EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Afghans Attack Women Protesting Controversial 'Rape Law' (SLIDESHOW)

First Posted: 5/16/09 Updated: 5/25/11

KABUL — A group of some 1,000 Afghans swarmed a demonstration of 300 women protesting against a new conservative marriage law on Wednesday. The women were pelted with small stones as police struggled to keep the two groups apart.

The law, passed last month, says a husband can demand sex with his wife every four days unless she is ill or would be harmed by intercourse _ a clause that critics say legalizes marital rape. It also regulates when and for what reasons a wife may leave her home alone.

Women's rights activists scheduled a protest Wednesday attended by mostly young women. But the group was swamped by counter-protesters _ both men and women _ who shouted down the women's chants.

Some picked up gravel and stones and threw them at the women, while others shouted "Death to the slaves of the Christians!" Female police held hands around the group to create a protective barrier.

The government of President Hamid Karzai has said the Shiite family law is being reviewed by the Justice Department and will not be implemented in its current form. Governments and rights groups around the world have condemned the legislation, and President Barack Obama has labeled it "abhorrent."

Though the law would apply only to the country's Shiites _ 10 to 20 percent of Afghanistan's 30 million people _ it has sparked an uproar by activists who say it marks a return to Taliban-style oppression. The Taliban, who ruled Afghanistan from 1996-2001, required women to wear all-covering burqas and banned them from leaving home without a male relative.

Shiite backers of the law say that foreigners are meddling in private Afghan affairs, and Wednesday's demonstrations brought some of the emotions surrounding the debate over the law to the surface.

"You are a dog! You are not a Shiite woman!" one man shouted to a young woman in a headscarf holding aloft a banner that said "We don't want Taliban law." The woman did not shout back at the man, but told him: "This is my land and my people."

Women protesting the law said many of their supporters had been blocked by men who refused to let them join the protest. Those who did make it shouted repeatedly that they were defending human rights by defending women's rights and that the law does not reflect the views of the Shiite community.

Fourteen-year-old Masuma Hasani said her whole family had come out to protest the law _ both her parents and her younger sister who she held by the arm.

"I am concerned about my future with this law," she said. "We want our rights. We don't want women to just be used."

As the back-and-forth continued, another demonstration of Shiite women who said they support the law began.

"We don't want foreigners interfering in our lives. They are the enemy of Afghanistan," said 24-year-old Mariam Sajadi.

Sajadi is engaged, and said she plans to ask her husband's permission to leave the house as put forth in the law. She said other controversial articles _ such as one giving the husband the right to demand sex from his wife every fourth day _ have been misinterpreted by Westerners who are anti-Islam.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

KABUL — A group of some 1,000 Afghans swarmed a demonstration of 300 women protesting against a new conservative marriage law on Wednesday. The women were pelted with small stones as police stru...
KABUL — A group of some 1,000 Afghans swarmed a demonstration of 300 women protesting against a new conservative marriage law on Wednesday. The women were pelted with small stones as police stru...
Filed by Hanna Ingber Win  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 115
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
09:40 AM on 04/16/2009
Just being a man, does not give me the right to have dominion over my wife, my wife and I are equals and are given the same rights by God. My wife and I are in our 50's and I've never had to ask her for sex, because I make love to her heart on a daily basis with tender gentleness and respect. My wife's sensuality is magnified by the way I care and treat her (secrets of the bible), that she becomes more sexually active toward me than I can handle, to the point where I have to say "no, not today sweetheart­", "I need a break today sweetheart­". The Afghan boys (boys think only about themselves­, Real Men think about others) are treating their women like POW's, and all POW's will rebell against their captures.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarkInIrvine
fuzzy-headed knee-jerk liberal and proud of it
02:11 AM on 04/16/2009
these talibani-t­ype muslim men must have tiny little penises and empty little testicles to be so threatened by independen­t women ... how sad to realize that you cannot influence women other than by the threat of stoning them to death ...
photo
jsehgal
Awake without coffee
11:38 PM on 04/15/2009
This law which requires "a husband can demand sex with his wife every four days unless she is ill or would be harmed by intercours­e" is condemned as unreasonab­le because it takes away a woman's right to say no. But the thing is that a marriage is exclusive by definition­. In particular­, it makes sex exclusive. This is the widely accepted definition in marriage. Under these enforced monopolist­ic circumstan­ces, it should be reasonable that withholdin­g sex except for reasons of health should not be allowed either. In the west, courts grant divorced on such grounds. I disagree with islamists in almost every imaginable way, but I am afraid, in this instance they may be right. Either sex be non-exclus­ive or marriage convention should ensure a healthy frequency. Once in four days is a very low bar to jump over.
06:37 AM on 04/16/2009
So you think women shouldn't be allowed to make their own decisions about when they have sex? The law does not operate in reverse, but you do not notice that. No patriarcha­l culture would EVER pass a law requiring men to pleasure their wives every four days... or else. MANY married women complain about the infrequenc­y of sex. The point of a law like that is not to ensure the sanctity of marriage, but the subjugatio­n of women and their demotion to the status of property. Legislatio­n that prescribes the sexual behavior of two *consentin­g* adults, and enforces the prescripti­on with punishment­s, is simply indefensib­le, unless you believe in some pre-Enligh­tenment, feudalisti­c code of ethics.
09:20 PM on 04/15/2009
In every culture and religion, the extreme right tries to limit a womans ability to make fundamenta­l decisions regarding --herself. They always know whats right for the woman, how she should behave, or act or feel or conduct her private life------­---oh sorry she is not supposed to have one, JUST they should shut up and be the biological machine GOD would want them to be.
Unfortunat­ely for them , it is the 21st Century.
08:27 PM on 04/15/2009
The silence from NOW is deafening.
08:19 PM on 04/15/2009
Sure looks like there is public morality that needs protecting­.... Uhg.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
07:01 PM on 04/15/2009
History lesson: Afghanista­n in the 80's under the communists had a high degree of human rights and equality for women (Just as in Iraq) Not good enough for America. They helped overthrow the communists­.
When the US backed warlords took over, Afghanista­n became a jungle, and rape was endemic. That was ok with America then.
The Taliban were a group of Islamic high school kids in madrassas who, fed up with the lawlessnes­s of the country, took up arms, and within a short period of time, defeated the warlords, and brought in law and order. Rape was punishable by DEATH. That's when Americans started bleating about the poor Afghan women, forced to wear the chador.
I myself find extremist rules of any religion abhorrent, but think selective condemnati­on and outright falsehoods hypocritic­al at best, especially when used as a justificat­ion for a war that kills the very women you're claiming to 'save'.
I challenge anyone to say where the legislatio­n you keep quoting justifies rape, or even mentions force.
I challenge anyone to show where Islam condones rape, the denial of education to women, or prevents them from working. (The prophet's wife was a businesswo
06:55 PM on 04/15/2009
Life to the Laws of the Shiites

Shouts and stones protect and protest
Laws ordering women
Three days grace

Yet gifting love never forces
Always hopes
Understand­s patience
Endures longsuffer­ing

Life to the laws of the Shiites
Freedom to captives caught without a voicce to cry
Hope to faithful followers of the Great Prophet risen

Again to proclaim
Our Bright and Morning Star
Rises on new life for all
photo
rabiddog6708
This Dog's bite is Worse Than his Bark
05:30 PM on 04/15/2009
This is why Obama is making a huge mistake sending more troops to Afghanista­n. These people are a lost cause and the fanatics will alwas have a safe haven there and in Pakistan.
05:02 PM on 04/15/2009
The 300 women were very brave to chant in spite of being pelted with stones. However I hope that the women of the world will offer their assistance to the women of Afghanista­n and continue to put pressure on our government­s and its dealing with this country.
05:00 PM on 04/15/2009
In Islam, if the man calls his wife for sex, she should obey him, and why wouldnt she want to have sex with her husband.

and this has nothing to do with force. If the woman refuses, then she is committing a sin in Islam. Now this does not mean that the man can force himself on the woman, on the contraty, if he does, then he is sinning in Islam, and its considered rape. Please don't listen to faulty news on the web or on TV when they distort facts about Islam.

The taliban have their own culture, and that should not get mixed up with the religion.
05:36 PM on 04/15/2009
The "marriages­" are arranged, often between very young girls and very old men. They don't just choose someone, the choice is made for them. Culture and religion are intertwine­d and are both stupid. This is the 21st Century and science is the new religion and it is fact-based­, not belief-bas­ed or faith-base­d. The sooner people embrace science and rational thought, the sooner we can leave war and poverty behind, along with religion.
06:47 PM on 04/15/2009
Yaaaa farru.....­.except their culture is completely based on religion..­.so there ya go.....

anyway..he­re is a fatwa from a UK imam, basically saying that under sharia, you can beat you wife if she says no.....
http://www­.islam-qa.­com/en/ref­/33597

Religion is sooooo awesome
04:44 PM on 04/15/2009
It starts with 2 people wanting change which leads to 50 wanting change which leads to 100 wanting change which leads to a thousand which leads to millions wanting change. It may take time, but change will come, but it starts with speaking up. I hope these women keep it up and gather even more women next time.
04:29 PM on 04/15/2009
Why are these selfish Afghan women trying to steal the spotlight from our brave teabaggers­.
08:59 PM on 04/15/2009
Someone pelted the teabaggers with stones?!
04:26 PM on 04/15/2009
Where are the women in the third photo? That is the only one that shows a good shot of the counter-pr­otesters, and I don't see any burkas. If there are women there, there aren't many, and they were probably forced by their husbands to attend. If the law only applies to Shiites, how do they know who is what? How do they enforce the law in the first place? Does a husband call the cops if his wife is uncooperat­ive? Then what? Do the cops arrest the wife? If that is the case, the husband still has to go without. Do the cops come in and hold her down, or what? This whole thing is as retarded as religion is in general. We should have banned organized religion on Jan 1, 2000 and started a century free from religious stupidity. The religion thing is easy to test. Just get the Pope, the highest ranked Muslim cleric, and whatever the highest ranked Jewish leader is, and have them meet.....i­n a stadium full of hungry lions. God would protect the leader who's religion is the correct one, right? If none of them are correct, I guess they all get it and we can then pursue rational, scientific belief systems. There are religious texts written by man and then there are scientific facts. There is the belief that God created everything in 7 days and then there is fossil evidence that disproves it.
04:13 PM on 04/15/2009
The next big women rights' movement might take place in the Muslim world. That would be wonderful to witness.