Reid: Congressional Budget Increased To Pay GOP Staffers

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

February 25, 2009 12:04 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

More than 2,000 employers laid off more than 50 workers each in January, the Labor Department reported Wednesday.

One workplace, however, wasn't on the list: the U.S. Congress.

A ten percent increase in the budget for Congressional operations was needed because Senate Republicans wanted to retain previous staff levels despite having lost roughly 20 percent of their ranks in the 2008 elections, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said Wednesday.

Congressional Republicans have been pouncing on any instance of wasteful spending they can find, but the congressional-operations line item will likely remain safe from their ire.

The one-tenth hike brings the budget for Congress itself to $4.4 billion.

Reid, asked about the increase at a press conference, initially dodged the question, speaking instead about spending in general.

The unsatisfied reporter repeated the question about a ten percent raise for the congressional budget. "How is that going to help get out of the depression?" she pressed.

Don't blame us, said Reid.

Story continues below

"We had a situation -- you should direct that question to Senator McConnell," he said, referring to the Senate Minority Leader, "because we had trouble organizing this year. He wanted to maintain a lot of their staffing even though they had lost huge numbers. And the only way we could get it done is to do what we did. So you should direct that question to Senator McConnell."

A GOP leadership aide said it's unfair to blame Republicans for the increase. "I just don't know how they can get away with blaming us for that 10 percent figure," he wrote in an e-mail. "Republicans aren't getting a dime more in committee money for staff than we got last year. The entire pot of funding used to operate Senate committees and other 'inquiries and investigations' is around 3 percent of the total ($137 million of $4.4 billion). And the increase from last year's funding for the 'inquiries and investigations' account is less than 2/10ths of 1 percent of the entire bill."

He added: "For perspective: all Senate operations funding increased 7 percent, the House funding increased 7.5 percent and the Architect of the Capitol funding increased 28 percent."

A Democratic leadership aide, however, said the fact that "Republicans aren't getting a dime more" misses the point, noting that while they aren't getting extra, they aren't getting less, either, even though they have far fewer members.

"This would be funny if it wasn't from someone associated with the the so-called party of fiscal responsibility," wrote the aide. "This is the height of hypocrisy and utterly fails to acknowledge the fact that in the past, when the spread has been like it is now, the minority party gets far less money than what they eventually got. It was an unprecedented deal that is more outrageous when you realize that they will end up voting against the bill."

More than 2,000 employers laid off more than 50 workers each in January, the Labor Department reported Wednesday. One workplace, however, wasn't on the list: the U.S. Congress. A ten percent increa...
More than 2,000 employers laid off more than 50 workers each in January, the Labor Department reported Wednesday. One workplace, however, wasn't on the list: the U.S. Congress. A ten percent increa...
 
Comments
2843
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (40 pages total)
photo

"Just to correct Rumple's "failing" memory, he used mongreI to describe anyone of mixed race then later tried to excuse it by saying, "Oh, I call myself mongreI all the time!""

Still waiting punks, and posters that bought in.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 PM on 02/25/2009
- coyote4 I'm a Fan of coyote4 70 fans permalink
photo

So am I.

It is easy to condemn and accuse, but without substantiating evidence and arguments, your words are nothing more than chauvinistic OPINION.

Apologies are in order here, especially from those who made claims to work from REASON and LOGIC. Come up with evidence or excuse yourself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:59 PM on 02/25/2009
- Kiba I'm a Fan of Kiba 71 fans permalink
photo

I'm not following this little drama, but I am reminded of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66KQThJ5Jpg

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:10 PM on 02/25/2009
- Dave27 I'm a Fan of Dave27 31 fans permalink

Servers are really runnin' Ole Republican tonight.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:48 PM on 02/25/2009
photo

Do you give them a tip?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 PM on 02/25/2009
- Dave27 I'm a Fan of Dave27 31 fans permalink

Thought you took care of that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 02/25/2009
- Chillinout I'm a Fan of Chillinout 125 fans permalink
photo

This comment is pending approval and won't be displayed until it is approved.

Ohiomark:

You know what. I just looked up the definition of earmark. I always thought it was the same as po_rk. I was wrong:

verb [ trans. ]
1 (usu. be earmarked) designate (something, typically funds or resources) for a particular purpose : the new money will be earmarked for can_cer research.

So you are almost right. There are, (I know because I counted them), 7775 earmarks. (I can even break them down into the categories they are in). That is money that is being given for a particular purpose. In other words, they are designating what every single penny is going to be spent on. I see that as transparency. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:43 PM on 02/25/2009
- SurferKit I'm a Fan of SurferKit 179 fans permalink
photo

You sly dog, you. Got him with that one, didn't you?

:-)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:50 PM on 02/25/2009
- Chillinout I'm a Fan of Chillinout 125 fans permalink
photo

hehehe

Never mess with the Chillmaster.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 PM on 02/25/2009
- Chillinout I'm a Fan of Chillinout 125 fans permalink
photo

Ohiomark:

You know what. I just looked up the definition of earmark. I always thought it was the same as pork. I was wrong:

verb [ trans. ]
1 (usu. be earmarked) designate (something, typically funds or resources) for a particular purpose : the new money will be earmarked for cancer research.

So you are almost right. There are, (I know because I counted them), 7775 earmarks. (I can even break them down into the categories they are in). That is money that is being given for a particular purpose. In other words, they are designating what every single penny is going to be spent on. I see that as transparency. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

And the three things you mentioned are for the benefit of ALL Americans.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 PM on 02/25/2009
- Chillinout I'm a Fan of Chillinout 125 fans permalink
photo

This is going to be a double post^

Sorry. :-(

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 PM on 02/25/2009
- hardybear I'm a Fan of hardybear 78 fans permalink
photo

It was worthy of a double take, no worries. :)

The career disgruntled need to acknowledge where municipal and state
funding often come from: federal "earmarks".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 PM on 02/25/2009
- lj9283 I'm a Fan of lj9283 67 fans permalink
photo

An "earmark" refers to any element of a spending bill that allocates money for a very specific thing, a given project, or location, or institution.

For example, if Congress passed a budget that gave a certain amount of money to the National Park Service as a whole, no one would consider it an earmark.

But if Congress added a line to the budget specifying that some of that money must go toward the preservation of a specific single building that is in the National Park Service the designation of funds for that specific single building would be an earmark.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 PM on 02/25/2009
- Chillinout I'm a Fan of Chillinout 125 fans permalink
photo

The definition from the Oxford dictionary is up there in my post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 PM on 02/25/2009
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1645 fans permalink
photo

Exactly. Furthermore, not all earmarks are wasteful. I know some fantastic space/defense related research and development taking place using earmarks, in areas that are so far out that it is difficult to convince others of their potential usefulness. Yet, if successful, those efforts would revolutionalize the field.

Sure, there are also wasteful earmarks. But earmarks are typically about 1% of the budget. We should eliminate waste, but eliminating earmarks is not going to give us a balanced budget.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:49 PM on 02/25/2009
- ohiomark I'm a Fan of ohiomark 126 fans permalink

Earmarks are used to buy votes.

You know it and I know it.

It's a practice that has been going on for a long time in Washington and at the state and local levels. Politicans are spending our money at an alarming rate and most of the time it is in the cover of darkness(so to speak) by slipping these earmarks into bills without open debate on the floor of Congress. The practice is wrong, no matter which party is running the show.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 PM on 02/25/2009
photo

so what was slipped into the bill w/o debate?

Are you saying no one knew about the money for the Smithsonian?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:03 PM on 02/25/2009
- OMG1 I'm a Fan of OMG1 23 fans permalink
photo

Reid is pastey, wimpy, and spineless. I want a new Majority Leader with big giant swinging ***** that he can use to knock around the GOP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 PM on 02/25/2009
photo

And you are?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 02/25/2009
- OMG1 I'm a Fan of OMG1 23 fans permalink
photo

huh?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 PM on 02/25/2009
- Dave27 I'm a Fan of Dave27 31 fans permalink

Come on PR, Reid could be tougher.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:45 PM on 02/25/2009
- OMG1 I'm a Fan of OMG1 23 fans permalink
photo

Reid is pastey, wimpy, and spineless. I want a new Majority Leader with big giant swinging cajones that he can use to knock around the GOP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 PM on 02/25/2009
- SweetBabu I'm a Fan of SweetBabu 100 fans permalink
photo

I agree

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 PM on 02/25/2009
- coyote4 I'm a Fan of coyote4 70 fans permalink
photo

Coyote: "Shall we agree that when someone is feeling insulted by another's personal attack, and asks for an apology, that the attacker should apologize?"

~
I guess not. There is little couth in the users here. so I guess we just keep b.eating each other up as per our chauvinistic prejudices ...

too bad. a little decorum could go a long way

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 02/25/2009
- forpeace I'm a Fan of forpeace 342 fans permalink
photo

coyote4
----------

If I agree with you .......... will you stop posting the same story?!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 PM on 02/25/2009
- coyote4 I'm a Fan of coyote4 70 fans permalink
photo

no

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 PM on 02/25/2009
- coyote4 I'm a Fan of coyote4 70 fans permalink
photo

See? no one cares. No manners. No decorum. No couth.

No humanity: animals, prigs and e.vildoers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 PM on 02/25/2009
- OMG1 I'm a Fan of OMG1 23 fans permalink
photo

Reid is pastey, wimpy, and spineless. I want a new Majority Leader will big giant swinging cajones that he can use to knock around the GOP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 02/25/2009
- rockyb26 I'm a Fan of rockyb26 130 fans permalink
photo

52 million tuned in for last night's address. that's 12 million more than Bush's first address

http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/audience-estimates-for-president-obamas-address-to-joint-session-of-congress/

that's change i can believe in

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 02/25/2009
- Dave27 I'm a Fan of Dave27 31 fans permalink

I'd bet those prelims are low numbers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:47 PM on 02/25/2009
- AdLib I'm a Fan of AdLib 277 fans permalink
photo

Rumplestiltskin See Profile I'm a Fan of Rumplestiltskin I'm a fan of this user permalink

Wrongo Hume. Never called the president a "mongrel", I was talking about myself, and maybe my god daughter that is mixed.
I am a "mongrel" Hume. I take pride in America being a country of "mongrels" that just love the country. Try again, and BTW, post the comment, not your synopsis, if you want to attack me.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 PM on 02/25/2009

============================

Just to correct Rumple's "failing" memory, he used mongreI to describe anyone of mixed race then later tried to excuse it by saying, "Oh, I call myself mongreI all the time!"

As usual, if Rumple's typing, he's Iying.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 PM on 02/25/2009
photo

link, and context, punk

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 02/25/2009
photo

I remember that...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 PM on 02/25/2009
- SurferKit I'm a Fan of SurferKit 179 fans permalink
photo

Yep. Me too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 PM on 02/25/2009
photo

Well, you peons really need to find it, and jack with me then. I know I'm not a r.acist, so you get to prove it instead of just throwing out accusations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:42 PM on 02/25/2009
- coyote4 I'm a Fan of coyote4 70 fans permalink
photo

Please offer evidence when making such serious charges

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 02/25/2009
photo

Hmmm. cat got your lying tongue?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:38 PM on 02/25/2009
- HumeSkeptic I'm a Fan of HumeSkeptic 1645 fans permalink
photo

OK. Now I remember that.
Yes, it wasn't quite that innocent as calling himself something.
.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 PM on 02/25/2009
photo

Okay Hume. Find it, and get back to me. I am a "mongrel", and I like that. Most Americans are. Grep my comments from 2005 until now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 PM on 02/25/2009
- LeeCalif I'm a Fan of LeeCalif 79 fans permalink

Gee Harry, you've finally done something right for a change.

You've made an effective attack against the GOP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 PM on 02/25/2009
- BEHM777 I'm a Fan of BEHM777 13 fans permalink
photo

Stop. Caving. To. The. GOP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 PM on 02/25/2009
photo

OT but ... as anyone seen me puyish?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:27 PM on 02/25/2009
photo

I think it's skulking behind the pillar in the foyer.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 02/25/2009
photo

No but I saw your mind and it's fine.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 PM on 02/25/2009
photo

Play a stupid game where you hit little balls around on the grass, and then make fun of people's names.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 PM on 02/25/2009
- hardybear I'm a Fan of hardybear 78 fans permalink
photo

No, but I'm sure you're outstanding.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:35 PM on 02/25/2009

Palin/Jindal 2012

A vote for a veto proof Democratic majority.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 PM on 02/25/2009
- forpeace I'm a Fan of forpeace 342 fans permalink
photo

DavidGetsInvolved
--------------------

That's a fun ticket .......... we will be laughing for years to come!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 02/25/2009
- jcollell I'm a Fan of jcollell 4 fans permalink

I had that in one of my posts. I guess great minds think alike.

http://www.youspar.com/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 PM on 02/25/2009
- Dave27 I'm a Fan of Dave27 31 fans permalink

Gov Sanford - Rush "may" be an idiot. Tough non-words in the family.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 PM on 02/25/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last » (40 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect