Loan Modifications Not Helping Homeowners

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Loan Modifications Not Helping Homeowners stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ALAN ZIBEL | April 3, 2009 02:03 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — Though lenders are boosting their attempts to curb record-high home foreclosures, fewer than half of loan modifications made at the end of last year actually reduced borrowers' payments by more than 10 percent, data released Friday show.

The report, based on an analysis of nearly 35 million loans worth more than $6 trillion, was published by the federal Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision. It provides the most detailed and broad analysis to date of efforts to stem the foreclosure crisis, which President Barack Obama is trying to combat with a $75 billion plan to promote loan modifications.

The report helps explain why many loans are falling back into default after being modified. Many borrowers and consumer groups contend that the modifications offered by the lending industry aren't very generous, despite more than a year of public prodding from regulators.

For instance, nearly one in four loan modifications in the fourth quarter actually resulted in increased monthly payments. That situation can happen when lenders add fees or past-due interest to a loan and spread those payments out over the 30- or 40-year period.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the report found that loans were far less likely to fall back into default if a borrower's monthly payment is reduced by a healthy amount.

Nine months after modification, about 26 percent of loans in which payments had dropped by 10 percent or more had fallen back into default. That compares with about half of loans in which the payment was unchanged or increased.

"This new data shows that, in the current stressful environment, modification strategies that result in unchanged or increased mortgage payments run the risk of unacceptably high re-default rates," Comptroller of the Currency John Dugan said in a statement.

But regulators said they saw a positive trend in the data, collected from mortgage companies including Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc.

Story continues below
advertisement

Traditionally, lenders have seen loan workouts as a way to get a borrower back on track after a temporary disruption in income. Now, with the economy sinking fast and foreclosures soaring, they are increasingly coming around to the idea to that more permanent changes are needed.

Among loan modifications made in the October-December quarter, about 37 percent resulted in a drop in payments of more than 10 percent, compared with about one-fourth in the first nine months of the year. Regulators saw that growth as a positive sign.

"The trend toward lowering payments to make home mortgages more affordable is moving in the right direction," John Bowman, acting director of the Office of Thrift Supervision, said in a prepared statement.

The Obama administration is aiming to help up to 9 million borrowers stay in their homes through refinanced mortgages or modified loans. Still, the faltering economy, driven down by the collapse of the housing bubble, is causing the housing crisis to spread.

Among the loans surveyed in the report, just over 10 percent were delinquent or in foreclosure, compared with 7 percent at the end of September, the report said. Delinquencies are increasing the most among prime loans made to borrowers with strong credit, it said.

A broader study of the mortgage market last month found a higher percentage of problem loans.

The Mortgage Bankers Association reported that nearly 12 percent of all Americans with a mortgage _ a record 5.4 million homeowners _ were at least one month late or in foreclosure at the end of last year. That's up from 10 percent at the end of the third quarter, and from 8 percent at the end of 2007.

The trade group's study includes more than 45 million loans, 10 million more than the government report.

WASHINGTON — Though lenders are boosting their attempts to curb record-high home foreclosures, fewer than half of loan modifications made at the end of last year actually reduced borrowers' paym...
WASHINGTON — Though lenders are boosting their attempts to curb record-high home foreclosures, fewer than half of loan modifications made at the end of last year actually reduced borrowers' paym...
 
Comments
220
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
- munki I'm a Fan of munki 34 fans permalink
photo

It is not working because...

TOO MANY red tapes...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 04/03/2009
- NWNHNM I'm a Fan of NWNHNM 4 fans permalink

Not working because it is optional, and the banks have no real incentive to meaningfully restructure these loans. This should be a mandatory program for banks receiving TARP and other assistance.

Homeowners really need to contact non-profit (free) credit counseling agencies. I went to a presentation two weeks ago sponsored by local and state credit/housing counseling agencies and a Bank. The speakers there said not to go to the bank first. The non-profit agencies will give better advice, as they are not beholden to any of the stakeholders other than the consumer. (One speaker suggested that if you realize you are going to default in a few months, don't pay your mortgage; save the money for post-foreclosure expenses, like moving or having a down payment for rent.)

At this point, I believe that the mortgages should be "stretched" to even longer terms - go from 30 to 50 year amortization of the mortgages, with the banks able to call the loan in 10 years. By that time, we will know what is up with this economy, and the "true" value of houses. If things have improved by then, homeowners will be able to refinance before the 10 year mark, when the bank can terminate the loan. Everyone has 10 years to figure this out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 04/03/2009
- munki I'm a Fan of munki 34 fans permalink
photo

any sites could be posted?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:23 PM on 04/03/2009
- MIKEBC I'm a Fan of MIKEBC 26 fans permalink
photo

The Bush / republican depression has america in the toilet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 PM on 04/03/2009
- tlgeiger62 I'm a Fan of tlgeiger62 59 fans permalink
photo

Surprised your piece doesn't mention where homeowners can go for information ...

www.makinghomeaffordable.gov

There is a link where you can find out if your mortgage is owned by either Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae too!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 04/03/2009
- maxmcgloin I'm a Fan of maxmcgloin 4 fans permalink
photo

The first phase only works if you are with Fannie or Freddie and your loan is not upside down.

The second phase only helps you if you never could afford the house in the first place and then only for the short term.

For those with non conforming loans with the ability to pay a reasonable payment if the could get their upside down loan modified or re-written at a current 4-5% fixed rate there is nothing.

So if you bought a house you could afford but have now seen the sales price drop in half, you can't take advantage of lower rates that would make it worthwhile to keep making payment on that underperforming asset called your house.

So now we are starting to see a broader collaspe of the mortgage market.

Problem needs to be fixed. Fannie and Freddie should be working on refinaning these loans, but follow stricter income to debt guidelines to insure the new payments can be made.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 04/03/2009

Business as usual. Banks claim they are helping distressed home owners in order to get public support for bail outs. The reality was just another phony sceme being sold to the public.

They grab the home owners by the throat and threaten them. Even though the tax payers (including those same home owners) passed hundreds of billions to these same banksters. The CEOs do not mind as they pocket a billion dollars of bail out money.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 04/03/2009
- markinaz I'm a Fan of markinaz 3 fans permalink

banksters=­gangsters.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:26 PM on 04/03/2009
- mitsie I'm a Fan of mitsie 54 fans permalink
photo

Another article written by some dimwitted reporter. Notice that he is referencing data from the end of last year. This is blatenly false and misleading, and someone should call him on it. Let's see data from the time this policy went into effect until now? What's it been about six weeks?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:37 PM on 04/03/2009
- clarryr I'm a Fan of clarryr 31 fans permalink

One is not allowed to comment on the accuracy of a headline. I've tried many times.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 PM on 04/03/2009
- mitsie I'm a Fan of mitsie 54 fans permalink
photo

You are correct, but people shouldn't get upset about an article that is misleading.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 04/03/2009

If the banks and financial institutions would stop tacking on unnecessary fees and **** maybe the payments would be lower.
What people forget is, yea interest rates are below 5%, and even if you do get a lower, initial, payment, you still have to keep the add-ons the same, so with house insurance, local property tax and from some lenders the notorious - we allowed you to have a loan, so we are going to charge you 'mortgage' insurance.­..........­...which usually adds between $300-400 more.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:35 PM on 04/03/2009
- blood1 I'm a Fan of blood1 12 fans permalink

DID YOU READ THE ARTICLE or ARE YOU RESPONDING TO A HEADLINE!!!!!!

The data is from the 4th quarter of 2008. Now who was in charge and what was Treasury doing?
Bush was in charge and was busy "thinking" about his legacy and how to push this problem on to the next year. Treasury was busy writing checks to banks...an­d giving them free choice on what to do with all the cash. The only individual who was actively trying to work on mortgage re-writes was Sheila Baer.

So shout all you want, but until you see data from the 1st quarter of 2009 (and that will be questionab­le)...scre­am and yell...but CONTEXT as in REPORTING DATA is relevant!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 PM on 04/03/2009
- mitsie I'm a Fan of mitsie 54 fans permalink
photo

Thank You

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 04/03/2009
- wrrock I'm a Fan of wrrock 2 fans permalink

Banks are so involved with how to regulate them, it's no wonder why every single policy that comes out directly helps them. See this:
http://www.butasforme.com/2009/04/01/milton-friedman-is-awesome/

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 04/03/2009
- clarryr I'm a Fan of clarryr 31 fans permalink

Alan Zibel's headline as he wrote the article is: "Report: Many mortgage loan modifications don't reduce payments much".

Reading the article, the news is not as dire as the hedlines suggest. Indeed, it says that if a loan payment dropped by 10% or more after modification, only 26% fell back into default - that means 74% haven't. That sounds like it's working pretty good to me. Unfortunately, many people were so far in over their heads or have fallen on such bad times, that a loan modification didn't help enough.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 04/03/2009
- Lemeritus I'm a Fan of Lemeritus 108 fans permalink
photo

"Reading the article, the news is not as dire as the hedlines suggest."

Exactly. Though the article does end on a down note, the headline is -- ONCE AGAIN -- misleading.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:42 PM on 04/03/2009
- markinaz I'm a Fan of markinaz 3 fans permalink

74% haven't YET. It will be interesting to see how many WILL ultimately fail.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:31 PM on 04/03/2009
photo

We're .. F*CKED!!


Congress doesn't listen to those who advise against them doing things the way banks want them to because -
BANKS ARE THE HIGHEST CONTRIBUTORS TO POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS, HIGHER THEN ANY OTHER ENTITY THAT LOBBIES FOR INFLUENCE IN OUR GOVERNMENT ! ! ! ! !

Legislation MUST be introduced making it absolutely illegal for ANY financial institution to contribute to ANY politician­..........­..........­..........­..........­.. PERIOD ! ! ! !


.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:20 PM on 04/03/2009

We? Hardly. You, maybe. A lot of others, for sure. But "we", no, "we" are not because I am not. So, no, it's not "our" problem. It might be yours, though.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 04/03/2009
- mitsie I'm a Fan of mitsie 54 fans permalink
photo

RELAX, the data was taken from the end of last year!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 04/03/2009
- clarryr I'm a Fan of clarryr 31 fans permalink

Somewhat misleading headlines again from the HuffingtonPost.
Alan Zibel's headline as he wrote the article is: "Report: Many mortgage loan modifications don't reduce payments much".
HP has modified that to: "Loan Modifications Not Helping Homeowners" and their banner on the home page says: "IT ISN'T WORKING".

For a otherwise good news consolidation, blog and comment website they sure engage is sensationalism a lot.

Reading the article, the news is not as dire as the hedlines suggest. Indeed, it says that if a loan payment dropped by 10% or more after modification, only 26% fell back into default - that means 74% haven't. That sounds like it's working pretty good to me. Unfortunately, many people were so far in over their heads or have fallen on such bad times, that a loan modification didn't help enough.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 04/03/2009
- DuganS1 I'm a Fan of DuganS1 19 fans permalink

The best way to solve the problem is via debt destruction. If a person is in a house they can't afford or is too over-burdened with mortgage debt, then foreclosure is the best option. In this way consumers can relieve themselves of their terrible debt burdens then start over. If consumers stay in their homes and maintain these very high levels of mortgage debt, they'll be forced to pay down debt and save for years and years and the economy and job growth will suffer as a result.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 04/03/2009
photo

In principle I really don't like the idea (i.e. not repaying the debt), but, considering the fact that the Treasury Department has permitted the mortgage/credit industry (e.g. Bank of America/Co­untrywide) to do whatever it wants, whenever it wants (e.g. hike rates, rely on inflated assessments, sell off credit facilities to hedge funds thus "laundering" the originating bank's risk profie, etc. etc. etc.), perhaps walking away is the just and right path for many.

A foreclosure remains on your credit record for 10 years, though (other unpaid obligations only 7 years), and prior to the present crisis one with otherwise good credit could qualify for another mortgage 3-4 years after the foreclosure (i.e. didn't have to wait 10 years).

Definitely worth considering if you're in an upside-down situation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:07 PM on 04/03/2009
- Robert59 I'm a Fan of Robert59 10 fans permalink

Principle is the crap the banking industry uses to make you feel guilty. A mortgage is just another contract and contracts get modified all the time. These lenders knew they were taking advantage of people and made alot of money. Now they are losing alot of money and they want people to feel guilty because they are walking away from a house.

Screw them. It's like modifying mark to market. There's one reason they want it modified, because it favors them. As soon as they are back in the black, they'll insist on returning to mark to market because when they repossess and resell it favors them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:39 PM on 04/03/2009
photo

"one with otherwise good credit could qualify for another mortgage 3-4 years after the foreclosure"

The question is: will Congress and Treasury (the SEC, OCC, FRS and OTS) have the time and will to plug the holes in the regs and adequately enforce them before we're into any kind of significant recovery? Otherwise, unscrupulous lenders will resume the same type of aggressive marketing (i.e. lending $Ms to unqualified borrowers, packaging high-risk facilities into "shared credits", and selling them to hedge funds, who in turn will "insure" them against default with CDSs within an arcane, colluded, unauditable global market.

There's a lot of work to do, and I fear we're all to lazy and complacent to do it...parti­cularly in the halls of government. Obama wants to do it, but the opposition from Big Banking and Wall Street is fierce, and will continue to be so for as long as they're in the game.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:09 PM on 04/03/2009
- inorbit I'm a Fan of inorbit 24 fans permalink
photo

Arrrrrrrrr­rggggggggg­ghhhhhhhhh­h!!! What's the purpose of not modifyng the loan in such a manner as to make it more affordable??? So that you can make more money by charging more fees???

I have lost the one tiny shred of respect that I had for the mortgage industry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:16 PM on 04/03/2009

Everyone should be able to pay their own, unmodified mortgage. They signed the dotted line, so they knew what they owed. What's the big deal? If you can't afford it any longer, walk out. Count your losses and move on.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:25 PM on 04/03/2009
- Robert59 I'm a Fan of Robert59 10 fans permalink

I agree with you. My parents lost their home when I was a teenager. They did the stupid thing trying to hold onto it when they would have been better off walking away while they still had some money in their bank account.

It's just a house. Two decades later my mom bought a house, got a great interest rate. No one even cared about the past foreclosure.

People get too wrapped up in material goods. Nothing wrong with renting. I did it for 20 plus years. Now that I own a house I sometimes wonder why I bought one. There are much better investments (and I bought before the market went crazy) . Unlike renting I can't just walk away at the end of my lease.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:34 PM on 04/03/2009
- mitsie I'm a Fan of mitsie 54 fans permalink
photo

Again go back and see when the data was collected, the end of last year. This article is getting people upset for nothing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:39 PM on 04/03/2009
- Tom95134 I'm a Fan of Tom95134 53 fans permalink
photo

"...lender­s add fees or past-due interest to a loan and spread those payments out over the 30- or 40-year period."

Greedy banks, greedy financial institutions, greedy , greedy. Added fees and interest spread out over the term on the loan is just interest on top of interest. Greed! Greed! Greed! Greed!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 04/03/2009

If you have a mortgage that's longer than 15 years, you have already screwed yourself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 04/03/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect