Genital Mutilation: African Women Risk Lives To Fight For Others

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Genital Mutilation: African Women Risk Lives To Fight For Others stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 02-27-09 01:49 PM   |   Updated: 03-30-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Africa

The female journalist was snatched by members of a secret society, forcibly stripped and made to parade naked through the streets. It might sound like an atrocity from the time when Sierra Leone was ripped apart by a bloody civil war, but in fact the public humiliation was exacted in the diamond-rich eastern town of Kenema just this month. The woman's alleged crime was reporting on female genital mutilation.

While the attack was condemned by media watchdogs as "disgraceful behaviour worthy of a bygone age", one woman who was not surprised was Rugiatu Turay. When she was 12 Ms Turay was stolen away by family members and underwent what some politely refer to as "circumcision". She calls it "torture". For the past six years, she has been waging a war against the practice, which many in Sierra Leone, including senior politicians, see as an initiation rite.

Her organisation, the Amazonian Initiative Movement, tries to protect young girls from the knife. "I picked the name because I am trying to talk about strong, powerful women," she says Ms Turay, who works with her 20-strong staff in and around the northern town of Lunsar. So far, she has persuaded about 400 practitioners of female genital mutiliation (FGM), who are often called soweis, to lay down their blades and stop their role in the traditional bondo ceremony. "Silence means consent. But if you say the truth people listen ... We go to the schools, mosques, everywhere."

As reward for her tenacious efforts, she has received death threats and been attacked by juju men, sometimes armed with magic, sometimes with machetes. She describes a time when more than a hundred people paraded a symbolic corpse outside her home to suggest her own death: "They came right in front of me sharpening their cutlasses."

But so many times has she failed to die, that locals now think she is immune. "Now they believe I have special powers. They do nothing to me."

Ms Turay was mutilated at her aunt's house where she was staying with her three sisters and her cousin. "We didn't even know that we were going to be initiated," she says. "They called me to get water and then outside they just grabbed me."

She was blindfolded, stripped, and laid on the ground. Heavy women sat on her arms, her chest, her legs. Her mouth was stuffed with a rag. Her clitoris was cut off with a crude knife. Despite profuse bleeding she was forced to walk, was beaten and had hot pepper water poured into her eyes.

"My mother had always told me never to let anyone touch me there. I was scared and I tried to fight them off. Nobody talked to me but there was all this clapping, singing, shouting," recalls Ms Turay. "When I tried to walk on the seventh day I could not walk. All they could say is 'Today you have become a woman'."

Story continues below
advertisement

Ms Turay is among the estimated 94 per cent of girls who undergo FGM in Sierra Leone. The practice - which forms part of a ceremony of initiation rites overseen by women-only secret societies such as bondo and sande - can cause severe bleeding, infection, cysts and sometimes death, but is largely ignored.

Reasons for the process vary, but many people cite tradition and culture, saying it is essential preparation for marriage and womanhood; binds communities to each other and to their ancestors; and restricts women's sexual behaviour.

Last year, UN agencies came out strongly against the practice, labelling it "painful and traumatic", a violation of human rights and demanding it be abandoned within a generation. "It has no health benefits and harms girls and women in many ways," said the UN's World Health Organisation (WHO). "The practice causes severe pain and has several immediate and long-term health consequences, including difficulties in childbirth."

Yet many international aid organisations are too scared to do anything about it in public for fear of being labelled cultural imperialists. A recent Sierra Leone child rights bill dropped any mention of FGM at the last minute, and politicians - including President Ernest Bai Koroma - baulk at the mention of the subject.

A decade ago, a female politician who later became the minister for social welfare said: "We will sew the mouths up of those preaching against bondo." More recently, politicians are rumoured to have sponsored mass cutting ceremonies, which can be relatively costly affairs in one of the world's poorest countries, in an effort to secure votes in elections.

"Secret societies have become intertwined with modern political life in Sierra Leone and retain considerable power and influence," wrote the anthropologist Dr Richard Fanthorpe in a paper commissioned by the UN.

When I asked President Koroma - whose country receives more aid per person from Britain than any other donor recipient - about his position on the practice, it was the first time I saw the usually affable leader lost for words. Unable to reach for his usually ubiquitous wide toothy smile, he meandered awkwardly through an answer: "Let people in civil society deal with this issue."

That leaves the fight against FGM, which the WHO says has been conducted on 92 million African girls - and rising by up to three million a year - to the odd brave soul such as Ms Turay. The 26-year-old is among a number of anti-FGM campaigners slowly achieving results. In her effort to keep some safe from cutting, Ms Turay has even adopted 14 children from Sierra Leone and Guinea.

Girls under 15 regularly undergo the cutting and for the newly initiated, it remains a frightening process shrouded in secrecy. "You should not tell anybody about circumcision or else your stomach will swell and you'll die," one young girl who didn't know her age told me quietly in her local Temne language.

Ms Turay hopes her struggle will help break such taboos of talking about the cutting in public, although it may also spur more reactionary moves, such as this month's punishment meted out to the journalist in Kenema. And it is no easy task persuading the practitioners to abandon what they see as a rite of passage. Girls as young as five are trained to become circumcisers and it is an income-generator in a poverty-stricken country, still struggling to shrug off the legacy of the 1991-2002 civil war.

"I didn't like it when it happened to me and I worry about the pain of the girl, but I do it because they pay me, and because we met our ancestors doing it," says practitioner Marion Kanu, 35, whose two children are also practitioners.

Others have seen the error of their ways. "I regret it now," says another sowei who has vowed to stop. But it is not always easy to hang up the knife. One woman practitioner who said she would stop the cutting was kidnapped by members of the bundu society. Both her and her baby were beaten and taken to the bush for three days without food or water; the mother was raped. Her life was saved only by Ms Turay's intervention.

Read more at The Independent.

The female journalist was snatched by members of a secret society, forcibly stripped and made to parade naked through the streets. It might sound like an atrocity from the time when Sierra Leone was r...
The female journalist was snatched by members of a secret society, forcibly stripped and made to parade naked through the streets. It might sound like an atrocity from the time when Sierra Leone was r...
Filed by Jessica Gusman  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
239
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- Fudgefase I'm a Fan of Fudgefase 16 fans permalink
photo

Breaking your wrist falling off a bike is 'painful and traumatic'.
FGM is torture, ongoing and permanent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 03/01/2009

I am not going to pull ANY punches with the ignorant pratts on here who have, despite some protestations to the contrary otherwise, made or implied or hinted at ANY equation between what the post is about, female genital MUTILATION, and male circumcision. There is NO equation between the two, and it is disgusting and self-centred in the extreme that some have tried to take over the discussion here by making such equations. Typical of a certain male mind set. Quelle surprise! What is being talked about here is FGM, a horrific and life altering event. It is a profound life altering mutilation; it is torture, imposed on young girls and young women without their informed choice. It is the REMOVAL of a sexual organ (and therefore the equivalent in males would be castration) and further mutilation. THAT is what is being talked about, that some women are risking their lives to try to put a stop to. If you (pratts) REALLY want to know about what is being talked about here, talk to some African girls and women who have had it done to them against their will or informed consent, ask THEM how THEY feel about it, HOW it has affected their life, WHAT physical, psychological, medical, social and cultural aspects of it THEY would LIKE to discuss with you about it, or not!!!! If you cannot go to Africa to do this, look in your community. Otherwise, shut the hell up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:08 AM on 03/01/2009

posternaut,
Is a "pratt" your rhetorical degradation, firstly, of the people that make the moral argument that genital mutilation is a violation of the physical autonomy of any person? Secondly, Is a "pratt" an "ignorant" male who can not possibly understand the suffing of a woman because he is, prima facie, the author of that suffering? Your anger and indignation lead you astray! The moral argument is all we have in the fight for the sanctity of the physical and phychic autonomy of all persons. I don't think that your last sentence is quite in keeping with the spirit of free inquiry, and free public debate!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:37 AM on 03/01/2009
- rzan1 I'm a Fan of rzan1 55 fans permalink

You sound mighty stupid, Mr. Mack. Now debate that!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:10 PM on 03/01/2009
photo

There seems to be quite a bit of ignorance regarding male and female "circumcisions" and in some cases anatomy.

Female Genital Mutilation­/Circumcis­ion is defined by the WHO as "all procedures that involve partial or total removal of the external female genitalia, or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons". http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/, and at Wikipedia. There are at least 4 recognized types.

Male Circumcision is not an analogous procedure. One poster is correct the majority of males have a congenital phimosis (inability to retract the foreskin), but usually subsides before age 3. A New England Journal of Medicine article shows that circumcised men have a reduced risk of HPV infection and cervical cancer in female partners. Having had the procedure at birth, and performed the procedure I can say that it's a safe and not "butchery".

I agree that forcible FGM/C is a human rights issue, and should be stopped. However, it must be stopped by educating those who do it. One example, I was involved with a student project many years ago, and one student who visited a village in Sudan we were working with began "preaching" how FGM was bad, this prompted the women in the village to rush to get all of their daughters as young as a few months old, not just the 11 year olds, to undergo the procedure for fear it would be banned. That was tragic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:19 PM on 02/28/2009

Thank you for bringing up this experience. Westerners write whatever they want on blogs, about how horrible and barbaric this procedure is. But if we really want to change lives, we must stop with all the dramatic and emotional rhetoric and talk to these communities one-on-one. This is a hard practice to eradicate; in fact it's contagious because for one community to inter-marry with a neighboring one, both must practice FGC. We're working against thousands of years of traditions that pre-date Islam (it's really more linked with ancient Egyptian mythology), so we can't simply tell people they are barbaric and have them listen to us. In fact, why should they listen to us at all? Eradication programs should come from within, be tailored to each ethnic group specifically.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 03/01/2009

I want to make it clear that I do not agree with FGC and would like to see it eradicated. But I've seen it posted that this is a horrible procedure because it deprives women of orgasm. But this is a Western imposition on African values. Could it be that women in other parts of the world value getting married more that sexual pleasure? I'm not saying this is right or wrong or even true...just stop for a minute and contemplate that there are women who do this to their daughters because they love them and fear their daughters will never marry or be accepted into society without it. Don't try to imagine how you would feel if FGC were done to you, because you aren't of that culture and can't imagine all the consequences you would suffer if it weren't done to you. FGC is not a clear cut problem, it's very complicated and must be looked at from many different angles.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 03/01/2009
photo

Excellent comment, I posted a longer response on your blog...but it seems to have disappeared. I applaud you on you work, and think you are definitely on the right track. Western ethnocentric outrage is not the key to eradicating this problem. Some cultures don't even SEE it as a problem. I believe sexual pleasure is universal since it is a physiologic response. Also, since all African cultures are not the same, I can't answer your question about women valuing marriage over orgasm. I will say that since the procedures are performed without informed consent, these women and girls are having a choice forced upon them and not been allowed to make their own. But I understand your point, many women do not have alternative opportunities for survival and depend on marriage in many parts of the world. The mothers and grandmothers who force their daughters into this are looking out for their survival and well being. Simply eradicating it by fiat may even cause more harm. Westerners would pat themselves on the back thinking a good thing was accomplished then turn a blind eye to the aftermath. This is a delicate issue that requires cultural understand, and as you said not just outrage and emotion. Good post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 PM on 03/01/2009
photo

Sierra Leone, the country without a clitoris.
Yikes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:05 PM on 02/28/2009
- BlackYowe I'm a Fan of BlackYowe 58 fans permalink
photo

Until the Muslim community all comes out with full force against this I cannot respect them. I first heard about this practice in the 1980s.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:24 PM on 02/28/2009
- fbr79 I'm a Fan of fbr79 12 fans permalink
photo

The article goes to lenghts not to mention religion, even though it is a determining factor on the practice. Appeasement....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:36 AM on 03/02/2009

Some of you have managed to make opposition to the genital mutilation of women controversial: a truly amazing feat which you seem to have accomplished almost inadvertently! Hdaryl01, at first I suspected that your rage was the result of a poorly performed circumcision, leaving you with a perpetual axe to grind, but I've re-read all of your comments and I have to believe you're sincere. More broadly speaking, the inculcation of the idea that we are all born imperfect and in need of improvement is literally diabolical, intended to keep the human being out of balance and perpetually vulnerable. Simply stating your opposition to the absurdity of genital surgery in all its forms would have been sufficient to make your case, it seems to me; no need to go on a testosterone induced verbal rampage that serves only to alienate the very gender whose mutilation, I thought, we all opposed. That in itself makes me wonder if transforming virtual unanimous agreement on the issue into full blown gender conflict wasn't buried somewhere in your agenda. Since it is circumcised males who still by and large grip the reins of power in this world, it is unseemly when they whine for attention whenever the very real anguish of others gains our attention every so often.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:00 PM on 02/28/2009
photo

I'm opposed to ALL genital mutilation, regardless of gender. And most males around the world aren't circumcised. You have an issue regarding your denial and male suffering. Pointing out a double standard is not a "testosterone rampage." Your alienation at the concept that others find your cause overly narrow is also your own issue, although not yours exclusively.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 02/28/2009
- prudencia I'm a Fan of prudencia 2 fans permalink
photo

watch "the secret pain" a documentary film from kate kendel. it will put all this arguing to rest. it ain't about tradition or culture or any other thing than getting paid.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 PM on 02/28/2009
- whognu I'm a Fan of whognu 6 fans permalink

FGM does not just occur in Africa, although it is predominate in sections of Africa. FGM has been performed in numerous nation and cultures. It is a dangerous custom, capable causing of long-term health complications, even death. It is being seen more frequently in the US, brought in through immigration. The despicable practice gained some noteriety here when a woman filed for asylum to avoid the "procedure." There are different types of FGM from the milder version, which involves a small cut, to the most extreme, which I cannot even describe here in detail. Dirty blades, even broken glass, may be utilized, bearing a very high risk of infection. Education is vital to stopping this vile form of child abuse.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 02/28/2009
- rzan1 I'm a Fan of rzan1 55 fans permalink

It is called infundibulation, the partial or total excision of the female genitalia. Anyone who equates this with male circumcision is ignorant beyond belief.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:58 PM on 02/28/2009

That anyone can, at will, sexually mutilate anyone in the name of whatever abstraction: God,Tradit­ion,Tribal Custom,Sexual Conformity,AIDS Prevention,Hygiene is on its face ludicrous. That male or female victims suffers the greater harm is to totally miss the point:that no one should impose their will upon another human being , without informed consent, in the total absence of coercion, whatever its "rationalization" . That Patriarchal Cultures are intent on controlling behavior by coercion and violence is an historical fact, only made absolutely concrete by this post. rzan1 to be the author of any human suffering is wrong,without question. Your post has clouded the issue,not clarified it!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 PM on 02/28/2009
- rzan1 I'm a Fan of rzan1 55 fans permalink

Did you read the article? It is inflicted on little girls under nonsterile conditions and with no anesthetic of any kind. Sorry, big difference. There is a removal of the possibility of feeling sexual pleasure, which is not what male circumcision is about. I have read your comment carefully, and you are not looking carefully at the issue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:51 PM on 02/28/2009
- NMdonkey I'm a Fan of NMdonkey 3 fans permalink

If pre-adolescent or adolescent males were forced to undergo cirumcision using dirty, crude instruments and nothing for pain, male leaders the world over would be doing everything in their power to stop this. And, while I disagree with circumcising male infants, I think we need to stop applying the same terminology to what is done to girls. When you say "circumcision," it does not have the connotation to address what is really going on. Call it what it is: mutilation, torture, disfigurement and destruction of genitalia.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 PM on 02/28/2009
- NMdonkey I'm a Fan of NMdonkey 3 fans permalink

If pre-adolescent or adolescent males were being forced to undergo circumcision with crude, dirty instruments and nothing for pain, male leaders the world over would be doing everything in their power to stop this. I don't agree with circumcision of male infants, either, but I don't think this (the women's version) should be called "circumcision" because the connotation does not address what is really happening.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 02/28/2009

"If pre-adolescent or adolescent males were being forced to undergo circumcision with crude, dirty instruments and nothing for pain, male leaders the world over would be doing everything in their power to stop this."

Muslim boys are circumcised at age 13, many in the most primitive of circumstances.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:56 PM on 02/28/2009

"If pre-adolescent or adolescent males were forced to undergo cir[c]umcision using dirty, crude instruments and nothing for pain, male leaders the world over would be doing everything in their power to stop this."

This is exactly what happens in much of Africa. 30-40 youths die of it every year in Eastern Cape Province alone. It is hard to argue that any outcome is worse than death. So far as I know the only male leader anywhere doing anything to stop it is the Children's Commissioner for Tasmania.

The Genital Integrity movement is completely opposed to genital cutting of all non-consenting people, as a human rights issue. If we seem more opposed to male circumcision it is only because there are more people defending it. The medical establishment has taken on board the protests of the tiny intersexed community almost without a fight. Female genital cutting is outlawed throughout most of the western world. Yet to point out that male babies are still at the mercy of their parents' whims brings down the wrath of heaven on our heads.

Now a group of articulate circumcised African woman is using that anomaly against FGC opponents, calling them hypocrites and claiming the right to cut their daughters as sons are cut in the west. The simplest way to answer them would be to close that anomaly and grant all our children equal freedom from non-essential genital cutting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:49 PM on 03/08/2009
- papapj I'm a Fan of papapj 29 fans permalink
photo

Who's the cutie-pie with the haunting eyes in the Getty Image above....?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 02/28/2009
- larry278 I'm a Fan of larry278 47 fans permalink

Since Europe & other western nations has people who engage in body modification including tattoos, implated rings on genetialia, incisions into genitalia, etc, I wonder if any western woman or women have gotten African style female circumcisions. Those who modify their bodies delight in exhibiting their modifications & there are sites which post photos & videos of body modifications, such as BMEzine. It's possible, if not probable, that some western women have chosen to be circumcised for aesthetic reasons. That means that we in the west have people who perform female circumcisions despite any laws which prohibit female circumcisions.
We may expect that some western women who have chosen to be circumcised as adults & those who do the circumcisions will assert that they have a right to be circumcised , to have someone circumcise them & those who circumcise consenting adult women will assert that it's their right to circumcise a consenting adult woman. If such cases go to court it will be interesting.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 02/28/2009

This is brilliant. Now, many beyond a certain age may be excused for not comprehending "what is up with all these piercings anyway?" That being said, I know of no women who have, or who would, permanently deprive themselves of the experience of orgasm, even for "aesthetic reasons." The brilliance comes with the second paragraph, where a population of "western women who have chosen to be circumcised as adults" [for "aesthetic reasons ", you'll recall], who had a merely speculative existence in paragraph one, have now been awarded actual existence, are asserting their right to self-mutilation, and are threatening to tie up our judicial system. Yikes! This discussion is proving very illuminating, after all. And papapj, I feel your yearning for attention, so here it is: your comment is not worthy of a human being.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:57 PM on 02/28/2009

I think you make a very good point. Yes, it's called labioplasty - women can now reduce the size of their labia, which is something that is also done in some types of FGC. The difference though, is that adult women make the decision to have such procedures done to themselves. Often, girls in cultures which practice FGC are not asked permission for this to be done to their bodies.

I think Westerners do need to think about the practices they routinely do to their bodies before they condemn FGC. I think it should be eradicated as well, but if we go into other cultures and tell them their 1,000's of years old tradition is wrong, they are NOT going to listen to us.

Think about the things we do which horrify them; breast implants, nursing homes, baby strollers as opposed to carrying your own baby. Why would they listen to us?

Here's a post about my thoughts, more in depth, feel free to comment on the blog:

http://heatherleilamoz.blogspot.com/2008/12/fgc.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 PM on 02/28/2009

larry278.. First of all, those of a certain age should be excused from having to comprehend "what's with all this body piercing, anyway". Having said that, I know of no women who have, or who would, permanently relinquish the potential for clitoral orgasm for "aesthetic reasons." But, and this is brilliant, by paragraph two, this hypothetical pool of "western women who have chosen to be circumcised for aesthetic reasons" have an existence which is no longer hypothetical but actual, are now demanding their right to self-mutilate, and are threatening to tie up the judicial process with frivolous lawsuits! Yikes! Heather Leila, it was nice of you to come to larry278's rescue here, but you're not seriously proposing that labial reduction and clitoral removal are congruent, are you? By the way, there are men who have tried to sue their parents for their "circumcision without consent", and some have had a procedure whereby a new foreskin is created from their own flesh and applied appropriately. Something to think about... Again, I'm not keen on body modification in general, and I'm not trying to denigrate the pain and suffering of anyone, but all procedures are not equal, and some results seem to me more devestating.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 02/28/2009
- marxmarv I'm a Fan of marxmarv 25 fans permalink
photo

As far as many countries are concerned, genital cutting is the province of medicine. Depending on the circumstances, charges including but not limited to grievous bodily harm, practicing medicine without a license, medical malpractice, or rape could apply even when there is no specific statute against genital cutting. They got Todd Bertrang five years on "posting obscene material" and other trumped-up charges.

It doesn't follow that there are necessarily people in Western countries that perform African style female circumcisions anymore; due to all the heat it may be less trouble to arrange a trip to Africa or to a Western country more accepting of the sovereignty of an adult's body.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 AM on 03/01/2009
- munki I'm a Fan of munki 34 fans permalink
photo

Sad... How can we help to change this type of practice?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:33 PM on 02/28/2009
- Nonpartay I'm a Fan of Nonpartay 84 fans permalink
photo

There is one organization, that I know of, in the US that's working on this issue: http://www.tahirih.org/tahirih/about/index.html. They are mainly working on the legal issues of women experiencing gender-based violence and genital mutilation. There's a compelling book called Do They Hear You When You Cry? that talks about this issue from the standpoint of one young woman who escaped to the US from Togo in order to avoid having it done to her. It goes into her abominable treatment by US immigration when she was just trying to seek asylum so she could keep all her body parts.
I really hope I live long enough to see all these kinds of needless and harmful practices stopped for both men and women. Just leave things as God designed them in the first place. What's the deal with cutting off parts or all of people's genitals? :( It's disgusting, horrible, dangerous, and just incomprehensible to me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 PM on 02/28/2009
- Nonpartay I'm a Fan of Nonpartay 84 fans permalink
photo

I don't see my earlier response posted an hour ago so I'll try again. http://www.tahirih.org/tahirih/about/index.html, the Tahirih Justice Center, is a wonderful organization that is working to help women avoid this mutilation and helps them attain asylum if they come to this country to escape. The book, Do They Hear You When You Cry? tells the story of how a young woman from Togo was helped. It's very touching though this whole subject is really more than body can bear. This whole thing is a great argument for never using tradition as a reason to do anything. We must examine all our traditions and see if they are still valid, I don't care if they are religious, cultural, or what. Just because something "has always been done" a certain way is no reason to think it needs to continue in the face of new evidence to the contrary.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:29 PM on 02/28/2009
- 4 Real I'm a Fan of 4 Real 58 fans permalink
photo

Although some argue the practice on both genders is essentially the same, the one glaring difference I see is the method. While boys in the US are cut shortly after birth in a hospital, young girls are kidnapped, gagged, forcibly held down and cut with a crude dirty knife.
Forced to go home in pain and bleeding with this trauma now burnt into her brain, her life is never the same.
I don't recall any male relating the same experience, nor have I ever heard a guy say it ruins his sexual drive or pleasure.

IMO, I think both practices should be stopped, but FGM is torture.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 02/28/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect


svn