iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama In Prague: Launches Effort To Rid World Of Nuclear Weapons

JENNIFER LOVEN   04/ 5/09 09:42 PM ET   AP

Obama In Prague

PRAGUE — Declaring the future of mankind at stake, President Barack Obama on Sunday said all nations must strive to rid the world of nuclear arms and that the U.S. had a "moral responsibility" to lead because no other country has used one.

A North Korean rocket launch upstaged Obama's idealistic call to action, delivered in the capital of the Czech Republic, a former satellite of the Soviet Union. But Obama dismissed those who say the spread of nuclear weapons, "the most dangerous legacy of the Cold War," cannot be checked.

"This goal will not be reached quickly _ perhaps not in my lifetime," he told a cheering crowd of more than 20,000 in the historic square outside the Prague Castle gates. We "must ignore the voices who tell us that the world cannot change. We have to insist, 'Yes, we can.'"

Few experts think it's possible to completely eradicate nuclear weapons, and many say it wouldn't be a good idea even if it could be done. Even backward nations such as North Korea have shown they can develop bombs, given enough time.

But a program to drastically cut the world atomic arsenal carries support from scientists and lions of the foreign policy world. Obama embraced that step as his first goal and chose as the venue for his address a nation that peacefully threw off communism and helped topple the Soviet Union, despite its nuclear power.

But he said his own country, with its huge arsenal and its history using two atomic bombs against Japan in 1945, had to lead the world. He said the U.S. has a "moral responsibility" to start taking steps now.

"To reduce our warheads and stockpiles, we will negotiate a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty with the Russians this year," he promised.

The nuclear-free cause is more potent in Europe than in the United States, where even Democratic politicians such as Obama must avoid being labeled as soft or naive if they endorse it. Still, Obama said he would resubmit a proposed Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty to the Senate for ratification. The pact was signed by President Bill Clinton but rejected by the Senate in 1999.

While espousing long-term goals, Obama took care to promise that America would not lower its defenses while others are pursuing a nuclear threat. He warned both North Korea, which has tested a nuclear weapon, and Iran, which the West says is developing one, that the world was against them.

Obama gave his most unequivocal pledge yet to proceed with building a missile defense system in Europe, so long as Iran pursues nuclear weapons, a charge it denies. That shield is to be based in the Czech Republic and Poland. Those countries are on Russia's doorstep, and the missile shield has contributed to a significant decline in U.S.-Russia relations.

In the interest of resetting ties with Moscow, Obama previously had appeared to soft-pedal his support for the Bush-era shield proposal. But he adopted a different tone in Prague.

"As long as the threat from Iran persists, we will go forward with a missile defense system that is cost-effective and proven," Obama said, earning cheers from the crowd.

Hours before the address, an aide awoke Obama in his hotel room to tell him that North Korea had make good on its pledge to launch a long-range rocket. By lunchtime, the president had addressed it publicly nearly half a dozen times.

"Rules must be binding," he said. "Violations must be punished. Words must mean something."

"Now is the time for a strong international response," he said.

After the speech and a round of private meetings with foreign leaders, Obama arrived in Turkey, the final stop of his trip.

On the broader anti-nuclear issue, more than 140 nations have ratified the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. But 44 states that possess nuclear technology need to both sign and ratify it before it can take effect and only 35 have do so. The United States is among the holdouts, along with China, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Iran, Israel, North Korea, and Pakistan.

Ratification was one of several "concrete steps" Obama outlined as necessary to move toward a nuclear-free world. He also called for reducing the role of nuclear weapons in American national security strategy and seeking a new treaty to end the production of fissile materials used in nuclear weapons.

Obama said the U.S. will seek to strengthen the nuclear nonproliferation treaty by providing more resources and authority for international inspections and mandating "real and immediate consequences" for countries that violate the treaty.

He offered few details of how he would accomplish his larger goal and acknowledged that "in a strange turn of history, the threat of global nuclear war has gone down, but the risk of a nuclear attack has gone up."

___

On the Net:

White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

PRAGUE — Declaring the future of mankind at stake, President Barack Obama on Sunday said all nations must strive to rid the world of nuclear arms and that the U.S. had a "moral responsibility" t...
PRAGUE — Declaring the future of mankind at stake, President Barack Obama on Sunday said all nations must strive to rid the world of nuclear arms and that the U.S. had a "moral responsibility" t...
Filed by Nick Graham  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 556
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nirek
Proud progressive Vietnam vet. against WAR
06:50 AM on 04/06/2009
The more I see and hear from our President, the more I like him. He has an agenda that I am in favor of, getting the whole world on the same page. Ending nuclear proliferation , talking to the folks who do not like us. These and more are good things to accomplish , we need to support him in his efforts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Benjine
05:40 AM on 04/06/2009
If you're on facebook, you can check out the photos from the day I met the President in Prague!

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=101014&id=685309119
03:00 AM on 04/06/2009
This is great news. Like he said, it will take time to accomplish the goal of completely abolishing nukes, but it's important that we do it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilipTaylor
Legalized Bribery is an Oxymoron - must END
02:29 AM on 04/06/2009
Must See!

This survivor of the Savings and Loan Scandal has written a book on this Banking Crisis:

William K Black on Bill Moyer on the SCAMS of the Banksters:

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/watch.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StellaRay
12:47 AM on 04/06/2009
Who's going to agree to this? Who's going to disarm first and how will we know they have? Will the world do continual round robins to check on everyone's WMDs? And if so, who's going to police that system and why should anyone believe them?

Truth is, I was a bit surprised by Obama's speech for nuclear disarmament. I have heard this song my whole life long and have yet to see it taken seriously. And yes, I'll just say it. It seems a bit naive. Seems to me the war on WMDs has about as much chance of success as the War on Drugs. Just say no ain't gonna do it. They're both here to stay and it's useless to war against them in the same old ways.

What I think Obama has so right is his diplomatic push to find common ground. I believe it is indeed possible to reach a global consensus on what's good for the endurance of all our governments. In other words, we aren't going to argue about whether you have WMDs or not. We're just going to say use them and the world will make you toast by the next morning. It isn't pretty, but at least it's more pragmatic than trying to decide who's going to disarm first, and trying to enforce it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:46 AM on 04/06/2009
Why does anyone have to do it first? It really is insanity to have this arsenal of nuclear weapons and every justification for it is just as irrational.
I am not a nuclear scientist or physicist, I am ignorant of all weaponry and that includes nuclear weapons.
The one thing I hear over and over again is that there is no such thing as a winnable nuclear war..although the hawks seem to think there is..and that if a major nation uses nukes it will be sucide as well as homicide.
So why keep them? It's like keeping dynamite under the bed..in case you will need it someday.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StellaRay
02:59 AM on 04/06/2009
Yes, to some extent you are right----"like keeping dynamite under the bed in case you need it someday."

But in answer to your question, why does anyone have to do it first?---I'm saying because someone does have to do it first, by the very nature of the challenge to be nuke free. And there's the rub. I doubt, despite all the idealists' greatest hopes, that the US is going to destroy all their nukes first and hope to God the rest of the world will follow. Ain't gonna happen.

Furthermore, every country feels that way. We're not going first. All the more to my point---the war on WMDs is as likely to be unsuccessful as the war on drugs. We must find a different way to mount this challenge. We must accept we all have access to Pandora's box and now the thing is, how do we keep from opening it?
12:03 AM on 04/06/2009
He did make one huge mistake. He said 'austrian' was a language. Problem is no one speaks 'austrian.' It ranks right up there with the so-called Palin gaffe of Africa being a continent (though the source for Palin's comments cannot be verified). Well we didn't elect a smart one after all. Wait until Obama learns Latin is a 'dead' language. OMG.

http://www.butasforme.com/2009/04/05/obama-thinks-%E2%80%98austrian%E2%80%99-is-a-language/
11:58 PM on 04/05/2009
OMG did you hear that Obama thinks ‘Austrian’ is a language. It's right up there with Palin thinking Africa was a continent (if the Palin gaffe actually was true, which it was not). See here:
http://www.butasforme.com/2009/04/05/obama-thinks-‘austrian’-is-a-language/
11:57 PM on 04/05/2009
Well if it works it would be fantastic. But our advesaries will never comply but we will....We lose.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TJCole
11:57 PM on 04/05/2009
Just reduce strategic weapons, thermo nuclear strategic warheads by 50% both American and Russia go for that first, and cancel the orders by Putin for 70 new generation warheads and stop Secretary Gates who favors an entire new arsenal of next generation warheads...

Does the left hand know what the right hand is doing, on this issue..?

Stop Gates and Putin and the new generation of nuclear insanity...!
08:26 PM on 04/05/2009
as logic dictates - somebody's gotta go first - and as obama rightly points out; the United States was the *only* nuclear power to actually use weapons of mass destruction - TWICE

obviously, the only sensible thing for the US to do is show some good faith - and credibility - IF America's stated goals are to spread freedom, peace and democracy around the world - and not just political rhetoric - then as self-appointed 'leaders of the free world' - the US must demonstrate its committment to non-proliferation by being the FIRST to begin dismantling & destroying its OWN arsenal of nuclear weapons. after all, being the only country to ever kill (evaporate) masses of people with nuclear bombs, the US 'kinda' has a moral obligation here. i mean, the ball really is in the US' court.

btw, it takes a helluva lot of courage to be the first to stand-down, and i admire Obama for giving a clear signal to the hawks & warpigs, at home & abroad, that he's 'man enough' to lead the world on a path to a greater purpose - peace.

imo, US citizens must *demand* nuclear disarmament from their government - demand PEACE - otherwise you're all just pissing into the wind and nothing's gonna change... until that is, the day we end up bearing witness to horrific devastation, and another mushroom cloud.

seems to me that all WAR is predicated on FEAR - and nuclear weapons keep us perpertually afraid
photo
politicali
Liberal means free, open and generous.
08:19 PM on 04/05/2009
Full speech now available!!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwYzAp7QV3U
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:52 PM on 04/05/2009
Thanks!
photo
politicali
Liberal means free, open and generous.
07:50 PM on 04/05/2009
Can't wait to see a video of the whole speech. i just found a clip with the last 3 minutes, it gave me goosebumps. I'm so proud of everything Obama does. He is the only person alive today to give a speech like this and have the whole world listen. He has the gravitas and the reputation to deliver!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TJCole
07:42 PM on 04/05/2009
Now if this we're actually a serious effort to reduce Nuclear Arms, it would begin with a 50% reduction on the part of American and Russia....

A 50% reduction would not in any real way effect either nations ability to destroy all life on the planet still several times over and yet would greatly reduce the possibility of these war heads falling into the wrong hands and also save billions of dollars in maintaining them and safe guarding and storing them..

That's just the strategic large scale high yield weapons the U.S. has approximately 10,000 do we really need 10,000 strategic warheads...10,000 and Secretary Gates wants to spend billions buy this new next generation of warhead design....Putin put in an order for 70 new Warheads a couple of months back as well...

So we'll see...first go for a 50% real reduction of all strategic warheads maybe of other nuclear nations as well such as India and Pakistan, Britain and France as well...even maybe Israel...
06:14 PM on 04/05/2009
I applaud the ambition and the effort, but I think unfortunately that the invention of nuclear weapons was opening a Pandora's Box that can't be closed. To totally get rid of nuclear weapons, you'd have to get rid of the mindset that caused them to be invented in the first place, and that ain't gonna happen.
06:01 PM on 04/05/2009
" a program to drastically cut the world atomic arsenal carries support from scientists and lions of the foreign policy world."

Yeah, but that doesn't make it an advisable or intelligent choice.

It was not that long ago, that scientists and foreign policy makers were into a fad called 'Eugenics."

And we know how that turned out!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
4akinderworld
06:06 PM on 04/05/2009
Nice new sock, Timny!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SirReal1
06:19 PM on 04/05/2009
That's an interesting assertion. You wouldn't happen to have a little thing called "PROOF" of that assertion, would you?

I didn't think so.

Illuminate us, oh great Timmy, how did that turn out?
06:55 PM on 04/05/2009
"how did that turn out?"

Well, if I remember right, it ended in a bunker in Berlin...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
AtheistUS
08:43 PM on 04/05/2009
It is well known how this turned out, in its most ugly forms.

That said, I think that usually an opinion of scientific community is the best we can have.