iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Taliban Leader: We're Planning Attack On D.C. "Soon"

ISHTIAQ MAHSUD   03/31/09 10:22 PM ET   AP

Wh

ISLAMABAD — Pakistan's Taliban chief claimed responsibility Tuesday for a deadly assault on a police academy, saying he wanted to retaliate for U.S. missile attacks on the militant bases on the border with Afghanistan. Baitullah Mehsud, who has a $5 million bounty on his head from the United States, also vowed to "amaze everyone in the world" with an attack on Washington or even the White House.

The FBI, however, said he had made similar threats previously and there was no indication of anything imminent.

Mehsud, who gave a flurry of media interviews Tuesday, has no record of actually striking targets abroad although he is suspected of being behind a 10-man cell arrested in Barcelona in January 2008 for plotting suicide attacks in Spain.

Pakistan's former government and the CIA consider him the prime suspect behind the December 2007 killing of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. And Pakistani officials accuse him of harboring foreign fighters, including Central Asians linked to al-Qaida, and of training suicide bombers.

But analysts doubt that Taliban fighters carried off Monday's raid on the Lahore academy on their own, saying the group is likely working more closely than ever with militants based far from the Afghan frontier.

It's a constellation that includes al-Qaida, presenting a formidable challenge to the U.S. as it increases its troop presence in the region, not to mention nuclear-armed Pakistan's own stability.

Mehsud told The Associated Press that the academy and other recent attacks were revenge for stepped-up American missile strikes into Pakistan's border badlands.

"Soon we will launch an attack in Washington that will amaze everyone in the world," Mehsud said in a telephone interview with an Associated Press reporter. He offered few details, though in a separate recorded conversation with local Dewa radio station, he said the White House was a target.

FBI spokesman Richard Kolko said the bureau was not aware of any imminent or specific threat to the U.S., despite what the Pakistani Taliban leader said.

"He has made similar threats to the U.S. in the past," said Kolko.

State Department spokesman Gordon Duguid said he had not seen any reports of Mehsud's comments but that he would "take the threat under consideration."

The ruthless attack on Lahore's outskirts Monday left at least 12 people dead, including seven police, and sparked an eight-hour standoff with security forces that ended when black-clad commandos stormed the compound. Some of the gunmen blew themselves up.

The siege-style approach using heavily armed militants came just weeks after the deadly ambush of Sri Lanka's visiting cricket team in the heart of Lahore. Both attacks were reminiscent of November's siege of Mumbai, India _ also blamed on Pakistani militants.

A senior police investigator, Zulfikar Hameed, told Dawn News TV, that the men arrested for the attack have corroborated Mehsud's involvement.

Besides Mehsud, a little-known group believed linked to him also claimed credit. Mehsud declined to discuss the group, Fedayeen al-Islam, or any others who might have been involved.

Pakistan Interior Ministry chief Rehman Malik said one attacker who was captured was Afghan, and that the initial investigation suggested the conspiracy originated in South Waziristan tribal region, Mehsud's stronghold. But Malik also said the al-Qaida-linked group Lashkar-e-Jhangvi might have played a role. Officials have said three gunmen are in custody.

"In my view, it's not done by one group," said Mohammed Amir Rana, a Pakistani analyst well-versed in the intricacies of militant groups. "One group has the major role in providing the fighters or one group might be providing the logistics or intelligence. And one group provided the financing."

A variety of militant groups operate in Pakistan beyond al-Qaida and the Taliban, and officials and analysts say it appears the coordination among some of them is increasing. Of particular concern are violent groups based in Punjab, Pakistan's most populated province, which borders India.

Some Punjabi groups have their roots in the dispute with India over the Kashmir region. The Pakistani spy agency is believed to have helped set them up and maintain some links, a prospect that vexes U.S. officials.

Others have different origins.

Jhangvi, for instance, is a sectarian extremist group blamed for a stream of actrocities against minority Shiite Muslims. In recent years, it has evolved, Rana said, and is believed to provide foot-soldiers and suicide bombers for al-Qaida operations. Qari Hussein, a Jhangvi member, was named in Mehsud's Pakistani Taliban council in 2007.

The groups' membership is fluid and overlapping. They are riven with feuds. But analysts say they are finding a common cause in striking America and its allies, while also focusing on spreading Taliban-style rule over more and more of Pakistan.

Interviews in recent months with three Afghan and Pakistani Taliban operatives, who demanded anonymity for security reasons, suggest a Pakistani crackdown on some groups following the Mumbai assault has prompted many operatives of Punjab-based groups to seek sanctuary in the northwest.

The Mumbai attacks were specifically blamed on Lashkar-e-Taiba, a Punjab-based group fighting in Kashmir. Both Taliban and American military commanders have reported Taiba members even in Afghanistan's northeast. Masood Azhar, a Kashmiri militant leader wanted by India, is reportedly in South Waziristan with Mehsud.

The militant activity may also relate to American plans to send thousands more troops to Afghanistan, where the Taliban have roared back more than seven years after the U.S.-led invasion ousted their regime, said Shaun Gregory, an analyst at Britain's University of Bradford.

With more allies, the Taliban may feel more capable of taking on grander assaults like that in Lahore as opposed to suicide bombings favored when their resources are more depleted, he said.

Mahmood Shah, a retired military officer, voiced concern that the Taliban were embarking on a campaign of terror in Punjab similar to that employed in the northwest, where hundreds of police were killed before militants turned their attention to political leaders.

While the pro-West ruling party has been trying to persuade a skeptical public to close ranks against an increasingly powerful nexus of militant groups, it has been largely preoccupied with squabbles over power and privileges with a key opposition party.

In unveiling a new war strategy for Afghanistan last week, Obama urged Pakistanis to fight the "cancer" of extremism gripping their country and pledged more aid for them to do so. Still, his administration has resisted Pakistani pressure to halt the missile strikes, believed to be fired by unmanned CIA drones.

Doubts also remain about whether the powerful Pakistani military is committed to sidelining extremist groups it has used as proxies against India and Afghanistan.

Defense analyst Ayesha Siddiqa said Pakistan must evaluate its own links to some of these groups if it is to survive.

"We have to dig this out of our past," she said. "Unless we do that, unless we have a consensus on our strategy ... we aren't going to go anywhere."

___

Associated Press Writer Ishtiaq Mahsud in Dera Ismail Khan and Foster Klug in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Filed by Rachel Weiner  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 503
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
12:35 AM on 04/01/2009
I guess the war on terror is officially over
Now the surrender to terror will start
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UsofA
Don't believe everything you think.
12:30 AM on 04/01/2009
I wonder what the reaction might be if Obama said, "Sure, you can attack us if you decide to, we're a free country. Hell, the guy down the street can attack us if he wants to. That's one of the costs of freedom, any nut can take a potshot at you in an open country. But we will never choose tyranny over freedom and your choice of darkness over light won't outlast us or defeat us. You may inflict some degree of intended pain, but you will never win and we will hunt you down.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:32 PM on 03/31/2009
This is a ridiculous statement, and it is equally ridiculous to print it.
05:40 PM on 03/31/2009
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/KD01Df02.html
Pakistan braces for more attacks
By Syed Saleem Shahzad
05:31 PM on 03/31/2009
http://www.armedforcesjournal.com/2009/04/3901424
Refusing battle
The alternative to persistent warfare
BY Col. DOUGLAS MacGREGOR (Ret.)
05:28 PM on 03/31/2009
Kill him.
05:19 PM on 03/31/2009
How nice of them to warn us! I wonder why on earth they would attack us, though? We never did anything against them. They must be "jealous of our freedom" I guess.
05:13 PM on 03/31/2009
I do believe I've heard this song before. Seems to hit the hit parade everytime a diversion from political heat is needed, ala BushCo.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glockman
06:08 PM on 03/31/2009
Yeah, only now it's a diversion from ObamaCo.
05:12 PM on 03/31/2009
They (Taliban) are so f*cked up...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:11 PM on 03/31/2009
Afghanistan is so foreign to everything we believe. It would be a nice place to pull our troops out of and find some other way to deal with them. The fact that we are staying in Afghanistan with multi-tour troops hints at just how much trouble we have on our hands.
At one time we could have offed a few dozen strategic leaders and called it good. Torture never gave us any worthwhile information, and the CIA said it would not before it was done. What it did was P.O. each torturee, his whole family, everyone they knew, and assure the people who ordered it, w and Dickee, that their war on terror would never run out of enemy combatants looking for payback.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
privategirl
05:04 PM on 03/31/2009
See what happens when you spend time fighting the wrong war.

No wonder Cheney is running around underminding Obama. He knew the REAL truth. They kept prisoners who were not a threat to this country locked up in Gitmo, while foolishly releasing the bad guys. They spent billions upon billions of our tax dollars trying to fix the mess they made in Iraq while ignoring what was happening in Afgan. The Taliban did not all of a sudden regained strenght in the past two months. It's clear that what was going on in Afganistan and Paskistan, regarding the Talibans, was being ignored by Bush and Cheney. Now he is going on every news show that will allow him and is sounding the alarm. The man is a masterful spinmeister.

Something tells me that we are only just beginning to see the real mess Bush left this country with. Sadly, Obama is now responsible for fixing something that might never be able to be fixed. And I am sure the Repubs, with the aid of the doom-and-gloom media, would be more than happy to pretend all of this stuff happened while Obama was in office.
05:43 PM on 03/31/2009
You forgot to metion that we'll be thoroughly entertained by the ensuing circus.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eva belle
Kolob a-calling
04:18 PM on 03/31/2009
I thought Gitmo had put this matter to rest?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:56 PM on 03/31/2009
(((yawn)))
04:13 PM on 03/31/2009
I thought the "War on Terror" was repealed by Bama and his cronies?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jinjinpinti
"I used to be disgusted, now I'm just amused."
06:48 PM on 03/31/2009
Actually no. It was "won" by the bush fiasco.
photo
Harry Scrote
Why so hateful, Conservatives?
03:47 PM on 03/31/2009
Ch e ney's as s a ss i n squ ads... I needn't say more.
03:05 PM on 03/31/2009
Huge yawn. This is the Taliban talking, not Al Qaeda.

It'll take 'em a while to get their donkeys across the Atlantic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:49 PM on 03/31/2009
Funny, that sounds exactly like what Bush said after he read the August PDB. ;o)
05:40 PM on 03/31/2009
We do not well understand what the "Taliban" is and what their relationships to the ISI and Al Queda are.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/KD01Df02.html
Pakistan braces for more attacks
By Syed Saleem Shahzad