Drought To Cut Off Federal Water To Calif. Farms

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Drought To Cut Off Federal Water To Calif. Farms stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

GARANCE BURKE | 02/20/09 10:59 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Federal water managers said Friday that they plan to cut off water, at least temporarily, to thousands of California farms as a result of the deepening drought gripping the state.

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation officials said parched reservoirs and patchy rainfall this year were forcing them to completely stop surface water deliveries for at least a three-week period beginning March 1. Authorities said they haven't had to take such a drastic move for more than 15 years.

The situation could improve slightly if more rain falls over the next few weeks, and officials will know by mid-March if they can release more irrigation supplies to growers.

Farmers in the nation's No. 1 agriculture state predicted it would cause consumers to pay more for their fruits and vegetables, which would have to be grown using expensive well water.

"Water is our life _ it's our jobs and it's our food," said Ryan Jacobsen, executive director of the farm bureau in Fresno County. "Without a reliable water supply, Fresno County's No. 1 employer _ agriculture _ is at great risk."

The drought would cause an estimated $1.15 billion dollar loss in agriculture-related wages and eliminate as many as 40,000 jobs in farm-related industries in the San Joaquin Valley alone, where most of the nation's produce and nut crops are grown, said Lester Snow, director of the Department of Water Resources.

Jeff Peracchi, a pomegranate and grape grower in Huron, said he was laying off employees because without water, there wouldn't be much fruit to pick.

"I can't just say I won't farm this year _ I have to do something. But I'm having to lay off guys who have been with us for years," Peracchi said. "At this point, I'm planning to farm to keep the fruit as healthy as I can, but I'm not sure I'm going to be able to be profitable."

Story continues below
advertisement

California's agricultural industry typically receives 80 percent of all the water supplies managed by the federal government _ everything from far-off mountain streams and suburban reservoirs. The state supplies drinking water to 23 million residents and 755,000 acres of irrigated farmland.

Farms supplied by flows from the state would still get 15 percent of their normal deliveries, but the combined state and federal cutbacks would leave more than 1 million acres of fields and orchards with no aboveground water supply, Snow said.

The state depends on winter snow in the Sierra Nevada for much of its summer water supply, but January was one of the driest winter months on record. This year, both the state and federal reservoirs have reached their lowest level since 1992.

Water for crops also was restricted by court decisions cutting back deliveries that flow through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, a freshwater estuary home to the delta smelt, a fish scientists believe is on the brink of extinction.

Dwindling supplies would have to be routed to cities to ensure residents, hospitals and fire crews have enough to meet minimum health and safety needs, said Don Glaser, the federal reclamation bureau's Mid-Pacific Region director.

The water shortages are so severe most cities will have to start mandatory ration programs by summertime, and residents will be asked to reduce their usage by 20 percent, Snow said.

"You've got to think about water as a precious resource," he said. "It may seem a stretch to conserve 20 percent of your water, but that's nothing in comparison to the consequences of the drought and job loss in agriculture."

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Federal water managers said Friday that they plan to cut off water, at least temporarily, to thousands of California farms as a result of the deepening drought gripping the ...
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Federal water managers said Friday that they plan to cut off water, at least temporarily, to thousands of California farms as a result of the deepening drought gripping the ...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
118
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 (3 pages total)
photo

Oh dear, won't that be putting all those people who are here illegally out of a job? So the environmentalist are racists and hate Mexicans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 AM on 02/21/2009
- dearlizzie I'm a Fan of dearlizzie 6 fans permalink
photo

legal or illegal, these workers are consumers. Whole towns (full of citizens) can go under.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:19 AM on 02/21/2009
- Geoffreys I'm a Fan of Geoffreys 14 fans permalink
photo

...because everybody who works in agriculture and its support industries is here illegally.­.. Even if a portion of the people effected are undocumented, they will by no means be everyone. You will be one of the effected when the loss of food increases your grocery bill.

Maybe you should look at being a little less snarky and take some time to discuss the topic at hand like a grown-up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 AM on 02/21/2009

Looking at a map of California­... I see a LOT of water right off their coast.

Problem: It's salty.

Congress just passed a stimulus package.

Use some of the money, build desalinization plants.

Problem Solved.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 AM on 02/21/2009

If only it were that easy.

And for your next trick, we just print a few trillion new dollars and fix the economy?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:10 AM on 02/21/2009

Why not? The stimulus money is going somewhere.­.. this creates jobs and saves lives.

And i thought we were already doing that? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNS8IY_Td14

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 AM on 02/21/2009

Louisiana doesn't want the money - use theirs !!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:01 AM on 02/21/2009
- dearlizzie I'm a Fan of dearlizzie 6 fans permalink
photo

The streamlined bill cut out much of the money for this sort of thing. If localities can't pay for police, firefighters and basic infrastructure like sewers and potholes, it's a cinch there's not going to be enough for desalinization plants for agriculture.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:23 AM on 02/21/2009
- MajorKong I'm a Fan of MajorKong 399 fans permalink
photo

From what I understand, desalinization is expensive and energy intensive. That's why only countries like Saudi Arabia go to the trouble.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:41 AM on 02/21/2009

I have heard that as well, but that is with "current" technology. Maybe a more economical and efficient method can be developed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 02/21/2009
- emily00011 I'm a Fan of emily00011 33 fans permalink

A couple of cities did have plans in the works, but they scrapped them when the drought broke for a couple years. Great planning?

They are expensive to build and the water isn't cheap, and of course, there is an environmental impact.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:33 AM on 02/21/2009
- Durango I'm a Fan of Durango 144 fans permalink

And how many coal power plants would be needed to power the desalinization plants.

Power plants built somewhere else (see: Desert Rock power Plant Navajo Reservation New Mexico).

And no matter what, you would NEVER get the costs of desalinization low enough for agriculture.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:06 AM on 02/21/2009

"And no matter what, you would NEVER get the costs of desalinization low enough for agricultur­e."

Is that a good reason not to use desalination as part of the solution?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:51 AM on 02/21/2009
- JScott I'm a Fan of JScott 21 fans permalink

Plus all the energy to move it around and uphill.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 02/21/2009
photo

Not before time. California agriculture has long needed to develop more efficient irrigation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 AM on 02/21/2009
- mommadona I'm a Fan of mommadona 177 fans permalink
photo

If you've ever driven through the Central Valley - there are miles - literally MILES of acreage all water with very inefficient 'sprinkler' type set ups.

It is ridiculous.

The farmers have resisted change - and NOW it's going to be forced on them,

Buy locally from organic farms.
At least in our area, they use innovative watering techniques and intensive farming for more yield per acre/tree.

It ISN'T rocket science.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 AM on 02/21/2009
- dearlizzie I'm a Fan of dearlizzie 6 fans permalink
photo

But without profits and without credit markets, there is no money to fund any change of irrigation systems for farms.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 AM on 02/21/2009
- grammy11 I'm a Fan of grammy11 5 fans permalink

Agreed. If they can't afford to farm, tell them to quit. I can't afford a lot of things in my life and do well without it. Should the government give me what I want even tho I can't afford it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 02/21/2009
- apoyo I'm a Fan of apoyo 41 fans permalink

There goes the food supply. Better start planting your own vegetable garden and fruit trees.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 AM on 02/21/2009
- fcsakes I'm a Fan of fcsakes 86 fans permalink
photo

...and the automatic sprinklers surrounding the mansions of the wealthy just keep ticking around.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 AM on 02/21/2009
photo

Y'know, using stimulus money to build deslinization plants along the coastlines of the U.S. would make a lot of sense during times like these. . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 AM on 02/21/2009

Thank You. I'm glad I'm not the only one with that thought... just to get it out there, I feel the need to post a new comment about it too!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 AM on 02/21/2009

I think you will get better value for money to build a separate plumbing system that uses seawater for toilet flushes (Hongkong already does it) and maybe the fire hydrant system. Use potable water for drinking and cooking only, perhaps for showers (ban bathtubs), gray water for lawns, Singapore recycles wastewater and uses it to recharge the reservoirs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 AM on 02/21/2009
photo

Those are very good ideas as well. . .I'd vote for them. . .

In our house, we plug up the tub when we shower and collect the graywater. Throughout the day, we then use an old milk jug (that's been altered by cutting a bigger hole in the top) that we dunk into the used shower water and just pour it straight into the toilet when we need to flush it. Works just as good as pressing the handle on the tank.

Cut our water bill by about 20%. . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 02/21/2009

I agree, almost. Personally, if something won't grow in the natural conditions of my yard, it isn't there. Watering of lawns is a ridiculous practice and should be banned in CA when water supplies are tight, and IMHO even when they're not. (Hand car-washing, too!).

Greywater and even brownwater recycling is much more efficient and cost-effective than desalination plants. And CA has the perfect environment for such a program - dense areas of urban water use near large areas of agricultural use. Use the freshwater for residential and commercial uses, then recycle it for agricultural purposes. The Feds ought to tell CA that they're not going to continue to get so much water unless they immediately start working to use what they have more efficiently.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:42 AM on 02/21/2009

In San Diego we are using some partially treated "waste water" for industrial and landscape irrigation uses. When you see water sprinkler fittings with a purplish color that recycled water. The delivery infrastructure is not in place to use everywhere, we would need to lay the pipes, but it helps It isn't certified for human consumption and last year there was case where it was hooked up to the potable water supply of an office building which resulted in those workers getting sick.

We also keep kicking around the idea if putting the waster water back into the drinking supply. They would fully treat it, put into a reservoir for a period of time and move it through several other reservoirs before going back into the supply system. This is no different from what happens with the water we get from the Colorado River, upstream cities have already used it. However, the talking heads on the local news dubbed it toilet-to-tap and squeamish among us screamed.

Supposedly if I captured all the rain runoff from my roof it would supply my family for the year. I haven't run the numbers; 1800 square foot roof, 6 inches of rain per year yields how many gallons?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 02/21/2009
- FairTalk I'm a Fan of FairTalk 18 fans permalink
photo

This is the first time I have heard of these ideas. Thanks. I am also wondering if wheat, or other grasses can be developed to grow, like marsh grasses, that can use more salty water?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:45 PM on 03/01/2009

It has been said a lot in recent years that water will become the new oil. Not jut here, but world wide.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 PM on 02/20/2009
- mommadona I'm a Fan of mommadona 177 fans permalink
photo

They are trying to make it a "commodity" - think ENRON....

Do YOU know who owns your local water supply/distribution company?

Our valley just got thru a very nasty, years-long fight with a German company that purchased the water source/distribution in this area and was going to bottle it and ship over seas for sale - after lengthy law suits and such, WE BOUGHT IT BACK and put it in local hands.

Heads up, everyone.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 AM on 02/21/2009
- fiorastar I'm a Fan of fiorastar 64 fans permalink
photo

Check out what Coca Cola has been doing in India. This is not new. But it is coming to the U.S.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:19 PM on 02/21/2009

aaaaaahhhh­hhhhhhhhhh­hhhhhh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 PM on 02/20/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect