More

Seattle Post-Intelligencer Publishes Final Print Edition

GENE JOHNSON   03/17/09 09:54 PM ET   AP

Seattle Pi

SEATTLE — Patrick Sheldon has been a loyal reader of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer since 1965, when his dad started buying it because he preferred its sports coverage to that of rival Seattle Times.

Will he continue being a loyal reader, now that the P-I exists only as a Web site? Like many of the paper's customers, he says it depends on who writes and what they cover.

"If it's just bloggers, I probably won't," he said, sitting on a ferry from Bainbridge Island to Seattle.

After 146 years, the P-I's final edition rolled off the presses Tuesday, but a skeleton crew remained in the cavernous newsroom to take part in a journalistic experiment: whether a major newspaper can make money, and consistently produce good stories, as an Internet-only operation. It's the first major U.S. daily paper to switch from print to digital, a step that the P-I's parent company, Hearst Corp., took after it failed to find a buyer for the newspaper.

Seattlepi.com on Tuesday featured many of the same articles that appeared in the final edition, including somber remembrances of days gone by. But it also offered a glimpse of what the site will look like once the content produced by the full staff vanishes, including breaking news updates from crime and political reporters, columns by Seattle luminaries such as U.S. Rep. Jim McDermott and about 150 blogs by readers. Some marquee names, including columnist Joel Connelly and cartoonist David Horsey, will remain on staff, while sports columnists Art Thiel and Jim Moore will freelance for the Web site.

The final edition sold quickly; The Seattle Times, which handled nonnews functions for the P-I under a joint operating agreement that dated to 1983, printed three times as many P-Is as usual. At First and Pike News, in Pike Place Market, the final P-I sold out by 12:30 p.m. Tuesday, even though the newsstand had 600 copies delivered instead of the usual 50. Liberal radio talk show host Ron Reagan, the son of the late president, showed up to buy one for his producer, who lives in New York.

"It's a sad day, but I guess that's the way things go," he said.

Sen. Patty Murray eulogized the paper on the Senate floor, crediting its investigative reporting as the reason she introduced legislation to ban asbestos and to boost the number of FBI agents in the region.

"At the end of the day, newspapers aren't just another business," she said. "For generations, newspaper reporters have been the ones who have done the digging, sat through the meetings and broken the hard stories."

At the P-I, laid-off reporters continued clearing out their desks. Some were still suffering after a night of hard drinking when they showed up Tuesday for their exit interviews.

Among those most skeptical about whether seattlepi.com can thrive with an editorial staff of 20 _ about 130 fewer than the print edition had _ are those who lost their jobs.

"You cannot kill a newsroom and still cover news; we didn't have enough people to cover everything that deserved coverage as it was!" reporter Debera Harrell wrote in a forum for P-I employees at the Columbia Journalism Review's Web site. "In an era where Paris Hilton and Angelina Jolie's breastfeeding earn the most hits off our website, maybe real journalists are not needed."

"A staff of 20 can't cover what over 150 reporters and editors covered for the print product," former assistant managing editor Janet Grimley agreed.

Several of the laid-off workers are exploring the idea of creating their own news Web site, possibly in partnership with Seattle public television station KCTS.

The remaining P-I employees say they know what they're up against.

"Seattlepi.com will continue to cover city hall, crime, courts, real estate, development, education, transportation and more," executive producer Michelle Nicolosi wrote in a letter to readers. "I hope you'll pardon our dust for the next few weeks as we launch our new digital news and information Web site."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

SEATTLE — Patrick Sheldon has been a loyal reader of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer since 1965, when his dad started buying it because he preferred its sports coverage to that of rival Seattle T...
SEATTLE — Patrick Sheldon has been a loyal reader of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer since 1965, when his dad started buying it because he preferred its sports coverage to that of rival Seattle T...
Filed by Danny Shea  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
adam hartung
09:35 PM on 03/17/2009
The change at Seattle Post Intelligecer is a good thing for Seattle, and for Hearst. Developing a viable news model for on-line reporting is important to future readers and society. Read more at http://www.ThePhoenixPrinciple.com
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
theredqueen
Some days I can't spell.
03:50 PM on 03/17/2009
Today was a sad day for Seattle - when I read the last edition of The Post Intelligencer this morning I became very tearful. My nine year old grandson actually started reading newspapers when he was about two years old, he still loves "his" newspaper in his home town. Here's hoping some newspapers survive.
photo
Jeffin90019
Independent, occasional absolutist
03:40 PM on 03/17/2009
All of us reading newspaper articles on the web are partly to "blame" for the end of print newspapers. But, really, do we still need to cut down trees to produce paper when the news can be delivered by other means? Western Union stopped delivering telegrams because there was so little call for them in the age of email and cell phone and pagers and blackberries. Times changes, the media changes. News continues.
Gasparilla
buy your local newspaper
11:52 PM on 03/17/2009
It will continue in the sense that we'll know all about national news, but the in depth local stuff won't be covered. When a crooked local politician gets thrown out of office, it's freqently because of things dug up by the local newspaper. That won't happen on line.
12:59 PM on 03/17/2009
This was my newspaper as well. I saw the "You've meant the world to us" with the picture of the spire and I got teary eyed.

Bye, PI, I'll miss you. But I am looking forward to the PI 2.0 web edition.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
GermanGoodness
12:25 PM on 03/17/2009
This was my newspaper. And today is a sad day. Seattle Post Intelligencer, you will be greatly missed.
11:46 AM on 03/17/2009
Will be one of those that indeed misses the printed pages...and frankly, note to advertisers, would take in MORE advertising from the print pages than ever bother with ONLINE which is far more a nuisance/irritant/annoyance as if online, am on there for speed read at such sites far more than indepth leisure readings/preusings and etc.
Further annoyance coming as "advertisers" take up more ON AIR time(to help pay outlandish salires for on air folks/costs/etc) and even your cell ringings now get zapped with advertising on the go--What wa it , they just announced enticement for ad folks to hook into twitter to tweeter folks ..ARE WE NUTZ or what to encourage such overload...like yee-sh.
11:08 AM on 03/17/2009
Another liberal rag down the toilet.
Gasparilla
buy your local newspaper
10:25 AM on 03/17/2009
And we'll get the people on here who will say how much more convenient it is to read a paper online. Completely wrong. That's people trying to convince themselves of something clearly not true. I can read my print paper as quickly or as leisurely as I want. Online,first of all, you go to the main page, and then scan the stories and click on the one you want. Then you wait for that page to download. Sometimes it's fast, sometimes not. If it's a long story, then you have to scroll down, then click to the next page, all the while waiting for all the ads on that page to be displayed, and killing the popups that are in the way of your reading.

Then when you are done, you have to click back to home or the header of the department you want, and then wait for that to be displayed again. Even with high speed, which I have, it can take time for a page to come up. Meanwhile, with my print paper, I am reading headlines, reading half way through a story, and when I'm ready to move on, I've already turned the page. I don't have to go back to the front of the paper to get to the next story I want.
10:52 AM on 03/17/2009
I have to disagree. I personally find it much easier to read something online because the headlines can be better organized, I don't have to deal with the bulky newspaper folding, and there is less page jumping (from page A2 to A16, etc). Perhaps this has to do with the fact I have never been too much of a newspaper reader.
Gasparilla
buy your local newspaper
11:12 AM on 03/17/2009
Actually, as I said, there is a lot of page jumping online. Usually, with a print paper, the only stories you have to turn to are on the first page of that section. And it takes little time to go to those stories. And I think the key here is you saying it's easier to read "something" online. Something implies one individual story. Since you admit you're not much of a paper reader, then that is exactly my point. Reading a whole paper from end to end, or at least picking the stories you want to read, is more easily done with a print paper. As for the folding, I don't fold it. I read it. It's not that tough.