Feinstein Seeks To Block Solar Power From California Desert Land

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Feinstein Seeks To Block Solar Power From California Desert Land stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

KEVIN FREKING | 03/21/09 07:21 AM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this Friday, July 22, 2005 file photo, a rainbow forms in rainy skies over State Highway 178 between Death Valley National Park and the town of Shoshone, Calif. More than 500,000 acres in the Mojave Desert would be off-limits to wind or solar energy production under legislation Sen. Dianne Feinstein intends to introduce. The land is coveted by companies seeking to develop alternative energy, setting up a potential clash with one of the more powerful members of Congress. (AP Photo/Reed Saxon)

WASHINGTON — California's Mojave Desert may seem ideally suited for solar energy production, but concern over what several proposed projects might do to the aesthetics of the region and its tortoise population is setting up a potential clash between conservationists and companies seeking to develop renewable energy.

Nineteen companies have submitted applications to build solar or wind facilities on a parcel of 500,000 desert acres, but Sen. Dianne Feinstein said Friday such development would violate the spirit of what conservationists had intended when they donated much of the land to the public.

Feinstein said Friday she intends to push legislation that would turn the land into a national monument, which would allow for existing uses to continue while preventing future development.

The Wildlands Conservancy orchestrated the government's purchase of the land between 1999-2004. It negotiated a discount sale from the real estate arm of the former Santa Fe and Southern Pacific Railroad and then contributed $40 million to help pay for the purchase. David Myers, the conservancy's executive director, said the solar projects would do great harm to the region's desert tortoise population.

"It would destroy the entire Mojave Desert ecosystem," said David Myers, executive director of The Wildlands Conservancy.

Feinstein said the lands in question were donated or purchased with the intent that they would be protected forever. But the Bureau of Land Management considers the land now open to all types of development, except mining. That policy led the state to consider large swaths of the land for future renewable energy production.

"This is unacceptable," Feinstein said in a letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar. "I urge you to direct the BLM to suspend any further consideration of leases to develop former railroad lands for renewable energy or for any other purpose."

In a speech last year, Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger complained about environmental concerns slowing down the approval of solar plants in California.

Story continues below
advertisement

"If we cannot put solar power plants in the Mojave desert, I don't know where the hell we can put it," Schwarzenegger said at Yale University.

But Karen Douglas, chairman of the California Energy Commission, said Feinstein's proposal could be a "win-win" for energy and conservation. The governor's office said Douglas was speaking on the administration's behalf.

"The opportunity we see in the Feinstein bill is to jump-start our own efforts to find the best sites for development and to come up with a broader conservation plan that mitigates the impact of the development," Douglas said.

Douglas said that if the national monument lines were drawn without consideration of renewable energy then a conflict was likely, but it's early enough in the planning process that she's confident the state will be able to get more solar and wind projects up and running without hurting the environment.

"We think we can do both," Douglas said. "We think this is an opportunity to accelerate both."

Greg Miller of the Bureau of Land Management said there are 14 solar energy and five wind energy projects that have submitted applications seeking to develop on what's referred to as the former Catellus lands. None of the projects are close to being approved, he said.

The land lies in the southeast corner of California, between the existing Mojave National Preserve on the north and Joshua Tree National Park on the south.

"They all have to go through a rigorous environmental analysis now," Miller said. "It will be at best close to two years out before we get some of these grants approved."

Feinstein's spokesman, Gil Duran, said the senator looks forward to working with the governor and the Interior Department on the issue.

"There's plenty of room in America's deserts for the bold expansion of renewable energy projects," Duran said.

___

On the Net:

The Wildlands Conservancy: http://wildlandsconservancy.org

WASHINGTON — California's Mojave Desert may seem ideally suited for solar energy production, but concern over what several proposed projects might do to the aesthetics of the region and its tort...
WASHINGTON — California's Mojave Desert may seem ideally suited for solar energy production, but concern over what several proposed projects might do to the aesthetics of the region and its tort...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
102
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
- Mosby12 I'm a Fan of Mosby12 4 fans permalink

The chickens in the Green movement are coming home to roost. We soon won't be able to blame anyone except ourselves for what I see as an impending failure. The concientious, enviornmentally minded Americans will now be forced to come face to face with what I've seen after 33 years in the federal government... the wackos with lots of money, who would have us all walk into incinerators at the ripe old age of 40 to preserve their idealic vision of "pristine". They will be holding up meaningful gains in alternative power - wind and solar citing the most specious and far fetched "impacts" for years and years.. forcing us back to carbon based solutions!!

FOLKS - WE NEED SOME PERSPECTIVE HERE

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 03/24/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 243 fans permalink

The BS is the Fossil fuel path.

We are not running out of wind and solar, we don't have to fight energy wars for trillions of dollars to install solar, Solar and Wind dollars will not go to rogue states all over the world. The cost for solar and wind continue to drop, while oil?

Rooftop solar and provide all our energy needs.

Rooftop solar already cut your monthly bill including financing purchase and installation, Where Air conditioning is the peak load.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/users/profile/research

After rooftop solar, the rest of the Picken's plan makes very good sense, and will work. It includes Carbon based Natural gas, which is the cleanest of all the carbon fuels. Natural gas used for trucking and backup will last plenty long enough to implement green generated syn fuels including hydrogen.

It's goal oil and Nukes that we must replace ASAP.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 03/31/2009
photo

Senator Feinstein can be an embarrassment at times.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:11 AM on 03/24/2009
- nirek I'm a Fan of nirek 84 fans permalink
photo

Go solar , wind, geo thermal, and hydro!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:00 PM on 03/23/2009

"It would destroy the entire Mojave Desert ecosystem," said David Myers, executive director of The Wildlands Conservancy.

Puuulease.... Be careful before you use hyperbole, since this issue is very important. Give an example where an ecosystem has been destroyed by a large area of solar panels. Where? For all you know, wildlife might be attracted to a large area array, akin to an artificial reef in the ocean.

I'm a dedicated environmentalist and and hiker. I see nothing wrong with large area solar arrays in the desert.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 AM on 03/23/2009
- OkieMon I'm a Fan of OkieMon 34 fans permalink

it only takes 96 square miles of solar panels to provide all of our energy needs...surely there are numerous spots across the southwest where this could be accomplished....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 AM on 03/23/2009

96 square miles? The island of Manhattan is 23 square miles, and putting up 23 square miles solar panels wouldn't even power Manhattan. In Scientific America's Grand Solar plan they estimate the size at 46,000 square miles to replace all US carbon fuel, the size of Pennsylvanian.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:55 PM on 03/23/2009
- OkieMon I'm a Fan of OkieMon 34 fans permalink

you've been reading too many oil blogs....this below ref was calculated at 10% PV efficiency and present efficiencies are on the order of 25% with 50% within easy grasp...you do the math....


"The Department of Energy
estimates that a distributed solar system sufficient to
meet the entire U.S. electricity demand would require
an average of 17 square miles of PV per state."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:07 PM on 03/23/2009
- PlayTOE I'm a Fan of PlayTOE 21 fans permalink
photo

The problem with Dianne Feinstein is that she only came up with what could NOT be done, but no replacement idea of what COULD be done that would be acceptable to both the environment and also produce the needed energy.

I favor placing solar energy on rooftops first, then over parking lots, then over highways.
I prefer seeing wind towers placed on High Voltage right of ways where the towers can do double duty (holding up wires as well as wind turbines), then placed on farmland where they have a very small footprint and a large income.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:04 AM on 03/23/2009

Exactly - put it where the grid already exists, but don't forget to connect it to the grid - otherwise you have to keep creating new transmission lines, etc. Rooftops, existing rights of way - how about in the windows of multi-story glass buildings?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:08 AM on 03/23/2009
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

mamacat See Profile I'm a Fan of mamacat I'm a fan of this user permalink

Correct me if I am wrong, but having watched her over the years, she seems to always come down on the side that would benefit the oil cartel. She is on-board with most Democratic party ideas, but not when it comes to cutting into Oil's profits. There may or may not be a valid issue regarding using a small amount of desert land for a few solar and wind projects, but I get suspicious when her objections are part of a larger trend.

She does not only sides with the oil cartel, she specially sides with big pharma. Guess what companies her husband is heavily invested in?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 PM on 03/22/2009
- dolphy I'm a Fan of dolphy 46 fans permalink

Sorry for some grammatical errors above.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:36 PM on 03/22/2009
- lapdogs I'm a Fan of lapdogs 14 fans permalink
photo

Guess she "forgets" about the initial days of OPEC and what those long lines at the gas stations looked like. Remember all those "Out Of Gas" signs, with people pushing their cars?

Now we are trying to prevent another OPEC Embargo with electric cars or the likes of Enron and "Aunt Millie"- yet Feinstein is against it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 03/23/2009

feinstein needs to wake up. if we don't address warming right now, then the whole damned southwest will be desert.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:20 PM on 03/22/2009

Don't all solar and wind development plans already require an EPA enviro impact review before approval? Whats she suggesting? That what could be a central source for future solar energy in this country be blocked off simply because she doesn't like the idea? I'm pretty sure all that pollution coming out of our coal powerplants messez up more than a few ecosystems.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 03/22/2009
- lizr I'm a Fan of lizr 221 fans permalink
photo

why cant they work together? what is Feinsteins problem?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 PM on 03/22/2009

I think it's time to brand her for what she is...

A KOOK period.

Surely, there is enough desert land to give some of it to Solar?

Or are desert rats, snakes and whatever more important than people?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:57 PM on 03/22/2009
photo

"Or are desert rats, snakes and whatever more important than people?"

This is idiotic drivel. Despite our best efforts, humans have not been able to make themselves 100% immune to environmental degradation. Those same, insignificant rats, snakes, etc. all play a role in sustaining ecosystems. Remove enough of them and the whole thing crumbles. It's not that they're more important than people. The real problem is that when enough of these species are eradicated by piss-poor human ecosystem management it will eventually catch up to humans and bite them in the a**.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:07 PM on 03/23/2009
photo

We're doomed. There is no energy source that doesn't come with a few trade-offs, but when CO2 is literally killing the planet, we have to make some sacrifices.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:18 PM on 03/22/2009
- research I'm a Fan of research 243 fans permalink

Roof top Solar is nearly ideal. It reduces grid load and is already cheaper than the utilities in areas where Air conditioning is peak load.

The desert loving environmentalist need to identity the land of greatest importance, and let the rest be developed.

There is enough rooftop area for all our energy needs.

See my profile.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 03/22/2009
- lapdogs I'm a Fan of lapdogs 14 fans permalink
photo

Is this a way to get political contributions from the Solar Companies? Seems she has done very well with other energy companies.

Guess the upcoming Solar Companies have to "learn the ropes" as to "How DC Works".

Isn't there some legal term for this? It's on the tip of my tounge.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 PM on 03/22/2009

There is 500,000 acres of near useless desert and Feinstein can't find a couple thousand acres or so to help save the planet from greenhouse gases? thats crap.

I am pretty sure that the tortoise could easily live on the remaining 490,000+ acres.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:48 PM on 03/22/2009
- newshawk14 I'm a Fan of newshawk14 8 fans permalink

I basically agree, as I've visited and hiked in various parts of the Mohave, and have to admit
I'm not much of a desert rat, and would rather spend my time among the Sierra peaks or CA
ocean shores. I do think, however, that we have to carefully look at the environmental impact,
before embracing any given program.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 03/22/2009

Plenty of land in and on existing Government military bases that would be suitable for this as it is already messed up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:01 PM on 03/22/2009
- stevi I'm a Fan of stevi 4 fans permalink

I agree, I have read that many desert military bases are so polluted with jet fuel and other nasty chemicals dumped by our military, that it cannot be used for much of anything. Why not use this land for solar panels or wind turbines or other such projects?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:14 PM on 03/22/2009
- JulieSA I'm a Fan of JulieSA 164 fans permalink
photo

You get a lot more electricity out of a nice little nuke plant. Then you don't have to pave over so much desert with solar.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:20 PM on 03/22/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect