Genital Mutilation: African Women Risk Lives To Fight For Others

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Genital Mutilation: African Women Risk Lives To Fight For Others stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 02-27-09 01:49 PM   |   Updated: 03-30-09 05:12 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Africa

The female journalist was snatched by members of a secret society, forcibly stripped and made to parade naked through the streets. It might sound like an atrocity from the time when Sierra Leone was ripped apart by a bloody civil war, but in fact the public humiliation was exacted in the diamond-rich eastern town of Kenema just this month. The woman's alleged crime was reporting on female genital mutilation.

While the attack was condemned by media watchdogs as "disgraceful behaviour worthy of a bygone age", one woman who was not surprised was Rugiatu Turay. When she was 12 Ms Turay was stolen away by family members and underwent what some politely refer to as "circumcision". She calls it "torture". For the past six years, she has been waging a war against the practice, which many in Sierra Leone, including senior politicians, see as an initiation rite.

Her organisation, the Amazonian Initiative Movement, tries to protect young girls from the knife. "I picked the name because I am trying to talk about strong, powerful women," she says Ms Turay, who works with her 20-strong staff in and around the northern town of Lunsar. So far, she has persuaded about 400 practitioners of female genital mutiliation (FGM), who are often called soweis, to lay down their blades and stop their role in the traditional bondo ceremony. "Silence means consent. But if you say the truth people listen ... We go to the schools, mosques, everywhere."

As reward for her tenacious efforts, she has received death threats and been attacked by juju men, sometimes armed with magic, sometimes with machetes. She describes a time when more than a hundred people paraded a symbolic corpse outside her home to suggest her own death: "They came right in front of me sharpening their cutlasses."

But so many times has she failed to die, that locals now think she is immune. "Now they believe I have special powers. They do nothing to me."

Ms Turay was mutilated at her aunt's house where she was staying with her three sisters and her cousin. "We didn't even know that we were going to be initiated," she says. "They called me to get water and then outside they just grabbed me."

She was blindfolded, stripped, and laid on the ground. Heavy women sat on her arms, her chest, her legs. Her mouth was stuffed with a rag. Her clitoris was cut off with a crude knife. Despite profuse bleeding she was forced to walk, was beaten and had hot pepper water poured into her eyes.

"My mother had always told me never to let anyone touch me there. I was scared and I tried to fight them off. Nobody talked to me but there was all this clapping, singing, shouting," recalls Ms Turay. "When I tried to walk on the seventh day I could not walk. All they could say is 'Today you have become a woman'."

Story continues below

Ms Turay is among the estimated 94 per cent of girls who undergo FGM in Sierra Leone. The practice - which forms part of a ceremony of initiation rites overseen by women-only secret societies such as bondo and sande - can cause severe bleeding, infection, cysts and sometimes death, but is largely ignored.

Reasons for the process vary, but many people cite tradition and culture, saying it is essential preparation for marriage and womanhood; binds communities to each other and to their ancestors; and restricts women's sexual behaviour.

Last year, UN agencies came out strongly against the practice, labelling it "painful and traumatic", a violation of human rights and demanding it be abandoned within a generation. "It has no health benefits and harms girls and women in many ways," said the UN's World Health Organisation (WHO). "The practice causes severe pain and has several immediate and long-term health consequences, including difficulties in childbirth."

Yet many international aid organisations are too scared to do anything about it in public for fear of being labelled cultural imperialists. A recent Sierra Leone child rights bill dropped any mention of FGM at the last minute, and politicians - including President Ernest Bai Koroma - baulk at the mention of the subject.

A decade ago, a female politician who later became the minister for social welfare said: "We will sew the mouths up of those preaching against bondo." More recently, politicians are rumoured to have sponsored mass cutting ceremonies, which can be relatively costly affairs in one of the world's poorest countries, in an effort to secure votes in elections.

"Secret societies have become intertwined with modern political life in Sierra Leone and retain considerable power and influence," wrote the anthropologist Dr Richard Fanthorpe in a paper commissioned by the UN.

When I asked President Koroma - whose country receives more aid per person from Britain than any other donor recipient - about his position on the practice, it was the first time I saw the usually affable leader lost for words. Unable to reach for his usually ubiquitous wide toothy smile, he meandered awkwardly through an answer: "Let people in civil society deal with this issue."

That leaves the fight against FGM, which the WHO says has been conducted on 92 million African girls - and rising by up to three million a year - to the odd brave soul such as Ms Turay. The 26-year-old is among a number of anti-FGM campaigners slowly achieving results. In her effort to keep some safe from cutting, Ms Turay has even adopted 14 children from Sierra Leone and Guinea.

Girls under 15 regularly undergo the cutting and for the newly initiated, it remains a frightening process shrouded in secrecy. "You should not tell anybody about circumcision or else your stomach will swell and you'll die," one young girl who didn't know her age told me quietly in her local Temne language.

Ms Turay hopes her struggle will help break such taboos of talking about the cutting in public, although it may also spur more reactionary moves, such as this month's punishment meted out to the journalist in Kenema. And it is no easy task persuading the practitioners to abandon what they see as a rite of passage. Girls as young as five are trained to become circumcisers and it is an income-generator in a poverty-stricken country, still struggling to shrug off the legacy of the 1991-2002 civil war.

"I didn't like it when it happened to me and I worry about the pain of the girl, but I do it because they pay me, and because we met our ancestors doing it," says practitioner Marion Kanu, 35, whose two children are also practitioners.

Others have seen the error of their ways. "I regret it now," says another sowei who has vowed to stop. But it is not always easy to hang up the knife. One woman practitioner who said she would stop the cutting was kidnapped by members of the bundu society. Both her and her baby were beaten and taken to the bush for three days without food or water; the mother was raped. Her life was saved only by Ms Turay's intervention.

Read more at The Independent.

The female journalist was snatched by members of a secret society, forcibly stripped and made to parade naked through the streets. It might sound like an atrocity from the time when Sierra Leone was r...
The female journalist was snatched by members of a secret society, forcibly stripped and made to parade naked through the streets. It might sound like an atrocity from the time when Sierra Leone was r...
Loading...
 
Filed by Jessica Gusman  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
239
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 (3 pages total)
- raaf I'm a Fan of raaf 25 fans permalink
photo

Genital mutilation, regardless of sex, is wrong period!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 PM on 02/27/2009
photo

There are so many a$$backward tyrants in The Mother Land, sometimes I dream about eliminating these people, so I can set my people free from their barbarism. It turns my stomach to think of the nightmare these girls go through.

Here are more facts on the situation, for those who want it...

http://www.path.org/files/FGM-The-Facts.htm

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:11 PM on 02/27/2009

Don't fail to address this barbarism, since you people find circumcision to be objectionable.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=62010

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 02/28/2009
photo

Is something stopping you from addressing it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 PM on 02/28/2009
- valkyrie607 I'm a Fan of valkyrie607 106 fans permalink
photo

This is a case where concern over cultural imperialism is misplaced.

Continuing traditions? Maintaining connection to the ancestors? Binding communities together?

These things are valuable, but not so valuable that one should torture and mutilate little girls to get them.

Anyway, I suspect the true motivation is something different, something more along the lines of control over women and their sexuality.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:47 PM on 02/27/2009
- missviv I'm a Fan of missviv 8 fans permalink
photo

You're right - why else cut off such an important female sexual organ? Many women cannot orgasm without having their clitoris stimulated - it has everything to do with making sure women never enjoy sex and feel like they have no control over it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:22 PM on 02/27/2009
- Vickster I'm a Fan of Vickster 16 fans permalink
photo

The motivation may be control over women and their sexuality, but don't overlook the fact that the perpetrators of this horror are women.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 PM on 02/27/2009

Yes, but you're missing the point! The perpetrators are the same women who have been systematically abused, manipulated, and mutilated, themselves. Some of them think they're providing a valuable service (making a girl "marriagiable") by doing this, because if it's not done to a girl, no man will have her and she will be poor and vulnerable and alone. They simply know no other way of life.

Do you really think these women have the power to rise up and stop this practice? They would have to overturn centuries of tradition and the patriarchal interest in keeping women powerless.

Did you read the entire article, and learn what happened to the woman who tried to give up her own practice, or to the journalist who spoke out against it?

Did you know that the people who used to bind girls' feet in China were also women? They, too, were systematically manipulated into mutilating their own, because women in that culture had no other options beside marriage and motherhood, and the practice was seen (by men, by tradition) as necessary---mainly to keep women from having any physical autonomy (i.e., they couldn't walk very well or run).

Do you see any men in these countries denouncing these atrocities? Until they do, the women won't get far on their own.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 AM on 02/28/2009

Cultural imperialism is definitely not misplaced. If you call circumcision mutilation, what you call it when you completely turn your boys into girls or girls into boys by removing their sex organs completely. Please, stay on the issue of "mutilation". Which one do you consider to be mutilation? A circumcised woman can still have sex and bear children. A trangendered cannot. So, who is mutilating little girls and boys? Look at these and comment on the "civilized" Western culture:


http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/04/worlds-youngest-transsexual-16-year-old-undergoes-sex-change-operation/

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23487460-details/Family's%20fury%20as%20girl,%2012,%20allowed%20to%20have%20sex-change%20operation%20without%20against%20father's%20wishes/article.do

http://www.buzzle.com/editorials/4-15-2004-52968.asp


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=62010

http://www.buzzle.com/articles/sex-change-operations-for-kids.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1540842/Unhappy-as-a-boy,-Kim-became-youngest-ever-transsexual-at-12.html

http://jonathanturley.org/2008/10/16/music-teachers-sex-change-operation-causes-outcry-at-foxboro-elementary/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:01 AM on 02/28/2009
- Zofomofo I'm a Fan of Zofomofo 49 fans permalink
photo

This is a sad comment on how un-evolved the human race is.

This is just a particularly vile example, but this level of sickening behavior is everywhere if you want to look for it.

Women are treated horribly, children are abused, men are enslaved on every corner of the planet, fear, theft and hatred prevail.

May we all drown in our own tears.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:29 PM on 02/27/2009

Women the world over must ARM themselves, by purchase or theft, and MURDER the MULLAHS......along with refusing to have more than two children!

The world--especially, parts of Africa--is awash in firearms and women must stop being SQUEEMISH(sp?) about using them for their own protection/preservation.....without REMORSE!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 02/27/2009
- Whatashame I'm a Fan of Whatashame 19 fans permalink
photo

This is sickening. These Muslim nations should stop this. If your going to perform this horrible act on girl do the same to the buys. Cut their weenie off to.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:52 PM on 02/27/2009
photo

Before you go after Moslem nations make sure you know what are you writing because there is no such a thing in Islam about this barbaric treatment of women.You just show how lack of knowledge affects your judgment ability.

First of all,this abnormal custom in Sierra Leone is part them but in no other way around it's connected to moslems.

Second,I believe as of now most of the media already covered brutality in that part of the Africa particularly those areas where civil wars were waged awhile ago including Sierra Leone,Rwanda.

It's always good to research the subject before you go out with comments.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 PM on 02/27/2009
photo

Before you go after Moslem nations make sure you know what are you writing because there is no such a thing in Islam about this barbaric treatment of women.You just show how lack of knowledge affects your judgment ability.

First of all,this abnormal custom in Sierra Leone is part of them but in no other way around it's connected to moslems.

Second,I believe as of now most of the world media already covered brutality in that part of the Africa particularly those areas where civil wars were waged awhile ago including Sierra Leone and Rwanda.

It's always good to research the subject before you go out with comments.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:26 PM on 02/27/2009

It isn't religion. This country has multiple religions, and they all do it. It's a tribal custom. As usual, when the tribe gains a religion, they'll claim their customs fit their religion - but it's not a part of the religion. No more than allowing women to wear pants is a part of the Christian religion because women in America wear pants when they like. It's not religion - it's tribal customs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 02/27/2009
- papapj I'm a Fan of papapj 29 fans permalink
photo

Darn! Why would anybody want to mess with the joy button...?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:44 PM on 02/27/2009
photo

So the females will not have joy. Seriously.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 PM on 02/27/2009
- papapj I'm a Fan of papapj 29 fans permalink
photo

Well.....I get joy playing with it....

Lovemaking is all about reciprocation...what's up with these guys?

They might as well just put it in their hands...!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:25 PM on 02/27/2009

Because if you don't enjoy sex, they don't have to work at keeping you happy, don't have to worry you'll be seduced away from them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:36 PM on 02/27/2009
- chaya I'm a Fan of chaya 46 fans permalink

If this kind of butchery were practiced on men the whole world would be up in arms. We have known about this for many decades. Thanks HuffPo for finally saying SOMETHING.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 02/27/2009
- MizK I'm a Fan of MizK 8 fans permalink
photo

OMG..that is sooooo on target. The same could be said for childbirth and such--if men had to go through it, there'd be soooo many drugs/treatments/etc!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 AM on 02/28/2009

This IS done to men as common practice. Male Genital Mutilation (circumcision) is an over $400 million a year industry in America. This type of response is typical sexism. Outrage when it happens to women, and complete denial about it happening to men.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 AM on 02/28/2009
- Hdaryl01 I'm a Fan of Hdaryl01 37 fans permalink
photo

Hear! Hear!

And women don't even see, acknowledge, or appreciate their insensitivity and hypocrisy. Very intelligent, professional, liberal, progressive, human rights activist women haven't even considered THE SIMILARITY.

So, let's simplify this. Both genders develop from the same eggs. With the same parts. Configured based on whether there is an XX or XY chromosome. Male testes are the female ovaries. Women and men both have a glans. In women it's called a clitoris. In men, it's called a glans (head). Women and men both have foreskins. In women, the foreskin covers and protects the glans (clitoris), and is known as the foreskin or clitoral hood. In men, the foreskin normally covers and protects the glans (head).

So, if male circumcision is so ACCEPTABLE, let me see a show of hands of all the women out there who think their clitoral hood is a meaningless, non-erotic, piece of unnecessary extra skin that should be entirely amputated at birth for hygenic and aesthetic reasons. Anyone? We'll leave the clitoris intact, just like the American male's glans. And, I assume that all of you that find male circumcision acceptable are perfectly willing to have your clitoral hoods and those of your daughters amputated? Now?

This very type of female circumcision is practiced in Egypt. Same Same. If you don't find the female version acceptable, but find the male version acceptable, you are a hypocrite.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:32 AM on 02/28/2009
- Hdaryl01 I'm a Fan of Hdaryl01 37 fans permalink
photo

Are you serious?

Where have you been?

Well over 1,000,000 new born males are "circumcised" for no medically indicated reason EVERY YEAR in the United States. In fact, male neo-natal circumcision is the most common operation performed in the United States. 3,500 per day, every day. 24/7/365 for decades. Today, more american males are, and will be circumcised than anywhere on the planet.

What's strange is that 85% of the worldwide male population is INTACT and UNCIRCUMCISED. And, has been from the beginning of time. As they should be. No problems.

Europeans don't do it.
Eastern Europeans don't do it.
Russians, and former Russian countries don't do it.
Asians don't do it.
Central America, Latin America, and South Americans don't do it.
The vast majority of Canadians, Australians, British, and New Zealanders don't do it.

So, why exactly DO Americans STILL do it? Why are our males' foreskins uniquely defective and in need of immediate amputation for no reason at birth?Where's the outrage? Where's the principle?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:27 AM on 02/28/2009
- Nonpartay I'm a Fan of Nonpartay 94 fans permalink
photo

I'm outraged, especially given insurance companies sometimes pay for it when they could be paying for legitimate medical treatments. I didn't circumcise my son, and he's 29 and FINE. So, not everyone does it, of course, but it is still WAY too common even though it has been known to be unnecessary for many decades now. I remember Dr. Dean Edell talking about this about 35 years ago. I was hoping his campaign against it would be the beginning of the end of this practice, but somehow it was not. Perhaps it's extra cash for the doctor and hospital. That's the only reason I can think of for anyone to promote or accept it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 02/28/2009
photo

It is practiced on men in the USA. The USA is the only civilied nation that butchers its baby boys.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 02/28/2009
- Clavis I'm a Fan of Clavis 39 fans permalink

Christopher Hitchens may be far from perfect, but he has never stopped beating the drum about this issue and calling the attention of his audiences to it, and for that, I thank him. When Hitchens brings the topic up, it at first feels like a tremendous imposition, because, well, after all, it is such a touchy and profane subject. But he is right to do so, and it is our shame that we allow squeamishness to overrule our sense of outrage and basic human rights.

I said it about marriage and I'll say it about this barbarism: "Traditional" doesn't mean "good" -- it just means "old"!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:23 PM on 02/27/2009

Millions of male children are abused yearly and no one cries "genital mutilation."
It's called circumcision, DOUBLE STANDARD!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:16 PM on 02/27/2009
- Whatashame I'm a Fan of Whatashame 19 fans permalink
photo

Excuse but this is different. This is cutting out a girls C-L-I-T-O-R-I-S.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:53 PM on 02/27/2009
photo

Cutting out, forcing a callus to grow. either is barbarity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:39 PM on 02/27/2009
- Hdaryl01 I'm a Fan of Hdaryl01 37 fans permalink
photo

Fine. Let's make it absolutely, indisputably the same. Foreskin for Foreskin. The male glans and the female clitoris develop out of the same cells in the embryo. Dependant only on XY or XX chromosome. Both are sheathed in foreskins, which ALSO develop out of the same cells........ Check your Biology 101 textbooks.

We've got Title IX. We've got affirmative action. We've got diversity. We're striving for ever increasing equality. We demand inclusion. We demand equal opportunity. No more seperate but equal. No more two tiered medical system that denies services to women.

Let's all band together now and DEMAND that women in the US get treated EQUITABLY! It's high time ALL infants in the United States get circumcised. If its good for the boys, its good for the girls. And, let's DEMAND that we have a program to remedy the past injustices-free on demand female foreskin circumcision for women of all ages.

Americans unite! Let's make universal infant neo-natal foreskin circumcision the practice of the land! Millions of American women for generations have been denied their right to have this simple harmless basic proceedure that eliminates duplicative, extra, non necessary, non-erotic skin, in a simple surgical process that can be done at birth, without anesthesia. What a travesty!

FIGHT FOR WOMEN'S EQUAL RIGHTS TO FORESKIN CIRCUMCISION NOW!

Absurd? Not nearly as absurd as your intellectual gymnatics struggle to make female circumcision "mutilation", and thereby unacceptable, and an outrage. While minimizing male circumcision as acceptable and "different".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 02/28/2009
- Telemachus I'm a Fan of Telemachus 155 fans permalink

Please. Circumcision of boys is done shortly after birth, often in a hospital, almost always with strict attention to sanitation, and it only takes a few seconds. There's no fear, and little pain. The part that is removed is not the most sensitive organ in the body, and you can get along fine without it. Bleeding is minimal. Health effects are positive, although slight.

I'm not saying every boy should be circumcised, but to equate the one procedure with the other and accuse FGM critics of employing a "double standard" is irresponsible.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 02/27/2009

Cirumcision in boys is not done at birth in Africa, its done as part of the initiiation into manhood, normally anywhere between 8yrs and 13 yrs.

Its only in developed nations - particularly the US - and in Jewish communties - that a boy is circumcised near birth.

And the FGM described in the article is 'minor' (if anything about FGM can be called such), as other cultures in Africa and the Middle East have much more damaging 'operations'.
These include a complete cutting away of the clitoris and the inner labia, a scraping down the bone of the whole area, with damage to the urethra, and then sewing up the outer labia to produce a tiny hole - through which a woman is expected to have her menses, pass urine, and give birth.

Many of the these girls endure terrible infections, permanent and often life threatening GU damage. Not to mention horrific injuries trying to pass a baby through an artificially reduced birth passage, in later years.

Its a horrible, pointless practice - and I'm glad to see that women that live in the society are speaking up about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:58 PM on 02/27/2009
- missviv I'm a Fan of missviv 8 fans permalink
photo

Exactly! Men are not kidnapped, mutilated with rusty and possibly infected tools, and they don't have pepper water tossed onto their eyes to add some extra pain. There is NO WAY you can compare the two practices.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 PM on 02/27/2009
- marxmarv I'm a Fan of marxmarv 25 fans permalink
photo

"to equate the one procedure with the other and accuse FGM critics of employing a 'double standard' is irresponsible."

The commonalities -- that functional erogenous tissue is being removed for cultural and/or cosmetic reasons, with the loss of function wrongly dismissed as insignificant compared to vague physical and/or behavioral benefits -- are at the root of the fight against FGM, are they not?

By way of example, for the upper classes in Egypt, cutting is performed in a hospital, often under anesthetic and in sanitary conditions, with as much consent as a latent-stage child can reasonably give, and they seem to get along fine without it. Some medical doctors have even gone so far as to hold traveling clinics where the procedure is performed under humane medical conditions. Since this mollifies Westerners only slightly, either there really is a double standard or one side or the other is withholding information.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:49 PM on 02/27/2009
- Hdaryl01 I'm a Fan of Hdaryl01 37 fans permalink
photo

OK. WHY is it done? Routine neo-natal male circumcision is NOT medically indicated. So, WHY is it done? WHAT PURPOSE IS ACHIEVED BY REMOVING THIS NORMAL HEALTHY PART OF MALE ANATOMY FOR NO MEDICALLY INDICATED REASON? WHY is this practice continued in large scale EXCLUSIVELY in the United States? While 85% of the world's male population has done just fine intact/uncircumcised from the beginning of time? Why have BRITAIN, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia virtually elininated the practice?

Is your dog circumcised? Your cat? Have you seen farmers circumcise their cows? Pigs? Horses? Seen any zoo keepers circumcise their Elephants? Monkeys? Lions? Tigers? Bears?

HAVE YOU EVER SEEN OR HEARD OF ANYONE ROUTINELY CIRCUMCISING ANY MAMMAL ON THE PLANET...........EVER.........EXCEPT THE AMERICAN MALE.........?

What makes us special, or rather deficient, in need of routine, uniform, across the board amputation of our foreskins at birth?

It's absurd. It's pointless. It's barbaric. It's hypocritical to view male and female circumcision differently, regardless of "degree". ALL GENITAL CUTTING MUST END.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:39 AM on 02/28/2009
photo

Female mutilation deprives the female of sensitivity or pleasure to the area. Male circumcision does not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:22 PM on 02/27/2009
- Hdaryl01 I'm a Fan of Hdaryl01 37 fans permalink
photo

Male circumcision does not......deprive the male of sensitivity or pleasure to the area......

Really, how do you know? Seriously, how do you know? And, I mean really, actually, experientially, KNOW. Upon what authority do you base making this statement?

Or, as most of the posters on this blog, are you merely assuming as fact that which you have been spoon fed, without question, without proof, and which you have accepted as reality?

In fact, if truth be told, YOU have NO IDEA. You are absolutely 100% clueless as to whether circumcision deprives the male of sensitivity and/or pleasure to the area. And, qualitatively, how much. You are completely devoid of any capability of defending this statement. Yet, you state it with such contemptuous authority. Is this a common practice for you? On ANY other topic? In any other context, professional or personal in your life?

You are completely unfit to make such a statement because:

1) You are female; or
2) You are uncircumcised and have never experienced being circumcised; or
3) You are circumcised and have never experienced being intact (uncircumcised)

Unquestioning, unfounded arrogance of this nature perpetuates this practice. Be it MALE or Female, GENITAL MUTILATION.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 AM on 02/28/2009
- Zofomofo I'm a Fan of Zofomofo 49 fans permalink
photo

Slightly different there flipant flipbiscut.

Circumcision is also primitive holdover, the damge is far less, although technically it is for the same reason, to limit sexually pleasure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:32 PM on 02/27/2009

Nicely put, 'mofo..but still incorrect..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:51 PM on 02/28/2009
- valkyrie607 I'm a Fan of valkyrie607 106 fans permalink
photo

Real differences in practice and circumstance = no double standard.

Not to say I particularly love male circumcision either, but the two are not the same.

"Circumcision" is a polite euphemism, anyway. Call it "Female Genital Mutilation."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:43 PM on 02/27/2009
- kellygrrrl I'm a Fan of kellygrrrl 643 fans permalink
photo

Horrifying! My heart goes out to these girls and women.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 02/27/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect