Olbermann: Future Of The U.S. Depends On Torture Accountability (VIDEO)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Olbermann: Future Of The U.S. Depends On Torture Accountability (VIDEO) stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

04/16/09 09:40 PM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

In his special comment tonight, Keith Olbermann takes on the release of the torture memos, praising President Obama for daring to release "the dirty laundry" but criticizing him for not laying blame.

Olbermann stressed the importance of torture accountability, emphasizing that it was Obama's responsibility to make sure that this "painful chapter" is not repeated.

Watch the video:


Here is the full transcript of the comments:

As promised, a Special Comment now on the president's revelation of the remainder of this nightmare of Bush Administration torture memos. This President has gone where few before him, dared. The dirty laundry -- illegal, un-American, self-defeating, self-destroying -- is out for all to see.


Mr. Obama deserves our praise and our thanks for that. And yet he has gone but half-way. And, in this case, in far too many respects, half the distance is worse than standing still. Today, Mr. President, in acknowledging these science-fiction-like documents, you said that:

"This is a time for reflection, not retribution. I respect the strong views and emotions that these issues evoke."

"We have been through a dark and painful chapter in our history.

"But at a time of great challenges and disturbing disunity, nothing will be gained by spending our time and energy laying blame for the past.

Story continues below
advertisement

Mr. President, you are wrong. What you describe would be not "spent energy" but catharsis.
Not "blame laid," but responsibility ascribed. You continued:

"Our national greatness is embedded in America's ability to right its course in concert with our core values, and to move forward with confidence. That is why we must resist the forces that divide us, and instead come together on behalf of our common future."

Indeed we must, Mr. President. And the forces of which you speak are the ones lingering -- with pervasive stench -- from the previous administration. Far more than a criminal stench, Sir. An immoral one. One we cannot let be re-created.

One, President Obama, it is your responsibility to make sure cannot be re-created. Forgive me for quoting from a Comment I offered the night before the inauguration. But this goes to the core of the President's commendable, but wholly naive, intention. This country has never "moved forward with confidence".without first cleansing itself of its mistaken past.

In point of fact, every effort to merely draw a line in the sand and declare the past dead has served only to keep the past alive and often to strengthen it. We "moved forward" with slavery in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. And four score and nine years later, we had buried 600,000 of our sons and brothers, in a Civil War.

After that war's ending, we "moved forward" without the social restructuring -- and protection of the rights of minorities -- in the south. And a century later, we had not only not resolved anything, but black leaders were still being assassinated in our southern cities.

We "moved forward" with Germany in the reconstruction of Europe after the First World War.
Nobody even arrested the German Kaiser, let alone conducted war crimes trials then. And 19 years later, there was an indescribably more evil Germany and a more heart-rending Second World War.

We "moved forward" with the trusts of the early 1900s. And today, we are at the mercy of corporations too big to fail. We "moved forward" with the Palmer Raids and got McCarthyism.
And we "moved forward" with McCarthyism and got Watergate. We "moved forward" with Watergate and junior members of the Ford administration realized how little was ultimately at risk.

They grew up to be Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. But, Mr. President, when you say we must "come together on behalf of our common future" you are entirely correct. We must focus on getting things right in the future, as opposed to looking at what we got wrong in the past.

That means prosecuting all those involved in the Bush administration's torture of prisoners, even if the results are nominal punishments, or merely new laws. Your only other option is to let this set and fester indefinitely. Because, Sir, some day there will be another Republican president, or even a Democrat just as blind as Mr. Bush to ethics and this country's moral force. And he will look back to what you did about Mr. Bush. Or what you did not do.

And he will see precedent. Or as Cheney saw, he will see how not to get caught next time. Prosecute, Mr. President. Even if you get not one conviction, you will still have accomplished good for generations unborn. Merely by acting, you will deny a further wrong -- that this construction will enter the history books: Torture was legal. It worked. It saved the country.

The end. This must not be. "It is our intention," you said today, "to assure those who carried out their duties relying in good faith upon legal advice from the Department of Justice that they will not be subject to prosecution." Mr. President, you are making history's easiest, most often made, most dangerous mistake -- you are accepting the defense that somebody was "just following orders." At the end of his first year in office, Mr. Lincoln tried to contextualize the Civil War for those who still wanted to compromise with evils of secession and slavery. "The struggle of today," Lincoln wrote, "is not altogether for today. It is for a vast future also."

Mr. President, you have now been handed the beginning of that future. Use it to protect our children and our distant descendants from anything like this ever happening again -- by showing them that those who did this, were neither unfairly scapegoated nor absolved. It is good to say "we won't do it again." It is not, however...enough.

Filed by Marcus Baram
In his special comment tonight, Keith Olbermann takes on the release of the torture memos, praising President Obama for daring to release "the dirty laundry" but criticizing him for not laying blame. ...
In his special comment tonight, Keith Olbermann takes on the release of the torture memos, praising President Obama for daring to release "the dirty laundry" but criticizing him for not laying blame. ...
 
Comments
2442
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (47 pages total)
photo

Keep up the pressure on President Obama to prosecute all people, at all levels, who are responsible for these illegal acts of torture.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 PM on 04/19/2009
photo

Keith Olbermann should be awarded a medal of honor for his defense of American civil liberties. He faced down the notorious dictator George Bush and he will ensure the our new President stays on the right path. Thank you Keith and God bless you.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:27 PM on 04/17/2009
- Ohsherri I'm a Fan of Ohsherri 102 fans permalink
photo

Keith-

Wait til Obama's SECOND TERM!!!

(Both Dems and Repubs would hold up everything Obama wants to do
right now...Dems would be his worst nightmare in Washington.)
Wait ...the second term, Obama is more free to raise he// against Repubs and Dems
who are responsible!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:12 PM on 04/17/2009
- Frenbar I'm a Fan of Frenbar 24 fans permalink
photo

That's grand.

When Obama was packing his cabinet with right wingers and neo-con retreads the Obama sycophants were saying, "you just wait, he has a plan, he will make them do his will".

Then Obama got into office, and the Obama sycophants said, "he just got in, give him time".

Now it's four months later, and other then flowery rhetoric and cosmetic adjustments, Obama is implementing the entire Bush policy, from US empire abroad, to corporate welfare on wall street, to trampling on the constitution and allowing torturers to roam free, and the Obama sycophants say, "you just wait another four years, then you'll see the real Obama".

It's time for people who claim to support the Constitution to start holding Obama accountable for his actions (and lack thereof).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:14 PM on 04/18/2009
- Ohsherri I'm a Fan of Ohsherri 102 fans permalink
photo

LOL!!
I guess that's what you would see.
Bush = Obama ....right?

ROFLMAO!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 PM on 04/18/2009
- Ohsherri I'm a Fan of Ohsherri 102 fans permalink
photo

Love Keith!
Love Obama!

Question for Keith-
What is Obama supposed to do when the majority of Dem. Leaders in Washington
push back against Obama for getting a special prosecutor?
I have no doubt that the Dems would create just as much chaos for him.
The Repubs already want him to fail and declared their loyalty to R0sh...
now the Dems would definately fight him on everything too.
There would be he// to pay for doing this on both sides.
What is the answer here?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 04/17/2009
- Ohsherri I'm a Fan of Ohsherri 102 fans permalink
photo

Anyone?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:52 PM on 04/17/2009
- Palemoon I'm a Fan of Palemoon 145 fans permalink
photo

He's supposed to take it upon himself to appoint the special prosecutor, just like Clinton did, remember? The Justice Department belongs to the EXECUTIVE BRANCH, remember? It does not belong to the legislattive branch (Congress) nor does it answer to them. Sure, Congress can put on a dog and pony show, call the JD officials before them, but you saw how well that worked, some refused to show, some plead the 5th, some were uncooperative and all of them were allowed to walk. Pelosi and Reid have no spine and no intention of holding anyone accountable. They took impeachments and all investigations off the table, remember??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:56 PM on 04/17/2009
- Ohsherri I'm a Fan of Ohsherri 102 fans permalink
photo

I know all that ...duh.
I'm talking about punishing Obama as far as not letting him get ANYTHING
done or passed as far as healthcare­...educati­on ...etc etc (remember???)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:03 PM on 04/17/2009
- MaryanneAZ I'm a Fan of MaryanneAZ 110 fans permalink
photo

I agree with Olbermann's premise on the whole, but I believe his outrage is premature and a tad narrow-minded. Our President is still in his first 3 months of his presidency. He has done more in that time than any other President we've known. There is nothing in the recent decisions that says that there will be no prosecutions. We know that there are ongoing reviews and investigations at Justice and in the House. We have to be patient. We seem to be unwilling to let our choice of President succeed and do what we elected him to do if it isn't accomplished on our timetable. If we undermine him and criticize him prematurely, then we become part of the problem. We could learn from the rethugs who NEVER diss their own.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:59 PM on 04/17/2009
photo

Are you crazy? He was elected to change things up, and so far all he done is preserve the status quo. All he is, is a black Bill Clinton (which I predicted he'd be), and which I assume many do not want or would have never voted for him if they'd known.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 PM on 04/17/2009
- Frenbar I'm a Fan of Frenbar 24 fans permalink
photo

What makes it even worse is that Obama made his positions abundantly clear during the primaries, yet people insisted on projecting their hopes on him rather then supporting someone who didn't insist on business as usual.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:17 PM on 04/18/2009
- pfrogger I'm a Fan of pfrogger 61 fans permalink

why are people rationalizing torture with he's only been in office for 3 months. only?
is there a time limit for human rights violations?
is there a "better" time for justice?

did I miss something or is torture OK until he's been in office for 6 months?

this is not an option for him. he took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and the laws of this land (including the Geneva Conventions). if he holds the CIA interrogators above the law, then yes people are above the law. but then say so.
say it loud and clear: we condoned torture. if you torture for the US it's OK. if you have a legal opinion that says it's OK, it's OK. the US does torture and we protect those who torture for us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:44 PM on 04/19/2009
- aaronr2000 I'm a Fan of aaronr2000 7 fans permalink
photo

No good. Your "it's only been 3 months since he's been in office" argument would fly if the question at hand was why hasn't he released all the torture memos or why is he saying be patient, these things take time, or I'm up to my eyeballs dealing with the economic crisis. But that's not we're hearing. Instead we're getting look, here are a ton of evidence that the previous administration's record on torture reeked to high heaven but let's just let by gones be by gone.

If that's how it's going to be then the only thing time has to do with this is for him to eventually relent over constant pressure from the people who are declaring like hell will you see such a gross trashing of the constitution and just walk away from it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 AM on 04/20/2009

I agree with KO, but I think he's not thinking through what he's saying.

It's easy for him to implore the new administration to be just as hawkish as the GOP can be. But Obama has to weigh this in political capital, and it's not as simple as saying he should pursue prosecution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 04/17/2009
photo

What you're advocating is power without principle. Good luck with that in the long run. People will call it out when they see it; and remember, a fish stinks from the head down

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 04/17/2009
- pfrogger I'm a Fan of pfrogger 61 fans permalink

good point. he has to be careful about his political capital.
if he has to subvert US and international laws to do so, so be it. hell Bush did it, so what's the big deal, right?

if he has to subvert or disregard other laws for political capital, he should.
if he has to disregard other laws for political capital, so be it.
he'll get to it at sometime. they say justice is blind, so why can't justice wait a few months or years.

it's not like he took an oath to uphold the Constitution and the laws of this land (including ones the US have signed, ie. Geneva Convention). he is the president and he is allowed to not exercise the law if he wishes. he's allowed to selectively prosecute. and Bush did it, so why can't he?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:53 PM on 04/19/2009
photo

Bravo. A milestone SC from KO. Instead of preaching to a unified choir about a willfully evil administration as -- of necessity -- he has done until 20 January 2009, Obama now presents Keith with a whole new set of thorny issues to deal with, none of which the left is necessarily united on. The future holds the true test of Keith Olbermann's courageous commitment to speaking truth to power. So far -- on my scorecard anyway -- he is batting a thousand.

P.S. At the risk of stretching the baseball analogy beyond the limit, Jonathan Turley hits one out of the park every time he appears on Countdown.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:44 PM on 04/17/2009
photo

+1
I may not always agree with KO, but I find myself continually in agreement with Mr. Turley

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 PM on 04/17/2009
- JonShank I'm a Fan of JonShank 35 fans permalink
photo

Keith is correct. I hate to say it, but it seems that on too many issues, President Obama looks more and more like a 'go-along-­get-along' politician, as opposed to a leader. I am rooting for the man, but when will ANYone in the previous administration be called to account for their lies, and illegal, not to mention, immoral, actions????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:37 PM on 04/17/2009
- MaryanneAZ I'm a Fan of MaryanneAZ 110 fans permalink
photo

Patience. President Obama is a strategist. He is not going to go off half-c*ocked and pursue w.ar crimes prosecutions until the time is right. A good time might be before the next election in 2012 or just after the next inauguration. I have not looked up any statute of limitations, but my guess is that President Obama is on top of it. We need to have some faith that President Obama will carry out his responsibilities in a constitutional manner. He has done nothing to cause us to believe otherwise.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 04/17/2009
photo

Your patience is virtuous and in fact there is no statute of limitations on the prosecution of War Crimes and/or Crimes Against Humanity [UNGA Res. 2391], but we are not talking about the mellow aging of a fine vintage wine here; we are talking about the festering, stinking wound of torture, committed essentially by us, through the monsters that we citizens of this soi-disant "representative democracy," elected to represent us. I think we have no choice but to give the Obama administration not one single minute of peace until he fulfills the promises he made (however indirectly) that he would prosecute these criminals--now.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:25 PM on 04/17/2009
photo

And when will this call for patience exhaust itself? Every decision that carves progressives and peels them from the party is another wound that eventually not even those with their heads in the sand can ignore.

Democrats were once a party -- ostensibly -- of principles. Now, they are revealing themselves as another party of men with faux rationales and convenient excuses for dubious decisions for all to see

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 04/17/2009

ko epitomizes stupidity.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:30 PM on 04/17/2009
- Beninn I'm a Fan of Beninn 33 fans permalink
photo

Jonathan Turley explains to Rachel Maddow why Obama is guilty of obstruction if he doesn't appoint a special prosecutor or direct the DOJ to prosecute the Bush administration.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tG9Nj0OizCA

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:29 PM on 04/17/2009

The power to prosecute or not prosecute is not obstruction of justice. Prosecutorial discretion is well with the President's Constitutional powers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:44 PM on 04/17/2009
- MaryanneAZ I'm a Fan of MaryanneAZ 110 fans permalink
photo

The real question is when should this occur? Not if. President Obama knows that there are reviews and investigations that are ongoing in his administration. He is a bold strategist who will time any appointment of a special prosecutor to fit his agenda overall. We just need to be patient and stop acting like whiny children who want it done now or we're gonna pout and cry. P.S. There are other legal professors who disagree with Professor Turley. The law is often convulted and difficult to decipher.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:08 PM on 04/17/2009
photo

You seem to be basing your contention that Obama is a "bold strategist" on something tangible, when, in point of fact, he holds nothing more than a marketing pedigree at this point. And let us not forget most of that came from hired guns and diminished primary opponents combined with an unelectable republican ticket. Hardly lofty qualifications for such accolades

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:50 PM on 04/17/2009
- Fudgefase I'm a Fan of Fudgefase 16 fans permalink
photo

We all know why. Because accountability goes all the way to the top. I think, if there was a chance, it would stop at Cheney, they might go for it, but there is too much dirt between Cheney and Bush. To go after one would be to go after both. And I feel that Obama needs to consolidate and stengthen before he could do that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 04/17/2009
- Actionman I'm a Fan of Actionman 5 fans permalink
photo

To Fox and CNN:

Olbermann's special comment is truly "Keeping them honest" with a "Fair and Balanced" approach.

I am a Obama supporter and will remain so, however, at times as Kieth did last night we must remain vigilant to get what we elected him for. Now what we elected him to do is take care of this country and apply the law of the land equally. If those military folks can be prosecuted for committing the crime so can CIA and especial the Bush administration.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:15 PM on 04/17/2009
- Sarastro I'm a Fan of Sarastro 11 fans permalink
photo

Part 2 of 2: There are simple truths.
Any path is still wrong which allows selective application of the law. The punishment should fit the crime - harsher punishment for the greater fault. Crimes going unpunished encourages repetition. These 'executive decisions' of choosing not to alienate the CIA operatives since they were misled by the legal team controverts actions we took to punish Japanese torturers for similar misdeeds perpetrated against our soldiers in WW II. We are risking being consistently guilty across more than one presidential administration of prejudicial application of our own laws, something for which the rest of the world will long remember us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 04/17/2009
- Sarastro I'm a Fan of Sarastro 11 fans permalink
photo

Part 1 of 2: Olbermann is right on. There has been perpetual failure to apply the law allowing some to be above it in this country. 'You rate what you get away with' was a stock phrase at the US Naval Academy in 1975 when 246 varsity athletes were handed the final coordinates to the Navigation final exam and used the information to cheat. Upon discovery of how large the number of midshipmen involved was [using an anonymous voluntary poll - the actual number was almost certainly higher], the Nixon White House decided to not apply the honor code in this situation, stopping any effort to expel the miscreants. This despite having expelled over a hundred from the class of 1976 during the first two years of their education in ones and twos due to minor offenses like being drunk and disorderly or cheating on homework. Which hurt the country more - expulsions of individual midshipmen for minor offenses to uphold an honor code, or mass failure of expulsions for violating that honor code in a big way? We are still reaping the fruits of this kind of illogic [that if the problem is too large, the rules no longer apply] in government today because it hasn't been dealt with in a stern unequivocal manner.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:02 PM on 04/17/2009
- gladys46 I'm a Fan of gladys46 214 fans permalink

When did President Obama say that the justice dept. or any other investigative entity should not or will not prosecute those responsible !!?? When !

The big fish may be the catch ! Patience !

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:08 PM on 04/17/2009
photo

When did he say they would actively look into this to make sure no laws were broken according to the Justice Dept mandate to uphold the laws of the land!!?? When?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 PM on 04/17/2009

once again, I've lost track of the count, we are witnessing the vindication of the Cheney policy. Once again, B*arry realizes the wisdom of the Bush Administration. Viva, third Bush term. It ought to be illegal having this much fun.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:49 PM on 04/17/2009
- MaryanneAZ I'm a Fan of MaryanneAZ 110 fans permalink
photo

Your reception must be bad. Tin foil is on sale now at Wal-Mart.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:19 PM on 04/17/2009
- Frenbar I'm a Fan of Frenbar 24 fans permalink
photo

You are right.

Obama has ended the US occupation and brought the troops home.

Obama has protected the Constitution and jailed torturers and people who spy domestically..

Obama has ended the "war on drugs".

Obama has stopped borrowing money from the Chinese to give to Wall Street.

Everything has changed, thanks for enlightening us.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:33 PM on 04/18/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (47 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect