Afghans Attack Women Protesting Controversial 'Rape Law' (SLIDESHOW)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Afghans Attack Women Protesting Controversial 'Rape Law' (SLIDESHOW) stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

AP   |  HEIDI VOGT   |   04/16/09 08:20 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

KABUL — A group of some 1,000 Afghans swarmed a demonstration of 300 women protesting against a new conservative marriage law on Wednesday. The women were pelted with small stones as police struggled to keep the two groups apart.

The law, passed last month, says a husband can demand sex with his wife every four days unless she is ill or would be harmed by intercourse _ a clause that critics say legalizes marital rape. It also regulates when and for what reasons a wife may leave her home alone.

Women's rights activists scheduled a protest Wednesday attended by mostly young women. But the group was swamped by counter-protesters _ both men and women _ who shouted down the women's chants.

Some picked up gravel and stones and threw them at the women, while others shouted "Death to the slaves of the Christians!" Female police held hands around the group to create a protective barrier.

The government of President Hamid Karzai has said the Shiite family law is being reviewed by the Justice Department and will not be implemented in its current form. Governments and rights groups around the world have condemned the legislation, and President Barack Obama has labeled it "abhorrent."

Though the law would apply only to the country's Shiites _ 10 to 20 percent of Afghanistan's 30 million people _ it has sparked an uproar by activists who say it marks a return to Taliban-style oppression. The Taliban, who ruled Afghanistan from 1996-2001, required women to wear all-covering burqas and banned them from leaving home without a male relative.

Shiite backers of the law say that foreigners are meddling in private Afghan affairs, and Wednesday's demonstrations brought some of the emotions surrounding the debate over the law to the surface.

Story continues below
advertisement

"You are a dog! You are not a Shiite woman!" one man shouted to a young woman in a headscarf holding aloft a banner that said "We don't want Taliban law." The woman did not shout back at the man, but told him: "This is my land and my people."

Women protesting the law said many of their supporters had been blocked by men who refused to let them join the protest. Those who did make it shouted repeatedly that they were defending human rights by defending women's rights and that the law does not reflect the views of the Shiite community.

Fourteen-year-old Masuma Hasani said her whole family had come out to protest the law _ both her parents and her younger sister who she held by the arm.

"I am concerned about my future with this law," she said. "We want our rights. We don't want women to just be used."

As the back-and-forth continued, another demonstration of Shiite women who said they support the law began.

"We don't want foreigners interfering in our lives. They are the enemy of Afghanistan," said 24-year-old Mariam Sajadi.

Sajadi is engaged, and said she plans to ask her husband's permission to leave the house as put forth in the law. She said other controversial articles _ such as one giving the husband the right to demand sex from his wife every fourth day _ have been misinterpreted by Westerners who are anti-Islam.

Filed by Hanna Ingber Win
KABUL — A group of some 1,000 Afghans swarmed a demonstration of 300 women protesting against a new conservative marriage law on Wednesday. The women were pelted with small stones as police stru...
KABUL — A group of some 1,000 Afghans swarmed a demonstration of 300 women protesting against a new conservative marriage law on Wednesday. The women were pelted with small stones as police stru...
Loading...
 
 
Comments
115
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)

Just being a man, does not give me the right to have dominion over my wife, my wife and I are equals and are given the same rights by God. My wife and I are in our 50's and I've never had to ask her for sex, because I make love to her heart on a daily basis with tender gentleness and respect. My wife's sensuality is magnified by the way I care and treat her (secrets of the bible), that she becomes more sexually active toward me than I can handle, to the point where I have to say "no, not today sweetheart", "I need a break today sweetheart". The Afghan boys (boys think only about themselves, Real Men think about others) are treating their women like POW's, and all POW's will rebell against their captures.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:40 AM on 04/16/2009
photo

these talibani-type muslim men must have tiny little penises and empty little testicles to be so threatened by independent women ... how sad to realize that you cannot influence women other than by the threat of stoning them to death ...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:11 AM on 04/16/2009
- jsehgal I'm a Fan of jsehgal 2 fans permalink

This law which requires "a husband can demand sex with his wife every four days unless she is ill or would be harmed by intercourse" is condemned as unreasonable because it takes away a woman's right to say no. But the thing is that a marriage is exclusive by definition. In particular, it makes sex exclusive. This is the widely accepted definition in marriage. Under these enforced monopolistic circumstances, it should be reasonable that withholding sex except for reasons of health should not be allowed either. In the west, courts grant divorced on such grounds. I disagree with islamists in almost every imaginable way, but I am afraid, in this instance they may be right. Either sex be non-exclusive or marriage convention should ensure a healthy frequency. Once in four days is a very low bar to jump over.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 PM on 04/15/2009
- ktal I'm a Fan of ktal permalink

So you think women shouldn't be allowed to make their own decisions about when they have sex? The law does not operate in reverse, but you do not notice that. No patriarchal culture would EVER pass a law requiring men to pleasure their wives every four days... or else. MANY married women complain about the infrequency of sex. The point of a law like that is not to ensure the sanctity of marriage, but the subjugation of women and their demotion to the status of property. Legislation that prescribes the sexual behavior of two *consenting* adults, and enforces the prescription with punishments, is simply indefensible, unless you believe in some pre-Enlightenment, feudalistic code of ethics.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:37 AM on 04/16/2009

In every culture and religion, the extreme right tries to limit a womans ability to make fundamental decisions regarding --herself. They always know whats right for the woman, how she should behave, or act or feel or conduct her private life---------oh sorry she is not supposed to have one, JUST they should shut up and be the biological machine GOD would want them to be.
Unfortunately for them , it is the 21st Century.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:20 PM on 04/15/2009
- 4Q-N4Q2 I'm a Fan of 4Q-N4Q2 7 fans permalink

The silence from NOW is deafening.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 PM on 04/15/2009
- TrnsNtnl I'm a Fan of TrnsNtnl 2 fans permalink

Sure looks like there is public morality that needs protecting­.... Uhg.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 04/15/2009
- Ergon I'm a Fan of Ergon 77 fans permalink
photo

History lesson: Afghanistan in the 80's under the communists had a high degree of human rights and equality for women (Just as in Iraq) Not good enough for America. They helped overthrow the communists.
When the US backed warlords took over, Afghanistan became a jungle, and rape was endemic. That was ok with America then.
The Taliban were a group of Islamic high school kids in madrassas who, fed up with the lawlessness of the country, took up arms, and within a short period of time, defeated the warlords, and brought in law and order. Rape was punishable by DEATH. That's when Americans started bleating about the poor Afghan women, forced to wear the chador.
I myself find extremist rules of any religion abhorrent, but think selective condemnation and outright falsehoods hypocritical at best, especially when used as a justification for a war that kills the very women you're claiming to 'save'.
I challenge anyone to say where the legislation you keep quoting justifies rape, or even mentions force.
I challenge anyone to show where Islam condones rape, the denial of education to women, or prevents them from working. (The prophet's wife was a businesswo

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:01 PM on 04/15/2009

Life to the Laws of the Shiites

Shouts and stones protect and protest
Laws ordering women
Three days grace

Yet gifting love never forces
Always hopes
Understands patience
Endures longsuffering

Life to the laws of the Shiites
Freedom to captives caught without a voicce to cry
Hope to faithful followers of the Great Prophet risen

Again to proclaim
Our Bright and Morning Star
Rises on new life for all

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:55 PM on 04/15/2009
photo

This is why Obama is making a huge mistake sending more troops to Afghanistan. These people are a lost cause and the fanatics will alwas have a safe haven there and in Pakistan.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:30 PM on 04/15/2009

The 300 women were very brave to chant in spite of being pelted with stones. However I hope that the women of the world will offer their assistance to the women of Afghanistan and continue to put pressure on our governments and its dealing with this country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 04/15/2009

In Islam, if the man calls his wife for sex, she should obey him, and why wouldnt she want to have sex with her husband.

and this has nothing to do with force. If the woman refuses, then she is committing a sin in Islam. Now this does not mean that the man can force himself on the woman, on the contraty, if he does, then he is sinning in Islam, and its considered rape. Please don't listen to faulty news on the web or on TV when they distort facts about Islam.

The taliban have their own culture, and that should not get mixed up with the religion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:00 PM on 04/15/2009

The "marriages" are arranged, often between very young girls and very old men. They don't just choose someone, the choice is made for them. Culture and religion are intertwined and are both stupid. This is the 21st Century and science is the new religion and it is fact-based, not belief-based or faith-based. The sooner people embrace science and rational thought, the sooner we can leave war and poverty behind, along with religion.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:36 PM on 04/15/2009
- jamiso I'm a Fan of jamiso 7 fans permalink

Yaaaa farru.....­.except their culture is completely based on religion..­.so there ya go.....

anyway..he­re is a fatwa from a UK imam, basically saying that under sharia, you can beat you wife if she says no.....
http://www.islam-qa.com/en/ref/33597

Religion is sooooo awesome

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:47 PM on 04/15/2009

Islam, like most religions have been corrupted and used to subjugate women.

If Mohammad could see how the religion has been perverted I'm sure he would weep.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 PM on 04/15/2009
- 4 Real I'm a Fan of 4 Real 59 fans permalink
photo

Why wouldn't she want to have sex with her husband? Maybe because she is tired or not in the mood (which is hormone driven and fluctuates). The point is, she should be able to say no. That's freedom.
As for the sin comparison, it still seems rather one-sided since the wife bears the guilt for refusing, not the husband.

I don't buy it's an Islamic thing either, I believe it's tribal custom and Islam is used to coerce people into doing something against their will. That's nothing new since it's pretty common to wield religion like a sword.

Unfortunately in this case, the laws were written by men to favor men and women are the victims in this society, again not much different elsewhere.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 PM on 04/15/2009
- 4Q-N4Q2 I'm a Fan of 4Q-N4Q2 7 fans permalink

That so-called "culture" became irrelevant about, hmmmmm....­, oh, ONE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED YEARS AGO!

GROW UP!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:30 PM on 04/15/2009
- floib I'm a Fan of floib 17 fans permalink

It starts with 2 people wanting change which leads to 50 wanting change which leads to 100 wanting change which leads to a thousand which leads to millions wanting change. It may take time, but change will come, but it starts with speaking up. I hope these women keep it up and gather even more women next time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:44 PM on 04/15/2009
photo

Why are these selfish Afghan women trying to steal the spotlight from our brave teabaggers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 04/15/2009
- trinity I'm a Fan of trinity 9 fans permalink

Someone pelted the teabaggers with stones?!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:59 PM on 04/15/2009

Where are the women in the third photo? That is the only one that shows a good shot of the counter-protesters, and I don't see any burkas. If there are women there, there aren't many, and they were probably forced by their husbands to attend. If the law only applies to Shiites, how do they know who is what? How do they enforce the law in the first place? Does a husband call the cops if his wife is uncooperative? Then what? Do the cops arrest the wife? If that is the case, the husband still has to go without. Do the cops come in and hold her down, or what? This whole thing is as retarded as religion is in general. We should have banned organized religion on Jan 1, 2000 and started a century free from religious stupidity. The religion thing is easy to test. Just get the Pope, the highest ranked Muslim cleric, and whatever the highest ranked Jewish leader is, and have them meet.....i­n a stadium full of hungry lions. God would protect the leader who's religion is the correct one, right? If none of them are correct, I guess they all get it and we can then pursue rational, scientific belief systems. There are religious texts written by man and then there are scientific facts. There is the belief that God created everything in 7 days and then there is fossil evidence that disproves it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:26 PM on 04/15/2009

The next big women rights' movement might take place in the Muslim world. That would be wonderful to witness.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:13 PM on 04/15/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect