Kill Your Fridge For A Month: Try Evaporative Cooling

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Kill Your Fridge For A Month: Try Evaporative Cooling stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

Chelsea Green   |   03/16/09

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Fridge

Chelsea Green:

Project Time: Afternoon.
Cost: Inexpensive ($5-50, depending on materials used).
Energy Saved: High. Can be high if used to replace an electric refrigerator. Can also quickly be made during camping trips or blackouts when no other refrigeration is available.
Ease of Use: Medium. Food temperature will be uneven, and in summertime the box will be considerably warmer than a mechanical refrigerator, resulting in quicker spoilage.

Read the whole story: Chelsea Green

Project Time: Afternoon. Cost: Inexpensive ($5-50, depending on materials used). Energy Saved: High. Can be high if used to replace an electric refrigerator. Can also quickly be made during camping ...
Project Time: Afternoon. Cost: Inexpensive ($5-50, depending on materials used). Energy Saved: High. Can be high if used to replace an electric refrigerator. Can also quickly be made during camping ...
 
Comments
13
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- SneathLane I'm a Fan of SneathLane 3 fans permalink

See, in the winter time you cut slabs of ice from the surface of frozen ponds, you store it surrounded by sawdust in a warehouse, and then you take it out in the summer and put it in a box with your food. It's called an ice-box. Works much better than this evaporation method, which only works in very low humidity climates.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 PM on 03/19/2009
photo

. . . and keep your fridge and freezer near full. Air dumps out with every opening of the door. Cold gets stored in "stuff" and it acts as thermal ballast.

Saw houses under construction in Germany -- small by our standards, but built to last for 100s of years. A very different ideal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 PM on 03/17/2009
- moonbay I'm a Fan of moonbay 5 fans permalink

did any of you read that article last week or so in HuffPo about insulating your fridge? Get a good fridge, insulate the outside (get creative and make it pretty), and save money on energy, while getting the cooling that you need to store your food safely. Makes sense to me. There was a mention of cork being a good insulator. I'm sure there're lots of good ideas out there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 AM on 03/17/2009
photo

What you'd save on energy you will loose in spoiled food. Trying this would probably increase your carbon foot print.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 03/16/2009
- prog I'm a Fan of prog 18 fans permalink
photo

Just an idea -- why haven't more houses, and fridges, integrated basic heat exchange technology?

I often wonder this when it's bloody freezing outside and my fridge is running.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:28 PM on 03/16/2009

Grey water heat recovery, and regenerative ventilation heat exchangers need to be designed into the home before construction. Most people don't understand the concept. They want something sexy like an enormously expensive Photo-voltaic array, that will generate a kilo-watt on a good day. Heat exchanger technology works all the time and churns out continuous savings. My sons and I have a small construction company. We intend to utilize these technologies when the company is expanded enough to build an entire house. (soon)

The Scandinavian countries already use these technologies. Hell, they take the waste heat from nuclear and coal fired power plants and use it to heat local towns. We in the US aren't that brave yet. We just send it into the atmosphere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:25 AM on 03/17/2009

Good point. But the US is waaaaay behind. Many homes don't even have double or triple pane glass and the wall and roof insulation is completely inadequate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:02 PM on 03/17/2009

Will only get as cold as the ambient dewpoint. Works OK in a desert, but good luck finding water to run it. In the hot muggy northeast, I will use mechanical refrigeration, thank you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:35 PM on 03/16/2009

I was wondering about the best possible result, with a strong feeling in my kneecap that it would be rather mediocre. Do you have an idea of how well the best historic examples used to work? I think they still seem to use it in some places in India, but it seems to put a strain on the water supply even there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 PM on 03/16/2009

We did study this when I was in college and it works for air conditioning when you have 0 humidity but for the bulk of the US you would only end up with a temp slightly less than the ambient air. And hear in Louisiana I think you would actually end up hotter with more water in the system.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:33 AM on 03/17/2009
- howcome I'm a Fan of howcome 7 fans permalink

just go live in a hut

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:44 PM on 03/16/2009

Oh brother... just replace your old fridge with a new, more efficient one and you will have done yourself and the environment a favor. And quit pretending that just because something is low tech it's better, greener or has to even work. If it would work well, they wouldn't have had to invent the electric refrigerator to begin with!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 03/16/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect