McConnell Won't Call For Earmark Ban In Omnibus Budget

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

February 24, 2009 03:16 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) twice declined to call for all earmarks to be stripped from the omnibus spending bill now before Congress.

"What we need to do is shrink the overall size of the pie," said McConnell when asked if he would call for an earmark ban. "The overall size of this bill is too large. We ought to shrink it down to the size it should be, which is eight percent less than it is now."

The reporter followed up: "And the earmarks?"

"Well, you can haggle about what's in it, but the pie is too big," he said. "And rather than focus on the pieces of the pie, the thing to do is to shrink the pie down."

Republicans in the House have generally taken a strong stand against earmarks, but in the Senate's more collegial atmosphere, the congressional prerogative is more often defended. Senators on both sides of the aisle point out that the Constitution gives Congress the power to appropriate funds -- and it's a power they are loath to give up.

That can drive the GOP base nuts. Erick Erickson, editor of the conservative blog RedState, told the Huffington Post that he was "not surprised Senator McConnell would not call for earmarks to come out. He just ran a re-election campaign themed on bringing home the bacon. There has not been a real commitment on either side of the aisle to clean up the culture of corruption in Washington -- just words."

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), at a press conference after McConnell's, strongly defended the congressional right to direct funds to particular projects, otherwise known as earmarking.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) twice declined to call for all earmarks to be stripped from the omnibus spending bill now before Congress. "What we need to do is shrink the overall si...
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) twice declined to call for all earmarks to be stripped from the omnibus spending bill now before Congress. "What we need to do is shrink the overall si...
 
Comments
71
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

Reagan would also turn to dessert talk when asked an economics question he wanted to dodge. At least Republicans are being consistent in their hero worship.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 AM on 02/25/2009
- bibb I'm a Fan of bibb 8 fans permalink

Why does Mitch get anything? He is on the minority side, and hasn't backed a single idea that the Obama administration has advocated. Why are the dems awarding him by keeping his pet projects? The dems need to develop a backbone and slap the hands that slap them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 PM on 02/24/2009
- mommadona I'm a Fan of mommadona 161 fans permalink
photo

Oh dear...it'­s hard when you're used to 'leading' while dancing...­.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TytGOeiW0aE

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 PM on 02/24/2009
- maxfax I'm a Fan of maxfax 18 fans permalink

The GOP is pathetic don't you think? They talk one way, act another. It's how you spell hypocrite, GOP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 PM on 02/24/2009
- SPQR1775 I'm a Fan of SPQR1775 52 fans permalink

THE REPUBLICANS ARE HYPOCRITES!!

The GOP has never met an earmark it didn't like, nor a CEO nor anyone name Big Business, Lobbyist, Fanatical Christians, Palin, Jindal, Romney, Cantor, McCain, McConnell, Blount, Bunting, Coburn, Cornyn, Bachman and the list goes on and on and on. All path of the corruption, scandal legacy. Jindal too is such a tool, Jindal act like the last 8 years did not happen, but then again so is the denial of all things GOP. In a few short months they will blame President Obama for launching wars in two theaters when President OBAMA is cleaing up the mess of the GOP which will actually take a while. Americans are hopeful and want CHANGE ane President O will ensure that the next 24 years of continual CHANGE will usher in another 100 years of American Democratic ideals. The GOP under any future name will still be a "white bigoted racist and ignorant" elitist party with no compass of ethics, sprituality or morals. Time to wipe out the GOP!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:46 PM on 02/24/2009
- mcantwell I'm a Fan of mcantwell 411 fans permalink
photo

President Obama needs to get his VETO pen ready.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 PM on 02/24/2009
- blood1 I'm a Fan of blood1 12 fans permalink

In 2008, McConnell ONLY sent home $15Million in earmarks - what a responsible guy! and now you know why he wants to keep this process alive and well...whi­le blocking all national legislation!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 02/24/2009
- idisVA I'm a Fan of idisVA 39 fans permalink

You beat me to it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 02/24/2009

THE REPUBLICANS ARE HYPOCRITES!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:30 PM on 02/24/2009
- VJ2008 I'm a Fan of VJ2008 22 fans permalink

I guess my new nickname for him is Hypocrit

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:59 PM on 02/24/2009
- deeppeace I'm a Fan of deeppeace 53 fans permalink
photo

I never knew ol' Mitch was such a good tap dancer!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:43 PM on 02/24/2009
- slarabee I'm a Fan of slarabee 27 fans permalink
photo

Could anyone tell me what part of this bill contains the earmarks? There are more sections than I care to read.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:23 PM on 02/24/2009
- Melizzy I'm a Fan of Melizzy 17 fans permalink

It doesn't matter. Most earmarks are necessary infrastructure spending. Except when they are bridges to nowhere or handouts to donors. Like the ketchup tasting. But earmarks in general aren't bad - it's just a talking point on the right. Who ask for the most. (See Palin, Sarah)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 02/24/2009
photo

It's actually a talking point for both parties, and yes, that does include the current president.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 PM on 02/24/2009
photo

A little myopic, aren't we? Earmarks hardly ever contain anything but pork, that's why they are earmarks and not budgetary items that get voted on! You need a real dose of reality and education!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:16 PM on 02/24/2009
- afram1 I'm a Fan of afram1 8 fans permalink
photo

I can't agree with that...a lot of McConnell's earmarks have positively built up the infrastructure (new library annex & facilities, growth of political science department) of the University of Louisville.

Like it or not, earmarks are a means that congresspeople can point to as being responsive to their constituents.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 AM on 02/25/2009
- afram1 I'm a Fan of afram1 8 fans permalink
photo

Rather, I agree that earmarks are not necessarily bad things.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:41 AM on 02/25/2009
photo

http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer?pagename=reports_pigbook2007
Citizens against Governement Waste

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 02/24/2009
- Nancy84 I'm a Fan of Nancy84 12 fans permalink

Time to give the President line item veto power?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 02/24/2009

He actually campaigned on earmarks, saying he was the only one who could bring the pet projects to his district. OF COURSE he won't rule them out

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 02/24/2009
- tbonehead I'm a Fan of tbonehead 11 fans permalink

McConnell is the most boring lier in government; gee he's boring!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 02/24/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect