Water Crisis, Not Just Rivals, May Have Collapsed Ancient Angkor

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MICHAEL CASEY | February 17, 2009 08:38 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Dec. 9, 2005 file photo, tourists walk to the world famous Angkor Wat temple in the late afternoon light in Siem Reap, Cambodia. A prolonged and intense drought may have contributed to the demise of Cambodia's great ancient city Angkor, an American researcher said Tuesday. (AP Photo/Andy Eames, File)

BANGKOK — The collapse of Cambodia's great ancient city of Angkor may have been due to a massive drought nearly 600 years ago _ not just rival Siamese forces and widespread deforestation as previously suspected, a researcher said.

Brendan M. Buckley said Tuesday that bands from tree rings that he and his colleagues examined show that Southeast Asia was hit by a severe and prolonged drought from 1415 until 1439, coinciding with the period during which many archeologists believe Angkor collapsed.

From the city of famed temples, Angkorian kings ruled over most of Southeast Asia between the 9th and 14th centuries. They oversaw construction of architectural stone marvels, including Angkor Wat, regarded as a wonder of religious architecture and designated a World Heritage Site by UNESCO.

While the 1431 invasion from Siam _ what is now Thailand _ has long been regarded as a main cause of Angkor's fall, archaeologists working at the sprawling temple site have suspected that ecological factors played a major part in its collapse.

"Given all the stress the Khmer civilization was under due to political reasons and so forth, a drought of the magnitude we see in our records should have played a significant role in causing its demise," said Buckley, a research scientist at Columbia University's Tree-Ring Laboratory in New York.

The thickness of a tree's rings provides scientists with a historical record of a region's climate. Wet periods encourage tree growth, making rings thicker, while dry periods create thinner rings.

Buckley, one of the world's top tree ring experts, has spent the past 16 years taking core samples from trees across Southeast Asia to build a record of the region's climate dating back hundreds of years.

Buckley _ who spoke on the sidelines of a three-day climate conference in Vietnam_ said his data helped identify at least four mega-droughts in Southeast Asia dating back 722 years.

Story continues below
advertisement

The Greater Angkor Project _ run by the University of Sydney in collaboration with the French archaeological group Ecole Francaise d'Extreme Orient and APSARA, the body responsible for management of the Angkor World Heritage Park _ concluded in 2007 that ancient Angkor had become unwieldy. Efforts to expand rice production to support a population of 1 million led to vast deforestation, top soil degradation and erosion.

Dan Penny, a University of Sydney researcher who is a director at the Greater Angkor Project, said the new findings on drought will help researchers gain a greater understanding of why the kingdom collapsed.

"Angkor was a civilization obsessed with managing water. It was an agrarian society," said Penny, who also spoke at the conference. "It's hard to imagine that a society like that could have shrugged off 20 or 30 years of drought."

Penny said sediment samples show no evidence that Angkor was turned into a "dust bowl" by the drought, he said. However, the drought likely came as a final blow to a kingdom already suffering the effects of deforestation and attacks from the Siamese and the Cham of southern Vietnam, he said.

"We have these droughts occurring on top of preexisting pressures," Penny said. "Climate change was an accelerant. It's like pouring petrol on a fire. It makes a social and economic pressures that may have been endurable disastrous."

___

On the Net:

Greater Angkor Project: http://acl.arts.usyd.edu.au/angkor/gap/index.php

Columbia University's Tree-Ring Lab: http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/res/fac/trl/

(This version CORRECTS city reference to 'Angkor' in lead)

BANGKOK — The collapse of Cambodia's great ancient city of Angkor may have been due to a massive drought nearly 600 years ago _ not just rival Siamese forces and widespread deforestation as prev...
BANGKOK — The collapse of Cambodia's great ancient city of Angkor may have been due to a massive drought nearly 600 years ago _ not just rival Siamese forces and widespread deforestation as prev...
 
Comments
3
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- NCRDIBULL I'm a Fan of NCRDIBULL 7 fans permalink

Damn those 14th century SUVs and Coal MINES

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 02/21/2009
- Eric8 I'm a Fan of Eric8 17 fans permalink

Great Article! This has nothing to do with the end of the world crap mentioned before, this is how science is done idiot, this is a scientific article that presents us with another historical case of the importance of resources in maintaining cultures. This would fit well into the studies of the tribe living on Eastern Island as well as other parts of the world affected by resource decline. We have a lot to learn from these earlier events and how we can overcome these types of events in the future with planning, communication, and technology. I have been to Angkor Wat, which is way cool, and I always sensed a sort of haunting feeling that something significant happened here long ago, and now this may be a clue as to why people would have abandoned such a beautiful place rife with cultural symbolism. people today are so afraid of crises, they think we should only report what they want to here. If u don't like something, so goes, but please do your pathetic whining out of the public space.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:17 PM on 02/19/2009
- johnnyjust I'm a Fan of johnnyjust 6 fans permalink

"May have" huh?

Now that's journalism.

It's also the problem with the reporting of each upcoming crisis. "Could be," 'Possibly," "In the next 100 years...", etc. No facts, just the same old earth-ending predictions we've heard forever.

Oh, but now, you know, it's different, because now it's really really really true! Really!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 PM on 02/18/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect