Woody Allen's Sex Life SLAMMED By American Apparel

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Woody Allen's Sex Life SLAMMED By American Apparel stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

LARRY NEUMEISTER | April 15, 2009 11:06 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
FILE - In this Dec. 19, 2008 file photo, U.S. actor and director performs with the Woody Allen Star Team in the 'Kulturpalast' hall in Dresden, Eastern Germany Friday, Dec. 19, 2008. The 73-year-old Allen touched off a fight recently, against American Apparel when he sued the company last year, a year after his image appeared on the company's billboards in Hollywood and New York and on a Web site. (AP Photo/Britta Engler, file)

NEW YORK — Actor-director Woody Allen has accused a clothing company of trying to harass and intimidate him with a "scorched earth" approach to defending itself against a $10 million lawsuit. In papers filed Wednesday by his lawyers, the 73-year-old Allen said American Apparel Inc. went too far in requesting information about his family life, personal finances and career.

Allen sued the company last year for using his image on the company's billboards in Hollywood and New York and on a Web site. Allen, who does not endorse products in the United States, said he had not authorized the displays, which the Los Angeles-based company said were up for a week.

The new court papers said American Apparel has "adopted a `scorched earth' approach," issuing broad document requests and subpoenas to many people close to him, including his sister.

Allen's lawyers said the company was seeking to "tarnish Mr. Allen's reputation a second time" and called it a "despicable effort to intimate" him.

American Apparel lawyer Stuart Slotnick said the company plans to make Allen's relationships to actress Mia Farrow and her adopted daughter Soon-Yi Previn, whom Allen married, the focus of a trial scheduled to begin in federal court in Manhattan on May 18.

"Woody Allen expects $10 million for use of his image on billboards that were up and down in less than one week," Slotnick said. "I think Woody Allen overestimates the value of his image."

He said the company's belief was that "after the various sex scandals that Woody Allen has been associated with, corporate America's desire to have Woody Allen endorse their product is not what he may believe it is."

One billboard featured a frame from "Annie Hall," a film that won Allen a best-director Oscar. The image showed Allen dressed as a Hasidic Jew with a long beard and black hat and Yiddish text. The words "American Apparel" also were on the billboard.

Story continues below
advertisement

Allen's lawsuit said the billboard falsely implied he sponsored, endorsed or was associated with American Apparel.

Slotnick said it was not a cheap shot to bring up Allen's sex life in a lawsuit over the billboard and Internet ads.

"It's certainly relevant in assessing the value of an endorsement," he said.

Farrow starred in several of Allen's movies during a relationship with the director that ended in 1992, when she discovered he was having an affair with her oldest adopted daughter, Previn, then 22. Allen married Previn in 1997.

During a bitter custody fight, Farrow accused Allen of sexually abusing their adopted daughter Dylan, 7. Allen was exonerated of the abuse charges, but Farrow won sole custody.

American Apparel is known for its provocative ads of scantily dressed models in tight-fitting and sometimes see-through garments.

Allen testified at a December deposition that he considered the company's advertising to be "sleazy" and "infantile."

The newly filed court papers revealed new excerpts from Allen, including why he might appeal to some advertisers.

"I've always been, from the start of my career, a special taste," he said. "There have always been people that have loved me and there have always been people that didn't know what I was about and couldn't see anything in me."

Allen also said ads shown to him by American apparel, including his rabbi ad, "have a sleazy quality to them" and were "not classy."

He said if he were to do a commercial, he would have to be paid a lot and "it would have to be a very clever, kind of witty or intellectual-style" commercial. He said being asked to do an American Apparel ad would be like being asked to do a deodorant or cigarette commercial.

"There are reasons that you say no despite the large sum of money offered because of the product involved, and this very possibly would fall under that category," he said.

Lawyers for American Apparel have complained that Allen has refused to turn over much of the information they have demanded to prepare for trial.

Among their demands were documents concerning any endorsement requests that were withdrawn after the sex scandal with Farrow and Previn became public.

The documents defined sex scandal as "your relationship with Soon-Yi Previn including the discovery ... (of) nude pictures you took of Soon-Yi Previn."

The lawyers also requested documents concerning Allen's public image and reputation, including his contention during his deposition that he was a "special kind of entity" or a "special taste."

Allen's attorneys said the request for documents related to the sex scandal and custody battle were "vexatious, oppressive, harassing" and irrelevant.

Slotnick said he couldn't discuss whether there were any settlement talks under way, but he hinted the company may be open to avoiding a trial, saying it had apologized for using Allen's image.

NEW YORK — Actor-director Woody Allen has accused a clothing company of trying to harass and intimidate him with a "scorched earth" approach to defending itself against a $10 million lawsuit. In...
NEW YORK — Actor-director Woody Allen has accused a clothing company of trying to harass and intimidate him with a "scorched earth" approach to defending itself against a $10 million lawsuit. In...
 
Comments
316
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
photo

Wait a mintue, your honor! We only use the sleasiest in our ads. Look, see????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 04/16/2009
photo

I'm a Woody fan. (Although I tried to watch Sleeper again last week and found it pretty unfunny)

I have a movie poster of Manhattan.

Broadway Danny Rose and Love and Death are two of my all-time favorite films.

I ALSO happen to have, framed, an old Smirnoff Vodka magazine ad with the slogan "Come Out of Your Shell-Try Smirnoff," which features non other than the Woodster emerging from a giant conch shell on a beach.

Granted, it WAS about 40 years ago, but Woody wasn't ALWAYS so opposed to appearing in advertisements of dubious "class."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 PM on 04/16/2009

I don't think the issue is the sleaziness of the ad but whether or not permission was granted BEFORE the ad ran.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:27 AM on 04/17/2009
- me again I'm a Fan of me again 28 fans permalink

Allen is just an odd duck.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:02 PM on 04/16/2009
- deckard70 I'm a Fan of deckard70 3 fans permalink

By trying to devalue Woody Allen, American Apparel is basically conceding that they are going to lose this case, and lose it in a big way. They're simply trying to make the damages less than $10 million by suggesting he isn't worth $10 million. But all the scandals they bring up just reinforce that Woody Allen is very recognizable -- both for his films and his scandals. They're proving he's worth every penny, since the point of using his image is because he is recognized.

It would not surprise me if the law firm doing this resigns. The tactic is the kind of sleazeball tactic that could only be coming from the mast.urbat­or-in-chie­f of AA (he's famous for having mast.urbated in front of a reporter who was doing a story on AA for Jane Magazine).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:35 PM on 04/16/2009

The value of his endorsement is $1.00. The other $9,999,999.00 is for using his image without permission, etc.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 AM on 04/16/2009
- piul05 I'm a Fan of piul05 52 fans permalink
photo

The whole thing with his stepdaughter (and present wife) WAS ethically reprehensible; however I don't see what it has to do with the unauthorized use of his image. He didn't give them his permission, so they shouldn't have used it - as simple as that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:07 AM on 04/16/2009

Was Soon Yi his stepdaughter? Allen and Farrow were never married, never even lived together. Soon Yi was adopted by Farrow and Andre Previn long before Allen came into Farrow's life. Allen was guilty of a consensual relationship with his girlfriend's 20-somethi­ng-year-ol­d daughter. A terrible and humiliating thing to do to your girlfriend, granted, but he was never the young woman's father or stepfather in any sense of the word, was he?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:59 AM on 04/16/2009
- piul05 I'm a Fan of piul05 52 fans permalink
photo

Woody Allen had a steady and, by all accounts, an exclusive relationship with Mia Farrow from 1980 to 1992, one which resulted in one biological son and two adopted daughters. So, it was a marriage, even if they chose not to make it formal, or to keep their personal belongings in separate - but adjacent - residences. The fact is, for twelve years, as a couple, and with the children (from Farrow's previous marriage and from their relationship), they were a family.

But more importantly, in 1980, Soon Yi was ten, so this then 45 year-old man would have been a father figure for all intents and purposes. It 's not as if he first met her as an adult; she was a child he saw grow up and whose mother trust him to be a father figure.

If this is not sleazy and disturbing, I don't know what is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 04/16/2009

what dicks. they appropriate the guy's image sans permission and now they're trying to get out of it by smearing him...great way to destroy their own image

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 AM on 04/16/2009

have you seen the american apparel ads? They're sooo sleazy... Their ads don't jive with their business philosophy.. anti sweat shop.. equal pay etc.. while their ads are voyeuristic and exploitive. if they were smart, they'd fly under the radar with the woody allen thing. also, if they were smart.. they'd appeal to the average american by not running those sleazy ads.... it doesn't surprise me that the company prez. was charged with sexual harassment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 AM on 04/16/2009

Woody should win. By having sex with his step-daughter he was just acting in typical Hollywood Liberal style.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:34 AM on 04/16/2009

American apparel's advertising works extremely well. if you think they are trying to sell to the 'average' American, you don't understand their business model at all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:16 PM on 04/16/2009
photo

The words Woody Allen and sex in the same sentence do not paint a pleasant picture.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:17 AM on 04/16/2009
- pthesmith I'm a Fan of pthesmith 4 fans permalink
photo

Although Allen is a disgusting pervert, AA should not use his image without permission. He should be paid.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 AM on 04/16/2009

AA claims that it is the equally wrinkled Alan Greenspan in the ads, NOT Woody.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 AM on 04/16/2009
- Toby Barlow - Huffpost Blogger I'm a Fan of Toby Barlow 26 fans permalink

I always thought of AA as sort of a cool outlaw brand. Now I see them as pighead, short sighted bullies with moronic and arrogant lawyers. How do they think they can get away with using someone's image without permission? Let alone a celebrity. And to battle it they bring his personal life into the case? They make me sick. Seriously. It is naseating.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:35 PM on 04/15/2009

I seem to think that their only legal argument to defend their behavior is to suggest that Woody has already so damaged his reputation that what they did had no affect in terms of what American corporations would be willing to pay for his endorsement.

But, what's worse, in the process of using this as their defense, they bring up a subject long forgotten.

These are creepy people. Really creepy.

Woody will prevail because he didn't give them permission to use his image, and he's capable of earning millions in endorsements if he should choose to - but the fact that he has chosen not to should not be used by the defense as a reason to bring up what they refer to as "scandal" which the public has long forgotten about.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 AM on 04/16/2009

This is about sleazy and greedy managers of a company that makes mediocre clothes... not really news, is it?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:06 AM on 04/16/2009
- ibivi I'm a Fan of ibivi 12 fans permalink
photo

AmApp just shot themselves in the foot. Prying into someone's personal life is dirty pool and has nothing to do with the real issue. They used an image of Allan without his permission for commercial purposes. They don't have a prayer of winning this in court.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 AM on 04/16/2009
- htd2009 I'm a Fan of htd2009 3 fans permalink

Now THAT'S rich...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 PM on 04/15/2009

AA has no right to use anyone's image without authorization to benefit their business. then all this speculation by their lawyer about Woody's worth and their efforts to somehow relate the subject of the lawsuit to his personal life?! downright outrageous. this completely changed the image of AA in my mind. I don't feel like spending my money on their products any more. good advertising!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:52 PM on 04/15/2009
- nowalnuts I'm a Fan of nowalnuts 3 fans permalink

AA is totally in the wrong. I think he's a great director and I used to really look up to him. While I found the Soon-Yi episode very twisted it was reading Mia Farrow's biography about things that went on with him and their adopted daughter Dylan than I found chilling. Yes, he was exonerated of the abuse charges but in the judge's written verdict, which is included in full in the back of her book, the judge said that Allen's behavior was not exactly on the up and up and the judge also said he found Allen only wanting custody of the 7 year old girl and not caring about getting custody of his biological male child with Farrow extremely odd. I guess he just gives me a case of the "icks". But so does AA and their creepy ads. He shouldn't be punished because they did something wrong. But he'll be fine. Seriously, what more dirty things could AA dig up about him that are not already a matter of public record?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:40 PM on 04/15/2009
- Doris I'm a Fan of Doris 7 fans permalink

why would you base any final opinion on a Mia Farrow biography? Wouldn't that be a little one-sided?Plus, she's a bit strange herself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 PM on 04/15/2009
- StacyJ I'm a Fan of StacyJ 5 fans permalink

What's strange about her ? That she works as a Goodwill Ambassador for Unicef ? That she travels to foreign countries and tries to help refugees and victims in Darfur and Rwanda ? That she adopted 10 kids, some with severe disabilities, and gave them a better life ?
IMO the only thing strange about her was her attraction to Woody Allen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:53 AM on 04/16/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (9 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect