iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Napolitano Defends Report On Right Wing Extremism Risk

EILEEN SULLIVAN   04/16/09 10:49 PM ET   AP

Napolitano

WASHINGTON — Civil liberties officials at the Homeland Security Department did not agree with some of the language in a controversial report on right-wing extremists, but the agency issued the report anyway.

The intelligence assessment issued to law enforcement last week said some military veterans could be susceptible to extremist recruiters or commit lone acts of violence. That prompted angry reactions from some lawmakers and veterans' groups.

Homeland Security spokeswoman Amy Kudwa said the report was issued before officials resolved problems raised by the agency's civil rights division. Kudwa would not specify what language raised the concerns.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano defended the report Thursday, but she said the definition of right-wing extremism that was included in a footnote should be changed.

In the report, right-wing extremism was defined as hate-motivated groups and movements, such as hatred of certain religions, racial or ethnic groups. "It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration," the report said.

"If there's one part of that report I would rewrite, in the word-smithing, Washington-ese that goes on after the fact, it would be that footnote," Napolitano said Thursday on Fox News.

The same definition was included in the agency's March 26 report on domestic extremism. Both reports were marked "For Official Use Only."

The report on right-wing extremists cites the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing by military veteran Timothy McVeigh as one instance of a veteran becoming a domestic terrorist.

Several lawmakers, the American Legion and Vets for Freedom took offense to the intelligence review. The Veterans of Foreign Wars defended it as an assessment, not an accusation.

Napolitano said, "We do not mean to suggest that veterans as a whole are at risk of becoming violent extremists."

She also said: "I apologize for that offense. It was certainly not intended."

The top Republican on the House intelligence committee, Michigan's Pete Hoekstra, has asked the director of national intelligence's ombudsman to investigate the Homeland Security report for "unsubstantiated conclusions and political bias."

The senior Democrat of the House committee with oversight of the department said the report raises privacy and civil liberty issues. "This report appears to have blurred the line between violent belief, which is constitutionally protected, and violent action, which is not," Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., wrote in a letter to Napolitano.

The department's definition of left-wing extremism in the March 26 report includes a reference to violence, stating these groups that embrace anticapitalist, communist or socialist beliefs seek "to bring about change through violent revolution rather than through established political processes."

These reports are part of the department's routine analysis of intelligence information to give to law enforcement agencies guidance on possible security threats.

In February, the department issued a similar warning about possible cyber attacks from left wing extremists. In September, the agency reported that right-wing extremists over the past five years had used the immigration debate as a recruiting tool.

Since September, the agency issued several reports on individual foreign and domestic extremist groups such as al-Qaida and Hammerskin Nation, a skinhead organization. The Hammerskin assessment said many of the group's members received military training and fought in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The latest report has turned into a "political football," said Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif. Harman, who chairs a House subcommittee on intelligence and information sharing, said the report could have been written more artfully, but added that "it was a well-intended effort to describe to law enforcement what things to look for."

"If the result is to dumb down intelligence products that could prevent the next attack to the homeland, we will all lose," she said.

(This version CORRECTS to show that DHS would not specify which language raised concerns.)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,153
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
harpen1
10:34 AM on 04/17/2009
I hope that people will take a moment on April 19, and remember the people in Oaklahoma City. The pictures of the dead children being carried from the wreckage of the federal building. Remember that it was home grown terrorism that did this deed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
steamboat
12:28 PM on 04/19/2009
So do remember the 3000 dead people at NYC on 9/11, also?..........So yes or no, if we're going to keep an eye on war vets, why not muslims?
10:24 PM on 04/16/2009
Rahm made her issue this report.
photo
BlackWidowPilot
"Fu! Rin! Ka! Zan!"
10:53 PM on 04/16/2009
Got proof?

Leland R. Erickson

Citizen
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:06 PM on 04/16/2009
No hope for this one. Usually making stuff up. A probable retort: "can you prove it didn't happen?" P.S. The P-61 was my favorite as a little kid: The twin boom was so neat.
12:54 AM on 04/17/2009
He is chief of staff - there are no reports issued unless they flow through him. That is the way thangs work Frau Erickson
09:41 PM on 04/16/2009
I think it is hilarious that the left wing of this country cannot accept criticism from the right. The Tea Parties were a combination of right, left, and independents who feel that the spending in this country is way out of control. There was no arrests at the Tea parties. It was a calm protest. The only screaming and helling was done by frustrated left wing media who were obviously out of their element and unable to show as journalists unbiased reporting. I thought the media was not suppose to be biased? The left seem to think that the right is dead however with all the stupid and biased comments of the left wing media, the country is moving more to the middle. No wonder Fox News is number one and MSNBC and NBC ratings are so low. NBC thinks having a reality show with the ousted Governer of Illinois will help their ratings. Pathetic........Shame on you.
11:44 AM on 04/17/2009
Sorry, sparky, but NO. If these people were truly objecting to out of control government spending, they would have started these protests six to eight YEARS ago!

But the fact is, they named these protests Taxed Enough Already - and were objecting to higher taxes - which is really ridiculous since we have just gotten a tax CUT for 95% of the population. The only ones who are going to see their taxes increase - and lets be honest here, this 'increase' is actually caused by the expiring of the Bush tax cuts - is the richest 1% of the population.

So who are all these 'grass roots' people protesting for? Why, the big corporations, Faux News (who, despite their protests to the contrary ARE in fact, sponsoring these tea parties - they're just not getting paid for it!), the Republican Party (who are openly sponsoring them) and multi-millionaire CEO's - you know, all the people who got our economy into this mess in the first place!

When you start a protest based on patently false information, and name yourselves after a rather disgusting sex act involving scrotum, you have NO CREDIBILITY!

If these people want to protest where their taxes are going, they should take aim at the bailout of the big corporations, not the increase in military spending, not on our now lower taxes, and not even at bailing out the car companies - at least they produce a tangible product, unlike these 'financial' institutions!
09:38 PM on 04/16/2009
This political report was just nuts.

The report seems meant to intimidate right wingers and many others who better have the right to believe whatever they wish if you and I want to keep the right to believe as we wish. The author of the report actually admitted in the report that they had no data or evidence of any real dangers, so how bizarre that they'd label so many millions of Americans this way. Political attacks like this that are allowed to go on could just as easily be turned right back on liberal beliefs if Republicans regain the majority. It would be much smarter to come up with good arguments as to why the right should consider views to the left.

The insult to veterans who risk their lives for this country was also over the top.

And the most ridiculous was this reports attempt to label Americans who believe in limited federal power as potentially dangerous extremists. The right of states to have all powers that were not specifically designated to the federal governmentwas written right into our Constitution in black and white. This federalism and sharing of power between the states and the federal government is the basis of our government structure. The founders set up this sharing of power so that the states could prevent the federal government from becoming tyrannical.

Were the founders of the most inspirational and fair government in world history extremists and hate-mongerers in Napolitano's book?
photo
BlackWidowPilot
"Fu! Rin! Ka! Zan!"
10:55 PM on 04/16/2009
I'm sure that Richard Poplawski would agree with you. At least, he's apparently using much the same justification for his rants on the Stormfront forum for shooting four police officers in Pittsburg, PA...

Leland R. Erickson

Citizen
12:55 AM on 04/17/2009
Kinda like the Weather Underground - Ayers was just like Timmy McV; only, Timmy did what Billy wanted to do.
10:21 AM on 04/17/2009
To those that are posting in opposition to all of us "right-wing, bible thumping, gun toting extremists", how many of you have actually served in the military? To even have a qualified opinion takes a little more than logging onto a computer. Life is about perception. Things/events/acts that we can justify are "GOOD" and those that we can't justify are "BAD". To justify in any way shape or form that veterans are susceptible to "violent extremism" in this country is simply disingenuous. The work of intellectual cowards. How about the tens of thousands of gang-bangers in our nations cities that perpetuate violence every single day to the tune of thousands of homicides against fellow Americans every year. Maybe look at the narco-terrorists that have been responsible for the abductions of over 50 Americans in and around Laredo Texas in the last 6 months alone. Make no mistake about this folks. We are in a battle of good versus evil. Pretty simplistic and an age old idea, but men’s hearts have not changed since the days of the first civilization. Study history; it tends to repeat itself. We are no different as a nation. Rome fell from within. Sound familiar............ So, sit back and think that you are ALWAYS right, you can never do any wrong, you are all knowing and seeing. A humble and wise man knows his faults and limitations. But apparently the “Left-Wing Extremists” don’t have to worry over such trivial inconveniences.
02:24 PM on 04/17/2009
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jon-soltz/military-training-on-extr_b_187924.html

Sorry I couldn't serve but does having a dad, brother, husband and a son who is currently active duty count for anything?
09:23 PM on 04/16/2009
The “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment” document was produced during the Bush administration, as a quick check of the PDF document’s properties reveals. It was created on January 23, 2007.

In other words, the document is not a reflection of the supposed sinister political coloration of the Obama administration, said by many “conservatives” to be socialist or Marxist. It is a document produced specifically as part of a larger effort to demonize and eliminate all opposition regardless of political persuasion.
08:28 PM on 04/16/2009
oh the hypocrisy, you all were screeching about shredding the constitution and the government spying on Americans andnow that they are going after conservatives you are all for it, typical liberish.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jhm1953
09:04 PM on 04/16/2009
Talk about hypocrisy. I guess you haven't listened to all the hateful spew coming out of talk radio or most of the cable "news" channels. There is nothing surprising about this at all. Is it okay for the Rethugs and their corporate allies to preach secession and revolution and yet not be held accountable for any potential violent activities that may result from it?
photo
BlackWidowPilot
"Fu! Rin! Ka! Zan!"
10:58 PM on 04/16/2009
Hypocrisy? You mean like "the party of conservative Christian family values:"

http://www.armchairsubversive.org

That is an example of hypocrisy incarnate.

This report? It is a report about one flavor of political extremists plaguing our body politic, no more, no less. Or are you asserting that the likes of Timothy McVeigh or Richard Poplawski or the neo-nazis who gunned down Alan Berg are just all misunderstood overly enthusiastic patriots?

Leland R. Erickson

Citizen
07:50 PM on 04/16/2009
I thank her and salute her for she and others are stand stand against something that is evil and is coming. Yes, it can be defeated and it is done as long as we have women and men like Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. Again thank you!
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
noaxe397
07:49 PM on 04/16/2009
To those who think Janet Napolitano is weak and a poor choice for DHS secretary, think again. Arizona government never ran better in the 6 years she was in charge. She is not an ideologue, she is a technician. She doesn't care if the solution is liberal or conservative, Dem or Rep. If it works, do it. The Az. legislature is controlled by zealots who waste the taxpayer's time and money daily with frivolous legislation to:

secede from the union
allow the private breeding of federally protected Gila monsters
prohibit grocery store baggers from putting their fingers to their lips when opening the plastic bags
legalizing fireworks (in a state with average 7 inches rain a year and millions of acres burn just from throwing cigarette butts out the car window.)
In addition the Republicans in the legislature want to permit citizens to carry weapons in:
church
bars
nightclubs
schools
Napolitano was the grown up in state government who tried to fully fund education, train state police officers to make ICE stops, and pick up the slack when Sheriff Joe was out arresting landscapers and short order cooks.
She's not flashy and in today's celebrity obsessed, sound bite culture she seems out of place.
Don't worry, just give her time
09:29 PM on 04/16/2009
Did you see the state of her last budget that she left?
10:27 PM on 04/16/2009
Budget or not--------she kept the senior citizens, invalids mostly, and Viet Nam vets
funded to keep them off the streets and sheltered---and with needed medical attention. Something McCain fought against tooth and nail over!
07:47 PM on 04/16/2009
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has not forgotten what had happened in Oklahoma and in many other states in our union. The terror before 9/11 was a white male with some military training and a born American. He and his organization supported the bombing of a federal building that killed children, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers all this man' and his associations's efforts were done to express hate. In my opinion, many politicans want these hate group to hang around for many of their votes depend on rather they will hold office. Too many are willing to use misdirection in an effort to encourage hopelessness. I have walked in my neighbor and heard talk that are traitorous and blasphemous from Americans and now new arrivals are expressing the same thoughts. What is so hard to understand for all those on the list of concern ran from oppressive nations for the safely of these shores. Yes, the Madam is right to stand and say let us take another look. How many abortion clinics were boomed because of that person's hate for the misinformed. How many soldiers who have come back from the military join gangs and some join hate groups these are facts. We cannot be silent and do nothing when we know this element is residing here and is damaging to this nation in perfect development or striving for perfect development.
09:30 PM on 04/16/2009
And the WTC first attack?
09:31 PM on 04/16/2009
Anyone that supports the Department of Fatherland Security targeting Americans is no different from their cohort in 1930s Germany that did the same thing. How does the government dupe such anti-freedom monsters?
07:23 PM on 04/16/2009
The advertisement appearing RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE of this article is friggin' hilarious!

I love you, Huffpo!!! Is this a great country or what? Where else can so many nutbags live together without.....

Oh, wait..except for Texas, of course...they might be leaving......


BWWAAAAHHHAAAAAHAAAAAAA!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carnelld
07:19 PM on 04/16/2009
I do not think Napolitano is a good selection for her position. She appeared weak and is
appearing to be weak.

I did not think she was a good choice. Too weak.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
thebanana
07:47 PM on 04/16/2009
Tell us how you really feel.
07:17 PM on 04/16/2009
These critics of Napolitano conveniently forget that Timothy McVeigh, a disgruntled 1991 war vet, massacred 168 people--including children--in Oklahoma City. BTW, I'm a veteran.
01:25 AM on 04/17/2009
I do not believe we conveniently forget; we inconveniently forget. This is because it is convenient to believe that one deranged vet has poisioned all vets since 1991; it makes for good press. It is inconvenient to research and understand the nature of that McVeigh did and note that he did not perform his crime because he was a veteran, he did it because he was nuts. Did Hitler kill all the people he did because he was a disgruntled WW1 vet?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BocaMom
07:10 PM on 04/16/2009
Napolitano has already apologized for these stupid remarks. This sounds like the 1950's McCarthy enemy list. It was scary then. It's scary now.
09:59 PM on 04/16/2009
Exactly what I thought when I read it. Sounded like McCarthyism. I guess history repeats itself and we never learn.
06:38 PM on 04/16/2009
Ill bet a lot of the "tea-Baggers" we saw yesterday who were right wing extremists are veterans. I respect their service to our country but remember most vets come from rural America and the gun culture.
07:30 PM on 04/16/2009
There it is ladies and gentlemen, the "enlightened, progressive, inclusive and tolerant" left on full display..
hahahahahha,,,,
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jhm1953
09:07 PM on 04/16/2009
Wow, what an intelligent posting (not).
09:39 PM on 04/16/2009
Do you have any proof for that statement? Do you really know how many Vets we have to be able to say that most of them come from rural America? Also when did people standing up for what they believe in suddenly make them extremists. That is the right of every American! Look at the ratings for the News Stations and you will see that there is a huge group of people that no longer believe in the 'Change" that was being touted in the campaign trail of Obama.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:35 PM on 04/16/2009
See e.g.: http://www.armytimes.com/community/opinion/marine_opinion_kerry_070716/
Now the piece is by John Kerry but it provides hard figures. Please refute them if you can. This Bush-commissioned report nowhere says just standing up for what one believes makes an extremist. That formulation is called a "straw man" and is only being presented in the media by the right-leaning media. Have you been taken in? Do you not think that standing up for violent overthrow of the government is extreme? That is not the right of every American.
photo
aquarius2001
Boredom is in the mind, Loneliness is in the heart
06:00 PM on 04/16/2009
Geez. When will the right-wingers stop for just a minute and actually listen (or read) what it actually says. Returning vets could be "targeted" for recruitment by right-wing extremists. So, how in the world does that equate to "The DHS thinks Vets are terrorists?"

Saw Ms. Napolitano on Morning Joe and just as I figured...they still couldn't comprehend it even after she clarified the report.