AP Shepard Fairey Counterclaim Filed

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - AP Shepard Fairey Counterclaim Filed stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

JENNIFER PELTZ | 03/11/09 06:45 PM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Graphic compares Shepard Fairey’s Obama poster to the AP photo it is based on

NEW YORK — The Associated Press countersued an artist Wednesday over his famous image of Barack Obama, saying the uncredited, uncompensated use of an AP photo violated copyright laws and signaled a threat to journalism.

The artist, Shepard Fairey, sued the not-for-profit news cooperative last month over his artwork, titled "Obama Hope" and "Obama Progress," arguing that he didn't violate copyright law because he dramatically changed the image.

The artwork, based on an April 2006 picture taken for the AP by Mannie Garcia, was a popular image during the presidential campaign and now hangs in the National Portrait Gallery in Washington.

According to the AP lawsuit filed in federal court in Manhattan, Fairey knowingly "misappropriated The AP's rights in that image." The suit, which also names Fairey's companies, asks the court to award AP profits made off the image and damages.

"While (Fairey and the companies) have attempted to cloak their actions in the guise of politics and art, there is no doubt that they are profiting handsomely from their misappropriation," the lawsuit says.

Fairey said he looked forward to "upholding the free expression rights at stake here" and disproving the AP's accusations.

"They suggest my purpose in creating the poster was to merchandise it and make money. It wasn't. My entire purpose in creating the poster was to support Obama and help get him elected," the artist said in a statement. He initially made the image available as a poster, donating the proceeds to charity or using them to make more posters, he said.

The red, cream and light-blue image depicts a pensive but determined-looking Obama gazing upward, with the caption "HOPE" or "PROGRESS." It went on to become a familiar sight on buttons, shirts and other objects, garnering Fairey a thank-you letter from Obama and more than $400,000 in profits, according to published reports.

Story continues below
advertisement

Fairey's lawyers acknowledge the image is derived from Garcia's photograph, made at the National Press Club in Washington while Obama was a senator.

But Fairey's lawsuit says he didn't violate copyright law because he transformed the picture into a "stunning, abstracted and idealized visual image that creates powerful new meaning and conveys a radically different message."

The AP argues the Los Angeles-based artist's image amounted to "blatant copying" and commercializing of another's work. Fairey piggybacked on the AP picture's "distinctive characteristics," including its composition, light and shadows, the cooperative's lawsuit says.

The AP contends news organizations need to protect their intellectual property rights so they can continue providing information, an endeavor financed in part by licensing their material to others.

"This lawsuit is about protecting the content that The Associated Press and its journalists produce every day, with creativity, at great cost, and often at great risk," AP President and CEO Tom Curley said in a statement. "The journalism that AP and other organizations produce is vital to democracy."

The dispute turns partly on the legal concept of fair use, which allows exceptions to copyright law. Courts decide based on factors including how much of the original is used, what the new work is used for and how the new work affects the original.

Copyright and fair use fights are gaining more attention as digital technology makes it easier to find and use images, songs and other creative content.

The cooperative said it tried to work out a license agreement with Fairey and agreed to donate proceeds from his prior use of the photo to a charitable fund that helps AP staffers who suffer personal losses in natural disasters and conflicts. Fairey cut off negotiations, the AP's lawsuit said.

A street artist known for a rebellious bent, Fairey, 38, pleaded not guilty Wednesday to 12 counts of vandalism in Boston. A spokesman for prosecutors said the charges were related to the artist's Obama and "Obey Giant" stickers, posted around the city.

Fairey issued a statement saying he was not involved in posting them in Boston. He noted that his art is widely available online.

Fairey has been arrested numerous times on charges of drawing on buildings and other private property without permission.

NEW YORK — The Associated Press countersued an artist Wednesday over his famous image of Barack Obama, saying the uncredited, uncompensated use of an AP photo violated copyright laws and signale...
NEW YORK — The Associated Press countersued an artist Wednesday over his famous image of Barack Obama, saying the uncredited, uncompensated use of an AP photo violated copyright laws and signale...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
185
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
photo

Boston is so failing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:06 AM on 03/13/2009
- MarcInCA I'm a Fan of MarcInCA 31 fans permalink

Somebody needs to build an AP-blocker to accompany my Ad-Blocker plugin in Firefox. I have no desire to keep this poscompany in business.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 AM on 03/13/2009
- MarcInCA I'm a Fan of MarcInCA 31 fans permalink

Somebody needs to build an AP-blocker to accompany my Ad-Blocker plugin in Firefox. I have no desire to keep this pos-company in business.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 AM on 03/13/2009
- Alvarask I'm a Fan of Alvarask 11 fans permalink

"Fairey’s large-scale, mixed-media stenciled collage was the central portrait image for the Obama campaign and was previously distributed as a limited-edition print and as a free download. The collage will be on view at the Portrait Gallery by Inauguration Day. It will be installed on the first floor of the museum in the exhibition titled “New Arrivals.”"

http://newsdesk.si.edu/releases/npg_fairey_obama_portrait.htm

Above I have provided the quote from the Smithsonian Institute which now has the Fairey poster. The link is to the Smithsonian website.

http://face2face.si.edu/my_weblog/2009/01/now-on-view-portrait-of-barack-obama-by-shepard-fairey.html

This link is also to the Smithsonian where you can SEE PEOPLE STANDING NEXT TO THE POSTER...it is as tall as a man. Probably about 6 X 4 feet. It is clearly a PAINTING and is not a photoshopped piece of work. Next?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 PM on 03/12/2009
photo

An interesting debate on the nature of visual plagiarism. I suppose it would have been polite for Mr. Fairey to have asked permission to use the photograph before publishing a work that so closely resembles it, but apparently he didn't. I think the whole thing has been overblown.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:23 PM on 03/12/2009
- petphotos I'm a Fan of petphotos 4 fans permalink
photo

AP needs to go away. Keep this crap up and it will come back to haunt you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:57 AM on 03/12/2009
- wedgie I'm a Fan of wedgie 19 fans permalink
photo

Exactly.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:05 PM on 03/12/2009

Jeepers. I posted what I thought was a thoughtful comment about AP's morphing of their photo through color change and cropping INTO Fairey's poster. At that point there were 31 comments. Now, at 139 and rising, I went ahead and expanded it into a complete post, with links, audio, photos, before and afters, etc.

But, rather than wait for the tender mercies of the numnuts "moderator" whoever that is, it's on MY blog. Sorry.

Nothing like incompetence and sloth to fire up the creative juices. (You know who I'm talking about, Moderator).

http://hisvorpal.wordpress.com/2009/03/11/ap-sues-fairey-shows-how-to-lie-with-picture/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 AM on 03/12/2009
- Alvarask I'm a Fan of Alvarask 11 fans permalink

So that's what happened? I have been wondering where the other image came from and wht most people seem to be talking about an image that is NOT Shepard Fairey's work! I have posted it here a number of times but you cannot get these things through the thick heads of most people.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 PM on 03/12/2009
- Alvarask I'm a Fan of Alvarask 11 fans permalink

I went to your blog and it is excellent! A wonderful description of just how crooked AP is in how they present this case and the fact that THEY manipulated their photo to make it look like Fairey's artwork!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:59 PM on 03/12/2009

Thanks, this is really helpful.

Warhol did something similar with photos of celebrities like Elvis Presley, Jackie Kennedy Onassis and Marilyn Monroe. The point of this particular style is to use non-representational color and representational form to evoke a response to the subject that transcends the fact of their humanity and makes us aware of another dimension to their popularity, their unique status as American icons.

It was a fascinating treatment of Barack Obama's image, particularly since it is a modern interpretation of the style, and undeniably added an enormous dimension of value to a completely ordinary photo. The application of this style is obviously dramatically transformative. It certainly qualifies as a case of "fair use."

In my opinion, the AP's right-wing President (Dean Singleton, who referred to President Obama as "Obama bin Laden") is the real explanation for the motivation behind the original accusation and the counter-lawsuit. Fairey is in the right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 03/12/2009
photo

I would hate to be this hack's lawyer. AP lawyers have only to cull the websites on this no-talent shtbag to prove that the Obama image is only one in a VERY long list of plaigarized images Fairey stole throughout his career. A career of theft aided and abeted by "sheeple" who bought his twaddle that he's some kind of a brilliant artistic anti-establishmentarian.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 AM on 03/12/2009

If a million people say a stupid and ignorant thing, it is still a stupid and ignorant thing.

"...we feel the need to address some of the vicious and unfounded rumors surrounding the originality of Shepard’s artwork that have been floated online in recent years. Though written by a variety of different detractors for a questionable array of reasons, the common thread binding them all—aside from a thinly masked veneer of obvious envy in most cases—is a nearly ubiquitous lack of understanding of the artist’s use of appropriated imagery in his work and the longstanding historical precedent for this mode of creative expression."

http://www.supertouchart.com/2009/02/02/editorial-the-medium-is-the-message-shepard-fairey-and-the-art-of-appropriation/

The "sheeple" here is you!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 03/12/2009

How did the Fairey image reduce the value of the original work? That image was essentially buried and was going to be lost into some archive. It was one of millions of different images of Obama, and as a photograph, not one that was so evocative that it was in any newspapers.

Fairey, if anything, increased the value of that photograph astronomically by altering it and creating his own iconic image. No one would have purchased posters of the original. Now AP is gaining tens of thousands of dollars from papers using the image in articles about Fairey's poster.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:06 AM on 03/12/2009
photo

Are things THAT bad, AP?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 AM on 03/12/2009

Actually the superposition of the photo and the poster actually is deceptive since it merges what is in the picture onto the Fairey image. Creases on the face, shadows, bossing and other features apparent on the photo are not on the poster. But the superimposed image makes one THINK they are.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 AM on 03/12/2009
photo

This "suit" is BULL$#!T through & through... & the AP KNOWS it.

They are simply posturing as to try & save FACE.. they have been swirling down the toilet for a DECADE now trying to resestablish their legitimacy after being expposed as the SHILLS for the neocons that they are.

First, they do NOT "own" the photo.. which was taken by an INDEPENDENT photographer who NEVER released it to them (in plain & simple fact.... he can SUE AP for using it without a CONTRACT).

Secondly... the "free use" laws PLAINLY allow such usage,, even if it WAS "copyrighted material" as the work of art was only BASED on the photo.. & NOT a REPRODUCTION of such.

Thirdly.. the work of art is a PAINTING.. NOT "photoshopped"... & NOT derived from anything OTHER than the ARTISTS INTERPRETATION of said image.

Finally.... a MOST dangerous precedent would be established as MANY other works of art from Warhol to Lichtenstein to Oldenburg to Rothko would be deemed an "infringement" as well.

Try as some on this thread might... they can only EMOTE their onjection... but they can't ELUCIDATE them.

Sorry throwbacks... but ART is ART.. & NOT "commerce".

PERIOD.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 AM on 03/12/2009
photo

What the #$% are you babbling about. It was an EXACT copy of the photo, and he PHOTOSHOPPED it. Fairey couldn't paint if you gave him a children's placemat to do. Furthermore its "fair use" not "free use", proving you know squat about legal issues. And no, there is nothing "clear" about fair use laws, and no, you're NOT more knowledgeable about the law than the AP's lawyers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 AM on 03/12/2009
- petphotos I'm a Fan of petphotos 4 fans permalink
photo

Exact or not, AP will get in their arse.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 AM on 03/12/2009
photo

It's PAINTED COLLAGE, nitwit.

Try doing some RESEARCH before you make a F.OOL of yourself AGAIN!

christ... where do these people COME from??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:33 AM on 03/12/2009
photo

Most likely, he used Adobe Illustator. Importing the photo as a base layer, then using "vector" drawing tools traced over it and altered the lines as he saw fit. Photoshop had nothing to do with it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 03/12/2009
- JZ735 I'm a Fan of JZ735 22 fans permalink

Sue the pants off that stupid kid...teach him a lesson he won't soon forget.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 AM on 03/12/2009
photo

Why?

TRY & be specific.. if you are ABLE to.

TRY & use LEGAL PRECEDENT... if you are ABLE to.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:41 AM on 03/12/2009
- petphotos I'm a Fan of petphotos 4 fans permalink
photo

There will be many going after AP for this crap.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:59 AM on 03/12/2009
- tjinc I'm a Fan of tjinc 17 fans permalink

I would also like to see a picture of Fairey's "lift" of the photo image along with these others. I have the poster at home and I see many differences.

As a graphic artist, I know the parameters around copying, and creating a "lift", or a very similar image.

Fairey's artwork based upon the photo is not a copy as far as I can see. The expression has changed, the mood of the subject looks different, and the extreme posterization takes it even further.

Political affiliation has nothing to do with this issue. This is one of artistic expression and image ownership.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 PM on 03/11/2009
- JZ735 I'm a Fan of JZ735 22 fans permalink

You see differences? Must not be much of a graphic artist.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:05 AM on 03/12/2009
- Alvarask I'm a Fan of Alvarask 11 fans permalink

tjinc is correct. The expression is different and in fact far more inspiring than that of the photo. The mood is quite different as well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:12 AM on 03/12/2009

Any graphic artist or artist could see the differences. The way contrast is used is quite different. The white tone is consistent on the right side of Obama's forehead and face in the poster, but all over the place in the photo. The dark shadows on the lower face/cheek on the left side of Obama's face is more solid than the photo.

Those are surely "manipulations" off the original, but they are alterations, nonetheless. Just as there is no flag in the background in the poster (that is why a superposition of the images is distorting rather than showing the dissimilarities. They should have shown the two side-by-side. Then let the eye decide.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 AM on 03/12/2009

The expression is different? Could've fooled me...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v664/Shtick/Fairey-HopeOriginalcopy.jpg

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:24 AM on 03/12/2009
- canfemlib I'm a Fan of canfemlib 13 fans permalink

My business includes licensing images, and the artist's use of the image is an infringement of the copyright. I'm not sure what sort of contract the photographer was working under, but likely a work-for-hire where the rights to the work is owned by AP. If the work had been reproduced for non-commercial editorial usages, likely there would not have been an issue, but once the "artist" turns into someone gaining commercial value from the image, which is clearly the artistic basis for the poster, note the camera angle and framing on the two images is identical as well as the subject himself, then royalties need to be paid for using the photograph for an artist rendering. A good artist, if using a photograph as a basis for their work often licenses the image in this way. I'm putting my money on the court ruling in favor of AP, and if I represented the photographer, I would certainly be taking this to court if the artist refused to negotiate a royalty.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:43 PM on 03/11/2009
- Alvarask I'm a Fan of Alvarask 11 fans permalink

Which image are you basing your opinion on? The one on this page is not it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 03/11/2009
- canfemlib I'm a Fan of canfemlib 13 fans permalink

The AP image above is the source image, and the actual poster is linked in another threat below this one.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 AM on 03/12/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect