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tangelan
You will not cast aspersions on my asparagus.
12:01 AM on 02/19/2009
I work, own my house, and pay my taxes and I'm for this 150%. If this plans saves a house in my neighborhood from being foreclosed then it saves my property values and my neighbor. If this plan benefits families where the breadwinners have lost their jobs, I'm all for it. Who wouldn't be? I pray that I'm never in a position to use it but I won't begrudge anyone who does. The middle class should have realized in the last few years that our jobs are not promised to us. Anyone of us can be in the same position as those being called "lazy" in some of these comments. What's wrong with you folks?
12:00 AM on 02/19/2009
I don't remember anyone forcing these homeowners to buy houses with no money down and no savings. Did I miss something here? They made a bad decision. They signed a bad loan. Why are we all being forced to chip in to save to give these homeowners a bailout?
02:21 AM on 02/19/2009
Where have you been? Have you not seen the documentaries interviewing mortgage company employees who have explained how they were instructed to force these sub-primes down people's throats if even they did not want them. They were told to advise people strongly in this direction.

You may be a very sophisticated money manager, but most people know nothing about banking, and far less about mortgages and home purchase. They are usually advised by the same people who were scamming them.

Get real and stop being so smug.

I guess you never did sh*t
03:49 AM on 02/19/2009
Ignorance is not an excuse. If I do something stupid and lose money it's my fault. I don't go complaining to the government and expect compensation for my losses. Nobody forced them to sign on the dotted line. I have not seen proof otherwise. How do you force somebody to buy a house anyways? Has common sense completely eroded from society? What do you expect from a mortgage that requires no down payment?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:34 AM on 02/19/2009
Who said these folks will be bailed out? O's plan as stated specifically excludes those in the scenario you depict...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IAM4CLINTON
11:28 PM on 02/18/2009
Hillary wisely proposed a 6 month moratorium on foreclosures and a resurrection of the Mortgage Corp from the Depression era- she was soundly ridiculed then by candidate Obama--but that is precisely what President Obama is proposing today- half baked though- with no relief for responsible home buyers like me who have paid on time, bought what I thought I could afford etc in lean times.
Where is the premium for responsibility ? Can we get a 120% write off of home mortgage payments on our taxes ?
11:30 PM on 02/18/2009
Obama's plan is targeted on people who will probably take no action at all. That is the big mistake.
He should have come out with comprehensive relief.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:41 PM on 02/18/2009
yeah. We'll write that up and also ask that he make you one of his advisers.

He's worked real hard this month. He needs a good laugh.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:32 PM on 02/18/2009
I didn't run any red lights today - can I get a cut of the fines from those who did?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:38 PM on 02/18/2009
Duh...

You do by means of the city services that are provided from that revenue.