Medvedev-Obama Meeting A Win For Russia: Analysis

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Medvedev-Obama Meeting A Win For Russia: Analysis stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

STEVE GUTTERMAN | April 2, 2009 03:27 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
U.S. President Barack Obama, right, shakes hands with his Russian counterpart Dmitry Medvedev during their meeting at Winfield House in London, Wednesday, April 1, 2009. (AP Photo/ RIA Novosti, Vladimir Rodionov, Presidential Press Service)

MOSCOW — President Dmitry Medvedev's first meeting with Barack Obama brought Russia a shot of prestige, upbeat headlines about nuclear-arms cuts and a powerful signal that Moscow has the ear of the new U.S. president.

Obama also got a boost from the talks, which set a constructive new tone after years of growing acrimony between the U.S. and an assertive Russia. The price tag for both sides so far: virtually zero.

Their joint vow to reduce the two biggest nuclear arsenals on the planet cast a softer light on Russia, which has worried Europe with recent natural-gas supply cutoffs and threats to put missiles on its borders. The same goes for the United States, which is seeking to shake off its boorish image abroad.

Unlike Cold War summits, the talks in London Wednesday, a day before the G-20 summit, had little of the atmosphere of a zero-sum struggle with one side emerging the victor. Both presidents can claim progress while also asserting that they stood their ground _ but that means persistent disputes may soon test the strength of a newfound bond that is still more style than substance.

At a news conference following the summit Thursday, Medvedev said he and Obama made some progress in resolving tensions but did not make "strong progress on the most complicated questions."

Obama pledged to support Moscow's World Trade Organization membership bid, which could help end what Russia sees as the embarrassment of being the largest economy outside the WTO. Obama also said he would seek U.S. ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, something Moscow has long wanted from Washington.

And in a nod to the Kremlin's self-image as a chief guardian of global security, Obama also acknowledged Russia's proposal for a new trans-Atlantic security arrangement _ a key Medvedev initiative that former President George W. Bush's administration pointedly ignored.

For his part, Medvedev pleased Obama by joining the U.S. in calling for clarity from Iran on its nuclear program and warning North Korea against a planned rocket launch. In the past, Russia has cast the U.S. as part of the problem on the Korean peninsula, and backed Iranian denials that it is seeking nuclear weapons.

Story continues below
advertisement

But at least publicly, Medvedev made no commitment to increase pressure on Iran. He did not promise to support harsher sanctions in the U.N. Security Council over Iran's nuclear activities or rule out further weapons sales to Tehran.

His signal of support for the U.S. effort in Afghanistan was also short on detail. He did not say Moscow would press Kyrgyzstan to call off its eviction of American forces from an important air base, for instance, or help the U.S. find a new Central Asian staging area for Afghan operations.

There was no sign of a Russian retreat on the divisive disputes that dragged ties to a post-Cold War low last year. Moscow remains adamantly opposed to the potential deployment of a missile shield in Eastern Europe, and is likely to use the issue as leverage in the talks the presidents agreed to set in motion on a replacement for the START I nuclear arms treaty.

Obama has displayed less enthusiasm than Bush for the proposed U.S. missile shield, but he did not tip his hand on the issue Wednesday, and made no visible concessions on other matters, either.

Russia opposes any further eastward expansion of NATO, and remains starkly at odds with the U.S. on Georgia following its war with the ex-Soviet republic last August. The Kremlin has made clear it will not consider U.S. calls to retract its recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia or withdraw forces from the separatist regions at the heart of the war.

Underscoring the persistent animus, Russia's Foreign Ministry spokesman Andrei Nesterenko on Thursday warned the U.S. against helping the "aggressor" Georgia rebuild its military.

The main ingredient in Russia's recipe for success was the same as in the era of Soviet-American superpower summits: its nuclear arsenal.

By trumpeting efforts to reach a new nuclear arms reduction deal before the last major Cold War pact expires in December, Russia reminded the world _ as well as the audience at home _ of the might that still sets it apart.

"The leaders of two major world powers," was how the state-run newspaper Rossiiskaya Gazeta described Obama and Medvedev in its front-page story Thursday about the meeting, which it deemed "quite successful."

Thursday's G-20 summit, meanwhile, allowed Russia to avoid appearing too cozy with the United States, which the Kremlin has cast as the culprit behind everything from the war with Georgia to the global financial crisis.

On the main morning news show on state-run Rossiya television, the anchor played up Medvedev's meeting with the Chinese leader and stressed that Russia wants to reform the global financial system while the U.S. thinks it can be fixed. He emphasized European opposition to U.S. economic proposals, which he said amounted to "switching on the money-printing presses."

___

Moscow correspondent Steve Gutterman has covered Russia since 2002.

MOSCOW — President Dmitry Medvedev's first meeting with Barack Obama brought Russia a shot of prestige, upbeat headlines about nuclear-arms cuts and a powerful signal that Moscow has the ear of ...
MOSCOW — President Dmitry Medvedev's first meeting with Barack Obama brought Russia a shot of prestige, upbeat headlines about nuclear-arms cuts and a powerful signal that Moscow has the ear of ...
Filed by Stuart Whatley  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
19
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- ILibertine I'm a Fan of ILibertine 21 fans permalink
photo

Knowing a thing or two about our history, I get really annoyed when some preach how other nations should act that is the tone I read in this article. America committed some if its worst offenses in an era when we were virtually an isolated continent. To suggest that all nations are going to see conduct in precisely the same terms as we, at the same time, is naive. Russia has been a big, sleeping bear (& sometimes volatile and charging) over centuries. All I know is that to remove the upfront demonization trip we self-righteously pander to the world (and yes, at times it may be justified) may leave room for less abrasive and beneficial negotiations. It should be painfully evident by now the no-talk course has yielded nothing good.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:14 AM on 04/06/2009
- oxygen I'm a Fan of oxygen 26 fans permalink
photo

the u. s. is the "culprit"

russians please - assume control - and thanks for sending so many smart doctors to work in our va hospitals!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:30 PM on 04/05/2009
- hotwire I'm a Fan of hotwire 22 fans permalink

Anyone who trusts the Russians will be soon be holding their ba--s in their hand.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 04/05/2009
- Blutus I'm a Fan of Blutus 11 fans permalink

So Russia is going let the US survive a little while longer?

Does this mean war is no long right around the corner with
that mean 'ole Russian bear?

Wow, sure is hard to keep up on all the countries that were about to wipe us
out just weeks ago.

And we're talking to Cuba?! Oh, the horror!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:19 AM on 04/05/2009
- BDVR I'm a Fan of BDVR permalink

I am so glad that W. has been put out to pasture at the ranch (a.k.a. that exclusive Dallas enclave he calls home).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:30 PM on 04/04/2009
- LMPE I'm a Fan of LMPE 64 fans permalink

It's certainly all the talk over here in Russia.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 AM on 04/04/2009
- Paulo1 I'm a Fan of Paulo1 41 fans permalink

What ! I am scandalized by this horrid break in tradition from the noble Bush Regency!

what do you mean that "The price tag for both sides so far: virtually zero."

No multi billion dollar loans? No armed intervention? No payoffs at all ? This Obama man must be stopped before he ruins 8 years of careful negotiation policy!!!

If this is not stopped how will we every buy the next "coalition of the willing"? Do you actually think people will stand with us out of principle?

Note to Republicans: The above is sarcasm,

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 AM on 04/04/2009

HP--the first thing that comes to mind, is that your headline again is misleading--what is the deal?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:28 PM on 04/03/2009
- GeorgeP922 I'm a Fan of GeorgeP922 105 fans permalink
photo

Obama should also hold a meeting with Putin.

When you scratch the surface, Putin is like Dick Cheney to George Bush.

So as long as Putin isn't seen buckling to Obama, the extremists in Russia (nashi etc) can still latch on to something.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:03 PM on 04/03/2009
photo

"The talks, which set a constructive new tone after years of growing acrimony between the U.S. and an assertive Russia. The price tag for both sides so far: virtually zero."

How does this sentence translate into "Medvedev-Obama Meeting A Win For Russia: Analysis.

I'm beginning to think that political healdine writing should be a recognized brain disorder.

Give what you can until there's s cure.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:17 PM on 04/03/2009
- ILibertine I'm a Fan of ILibertine 21 fans permalink
photo

I think it is a hook, line and sinker policy. You're right ..... both sides virtually zero isn't a win unless the headline writer is doing the new math ... you know, if a computer can't do it, it's incomprehensible.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 AM on 04/06/2009
- 1dogs2 I'm a Fan of 1dogs2 122 fans permalink

How about a headline that says "Meeting a Win for the World"?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:30 PM on 04/02/2009
- OMG1109 I'm a Fan of OMG1109 18 fans permalink

I 100% agree...bu­t HP is trying out the FIXED news headline hype. Lets see if this gets posted!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:38 PM on 04/03/2009
- samiam4285 I'm a Fan of samiam4285 3 fans permalink

I think that would be far more appropriate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:11 AM on 04/04/2009
- Clavis I'm a Fan of Clavis 38 fans permalink

Poor President Obama. When will he realize that he'll never be accepted as a true leader by Republicans until he either dribbles muffin crumbs out of his open mouth, curses in front of a world leader or vomits on them?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:18 PM on 04/02/2009
photo

lol.....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:43 PM on 04/02/2009
- 1dogs2 I'm a Fan of 1dogs2 122 fans permalink

I had exactly the same thought -- though I had forgotten the vomiting episode in Japan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:29 PM on 04/02/2009
- lynnn I'm a Fan of lynnn 42 fans permalink

you forgot choke on a pretzel!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 AM on 04/03/2009
- Blutus I'm a Fan of Blutus 11 fans permalink

LMAO!! Coffee dripping from the screen....­........ Give us a warning next time!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:16 AM on 04/05/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect