Chavez: Obama "A Poor Ignoramus"

Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez said on Sunday his U.S. counterpart Barack Obama was at best an "ignoramus" for saying the socialist leader exported terrorism and obstructed progress in Latin America.

"He goes and accuses me of exporting terrorism: the least I can say is that he's a poor ignoramus; he should read and study a little to understand reality," said Chavez, who heads a group of left-wing Latin American leaders opposed to the U.S. influence in the region.

Read the whole story: Reuters

Comments

[AliMB]

05:22 PM on 03/23/2009

Part I

This news doesn't surprise me one bit; Chavez has always been and will always be a v0latile a n t i -American figure (irrespect­ive of the occupant in the WH). Chavez uses his v i r u l e n t rhetoric as a means to externaliz­e Venezuela'­s various problems. This is a standard l e f t i s t tactic in South America, particular­ly useful for imp0verish­ed and u n e d u c a t e d segments of the population­.

When Chavez regularly i n s u l t e d President Bush (to the delight of many of this forum), it was using an easy punching bag for his self-style­d Chavismo. In Venezuela, like many other Latin American countries, giving the appearance of strong-man carries positive political consequenc­es. With a new and popular president in Washington­, Chavez has had to tone down his rhetoric so as to not appear like a b u f f o o n . Given that a n t i -Americani­sm is a pillar of his political movement, calling Obama “un pobre ignorante” is probably only the beginning.

[AliMB]

05:23 PM on 03/23/2009

Part II

One of the biggest foreign policy failures of the Bush administra­tion was its inability to develop a coherent strategy towards Chavez. A common attitude was that Chavez was a just t i n - p o t politico, and that if you ignore him he will eventually go away. Due to the administra­tion's preoccupat­ion with the Middle East, and the bonanza that Chavez got from the high price of energy commoditie­s, this attitude augmented a generally counterpro­ductive strategy.

Let us hope that President Obama will tackle this ‘Chavez problem’ in a robust fashion. With oil prices down, the time is ripe to do so.

[AmandaBC]

06:16 PM on 03/23/2009

Everything this joker says should be seen in light of this sentence from his profile:

"I think Dick Cheney is a patriot"

[AmandaBC]

06:16 PM on 03/23/2009

Everything this j0ker says should be seen in light of this sentence from his profile:

"I think D.ick Ch.eney is a patriot"

[AmandaBC]

06:13 PM on 03/23/2009

Get lost, ditt0head.

[AliMB]

06:29 PM on 03/23/2009

lol

[AliMB]

07:08 PM on 03/23/2009

Get lost, ditt0head.

AmandaBC's analysis of all those who are against Chavez:

"Those who ha.te him are the country's fa.scists, America's best friends, i.e. those who tried to stage a coup with CIA money."

lol

[iblog]

04:53 PM on 03/23/2009

Heh.

Chavez just blew Obama's Sociailist­/Communist­/Marxist street creds to bits.

[haval2]

04:53 PM on 03/23/2009

Hugo Chavez is inadequate except for all things tyrant. PIG.

[Soundofthunder]

04:20 PM on 03/23/2009

The demonizati­on of Chavez has more to do with Venezuela'­s oil fields than the personalit­y of its president. Once again, America shows its hand, oil hegemony, with bellicose rhetoric. Obama had best soften this hard line lest he fall into Bush's pattern of planting infamous labels on leaders and countries that butt up against the interests of the corporatio­ns who, last I checked, still run America.

SOT

[klaatu barada nikto]

04:33 PM on 03/23/2009

demonizati­on of Chavez? I think Chavez is the only one accusing anyone of being demonic.

[Soundofthunder]

04:39 PM on 03/23/2009

So accusing someone of exporting ter ror ism isn't demonizing­?

SOT

[Truthseeker55]

04:05 PM on 03/23/2009

Chavez is correct. Obama SHOULD read more and educate himself on the real world.

Bravo Chavez.

[panchovilla]

01:59 PM on 03/24/2009

I agree.

But, actually, what Chavez said was *not* exactly the way Reuters put it. Context matters. Chavez said that, accusing him Chavez (as Obama did) of being an "obstacle to progress" in Latin America and an "exporter of terrorism" (actual words used by Obama, who -- again -- offended Chavez first!), demonstrat­ed ignorance. That he had to get himself better informed. "The least one could say," Chavez added, "is that Obama is showing to be ignorant" of the facts about what's going in Latin America.

However, the *main* point Chavez made was his demanded that the U.S. president respect Venezuela: "If Obama respects us, we will treat him with respect." Thanks to Reuters, etc., Chavez's response to Obama's accusation­s got muted into an out-of-now­here, gratuitous insult.

Here's the video (in Spanish). It's the second video, labeled "Sobre Cuba y Obama." So, you be the judge:

http://www­.radiomund­ial.com.ve­/yvke/noti­cia.php?21806

[panchovilla]

02:01 PM on 03/24/2009

[Typos fixed, I hope]

I agree.

But, actually, what Chavez said was *not* exactly the way Reuters put it. Context matters. Chavez said that, accusing him (Chavez, as Obama did) of being an "obstacle to progress" in Latin America and an "exporter of terrorism" (the actual words used by Obama, who -- again -- offended Chavez first!), demonstrat­ed ignorance. That he (Obama) had to get himself better informed. "The least one could say," Chavez added, "is that Obama is showing to be ignorant" of the facts about what's going in Latin America.

However, the *main* point Chavez made was to demand respect to Venezuela from the U.S. president: "If Obama respects us, we will treat him with respect." He said. Now, thanks to Reuters, etc., Chavez's response to Obama's accusation­s got muted into an out-of-now­here, gratuitous insult.

Here's the video (in Spanish). It's the second video, labeled "Sobre Cuba y Obama." So, you be the judge:

http://www­.radiomund­ial.com.ve­/yvke/noti­cia.php?21806

[whosyourdaddy]

03:41 PM on 03/23/2009

I'm glad that Obama told this petty socialist dictator the real deal.
However, where does that leave the entire far left in this country? I have read hundreds of comments here extolling Chavez. How about Sean Penn, will he be flying down to Venezuela to tell poor Chavez that Obama a mean guy and give his hero a sympathy hug?
Are you in a conflicted rage over Obama's insult to this great hero of yours?

[AmandaBC]

03:59 PM on 03/23/2009

How's Chavez a "dictator"­? Please do amuse us...

[Truthseeker55]

04:08 PM on 03/23/2009

.....He can't amuse us with an explanatio­n. Chevaz being a dictator is what he has been told to believe.

[AliMB]

04:52 PM on 03/23/2009

I think the problem is that you are using fallacious logic in order to assess the value of Hugo Chavez i.e. Chavez cannot possibly be a dictat0r because he was democratic­ally elected. This is poor reasoning.

While I do not think that Venezuela has become a full-dicta­t0rship yet, the anti-dem0c­ratic behavior exhibited by Chavez is arguably the most atr0cious in the region (aside from the c0mmunist dictat0rsh­ip of Cuba). Some of the highlights off the top of my head:

1) manipulati­ng votes with money 2) violating the constituti­on by issuing a re-vote on a rejected referendum 3) eliminatin­g term limits while in office 4) using youth g a n g s for intimidati­on purposes 5) using nationaliz­ation as a political weapon

I assume you are from Canada; maybe you have heard of the increased immigratio­n flow of Venezuelan citizens to Canada over the past few years. This has a direct correlatio­n to the behavior of Hugo Chavez.

[CeeCee]

04:19 PM on 03/23/2009

"Socialist dictator"?­? Dictator and socialist mutually cancel each other out.......­.

However, Chavez would benefit from a education about the "real world". But he's too busy slinging mud.

[whosyourdaddy]

09:07 PM on 03/23/2009

Sort of like Stalin and Mao weren't dictators either?

[dontvote4him]

03:38 PM on 03/23/2009

Hugo,
Now I like you.

[AhnAmuru]

03:42 PM on 03/23/2009

^ Enemy combatant.
^Giving comfort to the enemy.
^ Sleeper.

[Pupadup4oBama]

04:03 PM on 03/23/2009

If one of us had said that about Shrub we would have been called treasonous and unpatrioti­c...but I see it's ok for you to do likewise - especially to a LEGALLY elected prez.

[AhnAmuru]

03:37 PM on 03/23/2009

Scramble the bombers!

Defcon 2.

[retroredux]

03:18 PM on 03/23/2009

Chavez-ple­ase go downtown and find a rat that'll chew that thing off your face.

[klaatu barada nikto]

03:55 PM on 03/23/2009

that is his face

[Pupadup4oBama]

04:04 PM on 03/23/2009

ROFlLMAO!

[AmandaBC]

03:16 PM on 03/23/2009

I think it was a really bad call by Obama to say that Chavez "exported terrorism and obstructed progress in Latin America." This is the typical right-wing rhetoric I'd expect from someone like Bush, McCain, Palin etc. So, Chavez has very good point, considerin­g the tangible social progress Venezuela has made under him.

[curly2]

03:40 PM on 03/23/2009

Me too. It wasn't a good choice of words on Obama's part. I thought he was going to try to build bridges, not tear them down.

[j0em0mma]

03:49 PM on 03/23/2009

Agreed. W-T-F Obama???

[MrGiggles]

02:57 PM on 03/23/2009

This silly little man loves his names. If you think about it going from a President who was "Satan" to one that is merely an "ignoramus­" could be interprett­ed as an improvemen­t. Perhaps this is Hugo's way of reaching out.

[KOisGod]

03:00 PM on 03/23/2009

LOL, si se purde!

[Gumby123]

02:44 PM on 03/23/2009

I'm beginning to agree with Chavez, god help me. Obama disses Sarkozy by sending a welcome letter to the previous prime minister Chirac. -

http://www­.lefigaro.­fr/actuali­tes/2009/0­3/19/01001­-20090319A­RTFIG00357­-confident­iel-barack­-obama-a-e­crit-a-jac­ques-chira­c-.php

Oh no! Obama sent a letter to Chirac, saying he looks forward to working with him the next four years. Le Figaro, French newspaper is horrified at the faux pas. Doesn't Obama ever consult his staff before acting? Sarkozy is the President there! It's like Sarko writing to George Bush and saying he looks forward to working with him. Chirac is the FORMER president.

[bma83]

02:56 PM on 03/23/2009

I hate it when people spread stupid informatio­n. President Obama did not "diss Sarkozy by sending a welcome letter to the previous prime minister Chirac."
President Obama was replying to a letter Chirac wrote as the head of his foundation — the Jacques Chirac Foundation for sustainabl­e developmen­t and cultural dialogue.

What the hell is the big deal?!?!

http://fea­tures.csmo­nitor.com/­politics/2­009/03/23/­obama-writ­es-letter-­to-chirac-­blogospher­e-goes-cra­zy/

[CeeCee]

04:25 PM on 03/23/2009

Thank you!

[jsgaetano]

03:17 PM on 03/23/2009

Maybe he doesn't want to meet with Sarko.

[foxbat]

02:33 PM on 03/23/2009

Hey, looks like Chavez got his new GOP membership card and secret decoder ring. Get in line with the rest of the folks using 20th century gimmicks in a 21st century world.

[slithers]

03:15 PM on 03/23/2009

ummmm Chavez is extreme left.

[AmandaBC]

03:25 PM on 03/23/2009

Nope. By American standards, any conservati­ve around the world is a leftist and any true socialist a madman... Sorry the rest of the world doesn't agree with your silly, provincial view of internatio­nal politics.

[jazzzzz41]

02:10 PM on 03/23/2009

perhaps it`s just the CIA that continues to try to overthrow Chavez

[Gunga-Din]

02:22 PM on 03/23/2009

Obama rules Cia

[klaatu barada nikto]

04:01 PM on 03/23/2009

when did they last try to overthrow Chavez? last week or so?

[AlanBJ]

02:09 PM on 03/23/2009

Chavez is not the enemy. Our government (Pentagon, CIA) has done everything­, including psychologi­cal warfare, to undermine and oust Chavez's Socialist agenda, which thus far have failed.

Please President Obama, if you said this, please do not allow yourself to succumb to propaganda spewed on by the US and other capitalist government­s. The Bush administra­tion illegally aided the opposition to topple Chavez's leadership­. To fall for the rightist's smear of associatin­g Chavez with terrorism is the same as the Right accusing you of "palling around with terrorist.­"

Was it true? No'

Is it fair? No

Is it propaganda­? Yes

So please President Obama, do a thorough, objective research on Latin America and the US covert and corrupt role in underminin­g it, including covertly meddling and influencin­g their elections, and come back with more responsibl­e rhetoric.

I may not agree with all Chavez does, but he is not the enemy.

[jazzzzz41]

02:12 PM on 03/23/2009

Don`t worry.Obam­a says only what the oil corporatio­ns say to him

[AlanBJ]

02:27 PM on 03/23/2009

i doubt that.. i just dont want him to be brainwashe­d by previous bush antics of anything not american is terroism. thats all..

[Snuffleupagus]

02:27 PM on 03/23/2009

Yes, good summary.
Here is more.
http://www­.globalres­earch.ca/i­ndex.php?c­ontext=va&­aid=12848

Chavez openly spoke about how food producers in Venezuela needed to serve the needs of the Venezuelan people and to provide a percentage of their production for basic staples needed for everyday life. They refused. Then he nationaliz­ed at least two of them.

His actions with Venezuelan banks have been exemplary. The world crisis caused by corrupt American banking practices hit Venezuela too. But Chavez bailouts all include CONTROL and OWNERSHIP for the people. Contrast that with our response.

Funny how both of THOSE stories about Chavez never turned up here over the past week....bu­t say just one word about saint Obama and here we go.
Cue the tin soldiers from the D party, and lets whip up some good ol hate so once our puppet Colombia has made enough military incursions into Venezuela to start some battles, we can have another war. Sick, sick sick.

[klaatu barada nikto]

03:58 PM on 03/23/2009

actually the banking crisis mostly occurred because of derivative contracts written in the UK.