Loan Modifications Not Helping Homeowners

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Loan Modifications Not Helping Homeowners stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

ALAN ZIBEL | April 3, 2009 02:03 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

WASHINGTON — Though lenders are boosting their attempts to curb record-high home foreclosures, fewer than half of loan modifications made at the end of last year actually reduced borrowers' payments by more than 10 percent, data released Friday show.

The report, based on an analysis of nearly 35 million loans worth more than $6 trillion, was published by the federal Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision. It provides the most detailed and broad analysis to date of efforts to stem the foreclosure crisis, which President Barack Obama is trying to combat with a $75 billion plan to promote loan modifications.

The report helps explain why many loans are falling back into default after being modified. Many borrowers and consumer groups contend that the modifications offered by the lending industry aren't very generous, despite more than a year of public prodding from regulators.

For instance, nearly one in four loan modifications in the fourth quarter actually resulted in increased monthly payments. That situation can happen when lenders add fees or past-due interest to a loan and spread those payments out over the 30- or 40-year period.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the report found that loans were far less likely to fall back into default if a borrower's monthly payment is reduced by a healthy amount.

Nine months after modification, about 26 percent of loans in which payments had dropped by 10 percent or more had fallen back into default. That compares with about half of loans in which the payment was unchanged or increased.

"This new data shows that, in the current stressful environment, modification strategies that result in unchanged or increased mortgage payments run the risk of unacceptably high re-default rates," Comptroller of the Currency John Dugan said in a statement.

But regulators said they saw a positive trend in the data, collected from mortgage companies including Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc.

Story continues below

Traditionally, lenders have seen loan workouts as a way to get a borrower back on track after a temporary disruption in income. Now, with the economy sinking fast and foreclosures soaring, they are increasingly coming around to the idea to that more permanent changes are needed.

Among loan modifications made in the October-December quarter, about 37 percent resulted in a drop in payments of more than 10 percent, compared with about one-fourth in the first nine months of the year. Regulators saw that growth as a positive sign.

"The trend toward lowering payments to make home mortgages more affordable is moving in the right direction," John Bowman, acting director of the Office of Thrift Supervision, said in a prepared statement.

The Obama administration is aiming to help up to 9 million borrowers stay in their homes through refinanced mortgages or modified loans. Still, the faltering economy, driven down by the collapse of the housing bubble, is causing the housing crisis to spread.

Among the loans surveyed in the report, just over 10 percent were delinquent or in foreclosure, compared with 7 percent at the end of September, the report said. Delinquencies are increasing the most among prime loans made to borrowers with strong credit, it said.

A broader study of the mortgage market last month found a higher percentage of problem loans.

The Mortgage Bankers Association reported that nearly 12 percent of all Americans with a mortgage _ a record 5.4 million homeowners _ were at least one month late or in foreclosure at the end of last year. That's up from 10 percent at the end of the third quarter, and from 8 percent at the end of 2007.

The trade group's study includes more than 45 million loans, 10 million more than the government report.

WASHINGTON — Though lenders are boosting their attempts to curb record-high home foreclosures, fewer than half of loan modifications made at the end of last year actually reduced borrowers' paym...
WASHINGTON — Though lenders are boosting their attempts to curb record-high home foreclosures, fewer than half of loan modifications made at the end of last year actually reduced borrowers' paym...
 
Comments
220
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 (6 pages total)
photo

If you are a Bank of America customer you owe it to yourself to read this, especially if you own a home equity line-of-credit account there.

Background: As a 50s-something, relatively senior government employee (=steady, secure employment) who has owned his (obsessively) well-maintained home on 5 wooded acres for over 10 years, I have never missed a payment or paid late on either my first mortgage or my second (i.e. the HELOC account). I usually make early payments for 2 to 3 times the minimum interest payment, which averages about $200/mo.

Incident: I was quite surprised, after posting a $650 early payment on 3/23 that as of 3/24 the account had been "blocked" by BofA's "Risk Management" department. I received no advance notice of this from BofA. Suspecting possible fraudulent activity, I contacted my branch, where I was transferred twice, given a phone number, which I called and where I was transferred 4 times before speaking to the correct individual. She said I would be getting a letter in the mail stating the reason for the block: my home is in a location where home values have fallen more than 50%. It had nothing to do with my credit score, employment, etc. she "assured" me, just the real estate market.

Nice, eh? Good doing business with you, BofA....NOT.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 04/03/2009
photo

I should have moved all of my business from Bank of America to USAA or Navy Federal years ago.

Dumb.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 04/03/2009

In other words, this 50-s something has greatly overpaid on his property. He can solve the problem by paying off the remaining mortgage with a balloon payment and be mortgage free. That's what I would do.

NEXT!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:22 PM on 04/03/2009

What's your problem? You seem to lack compassion...what's that all about?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:36 PM on 04/03/2009

No - the bank has unilaterally amended the terms of their contract of adhesion (a term of art, in case you don't know what it is). I would think you'd be offended by that, as am I.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:09 PM on 04/03/2009
photo

Exactly! What's the point of paying down the HELOC principal when I can make the minimum interest payment at 4.5% (locked) and use the extra $$$ to pay off the 1st (which under those circumstances would be very, very soon).

I'll let BofA GFTs until I'm good and ready to pay down the principal on the second. I still get the interest decuction on the 2nd, but they don't get their principal...until I'm ready to pay them.

Revenge is a dish best served cold.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:15 PM on 04/03/2009
photo

"greatly overpaid on his property"

Not the case. Bought it in mid-90s for $174K, present value is $300K, total principal remaining on both notes far less than that. When I took out the 2nd with BofA the appraisal came in at $414K. They pressured me with incentives to establish the LOC at a much higher amount than I needed/wanted, but I didn't bite.

BofA should get along quite well with their newly acquired Countrywide co-conspirators.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:24 PM on 04/03/2009
- eladora I'm a Fan of eladora 9 fans permalink

No matter how many times or how loud the noise, no one seems to pay attention to the forewarnings that this was never going to work. These big banks could really care less about individual situations and trying to repair them. I have examples from wells & citi of how they have given folks the runaround only to end up doing foreclosures anyway. I dont know why Congress wont listen .
These banks have just got them buffaloed with pretend solutions that they have no intention
of following up on. A modification should be simple ---but then the banks would have to actually do something wouldnt they?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 04/03/2009

As we can all tell from your rant, individuals also do not care about big banks. So why are you complaining? They are treating you as you should be treating them: as a business.

If you need someone to take care of you, ask your Mom, Dad or your partner and friends. Do not assume that a bank will treat you nicely, ever.

Sheeeesh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 04/03/2009
photo

Absolutely! The smiles and chitty-chatty "personal bankers" are just part of the ruse that we American's are all too frequently gullible enough to misinterpret as "caring". They all stink. I wouldn't hire a single one of them to clean up my backyard (I have 2 labradors).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:33 PM on 04/03/2009
- rjohns3 I'm a Fan of rjohns3 4 fans permalink

So nationalize the banks...


problem solved

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:09 PM on 04/03/2009

You rather want to sue the federal government if you have a real problem than a corporation? Wow. Some guts you got there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 04/03/2009
- StevieRae I'm a Fan of StevieRae 17 fans permalink
photo

One of the many amendments offered yesterday in the Senate's debate on the the Obama budget was one to establish a national usury law which would restrict fees and interest rates charged by banks. This was an effort to correct a 1978 Supreme Court ruling that struck down a similar effort back then to nationalize usury laws. The court decided that such a law went against states rights (for the most part banks operated under state charters back in 1978)

This is not the case today. We have NATIONAL banks, too big to fail, doing business across state lines. What does the Senate do: the Republicans with the help of Democrats defeated this amendment.

When are the pitchforks going to come out against these legislators who are more concerned about continuing to get campaign money from these banks than defending consumers?????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:02 PM on 04/03/2009
- eladora I'm a Fan of eladora 9 fans permalink

Congress doesnt get it . And evidently we are seeing that they dont plan on learning anything . These banks make them look like fools.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 PM on 04/03/2009

Charging interest proportional to risk is not usury.

Every corporation is incorporated in one state and one state only. Often it's Delaware or a state that has the laws they need to optimize their business. Your federal argument goes nowhere... you still have to sue in the state where the corporation has incorporated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 PM on 04/03/2009
- TJCole I'm a Fan of TJCole 192 fans permalink
photo

This Mortgage modification plan is ill conceived and leaves the little guy still subject to the power of these huge corrupt banks and lenders and Judges who are often overly influenced by the bankers and their lawyers..and money of course it does happen you know of other considerations..

It's unworkable for millions to all try and do this in bankruptcy court and many of these folks now cannot even afford the lawyer to declare bankruptcy..!

We need a plan that is across the board, as I offered back in January /February 2008 before it hit the fan..so to speak...

Just peg these mortgages to 3% above the Fed Rate not to go below 4.5% and forgive all penalties to date 1/2 of which are known to be illegal anyway..this would cost not one penny of Tax Payer Money..!

Now since they didn't listen to me we must also lower the capitalized amount due on these homes to their more realistic market value..that will cost $290 billion tops..if we the people pick up that tab otherwise the banks will need to write down around 30% of their value across the board but then the problem is solved...!

Some will not pay so then in a few months they'll be foreclosed upon and evicted soon enough anyway but the vest majority will be able to then remain in the homes and this is for Primary homes only..of course..!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 PM on 04/03/2009

If the little guy can't afford to pay his mortgage, the little guy shouldn't have bought that house he can't afford. Case closed.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 04/03/2009
- TJCole I'm a Fan of TJCole 192 fans permalink
photo

Really..

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 04/03/2009
photo

Agree. I feel sorry for those who were subjected to intellectual and financial rape by unscrupulous lenders while the feds were golfing and clearing brush, but not so much because they were raped as because they were too stupid to defend themselves (i.e. with knowledge).

Anyone who finds themselves in a situation where they either gambled on the market and lost or got hood-winked by Countrywide, et al (due to lack of smarts or initiative, or both) deserves to pay some kind of price unless, of course, they were victims of fraud as determined by a court of law (i.e. not as determined in the alleged victim's mind).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 04/03/2009

Surprise. Did we really believe that we could make the pain go away by letting millions of borrowers off the hook easy?

I, for one do not subscribe to that. This will take a long, long time. Some people will remember 2009 when they pay off their last payment in 2037, after having paid about three times as much as their home is worth.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 04/03/2009

This has been the problem with this bail out all along. The options for many homeowners are limited. The gap between what they are paying on the mortgages and what they could be paying for rent is often large enough to make it worth while to give up there homes. With so many people upside down on their loans unless the banks are willing to truly modify loans there will be many more people losing their homes.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 PM on 04/03/2009

Owning a home right now is a luxury. If you can afford it, good for you. If you can't... renting is better.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 04/03/2009

And this is what AMERICA has come to..."land of the free and home of the brave?" Hardly, land of the renters and home of the fearful (of large corporations).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:38 PM on 04/03/2009
photo

Everybody gambled in the housing market and lost: the lenders and the buyers. The lenders rode the gravy train racking up profits buy lending to anyone with a pulse and then passing those mortgages on to others who resold them, made a profit and then passed them on again. The buyers, seeing the cost of housing skyrocketing, scrambled to scrape together what they could to buy a horribly overpriced house. They did because: they feared being priced-out of the market; wishful thinking that after they bought a house their house would continue to increase in value, indefinitely; being hoodwinked into buying house that they couldn't afford by crooked lenders; and plain old greed, buy a house and hope it keeps increasing in value and sell it in a few years and make a profit.
Now, we the taxpayers must bail-out everybody involved no matter how greedy, no matter how desperate, no matter how stupid.
Somethings not right here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:32 PM on 04/03/2009
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 321 fans permalink

However the New Obama housing plan corrects this...

Homeowner get reduction in paymnets. Where reductions have been actually made.. they have a much higher rate of success... we needed a study to show that?

Remeber legally the bank is not generally the owner of a mortge.. just p[rocesses the monthly payment and is very legally limited to what the bak can do... additionally the same mortage may have been divided up between 5 investors and the bank has to get all 5 to agree to any change in the loans.

The best solution is to allow refianicing at low interest rates... thus doing away with the toxic mortages all together. Obama's plan starts to do that.

Regards.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:17 PM on 04/03/2009
- petridish I'm a Fan of petridish 7 fans permalink

The underlying problem is people who took out loans that were not affordable or bought more house then they should have. If people bought more home then they could afford the ONLY solution is for them to lose it, not for me to subsidize their payments.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:23 PM on 04/03/2009

Yes, a selfish "Me me and only me" attitude will get us all out of this.

If you are so determined to be destructively self centered, consider this:

The foreclosure of your neighbor DOES affect you. It lowers your home value. It cost the city in lost tax revenue AND in direct costs associated with the foreclosure (which can be a couple thousand dollars in some places).

But hey, all of that is worth it if you get to feel superior to someone who has fallen on hard times. (And, by the way, all of us live in homes that "we cannot afford" if we lose our jobs or get bankrupted by medical bills- so maybe snap judgments aren't the best line of reasoning here).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 04/03/2009

The banks sit on the TARP money while the whole sh*t house goes up in flames. It's not working because they don't want it - yet.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 04/03/2009
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 321 fans permalink

They sit on TARP money because our banking laws require reserves or they have to call loans...


You cant do stress testing and at the same time expect baks to take more risk.... the goals are in conflict.

And theire reserves are low because home owners got the money and could not pay it back...

Thats the law....



Regards

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:14 PM on 04/03/2009

What an advertisement for such an incorrect statement. The are sitting on the TARP money because the banks are fu*king greedy and they wanted to wait for the change in the mark to market rule before the sale of the toxic assets started.

Huge piles of TARP money have already been paid to the top 5 banks in the US and several over seas counter parties of AIG with no oversight at 100 cents on the dollar.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 04/03/2009
- dandypuddin I'm a Fan of dandypuddin 188 fans permalink
photo

And one wonders what the fee is to modify a mortgage less than 10%?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:02 PM on 04/03/2009
photo

You have the predators re-financing the mortgages of their pray. When is someone going to way up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 04/03/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect