More

A feel-good Oscar ceremony for the recession era

JOCELYN NOVECK   02/23/09 04:46 PM ET   AP

Slumdog

Maybe it was the adorable smile on that "Slumdog Millionaire" kid in his pint-sized tuxedo.

Or best director winner Danny Boyle bouncing in silly tribute to Tigger of "Winnie the Pooh."

The grinning, top-hatted dad of best actress winner Kate Winslet, whistling like a champion to get his daughter's attention.

Or an entire crowd standing together in remembrance of Heath Ledger.

This year's Oscar telecast was striking for its many feel-good themes and moments _ and perhaps exactly what we needed from a recession-era awards show.

Certainly, it was a notable contrast to last year, when darkness and cynicism ruled the nominated films, capped by best picture winner "No Country for Old Men," about a homicidal sociopath. The collective subject matter was so bleak that host Jon Stewart was inspired to say of "Juno," the one comedy: "Thank goodness for teen pregnancy!"

This year's host, Hugh Jackman, had no such trouble. He presided over a show filled with Cinderella themes both fictional and real-life. And none was more poignant than that of the night's big winner, "Slumdog Millionaire," with its story of love triumphing over desperate poverty, criminality and pure evil.

Lost on no one at Hollywood's Kodak Theatre, of course, was the Cinderella-like story of the movie itself, which nearly became a victim of the tanking economy and was headed for a direct-to-DVD release before News Corp.'s Fox Searchlight stepped in to distribute it.

And there were the many personal stories of those involved in the film. As the cast stood onstage after winning the best picture award, the cameras focused briefly on a beatifically smiling Azharuddin Mohammed Ismail, 10, one of the children who'd been whisked to the Oscars from a desperately poor neighborhood on the outskirts of Mumbai, where he lives in a lean-to made of plastic tarpaulins and blankets. One can only imagine how the moment must have felt for his friends and family back home.

It fell to Simon Beaufoy, who won for the film's adapted screenplay, to make the link between our troubled times and the film's appeal.

"It's come out at a time when the value of money, which has been raised to this extraordinary height, is suddenly being shown to be a kind of very shallow thing," Beaufoy said. "The financial markets are crashing around the world, and a film comes out which is ostensibly about being a millionaire. Actually ... it's a film that says there's more important things than money: love, faith and family."

It was a different family _ that of the late Heath Ledger _ that brought tears to many eyes in the most emotional moment of the ceremony, no less affecting because it was expected: Ledger's posthumous Oscar for his diabolical Joker in "The Dark Knight."

The entire theater rose along with Ledger's relatives to pay tribute to this deeply talented actor who died last year at age 28, of an accidental prescription drug overdose. They heard his father express how much Ledger would have wanted to be there.

"This award tonight would have humbly validated Heath's quiet determination to be truly accepted by all you here tonight, his peers within an industry he so loved," said Kim Ledger, Heath Ledger's father.

The moment was lacking only one thing: A look back at Ledger's stunning work as the Joker. The new format for the acting awards, with five former winners paying tribute to nominees in short speeches, may have added some touching moments _ Shirley MacLaine telling Anne Hathaway that she had a great future was one of them _ but it took away the film clips, an omission some found glaring.

"You've got all these wonderful images _ so let's see this stuff on screen!" said Jonathan Kuntz, a historian at UCLA's film school. "They could have done a better job selling their films by actually showing them. Not everyone has seen these movies."

The ratings support that view _ bigger and more mainstream movies always draw higher Oscar ratings, and though viewership was up by more than 4 million this year, at 36.3 million, there are still only two Oscar telecasts on record with fewer viewers, according to Nielsen Media Research.

Last year, when "No Country For Old Men" won best picture, the telecast was seen by 32 million people, the lowest on record. The 2003 telecast, with "Chicago" as the best picture winner, was seen by 33 million.

But back to the sweet moments, which came in some unexpected places. Certainly there was no Cinderella story in "The Reader," the tale of an unrepentant Nazi guard played by Kate Winslet.

But Winslet's win was touching nonetheless _ the popular British actress had been nominated five times previously with no success.

Thanking her parents for their faith in her, she called out, "Dad, whistle or something 'cause then I'll know where you are." And Roger Winslet whistled back _ heartily, for the world to hear.

Unlike the genial Winslet, Sean Penn is known for a somewhat prickly presence. But in keeping with the night, the best actor winner for "Milk" seemed a little, well, softer around the edges, virtually apologizing for some of his trademark brashness.

"I want it to be very clear that I do know how hard I make it to appreciate me, often," Penn said, to laughter. He went on to make a passionate plea for legalization of same-sex marriages.

Penn's portrayal of slain gay rights leader Harvey Milk was striking partly because the character was so much sweeter _ and full of smiles _ than many he's played before. His performance was so convincing that it gave Penn's friend, Robert DeNiro, one of the night's best comic lines.

"How did he do it?" DeNiro asked as he introduced Penn in the best actor category. "How for so many years did Sean Penn get all those jobs playing straight men?"

But for lines that epitomized the feel-good nature of the 81st Academy Awards, one could do no better than 43-year-old Indian composer A.R. Rahman, who won Oscars for both original soundtrack and original song from "Slumdog Millionaire."

"All my life, I had a choice of hate and love," Rahman said.

"I chose love, and I'm here."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST ENTERTAINMENT

Maybe it was the adorable smile on that "Slumdog Millionaire" kid in his pint-sized tuxedo. Or best director winner Danny Boyle bouncing in silly tribute to Tigger of "Winnie the Pooh."...
Maybe it was the adorable smile on that "Slumdog Millionaire" kid in his pint-sized tuxedo. Or best director winner Danny Boyle bouncing in silly tribute to Tigger of "Winnie the Pooh."...
Filed by Katherine Thomson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 177
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
11:10 PM on 02/23/2009
Congratulations to Danny Boyle and his team on their well-deserved wins at the Oscars for Slumdog. I believe this golden opportunity of global interest in child poverty should not be wasted. Instead, it should spur the Slumdog director to set up a foundation with some of the proceeds from the film to champion the cause of poor children with UNICEF in South Asia and the rest of the world.
Please visit http://www.riazhaq.com/2009/02/can-slumdogs-success-improve-lives-of.html for more on this.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:43 PM on 02/23/2009
Penn would not have won if it hadn't been for the PROP 8 loss. He has that to thank...but he forgot.
11:58 PM on 02/23/2009
Thanks for letting us in on the conspiracy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fedupinfla
In a kennel full of dogs, I bark the loudest
04:50 PM on 02/24/2009
Wow...you mean his acting had nothing to do with it?!?!?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ProudLiberalDan
Standing up an fighting conservatives since 1987
12:16 PM on 02/23/2009
While I was rooting for Penn and others were rooting for Rourke (and I know people who were rooting for Langella and Jenkins), I think it is really silly and unnecessary to have a competition for one Oscar, to come up with a "best", when these performances are often completely and totally different in different genres. Why come up with a "winner" and make other people doing the work of their lives "losers"?

Why couldn't Penn AND Rourke (and Langella and Jenkins) BOTH receive an Oscar for the merits of their performances? All five of those actresses gave Oscar worthy performances (plus the non-nominated Sally Hawkins and Kristin Scott-Thomas). Would giving out seven Oscars be beyond the pale? Why make it a competition with hurt feelings?

I know it will never change, but I just don't understand why the Academy has to be so miserly with its recognition?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fedupinfla
In a kennel full of dogs, I bark the loudest
04:52 PM on 02/24/2009
The recognition comes from being nominated...Next thing you know, you'll want both teams to win a trophy at the Superbowl !!!!
12:03 PM on 02/23/2009
in the history

1956 best movie: stanley kubrick’s “the killingâ€
1957 best movie: stanley kubrick’s “paths of gloryâ€
1960 best movie: stanley kubrick’s “spartacusâ€
1962 best movie: stanley kubrick’s “lolitaâ€
1964 best movie: stanley kubrick’s “doctor strangelove or…â€
1968 best movie: stanley kubrick’s “2001: a space odysseyâ€
1971 best movie: stanley kubrick’s “a clockwork orangeâ€
1975 best movie: stanley kubrick’s “barry lyndonâ€
1980 best movie: stanley kubrick’s “the shiningâ€
1987 best movie: stanley kubrick’s “full metal jacketâ€
1999 best movie: stanley kubrick’s “eyes wide shutâ€

oscar: stanley kubrick never won one personally

end of the issue
11:40 AM on 02/23/2009
For all it's worth, I saw all the contenders and I thought Benjamin Button was the best movie. I thought "Slumdog" was a good movie but sparse and small in certain ways. It's the kind of movie that if you go in not expecting much you'd be pleasantly surprised... I expect a lot of folks going out to see the winner for best motion picture are going to be a bit disappointed.

I think that "Button" will join films like "Shawshank" that hold up best over time.
11:00 AM on 02/23/2009
As you may realize by my (nick)name, I am a movie fan and haven't missed an Oscar for the past 40 years at least. This was one of the best shows of all and it was also one of the best prize-wise. I would have hated for Mickey Rourke to get another best performance for this Wrestler... Sean Penn was and incredible as Milk, but as an "oldie" I loved Frank Langella's Nixon, it was a superb performance to those of us that knew the original character....
10:11 AM on 02/23/2009
The Oscars are always a bore frest but at least this time they gave the Big Award to a great movie.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:05 AM on 02/23/2009
I thought it was a pretty lovely awards show - compared to past years what with all the flash bling Vegas style hysterics.

Was cute, funny and as intimate as it can be in a venue such as the Kodak theater.

My favorite moments were Hugh Jackman and Anne Hathaway and Tina Fey/Steve Martin presenting the screenplay awards. Awesome.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
azyuwish
it will be azyuwish
09:22 AM on 02/23/2009
I did not see the Oscars, why bother when you can get the highlights and re-cap the day after? ;-)

I am THRILLED that Kate Winslet won Best Actress! She has been my favorite actress for a LONG time. I loved her in "Holy Smoke" and "Hideous Kinky" and of COURSE she is the quintessential Marianne in "Sense and Sensibility". Nobody tops her in that role. I've not yet seen
The Reader nor "Revolutionary Road" but I will soon.

Congratulations Kate! It's doubtful that you read these blog comments but I am sending it out to the ethers......
09:17 AM on 02/23/2009
The Movie Academy folks just have no guts...always voting for the safe choices.

Sorry, but Mickey Rourke should have won. Sean Penn can act. We all know that. But come on, Mickey R's acting was a revelation.

Overall, this wasn't a great year in movies.
09:10 AM on 02/23/2009
Yes another Indian Film preferably in Bengali please Danny
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MNTom
09:09 AM on 02/23/2009
Some people on this site needs to go to the GOP site, your Hatred is amazing. Heath deserved that Oscar. Just all everyone has an opinion, but must some of you be so hateful. I guess "Liberals" are no better then the Right.
photo
TheBaffler
a long the riverrun
09:14 AM on 02/23/2009
What does politics have to do with it? He didn't deserve to win, it was a pity vote. He wouldn't have even been nominated if a cultish obsession with him hadn't arose after his death. It's a matter of aesthetics, not politics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
09:34 AM on 02/23/2009
Heath Ledger was a great actor, and people with 'moral sensibilities' are perhaps not the best judges of Art.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MNTom
10:51 AM on 02/23/2009
WRONG!!! Micheal Caine right after shooting Dark Knight started selling Heath for an OSCAR. Read the 2008 Primere Magazine. It came out right before Heath's death. I read the story the day Heath died. Just LOOK it up.
photo
NealHib
The war on drugs is a corporate war
09:04 AM on 02/23/2009
Way to go Sean!

Another film that we won't get to see in Wyoming along with Sicko, W, Religulous....
08:43 AM on 02/23/2009
Heath Ledger won Best Supporting??? Love The Dark Knight, thought Ledger was a great Joker, but Oscar worthy??? Come on guys, this is alittle PC I think.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LiberalBuzz
Voting republican is voting against America.
08:02 AM on 02/23/2009
Mickey was robbed.

Didn't agree with any of them.