iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gingrich Takes On Rush: Hoping For Prez's Failure Is "Irrational" (VIDEO)

First Posted: 04/08/09 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:05 PM ET

UPDATE: Rush Limbaugh responded to Newt Gingrich's criticisms on his radio show Monday. Politico reports:

"I'm frankly getting tired of talking about Newt. I mean, it's a pointless exercise," Limbaugh said of Gingrich's dismissal of him on Meet the Press. "I'm surprised by nothing when I'm dealing with people in the media who think they're in politics.... They are fly-by-night operators, and most of them stand for nothing until they see a poll about what the American people want, and then they go out and try to say one way or another what the American people want while trying to falsely hold onto an ideology at the same time -- and you can't count on them. You can't depend on them. They will sell you out; they will throw you overboard to save themselves, faster than anything. And they'll use you on their way up as often as they can at the same time."


"I mean, next week Newt could come out and profess his total admiration and love for me if it would serve his purposes," he continued. "They're running TV ads against me. Newt Gingrich wishes they were running TV ads against him."

Newt Gingrich became the highest profile Republican yet to push back against Rush Limbaugh, saying on "Meet the Press" that it's "irrational" to hope for the President of the United States to fail.

"You've got to want the president to succeed," said the former House Speaker. "You're irrational if you don't want the president to succeed. Because if he doesn't succeed the country doesn't succeed... I don't think anyone should want the president of the United States to fail. I want some of his policies to be stopped. But I don't want the president of the United States to fail. I want him to learn new policies."

Watch:

The remarks were an obvious shot at Limbaugh, even if the conservative talk show host wasn't named. There has been a brooding feud between Limbaugh and Gingrich over the future of the Republican Party that briefly erupted during the recent CPAC convention. Responding to remarks by Gingrich that "the era of Reagan is over," Limbaugh declared during his hour-long closing address: "Our own movement has members trying to throw Reagan out while the Democrats know they can't accomplish what they want unless they appeal to Reagan voters. We have got to stamp this out within this movement because it will tear us apart. It will guarantee we lose elections."

That Gingrich would respond by pushing back against Limbaugh's now-infamous line rooting for Obama's failure suggests just how testy the relationship between the two has become.

Gingrich was highly critical of nearly every other aspect of the current administration, from its economic policies to its political tactics. At one point, he called the Obama administration cynical for trying to make an issue out of Limbaugh. On Sunday's talk show circuit, Sen. Lindsey Graham was the only other person willing to put his head on the line with some anti-Rush rhetoric.

"I think Rush Limbaugh's prominence in the Republican Party is not what we are talking about. I think his prominence in the radio world to gin up people for conservative causes is prominent. He doesn't play in the Republican Party. He is not an elected official," said the South Carolina Republican. "I'm Lindsey Graham. He has been on me for two or three or four years for different things and I take it for what it is worth. ... Stop talking about Rush Limbaugh at the White House."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

UPDATE: Rush Limbaugh responded to Newt Gingrich's criticisms on his radio show Monday. Politico reports: "I'm frankly getting tired of talking about Newt. I mean, it's a pointless exercise," Limbau...
UPDATE: Rush Limbaugh responded to Newt Gingrich's criticisms on his radio show Monday. Politico reports: "I'm frankly getting tired of talking about Newt. I mean, it's a pointless exercise," Limbau...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,994
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (70 total)
03:59 PM on 03/16/2009
I watched that interview last night and found it very interesting. I thought Newt had a lot of good points.

At this point in this "crisis", I think we all need to get through it, regardless of political party. Bickering and fighting will not help anyone out. We need to all get on the same page and get back to being the economic power that we were.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alexander-Y
Student
12:31 PM on 03/14/2009
Newt Gingrich will have his hands around his ankles bracing himself for the weeks to come.
02:17 PM on 03/11/2009
How arrogant can you get, Newt... "learn new policies" this is NOT the school room.
I agree with fulanita... republican .... lame....
09:16 PM on 03/11/2009
Any one with an understanding of politics or US history knows that there is not a person alive who is ready to be President when he takes office. The first several years of every President is a classroom of stuff to learn. It will take between six months and a year just to catch up on what policies, documents and programs the outgoin President left. Knowing these is necessary to adjust or change policies and programs -&- most of these were high level classified and not available to the President Elect until after he took office or if the outgoing Pres. upgraded his security clearance high enough to see these. Every move any new President makes during his first one to two years will have new twists and turns to it from the old administration. Any new President has to learn to shift from being a member of one party trying to cut apart the other party. He has to learn to be multi-party proficient and diplomatic. It is a learning curve. From one Pisces to another, PiscesPrincess apparently does not understand this. But, all of life is a classroom in which if you do not learn something new everyday you are in a coma.
01:27 PM on 03/11/2009
Ummm...you DO know that James Carville said during an interview that he hoped GW Bush would fail ( "I certainly hope he doesn't succeed")

That interview took place early in the morning on 9/11/01...just an hour or so before the attack He asked that his comments be redacted after the news came out, and it was.

But he said it.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/11/carville-wanted-bush-fail/
photo
SlimPickins79
What's past is prologue
01:52 PM on 03/11/2009
so 2 wrongs make a right?
02:07 PM on 03/11/2009
Oh Good Grief!! Let's all get real. We all know everything changed dramatically on 9/11
jaslyn
don't go away mad, just go away
11:14 AM on 03/11/2009
When Rush brags that he has more listeners than any other host, it's not what it seems. Clearchannel has more outlets and puts Rush on those, but when you have people like Tom Hartman, who is only available to fewer outlets, the amount of people that listen to Tom is greater than Rush. Rush is a legend in his own mind, and his brain seems to be tied behind his back.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
liberalNmoderation
We've only got the one planet, don't screw it up.
11:09 AM on 03/11/2009
Takin all bets here...how long before teh Newt apologizes to el rashbo?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
pfrogger
09:02 AM on 03/11/2009
poetic justice baby
I'm sure Newt understands the effect Limbaugh has on the vast majority of people when he says his "ugly" and "incendiary" remarks. the faithful will gather to him. but when that real number is 1-2 million, Newt understands that appeasing this base won't win elections.
it's funny that Newt now has to contend with that which he created. the man has never watched a horror movie or else he would know the monster will always turn on its creators. Rookie mistake Newt. You did an excellent job since the 80s with your evangelical and conservative rallying and now you get to deal with the consequences, the hard-cores like Limbaugh and Coulter, who both get paid millions (Rush 33 million in 2007 wiki) and yet pretend to be like the average person.
I almost feel sorry for Newt. He doesn't even understand that his monster has replaced him as head of the Repubs. He doesn't understand that any critical remark against Rush is Repub suicide. Newt, buddy, "my friend", don't you get it - if you create a group of angry violent people, devoid of any rational assessment, why would you think they won't turn on you? That's the point of a lynch mob, angry irrational fear. You can't talk them down with logic. Repubs know who Rush and Coulter are, and you're just the "old guy". You don't think that these mindless simpletons of the mob are going to become rational, do you?
Poor gullible Newt.
02:10 PM on 03/11/2009
One last thought: Newt is not a threat to the Dems or America or the Republican party.
say slowly this name..... Karl Rove. Karl Rove. Karl Rove.... arghhhh
07:19 AM on 03/11/2009
It's a toss up as to which one is more repulsive. When Newt was house speaker he did everything he could to command complete power at the expense of of our country, they are both treasonous traitors as was their hero g w bush.
03:23 AM on 03/11/2009
That's right.
03:21 AM on 03/11/2009
Rush is not a fan of mine.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MuseScavenger
Yeah, my micro-bio is so what
02:45 AM on 03/11/2009
Limbaugh is a drug addled fraud.
08:45 AM on 03/11/2009
--thrice divorced--too bad he is not a Mormon!
01:57 AM on 03/11/2009
hey socialmistfit,
you say that poll about wanting Bush to fail was taken Aug 2006,
well, that was after he had been in office for 6 years.
so the Obama haters are a bit premature don't you think?
01:56 AM on 03/11/2009
Who else might want Obama to fail . . . Let's see, now.

Kim Jong Il probably does. And I would bet that Osama bin Laden does. And what about Mahmoud Ahmadinejad; I'm sure he does, too.

So, I would say that Rusch is in league with some high-profile folks.
01:01 AM on 03/11/2009
Another GOP has-been crawling out of the woodwork to get some extra cash for TV appearances. When will the GOP realize that Gingrich and the rest of them is just fodder for the media to have a 180 degree point of view. It's not working.
02:13 PM on 03/11/2009
True. Its NOT working. What we are seeing is a MSM tilting to the right with all these Repubs on talk news shows. yech... gag... arghhhh
photo
BetterDeadthanRedState
Speech isn't free when only the rich can afford it
01:00 AM on 03/11/2009
I didn't want Bush to fail, but it was inevitable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Balloonman
03:18 AM on 03/11/2009
GINGRICH vote record is opposite OBAMA'S concilliatory, checks and balances operative, regulate the powerful, community for itself organizing, we are all in this together theme. When Obama wins GINGRICH loses. When GINGRICH claims to be speaking best for the people his right wing built-in take from the people and give it to Money and Power predominates. His deceipt knows no bounds. He and GWBUSH are of the same cloth.

Wishing GWBUSH NOT to fail must mean IRAQ. BetterDeadthnRedState. Conquering IRAQ without much fuss for its oil central base to thus Democratize by force and example the Middle East.and dominate policy and traderoutes. In everything his type Republican idelogy is alien peoples health benefit. If his decision maker behaviour's tragic wake is any proof. Fattening crony and banker and one-percenter interests, firmly establishing the militrary/industrial juggernaut as our foreign policy. Munitions, munitions, munitions. Minimizing citizen fodder to bankroll finance, war and consume and consume and consume. GW BUSH failed on virtually every leadership front for 8 years. Ruined our nation and antagonized, crippled, in the case of IRAQ, and made us feared, not trusted, suspect if not enemy in much of the world. The In what arena within his President expertise would I have liked him NOT to fail? Living up to his professed born again Christian values. Primarily do unto others.
08:47 AM on 03/11/2009
Yeah, who really did believe there was WMD's in Iraq and believed it would be over in a month?!

It's not wanting him to fail, but the frustration that so many (apparently) couldn't see through him.