More

EPA Continues To Block Harmful Mining Projects

Mountaintop Removal

TIM HUBER   04/ 9/09 06:08 PM ET   AP

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is objecting to three more Appalachian surface mining permits, saying the operations would cause unacceptable damage.

The agency recently asked the Army Corps of Engineers to revoke a permit for a Virginia mine that was issued under a streamlined process and require the operator to obtain an individual permit, which would include stricter environmental standards. The EPA also wants more environmental safeguards before the corps issues permits for two West Virginia surface mines, including one owned by Richmond, Va.-based Massey Energy Co., the nation's fourth-largest coal company.

In letters released Thursday, the EPA told the corps that the projects likely violate the Clean Water Act.

Under President Barack Obama, the EPA has begun subjecting surface coal mining permits to tougher scrutiny than the Bush Administration did _ particularly operations that blast away mountaintops. Administrator Lisa Jackson last month directed EPA staff to review 150 to 200 pending applications for new or expanded surface coal mines. The agency has since objected to several permits.

The EPA's renewed interest has buoyed environmentalists and other opponents of so-called mountaintop removal mining. The highly efficient and destructive practice involves blasting away ridgelines to expose multiple coal seams and dumping debris atop stream beds in valleys.

National Mining Association spokesman Luke Popovich said the latest letters underscore fears of a de facto moratorium on surface mine permits from Virginia to Illinois. The Washington, D.C.-based trade group estimates coal mines in the region employ 77,000 people.

"The reason this permit review is potentially so disruptive over such a widespread area is that _ as the EPA well knows _ existing operations need new permits to dispose of fill as they exhaust the use of areas available to them now under existing permits," Popovich said in an e-mail. "It's coming in late in the process to recommend against these permits, so a comprehensive delay seems likely."

That's good news, said Janet Keating, executive director of the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition. The group recently persuaded a federal judge to bar mine operators from using southern West Virginia valley fills authorized by the corps under the same nationwide permit used to authorize the Virginia mine targeted by the EPA.

"It makes sense to me, in light of the recent ruling," Keating said. "We're extremely pleased."

Ginger Mullins, regulatory branch chief for the corps' Huntington District, which covers portions of Kentucky, Ohio, West Virginia, Virginia and North Carolina, said it's good that EPA is commenting on the two West Virginia permits before they're issued. "We are reviewing their letters," she said.

The corps Norfolk District, meanwhile, is evaluating the EPA's request to revoke the Virginia permit, spokesman Mark Haviland said. "A decision has not been made yet by our district commander."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is objecting to three more Appalachian surface mining permits, saying the operations would cause unacceptable damage. The agency rec...
CHARLESTON, W.Va. — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is objecting to three more Appalachian surface mining permits, saying the operations would cause unacceptable damage. The agency rec...
Filed by Dave Burdick  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
01:05 PM on 04/13/2009
Darn, those poor little fundies can't dump toxic waste in rivers and drown towns in their coal sludge.

They are being discriminated against!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Kungfublood
11:56 AM on 04/13/2009
I have written plenty of letters to the EPA during the public comment period over the last ten years largely to no effect. Do you suppose that with Bush is no longer in office they have employees at the EPA that can read?
08:11 PM on 04/10/2009
Lets get more Natural Gas to replace the coal electric plants with.

The Federal Reserve Bank.

What is the Fed?

For starters, it's neither "federal"
nor a "reserve" nor a "bank."

What is it then?

The answer may surprise you:

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/585.html
04:58 PM on 04/11/2009
Your Fed propaganda is getting old. The fed is necessary to counteract inflation. As much as you'd like to believe otherwise, even the founding fathers of this nation saw the effects of uncontrolled currency supplies, and realized the importance of a "central bank". The money we "pay" to the Fed keeps our dollar worth a dollar.

If you don't believe me, head to Zimbabwe and blow your nose with a 1 Trillion Zimbabwe Dollar bill. It will only cost you about 3 US Dollars.
05:25 PM on 04/10/2009
Will be hard times ahead. Remember we get allot of energy for everyday needs from these mines. While I too want clean energy going cold turkey is going to be a painful transition and one likely to cause economic issues to dwarf those we face today. Sure 20 years ago this would have been easy but we are living in a peak oil economy and to take us off the teat prior to providing clean energy to replace it is a mistake.

You have to look at all the facets to understand the totality of any decision.
06:12 PM on 04/10/2009
Exactly.
09:08 AM on 04/11/2009
...but, but, but. No more buts.
photo
joebaggadonuts
Civilization: Evolutionary pathway of choice.
03:25 PM on 04/10/2009
Climate change is shaping up to be a surprising battle. See this for perspective http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/04/10/rich-poor-divide-still-stalls-climate-accord/
03:15 PM on 04/10/2009
This type of prevention is just what we need! But it's too late for Harriman, Tennessee. To see a new before-and-after video of the tragic TVA Coal Ash Spill and learn how you can fight this injustice, visit FIlthyCoal.org
06:11 PM on 04/10/2009
What happens when an accident happens involving wind or solar power? Will filthywind.org and filthysolar.org pop up to fight that injustice too?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quidam56
02:54 PM on 04/10/2009
Appalachia can't stand anymore of the prosperity of MTR. We are being bombed, blasted and bulldozed right into 3rd world America. http://www.wisecountyissues.com/?p=138 Coal isn't nearly as big of a problem in comparison to how it's extracted.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Cynth
[Your ad here.]
01:50 PM on 04/10/2009
Sounds like the EPA is back on the job!
BlackbirdHighway
Brawndo's got electrolites!
01:35 PM on 04/10/2009
The wind power industry already employees more people than the coal industry. We need more green energy to create jobs and revitalize the economy!
06:09 PM on 04/10/2009
Wait... the wind power industry employs more people, but produces far less electricty...

Doesn't that mean its more expensive and wasteful?
03:31 PM on 04/12/2009
The DOD employs VASTLY more people, but produces ZERO electricity, or any product of any kind.

Doesn't that mean that it's expensive and wasteful?
12:53 PM on 04/10/2009
Hell Yeah ,it's about time

So thrilled for all th people living in those places and all who worked so hard to undue this Bush era environmental crqap!!!!!!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
GOP is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
12:26 PM on 04/10/2009
Shut down all this mountaintop mining. We are raping our country for a few short term benefits, just like many developing countries do. It is shameful!
12:41 PM on 04/10/2009
If you are currently using the electricity provided by coal mining, you aren't really aiding your "cause" by continuing to create demand for that electricity.

Let me know how you feel when your house goes dark when those coal mines are stopped. Oh wait, you wont be able to!

Hypocrite.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
kareemachan
watashi ha tororu ga oroka da to omoi masu。
01:37 PM on 04/10/2009
But you don't know where he/she lives, so no hypocrite. And, obviously, I agree with the comment. We need some other energy methods than those that pollute the air and water as well as ruin the environment.
11:26 AM on 04/10/2009
Victory... well a little bit...

http://pitchbendpost.blogspot.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
11:00 AM on 04/10/2009
It is nice that the most destructive projects are being changed to be more environmentally careful.
Hopefully, the world will get off oil and off fossil fuels altogether.
10:50 AM on 04/10/2009
Poor little coal companies, my heart breaks for them. I'll miss those days of mud covered mountain tops that have become the landscape signature in WV.

A special note to the coal miners lossing their jobs. Please don't worry because the progressive population has your backs. Solar Maid and GreenScene EMS are both filling positions nationwide and we welcome you to consider a career in the 21st century

http://www.mygreenscene.com
http://www.greensceneems.com
http://www.mygreenscene.com/thesolarmaidcompany/index.html
12:42 PM on 04/10/2009
It will be hard for those out of work coal miners to go to a website on a computer that is non functional, due to no electricity.
02:29 PM on 04/10/2009
I am an opponent of MTR and other issues related to coal and the industry and always have been. I live in KY and this has been a hot button issue since I have lived here for 25 years. However, having spent a lot of time on the issue, in the mountains and teaching about the peopele of Appalachia who have such mixed responses to the problems of coal, and to those whom you refer to, unless you live there or have been there extensively, it's not as simple as you make it sound for these people.
If you haven't visited there, you should. Everyone should. YOu will feel as if you have stepped into another realm. I can't really explain it, but you have grossly oversimplified the people there.