Baby Boomlet: US Births In 2007 Break 1950s Record

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Baby Boomlet: US Births In 2007 Break 1950s Record stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MIKE STOBBE | 03/18/09 09:12 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Graphic shows number of births in the U.S. since

ATLANTA — Remember the baby boom? No, not the one after World War II. More babies were born in the United States in 2007 than any other year in the nation's history _ and a wedding band made increasingly little difference in the matter. The 4,317,119 births, reported by federal researchers Wednesday, topped a record first set in 1957 at the height of the baby boom.

Behind the number is both good and bad news. While it shows the U.S. population is more than replacing itself, a healthy trend, the teen birth rate was up for a second year in a row.

The birth rate rose slightly for women of all ages, and births to unwed mothers reached an all-time high of about 40 percent, continuing a trend that started years ago. More than three-quarters of these women were 20 or older.

For a variety of reasons, it's become more acceptable for women to have babies without a husband, said Duke University's S. Philip Morgan, a leading fertility researcher.

Even happy couples may be living together without getting married, experts say. And more women _ especially those in their 30s and 40s _ are choosing to have children despite their single status.

The new numbers suggest the second year of a baby boomlet, with U.S. fertility rates higher in every racial group, the highest among Hispanic women. On average, a U.S. woman has 2.1 babies in her lifetime. That's the "magic number" required for a population to replace itself.

Countries with much lower rates _ such as Japan and Italy _ face future labor shortages and eroding tax bases as they fail to reproduce enough to take care of their aging elders.

While the number of births in the U.S. reached nearly 4.3 million in 2006, mainly due to a larger population, especially a growing number of Hispanics, it's not clear the boomlet will last. Some experts think birth rates are already declining because of the economic recession that began in late 2007.

Story continues below
advertisement

"I expect they'll go back down. The lowest birth rates recorded in the United States occurred during the Great Depression _ and that was before modern contraception," said Dr. Carol Hogue, an Emory University professor of maternal and child health.

The 2007 statistical snapshot reflected a relatively good economy coupled with cultural trends that promoted childbirth, she and others noted.

Meanwhile, U.S. abortions dropped to their lowest levels in decades, according to other reports. Some have attributed the abortion decline to better use of contraceptives, but other experts have wondered if the rise in births might indicate a failure in proper use of contraceptives. Some earlier studies have shown declining availability of abortions.

Cultural attitudes may be a more likely explanation. Morgan noted the pregnancy of Bristol Palin, the unmarried teen daughter of former GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin. The young woman had a baby boy in December, and plans for a wedding with the father, Levi Johnston, were scrapped.

"She's the poster child for what you do when you get pregnant now," Morgan said.

Teen women tend to follow what their older sisters do, so perhaps it's not surprising that teen births are going up just like births to older women, said Sarah Brown, the chief executive for the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.

Indeed, it's harder to understand why teen births had been declining for about 15 years before the recent uptick, she said. It may have been due to a concentrated effort to reduce teen births in the 1990s that has waned in recent years, she said.

The statistics are based on a review of most 2007 birth certificates by the National Center for Health Statistics, part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The numbers also showed:

_Cesarean section deliveries continue to rise, now accounting for almost a third of all births. Health officials say that rate is much higher than is medically necessary. About 34 percent of births to black women were by C-section, more than any other racial group. But geographically, the percentages were highest in Puerto Rico, at 49 percent, and New Jersey, at 38 percent.

_The pre-term birth rate, for infants delivered at less than 37 weeks of pregnancy, declined slightly. It had been generally increasing since the early 1980s. Experts said they aren't sure why it went down.

_Among the states, Utah continued to have the highest birth rate and Vermont the lowest.

CDC officials noted that despite the record number of births, this increase is different from occurred in the 1950s, when a much smaller population of women were having nearly four children each, on average. That baby boom quickly transformed society, affecting everything from school construction to consumer culture.

Today, U.S. women are averaging 2.1 children each. That's the highest level since the early 1970s, but is a relatively small increase from the rate it had hovered at for more than 10 years and is hardly transforming.

"It's the tiniest of baby booms," said Morgan in agreement. "This is not an earthquake; it's a slight tremor."

___

On the Net:

The CDC report, including some state-by-state figures: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs

ATLANTA — Remember the baby boom? No, not the one after World War II. More babies were born in the United States in 2007 than any other year in the nation's history _ and a wedding band made inc...
ATLANTA — Remember the baby boom? No, not the one after World War II. More babies were born in the United States in 2007 than any other year in the nation's history _ and a wedding band made inc...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
286
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
- sunnybunny I'm a Fan of sunnybunny 15 fans permalink
photo

I can't wrap my head around an idea that anyone would just randomly get pregnant whenever it happens. To me, it's part of taking care of yourself and your family to plan when you get pregnant, just like brushing and flossing your teeth so they don't fall out, or exercising and eating right or good hygiene. The only thing keeping these women from having like 10 kids is bad health.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 03/22/2009
- sunnybunny I'm a Fan of sunnybunny 15 fans permalink
photo

This is part 2 of another comment

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 AM on 03/22/2009
- sunnybunny I'm a Fan of sunnybunny 15 fans permalink
photo

People feel differently as individuals about marriage and committment and family planning. Even in this country, there are social groups where birth control and family planning and safe sex are practically considered myths or something that "uppity people" do - right along with teeth whitening, tanning, and well, they make fun of aerobics classes too. I went to a party yesterday (redneck party) and one of the women there was getting married soon to a man she has been living with for a couple of years and we were talking about marriage and the difference between living together and being married. I made the statement about my own marriage that we had always planned to have a big wedding but not until we had lived together 10 years but we were forced because of a legal problem to go and get a marriage license about 9 years into our relationship. There isn't much difference in the way we see our relationship, but we have seen a huge difference in the way other people treat our relationship. We had made the commitment to stay together for life before we DECIDED to have our children. These women proudly stated they don't use any of that birth control stuff, that none of their children were planned, they just take what the good lord gives them and they think thats how it should be.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:30 AM on 03/22/2009
photo

It make me think by some comments that Many people are single with No children- which does change a humans outlook on life- for the better- The best thing in my family are the two births we just experienced--- and are family is not out of wedlock either-

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:40 PM on 03/21/2009

Misleading story.....

The 1950 Census showed 151+ million people. The 2000 Census showed 281+ million

A baby boom of 4.3 million babies in the 1950s, isn't really being eclipsed, relative to the population.

Were we making 10 million babies, then we could evoke the baby boom stuff.

Anyway, the birth jump isn't a total surprise. People have babies in times of anxiety and crisis, you know, like comfort food..... I'm sure this will be great for society.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:50 PM on 03/19/2009
photo

The Housing Bubble produced this spike in offspring...

New subprime loan for the stucco McAbode in the burbs...new lease for the flossin' SUV...how about a dog or two to show off? And, then, of course, the final fashion/success accessory, the child (or 2)...

See how I successful we are! See how we've made it! All on credit!

The Bubble popped...what now?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:15 PM on 03/19/2009
- neurolux I'm a Fan of neurolux 3 fans permalink

Oh good, more people. I was afraid we were going to run out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:43 PM on 03/19/2009

HAhahahaa!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 PM on 03/19/2009
photo

As long as the US has a slightly positive birthrate, I'm happy. Not too positive, just a little over zero. Although I hate to see the high percentage of "unintentional" single mothers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:02 PM on 03/19/2009
- cd789 I'm a Fan of cd789 55 fans permalink
photo

I would caution against reading too much into the 40% of unwed mothers statistic before understanding their methodology for determining whether a birth occurs out of wedlock. In a number of instances, all that happens is that birth certificates are examined, and if the last names of the mother and father are different, then they are classified as unwed, and there is no follow up to see whether the birth actually comes from married mothers who decided to keep their maiden names. This artificially inflates the unwed statistic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 PM on 03/19/2009

In order to properly fill out a birth certificate you indicate whether you are married or not. It is a yes or no question so determining whether the mother is married or not has nothing to do with the last names. Birth certificate forms also ask for the highest level of education completed by each parent in addition to race and ethnicity information.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:53 PM on 03/20/2009

Someone here MUST have mentioned Soylent Green already.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:32 PM on 03/19/2009

As long as future conservatives are multiplying faster than future Democrats (which, considering Republicans have more children and Democrats abort more), might be the case.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:31 PM on 03/19/2009
- Clovie I'm a Fan of Clovie 15 fans permalink
photo

"...and Democrats abort more"

That's absolutely ridiculous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 PM on 03/19/2009
photo

Which orifice did you pull that out of? Cite your source, if you're so confident that's true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:35 PM on 03/19/2009

Well... case in point: Since there is a high correlation between conservatism and poor education, as well as a correlation between poor education and higher birthrates, It's pretty likely you're getting your wish.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 PM on 03/19/2009
- LolaP I'm a Fan of LolaP 10 fans permalink
photo

"The new numbers suggest the second year of a baby boomlet, with U.S. fertility rates higher in every racial group, the highest among Hispanic women. On average, a U.S. woman has 2.1 babies in her lifetime. That's the "magic number" required for a population to replace itself.

Countries with much lower rates _ such as Japan and Italy _ face future labor shortages and eroding tax bases as they fail to reproduce enough to take care of their aging elders."

I don't get it?? I thought the world was becoming overpopula­ted......?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:52 PM on 03/19/2009
- Sepulchre I'm a Fan of Sepulchre 102 fans permalink
photo

It is in non-developed countries the birth rate is growning exponentially every year, but then you probably don't count that part of the world as worth mentioning.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:09 PM on 03/19/2009
- LolaP I'm a Fan of LolaP 10 fans permalink
photo

why do you say that? i was just wondering, why so hostile?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 PM on 03/19/2009
- Sepulchre I'm a Fan of Sepulchre 102 fans permalink
photo

And the not funny thing about it is that those same fundamentalist Christians turn around and condemn the unwed mothers. It's well like watching a person with a split personality fight with itself.

Also how do get that assumption? As the number of people decrease, consumption decreases. So even though you have a reduced population you have enough workers to accomidate your decreased consumption, not so difficult is it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:13 PM on 03/19/2009
- CalverH I'm a Fan of CalverH 3 fans permalink

The higghest rates are in the developing world...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 03/19/2009
photo

The world IS becoming overpopulated. The issue surrounding the tax base is based upon the unequal income distribution within countries (especially the U.S.). As long as people are being paid barely minimum wage, it is always going to take the combined meager incomes of many to support the retirement of a generation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:53 PM on 03/19/2009
- rlugbill I'm a Fan of rlugbill 8 fans permalink

A lot of the births now are either unwed mothers or fundamentalist Christians of one stripe or another. Mainstream families' birth rates are down.

So, it appears that society is going to become even more split between those with very strict upbringings in a big family and those without much of an upbringing at all because no one is at home watching them because the mother is too busy.

Meanwhile, fathers are mostly in roles of either being the patriarch and breadwinner or being a distant wallet, paying out a little child support, but otherwise not around much.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:59 PM on 03/19/2009
- Sepulchre I'm a Fan of Sepulchre 102 fans permalink
photo

And the not funny thing about it is that those same fundamentalist Christians turn around and condemn the unwed mothers. It's well like watching a person with a split personality fight with itself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 03/19/2009
- Sepulchre I'm a Fan of Sepulchre 102 fans permalink
photo

Sorry replied to the wrong post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:11 PM on 03/19/2009

Yes, good point. That's what I'm afraid of. One uhealthy extreme (Fundamentalist Christians) vs. another (random breeders).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 03/29/2009
- patianneb I'm a Fan of patianneb 18 fans permalink
photo

So much for education and responsibility. So much for giving a damn about anything but narcissism. The popularizing of Spears, Palin etc., not to mention Octomom is disgusting, as far as I'm concerned.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 03/19/2009
photo

Those who feel that one doesn't have to be married to be committed are missing the primary reason to marry: A marriage is a legal contract. Try getting your live-in's health insurance benefits or social security or making important health care decisions for him or her without that silly piece of paper.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:39 PM on 03/19/2009
photo

Try being gay - in California now, you're not even given that option.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 PM on 03/19/2009

Yeah, I agree. Even if you don't believe in the religious aspect at all, why the h*ll would you have a kid without signing a legal contract with the other parent? Makes no sense. But then, humans aren't rational.

I also say there's something to be said about signing on the dotted line. It weeds out some of the less committed and makes some folks more committed than they would without that so-called "piece of paper". I know divorce rates are high, but "live in" relationships have even higher breakup rates.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 03/29/2009
- Nutcase I'm a Fan of Nutcase 49 fans permalink
photo

It seems we are headed back to the good old days.

Over half of all women were either pregnant at or had given birth before the time of their marriage in the days prior to the American Revolution.

That may explain why our country harbors so many atavists.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 03/19/2009

Where does that information come from? And what recording agency took those figures? Just curious-- I have never seen that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:58 PM on 03/19/2009
- Nutcase I'm a Fan of Nutcase 49 fans permalink
photo

I ran across it while taking a History degree at UCLA back in the 1960s. It is credible though I would have difficulty locating it after more than four decades. I do recall that it was based on a compilation of records of births and marriages across all of New England. It could very well have been based on sampling but I think it was from a large study.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:46 PM on 03/19/2009

Yes, it's true. I leaned it in a college sociology class. It just shows you how birth control in many ways has encouraged indiscriminate sex and the resultant unplanned pregnancies....the opposite of what was intened.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 PM on 03/29/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect