More

Russia To Modernize Its Nuclear Arsenals

VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV   02/25/09 09:18 AM ET   AP

Russia

MOSCOW — Modernization of Russia's strategic nuclear forces is a top priority for the government, a senior Cabinet official said Wednesday.

Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said that upgrading ground, sea and air components of the nation's strategic forces is costly but necessary.

"It's expensive, it's very expensive, but there is no other way," Ivanov told lawmakers in the lower house of parliament. "We will develop and modernize our strategic deterrent forces."

The Kremlin has welcomed Washington's stated intention to intensify arms control talks to negotiate a successor to the pivotal 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or START I, which expires in December. But at the same time, Russian officials continue to emphasize the need for modernization of Russian nuclear forces.

Ivanov said last fall that the government budgeted 1.3 trillion rubles ($36 billion) for weapons purchases this year. The exact figures for spending on each category of weapons, including nuclear forces, were not released.

The military's modernization efforts have gone slowly, despite Kremlin pledges to revive the nation's power and global prestige during what had been eight years of economic growth. The Russian military's weaknesses, such as shortages of precision weapons and modern communications, were spotlighted during its August war with Georgia.

Ivanov told lawmakers Wednesday that other priorities for the military include upgrading the nation's satellite network, modernizing the military's information networks and procuring "smart" weapons.

He said the most important program for the air force is the development of a next-generation fighter jet. Officials said that the new jet is to make a maiden flight this year.

The navy should focus on smaller ships, no bigger than frigates or corvettes, Ivanov said. The statement apparently indicated that authorities have ditched the plans for building new aircraft carriers that they discussed before the current financial crisis set in, draining government coffers.

Ivanov said the spending on new weapons planned for this year will not be cut, despite the financial crisis. He pledged that the government will help provide loans to Russian defense enterprises which have suffered from a severe money crunch.

Sergei Chemezov, the head of Russian Technologies state holding company that includes top arms manufacturers, pushed for more support from the state. He warned that about one-third of enterprises in the holding are on the verge of bankruptcy.

Even before the crisis, officials said defense industries were in desperate condition because of old equipment and aging personnel.

Chemezov said Wednesday that about 80 percent of equipment in Russia's weapons plants is outdated and the average age of their workers is over 50.

"We are nearing an end of safety and survivability margin for the military-industrial complex," Chemezov told lawmakers.

Experts said that a steady decline of Russian arms industries has swelled production costs and eroded quality, jeopardizing government hopes to boost arms sales. Last year, Algeria returned 15 MiG-29 fighter jets it bought from Russia, complaining of their poor quality.

Some experts said that substandard parts were also the main reason behind a series of test failures of Russia's prospective Bulava intercontinental ballistic missile.

The missile, intended to equip Russia's nuclear submarines, has failed in five out of 10 of its test launches, making its deployment prospects uncertain. A new test is tentatively scheduled for March, Russian news reports said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

MOSCOW — Modernization of Russia's strategic nuclear forces is a top priority for the government, a senior Cabinet official said Wednesday. Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said that upgradi...
MOSCOW — Modernization of Russia's strategic nuclear forces is a top priority for the government, a senior Cabinet official said Wednesday. Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said that upgradi...
Filed by Jessica Gusman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
08:31 PM on 02/25/2009
See what happens when you start sabre rattling andbeating the war drums??? Russia, Iran and China are friends now, maybe we should stop with thethreats and try to get along for a change!!!
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
08:27 PM on 02/25/2009
See what happens when you start sabre rattling and beating the war drums??? Russia, Iran and China are friends now, maybe we should stop with the threats and try to get along for a change!!!
02:29 PM on 02/25/2009
Where do you people think russians got their money from to modernize it?

So that's why West needs to be more cautios with russians on making business deals because if they don't here is an example of not predicting what might be down the road.Putin is an old style KGB formula. It's time to have an adequate and consistent policy on Russia
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ZenCrusader
trying to be more zen in a zany world.
01:52 PM on 02/25/2009
OMG here we go again. Never one to trust Russia, who do we think they are planning on using those nukes on ? Madagascar ? El Salvador ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TJCole
01:49 PM on 02/25/2009
Secretary Gates is all for a new generation of Nukes as well, so we're charging full speed backwards...

"The one thing history teaches, is that man learns nothing from history..!"
12:45 PM on 02/25/2009
Sounds like a good time for the USA and Russia to do a bit of nuclear arms reduction, that will
save both countries money, and get us back on a track of cooperation instead of confrontation.
11:14 AM on 02/25/2009
Sounds good Russia. We'll be sure to do the same (if we already haven't).
12:54 PM on 02/25/2009
we are not even sure the nukes will work. Modernization is a must. If your trillion dollar deterrant doesn't work, not much of a deterrent is is?

there are plans in place to modernize our warheads. Scientific American had a good article on the subject in November 2007.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeorgeP922
01:07 PM on 02/25/2009
That will be the day that our 30K nukes all have dead triggers, and the russians get us?

Seriosuly dude, 1981 was a long time ago.

No nation would ever dare to detonate a nuclear explosive.

I bet you support MORE testing, I suggest you read up on nuclear testing, most Americans don't know that we set off thousands of bombs in the ocean, underground, in the air, and in space.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:03 AM on 02/25/2009
Excellent, just what we need.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeorgeP922
10:50 AM on 02/25/2009
Thats Awesome.

The more our adversaries waste on weapons with no use what so ever, the better for America.

With the ammount of oil and natural gas the Russians own, this trillion dollar investment is a nice offset.

I feel sorry for their citizens though.
12:56 PM on 02/25/2009
we will be doing the same. We are not sure that the nukes will even work. The tritium in the triggers breaks down within a few years.

Our deterrant would not be very effective if the enemy did not think our bombs would work...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeorgeP922
01:08 PM on 02/25/2009
Our "Deterrant" is an illusion.

Plus how is it a deterrent when North Korea, Pakistan, Israel, India, South Africa all have nuclear weapons programs?