Bank of America Posts 1Q Profit, Tempered By A $13B Loan Loss Provision

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Bank of America Posts 1Q Profit, Tempered By A $13B Loan Loss Provision stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

IEVA M. AUGSTUMS | April 20, 2009 04:59 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Bank of America Corp. warned of worsening loan default problems Monday even as it posted a first-quarter profit of $2.81 billion. Investors concerned about the banking industry's health sent financial stocks and the overall market sharply lower.

Although Bank of America said higher revenue from the purchase of Merrill Lynch & Co. helped offset a surge in credit costs, it took a $13.4 billion provision for credit losses during the first three months of the year. The amount of its problem loans more than tripled to $25.7 billion and CEO Ken Lewis said he couldn't predict when the bank's credit morass would end.

The bank's stock fell $2.58, or 24.3 percent, to $8.02 as the overall stock market plunged. Last week Wall Street was happy with better-than-expected results from JPMorgan Chase & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Citigroup Inc., but investors have been rethinking that initial upbeat response. Banking companies generally benefited during the quarter from unusually strong bond trading, a trend not expected to continue, while recession-driven loan problems persist and are expected to worsen this year.

Also weighing on investors is uncertainty about the government's "stress tests," analyses of bank finances to determine if they'll need more bailout funds if the economy worsens.

Over the weekend there were statements from administration officials that banks may need more government capital," and "the markets are reacting," said Gary Townsend, chief executive officer of Hill-Townsend Capital LLC.

Stress test results are due in the coming weeks.

"The economy hasn't hit bottom, the credit cycle hasn't run its course," said banking industry consultant Bert Ely. "We have a few more quarters of touch and go on profitability because of all the credit losses that are being taken."

Charlotte, N.C.-based Bank of America earned $2.81 billion after paying preferred dividends, or 44 cents per share, compared with a profit of $1.02 billion, 23 cents per share, in the year ago period. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters expected profit of 4 cents per share.

Story continues below
advertisement

Bank of America, as other banks have done, attributed its profit to trading activities on markets including bonds.

"Like it or not, capital markets is now a core business for Bank of America, and that has more volatile returns than other businesses," said Celent banking analyst Bart Narter. "Bank of America is no longer exclusively a retail bank and there can be more fluctuations."

But troubled loans, also known as nonperforming assets, increased to $25.7 billion from $7.8 billion a year ago. The bank also lost $1.8 billion on credit card services, after posting a profit a year ago.

"Credit is bad and we believe credit is going to get worse before it will eventually stabilize and improve," Lewis said during a conference call with analysts. "Whether that turn is later this year or in the first half of 2010, I'm not going to hazard a guess."

Lewis has been under intense pressure this year over the Merrill purchase, which closed Jan. 1. Shareholders approved the deal before learning of big losses at the New York-based investment bank and reports surfaced that Merrill paid billions of dollars in bonuses to employees before the deal was completed, even as Bank of America was begging the government for aid to complete the acquisition.

With the company's acquisition last year of mortgage lender Countrywide Financial Corp. and its expansion into credit cards after buying MBNA Corp. in 2005, Bank of America is mired in two businesses that are suffering. Consumers are spending less and defaulting more often as they worry over declining home values and rising unemployment.

"Bank of America is more exposed than their competitors in these areas, and it hurts them on the consumer side of the business," Narter said.

Bank of America recorded a $13.4 billion provision for credit losses in the first quarter and set aside $6.4 billion as additional reserves to cover future losses.

The first-quarter results include revenue from the company's acquisitions of Merrill and Countrywide. Revenue more than doubled to $35.76 billion, mainly from the addition of Merrill. It was also helped by a $1.9 billion pre-tax gain from selling shares Bank of America owned in China Construction Bank. Bank of America continues to own about 17 percent of the common shares of the Chinese bank, it said. Analysts expected revenue of $27.13 billion.

Bank of America has received $45 billion in government funds as part of the Treasury Department's $700 billion financial rescue package. Lewis has made remarks of his intentions to repay the government as soon as possible.

Townsend said he isn't certain that Bank of America is able to come up with the money, unlike Goldman Sachs, which has already raised capital.

"Bank of America is not yet positioned to repay the TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) and move itself away from the rather uncomfortable embrace of the United States government," he said.

In the investor conference call, Lewis said his bank won't need more capital from the government, reiterating a theme he's touched on often in recent weeks. Asked about the government converting its preferred shares in the bank into common, Lewis replied, "We think we're fine but it's out of our hands ... This is in the hands of the regulators at the moment."

An analyst at Standard & Poor's equity research division, however, said Monday that "a capital raise can't be ruled out."

While Bank of America benefited from stronger-than-expected trading and refinancing revenue, "we don't think revenue is sustainable," wrote Stuart Plesser in a research note. Plesser maintained a "hold" rating on Bank of America's shares.

Filed by Julie Satow

CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Bank of America Corp. warned of worsening loan default problems Monday even as it posted a first-quarter profit of $2.81 billion. Investors concerned about the banking industry...
CHARLOTTE, N.C. — Bank of America Corp. warned of worsening loan default problems Monday even as it posted a first-quarter profit of $2.81 billion. Investors concerned about the banking industry...
 
Comments
151
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

We should have nationalized these Bank's. Fire the Morons who had no care for their company seeking quick profits. Fix the issues and then sell them back to private sector. Yet, all the GOP were playing the political game crying, "that's socialism and the next step is communism.­"

I am still yet to hear GOP take blame for repealing Glass-Steagal Act which is suppose to protect us from these kind of disaster of economic doom.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 04/20/2009
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 264 fans permalink

Repeal Glass -Steagal which the Clinton Admin supported did not cause this. It wa s required in Global world where we compete againts other firms not so restricted. Are you going to force Toyota to down size since its too big to fail so GM can compete with it?

Heading up regulatory agencies with people who dont believe in regulation did such as the SEC.

If just the rating agencies had not rates the CDOs AAA, thios would not, could not have happened.


However the biggest problem and cause is free trade, deindustrialiaztion and us buying more stuff made elsewhere than here with money we borrowed that we could not pay back.

Regards

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:37 PM on 04/20/2009
- nibblybits I'm a Fan of nibblybits 14 fans permalink

It was not required. The repeal of Glass Steagall was one of several factors that created this mess.

And to use Toyota as an analogy is completely false. Because it can fail. Not that Japan would want it too, but they do one business and if they failed it would not collapse the Japanese economy. The banks and the financial system is a whole nother matter.

Almost every comment you made in your post is grossly misguided. Excuse me, they are just outright wrong. It would take a longer post than mine to refute your misstatements.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:53 PM on 04/20/2009
- nibblybits I'm a Fan of nibblybits 14 fans permalink

You can't nationalize them. It would be a logistical and managerial nightmare. In theory, it sounds like a decent idea (ie. Sweden) but the size of these behemoths and the sheer number of them make the suggestion impossible.

(Sure, it's easy to say, fire the jerks. But it really would be hard to find qualified people free of taint to run them. Especially with the compensation limits.)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 PM on 04/20/2009
- FZliveson I'm a Fan of FZliveson 82 fans permalink
photo

BobDobbs757: Please tell me that I am wrong. To me "Nationalization" puts something under the control of the government. Our government has a lower approval rating now than Dubya had at his own lowest point. Why should we trust ALL our money to the freaking congress, who only seems interested in serving their real masters...­the lobbies. Help me understand if you see it differently.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:20 PM on 04/20/2009
photo

Did they exclude Dec' 08 numbers like the way Citicorp did? This is pure BS...more of the same hocus pocus finance...­looks like Planet Finance is not going away without a fight...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:46 PM on 04/20/2009
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 264 fans permalink

Excuse me fdo you have a glue?

P&L number are acrrued during a current year... past years losses/income at year end (12/31) are charged to retained Earnings and are then a Blance Sheet item.

Thats mormal accounting. They are reporting revenue, expenses and income for the first qtr of this year. By the way iof you would like to include past earnings/l­osses... that 4th QTR loss was their first ever.

Regards

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:31 PM on 04/20/2009
- nibblybits I'm a Fan of nibblybits 14 fans permalink

You must not be familiar with the banks' accounting cycles. They don't follow the calendar year.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:41 PM on 04/20/2009

Also, You obviously didn't read the report last Friday. They themselves said they did not report December '08 because it was so bad. how do you figure that. Paul Krugman noticed it too.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:01 PM on 04/20/2009
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 264 fans permalink

To all the people complaining about banks raising credit card charges...­. well thats because of those not paying their debts as shown by the fact they have losses there in spite of everyone shouting about them raising interest rates. Blame the 20% not paying... that means to breakeven everyone elses credit card rates have to be raised. And if your boss is lossing money on a product he sells, does he sell more of it?

Where are the profits.. in refinancing mortages and in the brokerage side ( which is what Kem Lewis bought). Banks w/o those other business activities will get killed such as your local banks.

Questionable earnings.. they wrote off a ton, 13 Billion, which reduced their income 13 billion and they still made a profit... evebn with the losses in the credit card area.

Pls note Wallstreet was not banks... it is now... It was Wallstreet, government and the rating agenicies and yes US too spending more than we could not payback and more often than not on goods not made here that has led us here. This trying to blame one group so as to deflect any self blame is foolish and irrational.

Regards

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 PM on 04/20/2009

Ask JPMorgan why they brought the bogus math formula written by David x Li to AIG.they KNEW it was a scam and made sure AIG went down.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 PM on 04/20/2009
- LinuxDude I'm a Fan of LinuxDude 6 fans permalink

Pray tell, do you have first-hand knowledge of a single thing you alleged here?

Please tell us how you personally verified who did what at AIG.

Thanks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:38 PM on 04/20/2009
- MSaxe I'm a Fan of MSaxe 25 fans permalink

Nice try...no cigar. Usury is usury. This is all a ploy to allow the banks to charge whatever rates they want to charge. Anything over 10% should be illegal as it was 4 decades ago. 29% and higher rates will force people into default, and never get the principal repaid. I could go to the mob and the vig is less.

The bankers are thieves using the laws to steal. Obama said it right when he said that he was all that stands between them and the pitchforks. They deserve the picthforks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:13 PM on 04/20/2009
- noesis I'm a Fan of noesis 65 fans permalink
photo

At this point, I wanna see banksters heads at the end of pikes! Would be cathartic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:26 PM on 04/20/2009
- nibblybits I'm a Fan of nibblybits 14 fans permalink

Usury refers to interest above the legal rate. You may not like it, but 29% is legal. Did you know that pawn shops can legally charge 78% annual interest?

The lesson in all this is not to be dependent on the easy credit of credit cards or carry a balance on them. Pay them off and use cash.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 04/20/2009
photo

"Questionable earnings.. they wrote off a ton, 13 Billion, which reduced their income 13 billion and they still made a profit... even with the losses in the credit card area."

After they got how much from AIG to cover their CDS exposure? It's all one big shell game.
Find the pea! Which cup is it under today?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:15 PM on 04/20/2009

Wall Street was responsible for packing, rating and peddling CDS and CDOs which were created with high risk ARMS issued by banks and also bought by banks. This created systemic risk. And given the fact that you cannot have an economy that consumes, but does not produce it does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that the consumer will not be able to make payments eventually. So yes, they are responsible for a good portion of the economic crisis.

Secondly, raising interest rates on credit cards in this economy is absolutely stupid. It will just force more people to default.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:03 PM on 04/20/2009
- 02bmw76 I'm a Fan of 02bmw76 13 fans permalink
photo

This would be fine if I could decide what the value of my home is, lower the interest rate and pay my mortgage based on that number. I could be doing well too. This is pure BS. All the more reason to be worried about anything telling us we are on the road to recovery. It just isn't true.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 04/20/2009

oh, and Who, may I ask, is telling you we are "on the road to recovery" I did NOT hear President Obama say that, even though he has been miscredited with that statement. I heard exactly what he said: We see a glimmer of light. and please be cautious about that" almost exact quote.
No No road to recovery here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 04/20/2009
photo

OBUSHMA War Crimes Conspirator After the Fact, Obstructor of Justice, POTUS, and BANKSTER's BFF.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:18 PM on 04/20/2009
- nibblybits I'm a Fan of nibblybits 14 fans permalink

Go check yourself into the sanatarium.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:45 PM on 04/20/2009

Yes, find that sanatorium and be quick about it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 04/20/2009
- moUSAnMe I'm a Fan of moUSAnMe 16 fans permalink
photo

GET RID OF KEN LEWIS.
PERIOD....­....

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:10 PM on 04/20/2009
photo

This will fix what? How does it make things better?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:40 PM on 04/20/2009
- oldtree I'm a Fan of oldtree 7 fans permalink

The headline is a lie, why do you print a story with a headline you know to be void of fact? "post a profit" based on bailout, is not a profit. It is a scam.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:33 PM on 04/20/2009
- steveRB I'm a Fan of steveRB 4 fans permalink

What about the fact that they don't have to realize the losses on their toxic assets? Aren't these banks claiming that they are worth 90% face value?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 04/20/2009
photo

they took a 13 billion dollar hit on their income statement for further devaluation of "toxic " assets.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:26 PM on 04/20/2009
photo

Hmmm...I don't think it's that simple; although they are certainly lending less and have bailout capital, I think the dimissal of mark-to-market and the adoption of mark-to-model on their assets surely has played a role in their claimed profits.

In all likelihood there's a ton of stocks & detrivatives in their possession that are hugely overpriced.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:24 PM on 04/20/2009

I think this bank is in really big liquidity problems. I had a balance of 2800.00 in a Bofa credit and because I noticed they was charging to me almost 30% APR, I pay with great effort the whole balance, And yesterday I noticed they reduced my limit from 3000 to 600.00, they said they do that for confidential matters, my credit is ok, I HAVE THE FEELING THAT THE "CONFIDENTIAL" , REAL REASON IS THEY DON"T HAVE ANY MONEY TO BORROW, WHERE IS THE BAIL OUT MONEY?, ARE THEY BROKEN ALREADY?

THIS IS A BIG INJUSTICE
STEP 1.- Taxpayers borrowing to banks practically with no interest.
STEP2.-The Banks borrowing only little bit of that money to taxpayers charging high interest.

BORROW TO CONSUMERS DIRECTLY!!­!!!!!!!!!!­!!!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:22 PM on 04/20/2009
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 264 fans permalink

And yet 20% of those holding credit cards are defaulting such that BofA lost money on Credit Cards... You assume they made money on their credit card business.

Thus they must double interest rates just to make up for the losses your neighbor caused by not paying just like all stores charge you more for the goods they sell to make up for the shop[lifters losses...

And of course the FED Regulators make them charge more and loan less when credit risk rise...

It all sucks... but thats what happens when your country makes nothing for 30 years and borrows to cover up the loss of real income and real products..­.

Regards

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:43 PM on 04/20/2009

When they were sending pre approved credit cards to high school kids and college students {ninja cards}what did they expect would happen?You talk as if they were honest brokers...­......they were NOT!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:18 PM on 04/20/2009
- gfs5541 I'm a Fan of gfs5541 26 fans permalink
photo

So What? Tha Books was cooked!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 04/20/2009
- TXfemmom I'm a Fan of TXfemmom 193 fans permalink

How are we to believe anything these institutions say? The feds should go in with a team of auditors and immediately verify these numbers and stipulate how they could be reporting earnings such as this, and if it is a fluke or manipulated, and how future earnings should be predicted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:56 AM on 04/20/2009
- sposton I'm a Fan of sposton 183 fans permalink
photo

They should but they are unlikely to do anything. The administration is controlled by the oligarchic Wall Street interests.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 04/20/2009
photo

When they reported horrendous results last fall, why did you believe them?

The banks are constantly being audited - federal, state, CPAs, and internally. They are also constantly visited by bank analysts who work for investors/investor media.

Today the investors saw the BoA profit as being made up mostly of one-time events, so they're selling it. Some of the sell could also be for the looming dilution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:04 PM on 04/20/2009
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 264 fans permalink

In a 3 month period, the assets held by Banks dropped by up to 90%... so they had write downs in that period of hundreds of billions..­. you know why? because we americans took the money that we cant pay back and bought goods not made here increasing the trade deficits while our plants closed and real wages dropped. But they alone are the bad guy and Iraq had WMDs.

And with stocks being up 30%.. its called profit taking...

What scared investors is the loss in the credit Card business, indicating americans credit worthiness is still dropping and even higher interest rates cant cover the losses of giving more credit to the worlds largest Debtors per capita by a huge amount.

Regards

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:50 PM on 04/20/2009
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 264 fans permalink

Have you ever done any auditing in a company this large with international operations, with asset value changes by the second....­???

I assure you that only a few transaction are pulled and evaulated on a statistical bases because the cost of such audits and the time it takes are extreme as are the costs.

Pls note it was the failure of the FDIC/SEC ...the same agenicies now you want to rely on that did nothing for 8 years that helped get us here.

Taking 13 billion in write down (reserves, not yet actual losses.. projecting losses going forward) does not look a company trying to phony up earnings.

Their earnings was from the sell of assets and its purchases in the last year of Country Wide and Merril that have made BofA 40% bigger which was responsible for the earnings. They lost money in their credit card divison after making huge write off reserves for future actual losses.

You need to understand acrrual accounting­...

And we could put every auditor in the U.S. government there and in about 2 years they coudl tell you with some degree of reliability about what condition they were in 2 years ago.

The worst accounting BofA does, is far better, more reliable than government accounting­... which is what a nationalized bank then operates under... no mark to market.. no such thing as insolvency. no asset write downs, no reserves for losses... no P&L, no GAAP financial statements­... ...

Regards

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 04/20/2009
- 4real I'm a Fan of 4real 29 fans permalink
photo

So BOA gets bailed out. They are apart of AIG and they get bailed out again, then they are going after people that owe them money so they are getting paid from them too. So no wonder they might post a profit now.

Somehow this doesn't seem right.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 04/20/2009
- dandypuddin I'm a Fan of dandypuddin 178 fans permalink
photo

How are they a part of AIG? You mean Merrill Lynch.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 PM on 04/20/2009
- 4real I'm a Fan of 4real 29 fans permalink
photo

Yes Merrill Lynch. All these companies are connected and it seems like they receiving double bailouts plus still going after the consumer for the money which was their reason for needing the bailout in the first place.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:50 PM on 04/20/2009
- donniebnyc I'm a Fan of donniebnyc 2 fans permalink

BoA purchased Merril last year, so Merril is a part of BoA.

To 4real: Neither is a part of AIG.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:01 PM on 04/20/2009
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 264 fans permalink

Not Part of AIG. LOL... And if some one owes you money ... would you go after it?

I dont see the stores giving stuff away... do you?

Regards

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:51 PM on 04/20/2009
- bluguy8 I'm a Fan of bluguy8 22 fans permalink

so if there is a loss , there can't be a profit.. you can't have both at the same time. and the loss tops a profit . BOA needs to get back to their roots

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 04/20/2009
- sposton I'm a Fan of sposton 183 fans permalink
photo

Regardless of profitability, real and imagined, we should break all these too-large-to-fail corporations into small enough pieces not one of which is too-large-to-fail. Without this, no amount of regulation will prevent another similar meltdown in the future.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:06 PM on 04/20/2009
- Viper I'm a Fan of Viper 264 fans permalink

Two simple ideas... that dont work. 1) It is a global economy and to compete, you will have to have business that are larger than your own economy may support... Do you think Japan should break up Toyota? Do force Japan to be smaller by not allowing its sales here? ??? Foreign banks are here. Canb you control their size in other countries so to make our companies abole to compete.

Look at the economies of scale required: Chrysler is almost too big to fail here... yet its too small to compete on its own...

2) Nationaliz­ation... based on the cost of the 42 nationalizations done to date which are small and less complex... the cost of nationalization would be 14 trillion..­. not really an option at this point.


Regards

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 PM on 04/20/2009
- mjtaylor22 I'm a Fan of mjtaylor22 39 fans permalink
photo

the books are cooked, and the taxpayer added the sauce.
fire ken lewis pls, take over his bank and make him unemployed like his bad business decision made so many in this beautiful city un employed
i see these people everyday used to work with them, now they are unemployed and indire straits and big ken, say he has to keep the thieving " money generators"
great

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:01 PM on 04/20/2009
photo

The BoA "brand" is poison, as anyone who's dealt with them knows. That's the real reason the stock price can't go up on apparently good news.

If BoA were around in the time of Cleopatra, she would have been hard pressed whether to let an asp or BoA bite her.

Let's assert our rights as equity owners and get rid of Ken Lewis & his band of thieves.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:41 AM on 04/20/2009

What a shame they call themselves bank of America and
have been acting more like Banking on America.
Dump the B on A.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 AM on 04/20/2009
- munki I'm a Fan of munki 34 fans permalink
photo

Hope Ken Lewis do understand - taxpayers are paying their expenses now...

So cut CEO compensation and perks... we are not interested in funding it...

Since failure was performed by present CEO/exeutives

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 04/20/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect