iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Newest Neocon Outfit Hosting Afghanistan Forum With Sen. McCain And Rep. Harman

First Posted: 04/26/09 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:10 PM ET

Mccain

Largely under the radar, some of the major neoconservative figures who fashioned the rationale for the Iraq war have set up a shop for shaping future trends in American foreign policy.

And while the Foreign Policy Initiative does not have friends within the White House to whom it can push its agenda, it is not lacking for pull among senior elected officials, including Democrats.

FPI, whose founders and principals include Robert Kagan, Bill Kristol, and Dan Senor, will host a summit next Tuesday titled "Afghanistan: Planning for Success." Billed as a "half-day conference" to "discuss how the United States and our allies can succeed in Afghanistan," the event will feature appearances and discussion from Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), Rep. John M. McHugh (R-N.Y.) -- ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee -- and Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.), who chairs of the House Homeland Security Intelligence Subcommittee.

"I know these people and recognize where they're coming from," the Congresswoman said of her appearance at the event. "I'm coming from a different place and want to be sure that point of view is heard. My point of view will be extremely sympathetic to the Obama Administration position on Af/Pak."

Tuesday's affair is designed, per the group's website, to provide an open and frank discussion on the problems confronting the Obama administration in Afghanistan. And with the president expressing a policy to that war that has been received approvingly by the neo-con community, including McCain himself, it seems likely that the agenda will be as much analytical as aspirational.

Nevertheless, it is worthwhile to note just where "Washington's newest think tank" is coming from. Kagan and Kristol were both directors at the Project for the New American Century, one of the key organizational catalysts persuading George W. Bush to launch preemptive military action in Iraq.

Now with the Foreign Policy Initiative, the principals are charting a similar philosophy in the realm of international affairs. From its mission statement:

There are those who hope we can just return to normalcy--to pre-9/11 levels of defense spending and pre-9/11 tactics. They argue for a retreat from America's global commitments and a renewed focus on problems at home, an understandable if mistaken response to these difficult economic times.


In fact, strategic overreach is not the problem and retrenchment is not the solution.

[snip]

The Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI) is a newly formed, non-profit, non-partisan organization intending to qualify as a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code that promotes:

* continued U.S. engagement--diplomatic, economic, and military--in the world and rejection of policies that would lead us down the path to isolationism;
* robust support for America's democratic allies and opposition to rogue regimes that threaten American interests;
* the human rights of those oppressed by their governments, and U.S. leadership in working to spread political and economic freedom;
* a strong military with the defense budget needed to ensure that America is ready to confront the threats of the 21st century;
* international economic engagement as a key element of U.S. foreign policy in this time of great economic dislocation.

UPDATE: John Isaacs, at the progressive Council for a Livable World, offers his reaction.

The same folks that brought us the war in Iraq are now they are trying to bring us more wars. The same folks that helped screw up Afghanistan with the Bush administration are now offering their judgment on the same war... I would hope every article written about them in the future starts with, 'Robert Kagan, the man who got it terribly wrong in Iraq said...,' But I don't envision that happening.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Largely under the radar, some of the major neoconservative figures who fashioned the rationale for the Iraq war have set up a shop for shaping future trends in American foreign policy. And while the...
Largely under the radar, some of the major neoconservative figures who fashioned the rationale for the Iraq war have set up a shop for shaping future trends in American foreign policy. And while the...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 104
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
07:15 PM on 03/27/2009
The gop aren't even pretending to being interested in our country. It's clear they are more concerned with themselves than they are with the citizens of this country!!!
04:35 PM on 03/27/2009
Buffoons plain and simple
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Middleclassvotingbloc
03:15 PM on 03/27/2009
They will be talking to themselves,, no one else will care to listen. These people have had nothing but pain and suffering to offer to the world.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
VOTER
Freedom from fear - the philosophy of human rights
02:44 PM on 03/27/2009
McCain?

"Loser" McCain?

"Warmonger "Market Shopper" McCain?

PALIN McCain?

ROFL
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TimtheEnchanted
My micro-bio is empty on purpose
01:36 PM on 03/27/2009
Ever wonder why no country hates the Swedes, the Norse, Why doesn't the taliban get pissed at Iceland? BECAUSE THEY MIND THEIR OWN DAMN BUSINESS!! Who says we have to be the worlds police force? Oh yea, the republicans... Fiscally conservative at home, spend like a drunken sailor everywhere else. Thanks guys.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
springsm
10:59 AM on 03/27/2009
This is almost as bad as a third world country run by a junta after over throwing a decent presidente. McCain needs to know that in 7+ years he did not help win any war, altho he claimed he "knew how to win wars." His mantra is kill kill kill, bomb bomb bomb...and his minions don't seem to have a solid brain among them. Why is he doing this? Gawd..HE LOST...and unfortunately Obama has included him and been more than civil with that hand reach and McCain does what he does...a petulant teen who will stab obama in the back every darned time. (figuratively). I am sick of this tired old man who is trying so hard to campaign and show how needed and important he is. Blah.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MESGAIN26
10:47 AM on 03/27/2009
WILL SOMEBODY PLEASE TELL MCAIN HE LOST
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
24kgold
11:04 AM on 03/27/2009
OK
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
judiNJ
The Free Market is Not Free
05:13 PM on 03/27/2009
Will someone tell McCain to tell the President where Osama Bin Laden is... when he was running, he told everyone that he knew, "just where Bin Laden is and I know how to get him". So great, now tell us where, Senator Mcain! That would shorten our stay in Afghanistan.
10:23 AM on 03/27/2009
What are the results of the last 8 years of consultation? That may be a difficult question for most Americans to answer, unfortunately.

25% of Americans hold a passport, 50 % of those are for trips to Mexico. You expect them to think Global thoughts?

The USA does not even make it within the top 25 countries in the world for education and
10:16 AM on 03/27/2009
William Kristol was on C-Span this am

He was concerned about gays in Iran?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:55 AM on 03/27/2009
re: John Isaacs' comment
There is no reason that William Kristol, Robert Kagan or any other advocate for preemptive attack should be cited as "experts" on military or foreign affairs, nor probably of anything else. Robert Redford is not normally cited as an "environmental expert" and Pamela Anderson has never been introduced as an "animal rights expert" to my knowledge. Both are accurately described as "advocates" for causes that are important to them. Accordingly, "advocate" for a (sloppily-defined) type of foreign policies is all that any neo-con is. To be an "expert" you have to get at least one thing right, and it should be something difficult; removing the Taliban from power for sheltering Osama bin Laden does not qualify. Actually catching him in Tora Bora would have been a necessary, but not sufficient accomplishment to claim the mantle of "expert" in counter-terrorism. Evidently, no such thing exists.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
springsm
11:01 AM on 03/27/2009
Good points!
09:50 AM on 03/27/2009
Billed as a "half-day conference" to "discuss how the United States and our allies can succeed in Afghanistan"

Let's see....those allies would be KBR and Blackwater...errr, I mean Xe?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martha12
06:43 AM on 03/27/2009
This must be one of the Jihad moves they were talking about earlier. Remember that?

Now they are setting up these cells outside of the government, refusing to meet with the POTUS for discussions on Afghanistan.

Why didn't McCain show up? He was the one that said he knew how to win wars, he knew where Osama was AND how to get him.

Why doesn't McCain inform Obama and the pentagon?

If the republicans cannot be in charge, then they will just act like they are in charge.

How many more temper tantrums do they think the American people will put up with?

How many of their members do they think will be voted out in 2010........2012?
init
Vulture Capitalist #1
01:05 AM on 03/27/2009
And treat it as if Obama is not even President? Obama needs to get serious about some jail time. He's really going to have to toughen up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:58 AM on 03/27/2009
He has negligible public support so far; barely 90,000 signatures in favor of a mere "Truth and Reconciliation Commission" for what we all know are war crimes. Why should President Obama take up such a lost cause?
12:00 AM on 03/27/2009
Has anybody noticed how many radical, underground cells the Republicans/neo-cons are forming? It is kind of scary if you look back a hundred years to certain organizations that were formed in Europe.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
jsanti7
Sin's a Good Mans Brother I Know Both
11:34 PM on 03/26/2009
Hard for me to understand fpi main promotions about * the human rights of those oppressed by their governments, and U.S. leadership in working to spread political and economic freedom; and * international economic engagement as a key element of U.S. foreign policy in this time of great economic dislocation. when the most visible of their founders support a political party and a president (bush) that advocates neither for the people of this country laughable is their descriptor The Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI) is a newly formed, non-profit, non-partisan asking for tax exempt status is disingenuous at least and holds no credit in my eyes. Is the fpi also advocating economics as a weapon ...very 20th century of them........Thank the stars that their influence has diminished