iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Authorities: Jordan Brown Killed Father's Pregnant Girlfriend; 11-Year-Old Charged As Adult

First Posted: 01/27/11 09:07 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:05 PM ET

Jordan Brown Kills Fathers Pregnant Girlfriend

Ed. Note: The headline of this story has been updated to clarify who made the claim that Jordan Brown killed Kenzie Marie Houk.
___

WAMPUM, Pa. (Associated Press) — An 11-year-old boy shot his father's pregnant girlfriend in the back of the head while she was lying in bed in their western Pennsylvania farmhouse, then got on the school bus and went to school, authorities said Saturday.

Jordan Brown was charged Saturday as an adult in the shooting death of 26-year-old Kenzie Marie Houk, who was 8 months pregnant, Lawrence County District Attorney John Bongivengo said at a news conference.

Houk's family and friends, who gathered at her parents' house Saturday night, told The Associated Press that Houk had had problems with the boy in the past.

"There was an issue with jealousy. He told my son stuff," said Houk's brother-in-law, Jason Kraner, 34. "He actually told my son that he wanted to do that to her."

Brown, the son of Houk's live-in boyfriend, was charged with criminal homicide and criminal homicide of an unborn child, Bongivengo said. He was being held in Lawrence County Jail. A preliminary hearing is set for Thursday.

The fifth-grader was picked up from school Friday by Pennsylvania State Police, who found Houk's body after her 4-year-old daughter told tree cutters on the property that she thought her mother was dead, Bongivengo said.

The boy had told police there was a suspicious black truck on the property that morning, causing investigators to look into a false lead for about five hours, he said.

Inconsistencies in Brown's description of the vehicle led police to re-interview the victim's 7-year-old daughter, who implicated the boy in the killing, Bongivengo said.

"She didn't actually eyewitness the shooting. She saw him with what she believed to be a shotgun and heard a loud bang," Bongivengo said, adding that the weapon, a youth model 20-gauge shotgun, was found in what police believed was the boy's bedroom.

The shotgun, which apparently belonged to Brown, is designed for children and such weapons do not have to be registered, Bongivengo said.

Brown's attorney, Dennis Elisco, said the evidence points to the gunshot wound being "consistent" with the boy's hunting gun, but he wanted to see stronger proof that it was Brown's.

"I believe Jordan did not do this and I'm looking forward to seeing the physical evidence to see if it matches with what I think happened," he said Saturday after meeting with the boy in jail.

The attorney also said he met with the boy's father, Christopher Brown, and planned to file a motion Monday to have the boy released on bail and move the case to juvenile court.

The attorney said Christopher Brown was "in a state of actual shock and disbelief." There was no indication the boy had a problem with Houk, he added.

"This is a tragic, extremely tragic situation, and it's way too early to have any substantive comment," Elisco said.

Police said they had no motive for the shooting, and Bongivengo would not say whether the boy confessed.

"An 11-year-old kid _ what would give him the motive to shoot someone?" Houk's father, Jack, told the AP. "Maybe he was just jealous of my daughter and the baby and thought he would be overpowered."

Jack Houk said the family had gathered at his home in nearby New Castle on Thursday night to celebrate his 4-year-old granddaughter's birthday. Everyone was excited about the pending birth of his daughter's baby, he said.

"That's the last time I seen her, my daughter," Jack Houk said.

He said Brown was raised by his father and grandmother. Houk and the boy's father had been together since May 2008 and were engaged at Christmas, her father said.

Jack Houk said the boy and his father used to practice shooting behind their farmhouse, and the two enjoyed hunting together.

He didn't know of any recent problems between the boy and his daughter, but said there had been "some tension" in the beginning. Houk said his daughter had been working hard to forge a relationship with the boy.

Kraner, Houk's brother-in-law, said Jordan could be a "rough kid." He said his son was interviewed by police about the boy.

Kenzie Houk had been renting the farmhouse in Wampum, a rural community about 35 miles northwest of Pittsburgh, for no more than a year, neighbor Cameron Tucker said.

Tucker's wife sometimes drove Houk's younger daughter to the bus stop because she went to preschool with the Tuckers' 5-year-old.

"She was very protective of her kids," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST

Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 519
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
11:05 AM on 02/24/2009
I don't care if he's a child. He killed someone in cold blood. He committed a heinous act. The law is no respecter of persons and he shouldn't get away with it just because he's 11 years old. We sentenced Lee Boyd Malvo to life imprisonment even though he was 17 when he pulled the trigger, killing most of the D.C. sniper victims, and no one cried over his sentence.

Let the kid sit in a cell.
07:03 AM on 02/24/2009
Is anyone else wondering why the boy is locked up and not his father? Giving access to loaded guns to kids is stupid and this is what happens.
04:16 PM on 02/23/2009
Don't you just love the law enforcement types/prosecutors who jump on the anti-gun bandwagon every time one of these rare tragedies happens? Yet, not one word when the situation in Verona, NJ where a gas station attendant was gunned down and robbed by criminals. I guess the gun laws applied to the criminals as well and should have their guns taken away too--while they thumb their noses at the gun laws. Because NJ has such draconian gun laws, the gas station attendant was deprived of his right to self-defense, hence, deprived of his life. And, where were the police? Only 20-30 minutes too late. I guess the police are a great deterrent to this type of stuff. Not. Read Roger Roots' Seton Hall University Law School constitutional law review article "Are Cops Constitutional?" for a full explanation on the absurdity of police departments and how they have become a political force to be reckoned with, as a standing army--in violation of the 3rd Amendment.

The reason for the 2nd Amendment is because the people knew that government was incapable of protecting it and they had to do it themselves. See, for example, Pearl Harbor. Japanese Admiral Yamamoto said the reason the Japanese didn't invade the continental United States is because the American citizenry was armed to the teeth and would have defeated the Japanese army on American soil.
05:07 AM on 02/24/2009
nice post...
09:58 PM on 02/22/2009
and lets apply the twisted logic that i have seen here that there is no need for firearms of any kind in an urban setting.....equal rights being applied differently based on geography....how about this...if you live in a urban setting you give up your right of free speech and assembly....country folk can yell fire in a crowded theater with no consequences...if you live in an urban setting you give up your right of choice...you go to school and church and the grocery store when and where the goverment tells you..country folk are free to travel anywhere and shop anywhere based on their zip code...do you get the point...equal rights also means equal application of aforementioned rights...
08:07 PM on 02/22/2009
The 2nd Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms to citizens serving in a state militia. That's it. Other interpretations are judicial/legal overreaching to achieve the desired result of universal gun ownership (and apparently more dead pregnant women). Gun ownership by individuals needs to be left to the states to decide. Then all the gun nuts can move to Mississippi and Louisiana and Alaska and wherever else they want to congregate to make their secession plans, and the rest of us can decide with our votes in our own home states how far we wish to extend the right of gun ownership.
08:40 PM on 02/22/2009
we already have universal gun ownership in the u.s....legal ownership is a right and was recognized as such before the bill of rights was written..call it settled law or law of the land..guns defined america....and you don't seem to grasp the principle that the government can expand on existing rights anytime it chooses i.e. passing a federal law which says that everyone over the age of 18 can legally carry a gun anywhere in the continental u.s. would be an expansion of your rkba not a restriction of it which they are forbidden to do...and since the heller decision affirmed what pro-rkba people already knew...that there is right to rkba for the common citizen...you view of that right has become mute....need i remind you of the number of democrats that abandoned bill clinton in '93 after he signed the awb....people like jim webb and kristen gillibrand are pro-gun democrats and won by running on that platform..let me know when you find a candidate willing to run on the "i hate guns...i will take your guns away from you..and i will take away your right to own a gun" platform...
09:50 AM on 02/23/2009
Just because your view has become the mainstream one doesn't have anything to do with whether or not it is the right one. You know there are a whole lot of 'let the markets work' politicians who are going to be in big trouble next time around. And the more whack jobs there are out there defending universal gun ownership that is inconsistent with protecting states from an overreaching Federal government and leads to more 11 year-olds killing their father's pregnant girlfriends, the more people will see how foolish and distorted from the original intent 'universal' unquestioned gun ownership is. I don't know how many dead pregnant girlfriends it will take to reach a tipping point. I'm OK with you owning all of the single loader muskets you can carry, but as long as you oppose sensible restrictions on gun types and ammo as promulgated by the states (ever hear of states' rights?) then I will have to continue to fight against all guns at all times for all reasons.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mort
Once I thought I was wrong, but I was mistaken.
10:51 PM on 02/22/2009
What part of "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. " don't you understand? It doesn't say the right goes only to citizens serving in a militia, though It does say having a militia is vital. Read up on what the founding fathers said about this right. Especially John Adams and Thom. Jefferson. They considered one of the responsibilities of citizenship that everyone be willing and ready at a moment's notice to drop everything and join the ranks. That's what a militia is. The National Guard grew out of that philosophy, but it doesn't absolve us of our duty. Kinda hard, though, to defend ourselves against foreign or domestic enemies if we're all disarmed and unwilling to give a *@%&#.
09:42 AM on 02/23/2009
So now we can have armies made up of 11 year-olds because of your wacky interpretation of how to assemble a militia. Nice.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HotheadPaisen
Longform bio awaiting the Donald's approval.
07:56 PM on 02/22/2009
I'm seeing very good statements on all sides of this issue. Kuddos to those who allow that nothing is exactly black or white in the world, and generalizations and stereotypes don't cut it.
I kind of have one foot in both sides- I am a gun owner, I abhor sport hunting- I'll say that right up front- so ya'll will know how to flame me if you must.
My question, not that there are any REAL answers, but I would like to hear reasoned responses from both sides...
Most people would agree that a child who torments or kills animals for fun is exhibiting very serious signs of trouble, and most agree that it is a big red flag for future violence against humans.
Is there no danger in teaching young children that killing animals for fun-sport, is really dangerous if that child has serious issues that may not have come to the surface yet?
WOuld it not be a good thing to wait until the child's moral compass and 'personhood' is not more fully developed before encouraging them to enjoy tracking and killing creatures for fun?
There's a million things to do to bond with your kids, can't the bloodletting wait?
09:10 PM on 02/22/2009
i don't hunt anymore for myself...however my dogs still enjoy a good rabbit or squirrel hunt..people who have lived mostly in cities don't understand how vast the u.s. is or the traditions that shaped our country...i have spent an entire week hunting in the same valley before and never crossed my own path twice...most people don't realize that most of america is still as it was a hundred years ago....my backyard is like the appalachian trail...lots of wild animals and no people....gun ownership is a tradition as is teaching your kids to hunt and fish....that being said i am willing to compromise on my rkba...in exchange for registration and licensing and demonstrating my ability to use my gun...my right to carry the gun of my choice anywhere i want in the continental u.s. is sacrosanct.....no one questions my right as long as i meet the criteria laid out above....
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HotheadPaisen
Longform bio awaiting the Donald's approval.
10:00 PM on 02/22/2009
Thanks for your comments Mojo. Again, I have a foot in both world. I was born and raised in NYC, but live eslewhere now, and love the wilderness that's not too far away. I do all my hunting with a camera though. Knowing that some of the creatures I cherish seeing can be snuffed out for another's idea of fun is just so disturbing- I just can't wrap my mind around it. Currently I live near a pair of nesting bald eagles with young chicks. I can feel some of your sentiments as I think of how many Americans will never see the majesty of these birds soaring in the wild. Still, every time I visit the nest I fear some little s**t will have shot one or worse, as a kid did last year when he killed a whopping crane...for fun.. Imagine none of them left at all- we're getting pretty close.
A kid tormenting a cat or dog under his porch is sick and twisted, but a kid stalking and shooting a majestic elk or bear is to be praised... I just don't get it.
Treasure your backyard- sounds lovely.
I think we should be able to carry anywhere too (yes- flame on!) especially as a female who loves to hike and kayak in places where women seem to be among the creatures hunted.
04:24 PM on 02/22/2009
hello to julie sa and former prosecutor: have you noticed how insane anti-gunners are when it comes to looking at the facts....they say that 30000 people are killed each year with guns...they never say how many of those deaths are suicides and accidents...lets not forget that less than 2 people per state per day are involved in a gun death...north dakota had no homicides involving a gun last year but i am sure there are a lot of guns in the badlands...this was a tragedy in the gravest since but so was eric claptons kid falling out of his thirty story building...i don't hear anyone saying kids have to be raised on the ground floor or that we should ban nascar because of the needless deaths suffered by the petty family in the name of entertainment...if you can teach your kid not to drink bleach from under the sink you should be able teach him or her not to misuse their gun..or bow...or car...or alcohol...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mort
Once I thought I was wrong, but I was mistaken.
05:15 PM on 02/22/2009
Very well said!
08:14 PM on 02/22/2009
So, just under 36000 people a year are involved in gun deaths in the US and you expect me to let out a cheer of "Yay guns!"?

Are you high?
08:46 PM on 02/22/2009
nice distortion..are you saying that suicide will go down if we don't have guns...and we have 300,000,000 million people in the u.s. and only 30,000 deaths total every year from guns and 80,000,000 million gun owners and 250,000,000 million guns in the hands of civilians...i will do the math for you...30000 deaths over fifty states over 365 days a year is about 1.8 deaths per state per day....don't let facts get in the way of your reality..if only we didn't have those evil guns....
02:44 PM on 02/22/2009
Shocked? I am not shocked that a boy killed someone with a gun any more than I am shocked he's being charged as an adult (Of course, he's not an adult, but what the hell does that matter? This is America! Anything ais possible! Charge a non-adult as an adult? Yes We Can!). I am only shocked that anyone is shocked.
12:51 PM on 02/22/2009
Evidently, PA encourages children under 12 to learn to "hunt"; I am deeply concerned about the government encouraging and facilitating an activity that very well could have a psychological impact on the mind of a child of tender years. Teaching a child to take life before they can fully understand life and death; is disturbing. This isn't 1915; and the real rhythm of the cycle of life and death is not experienced by the children of today.

http://www.pgc.state.pa.us/pgc/lib/pgc/digestpdfs/2006/youth_hunting.pdf
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:17 PM on 02/22/2009
They issue a trophy for the "First Big Game Harvest." How nice. If laws required you to kill at close range, so you were forced to watch the animal in its throes of death, to hear it's pain and panic, and rasping breath, fewer people would hunt. I've talked to hunters. Many find it disturbing when they don't get that quick kill.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Mort
Once I thought I was wrong, but I was mistaken.
03:48 PM on 02/22/2009
I wonder if the lady felt that way.

Personally, I haven't hunted for that very reason since I was a teenager. But it's a big part of life in some states, and it does make you more aware of life and death, and makes you more respectful of firearms. (Unless you're more interested in drinking than shooting.) I learned a lot as a child hunting with my dad and grandfather. A lot about life.
02:49 PM on 02/22/2009
"the real rhythm of the cycle of life and death is not experienced by the children of today."

Absolutely. And that's a problem. They all think meat comes from the store. Kids who hunt, or see their parents hunt, or see grandma kill a chicken for dinner, know what's involved. I think it's good that we don't all have to go personally ki ll our own food anymore, but I also think people should at least be exposed to these things. It's bad for humans to be so disengaged from natural processes. We are predators, just as many other animals are.
03:50 PM on 02/22/2009
You have no idea what I was referring to. I am speaking of true farmers; those that scarifice to bring life into the world; stay up all night lambing; deliver calves in a blizzard; bring the pigs in the kitchen; feed the stock before themselves; you are still talking about death; and I am speaking about how real farmers know how precious and precarious it is; the mircale of birth; turning those eggs in the incubator; and weeping for boththelife of the lost babies but also for the financial loss. and allt he hard work it takes to preserve life; those people know that having to take a life, to survive is none with the greatest reverence. But you missed it, because you haven't ever had to work to keep fragile things alive year after year season after season; so you could survive. As I said this isn't 1915; so you couldn't know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steamboater
Forget hope. Agitate.
12:48 PM on 02/22/2009
Shotguns made for "children"? Guns made for them? It's insane. If this kid commited this murder, he should be tried as an adult. I hate to say it but he's much too dangerous to be let out out when he beomes of adult age. This is not someone I'd want living free for a very long time. That father needs to take some responsibility too because he put a gun into a child's hand. You don't make a man of someone by doing that and then he allowed the gun freely accessible to the kid at any time.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
robiform
if you're commenting, you DO care!
12:43 PM on 02/22/2009
I don't know what the boy's psychological problems are--he obviously has some serious ones. I do know that the fact that he shot the woman, laid the gun down, then got on a bus and went to school (Lord knows what would have happened if he had taken the gun to school!), indicates premeditation which means that he acted as an adult and should be tried as an adult.

Certainly, the father bears a great deal of responsibility for not securing the gun and for not being more attentive to his son. Most kids who display behavioral characteristics that this boy did don't just "snap"; the victim's brother-in-law said that the boy was jealous, so why didn't the father see it?

JulieSA, since you're so fond of guns, perhaps you would have liked to be a neighbor of this family since you have something in common with them! You and the other members of the NRA, who constantly misinterpret the Second Amendment make me ill!
02:08 PM on 02/22/2009
Most of my neighbors have guns, and most of them hunt. All of them are outstanding individuals and even civic leaders, with nice children.

I would not like to live next door to a dysfunctional family with psychological problems whether they had guns or not.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MamaBird62
12:32 PM on 02/22/2009
So many sad facts in this situation - though of course Jordon hasn't been found guilty. That house looks depressing, maybe it's the season. Was Jordon responsible for getting the 8 year old and himself ready for school alone while Mom/girlfriend sleeps? I know it's exhausting to be 8 months along, but where is Dad? Who made sure they were safely on the bus? Ate breakfast?
One of the first things mental health pros working with kids will say is make sure there is no access to weapons, as the child could be a danger to himself or others. Most parents keep weapons out of reach as a matter of common sense. If a child is making threats, as Jordon was, the first thing to go should be the gun. Wonder if Jordon had assaulted other kids, or tortured animals? Relatives described him as rough. One thing is for sure, there are always warning signs and those must have been ignored by a variety of adults. How did he do at school?
If Jordon lived most of his life as an only child with Dad and Grandma, as another story said, then suddenly was moved in with Dad's pregnant girlfriend and her other children, that could trigger some negative emotion in even the healthiest child.
Parents, please think about what you're doing with your child's living situation. This tragic situation is extremely rare; but anxious, depressed children from dysfunctional homes are all too common.
12:29 PM on 02/22/2009
I am so proud of this group of posters that have not given in to respond to the teee arrr ohhh ellll
12:08 PM on 02/22/2009
The larger issue here is the response of many gun owners to incidents like this, as it pertains to gun laws, or the lack of them. Unfortunately incidents like this happen fairly often in some of the most pro-gun parts of the country. And when they happen the neighbors will display their obligatory show of sympathy only to then privately allow the NRA or some extremist talk show host convince them that this was a singular event, an "accident, and that the "libs" are waiting at the gate to confiscate ALL of their guns. It becomes "us vs them," nothing changes, and incidents like this are repeated, over and over.
12:25 PM on 02/22/2009
As a gunowner, my response to this is based on statistics, not on anecdote. These incidents are very rare, which is why they make national news when they happen.

Children who own guns legally have a lower crime rate than those who don't, and hunters have a low crime rate. The murder rate is high in certain inner city areas where gangs prevail. If you want to reduce the crime rate, you should focus your efforts on where the crime is happening, and who is committing those crimes. This is based on science, not faith or emotion.
12:51 PM on 02/22/2009
No, your response was complete baseless. Statistics you say? The 20 states with the highest per capita rate of firearms death are as follows: 1 - Alaska, 2 - Louisiana, 3 - Wyoming, 4 - Arizona, 5 - Nevada, 6 - Mississippi, 7 - New Mexico, 8 - Arkansas, 9 - Alabama, 10 - Tennessee, 11 - West Virginia, 12 - Montana, 13 - South Carolina, 14 - North Carolina, 15 - Georgia, 16 - Kentucky, 17 - Oklahoma, 18 - Missouri, 19 - Idaho, 20 - Colorado.

Next time do a little research before you make ridiculous claims that are not supported by facts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steamboater
Forget hope. Agitate.
12:55 PM on 02/22/2009
If numbers count for you JulieSA then one is enough. How many people have to be shot to death for you to realize that?
11:55 AM on 02/22/2009
For less than 1% of Americans, hunting is necessary for survival. Wishes to them for a successful securing of food via the hunt since they can't get food through other means.

For the rest -- those who go into the already-diminished habitat that animals call home and get a big charge out of blowing away a defenseless, living "target" -- there is a particular desensitization and devaluation of life. Among _most_ of these people, the side-effects don't manifest as killing of a human... There are different gray areas and gradations of sociopathy.
12:20 PM on 02/22/2009
I have to lean towards your view; I rarely provide personal anecdotes, but I grew up susbsistence hunting; meat for the table; a neccessity. We could argue all day of the santitation of death as it pertains to our food supply; meat eaters v vegetarians; etc. But having come from a culture of both hunting and ranching; there is still a huge difference in the psychopathy of the stalking and killing of wild animals for sport and the raising and methodical slaughter for human survival.(though it may or may not make much difference to the animal) Contrary to what some city dwellers may think; many ranchers and farmers are NOT hunters. Those two endeavors do not go, neccessarily, hand in hand.
What is even more disturbing is the sport of killing ground hogs / prarie dogs for pure sport by the thousands. people drive for thousnads of miles , fill up hotels to kill as many as they can in the shortest amount of time. I have always viewed these people with a cautious eye. Even in subsistence cultures; not eating what you kill was considered a "sin". Respect for living things is evidently not "universal"
12:45 PM on 02/22/2009
Excellent, thoughtful post. Thankyou for your articulating perspective.

My father's family subsistence hunted and trapped also. My father put up the gun when he realized he was squirrel shooting out of habit, not need, and found it repulsive.
02:39 PM on 02/22/2009
In some ways I agree with you, but if rural economies didn't have the income from sport hunting, there'd be a lot more ugly subdivisions paving over wildlife habitat. Hunting is a legitimate sport that millions of normal people engage in. Not all hunters are ethical, but neither are all people engaged in other activities.
12:21 PM on 02/22/2009
Hunters have put more money into conservation than most groups have.
12:43 PM on 02/22/2009
And the what that says is essentially "We won't decimate your home but we're going to slaughter a bunch of you in return for that".

Anyway, your statement is a factual fallacy. For example:

"Hunters contribute to hunting. Hunters contribute money to hunting in various ways, let's examine them.

Hunting licenses and state stamps. These are sold and the money collected at the state level. The states use 71% of the funds generated by these sources to enforce the hunting regulations of the states (Iowa DNR studies). The remainder are used to improve and maintain state lands for hunting use. Cleaning up after the hunting season, providing parking areas, and even stocking game on state lands for hunters to kill. Illinois stocks pheasants on 8 state parks for hunter's exclusive use as targets. The parks are closed to other uses during the hunting season. Ed Rodniak, manager of the Chain O' Lakes State Park in Lake Co., IL states that carryover (survival) of the birds is "0 %". Those that are not killed by hunters die of exposure to the elements. These are pen raised, hand fed birds."
http://www.animalfrontline.nl/jagen/myths.php

These fees, then, become reimbursement to the states for regulating and catering to the hunters. It is not "for the wildlife".
01:22 PM on 02/22/2009
Provide a link for that, or are you just pulling "facts" out of some orofice?