iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

EFCA Backers Step Up Efforts, Begin Calling Out Democrats, Obama

First Posted: 05/23/09 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:15 PM ET

Efca Rally

Whether out of despair, frustration, or the political calculus that more sheer aggression is needed, labor officials and progressives are taking a far more forceful tone in their advocacy for the Employee Free Choice Act.

Over the past few days, national and grassroots efforts have been launched in support of the union-backed legislation aimed not only at the Republican swing vote in the Senate, but at wavering Democrats and even the president. The strategy is in contrast to the campaign waged up to this point, when supporters of the bill -- which would allow for unions to more easily organize -- had largely tried to frame it in a more acceptable light for moderate Senators.

With several of those moderates now expressing reservations over EFCA, labor hands are expanding the scope of their efforts: calling on the wavering and even ostensibly pro-EFCA Democrats to stand with them.

"I wouldn't say [it is] so much getting tougher on 'where they stand' since they've been talking about it," said one union official, "but getting tougher on saying they need to stand with America's workers."

Even the White House is in the spotlight. Acknowledging the need to "hunt for a solution" for labor law reform this year, Service Employees International Union chief Andy Stern nevertheless did something a bit rare during a recent interview with the Washington Post: he subtly digged Barack Obama for not offering more help.

"The President has said he has a series of things -- that we agree that he needs to get done -- which are major for every man woman and child, like health care, like the budget, like financial regulation," Stern said. "We respect that we have a job to do to line up enough votes without him."

Previously, union hands, including Richard Trumka, the Secretary-Treasurer at the AFL-CIO, have said that while they'd love to see more pro-EFCA campaigning from the White House -- which has offered only perfunctory one-sentence endorsements for the legislation -- they believed the president would come through in the end.

Democrats in Congress, likewise, are finding themselves being called out for their EFCA hesitancy. Over the past few weeks, several senators, including Jim Webb of Virginia, Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, and Diane Feintstein of California have either said they would oppose the measure altogether or believed it was the wrong economic climate to consider it.

In private, their statements drew furious responses from labor officials and progressives, who noted that unions helped elect many of these pols and that the last sweeping reform of labor law -- the National Labor Relations Act -- was passed during the Great Depression. Now, some of that frustration is seeping out into the public.

"Corporations and Wall Street have run roughshod over our economy, and as a result America's workers are losing their jobs, their benefits and their homes," said Eddie Vale, a spokesman for the AFL-CIO, referencing the reluctant Democrats specifically. "We need to restore balance to our economy and make it work for everyone again. And that is why this difficult economic time is EXACTLY the right time to pass the Employee Free Choice Act. America's workers can't borrow their way back into the middle class, they need to be able to bargain into it."

Meanwhile, the pro-labor author Thomas Frank penned a scathing piece for the Wall Street Journal on the relationship between Democrats and Labor that was subtitled: "Some Democrats only care about labor's money."

"First, there are those Democrats who don't care much for labor to begin with," he writes. "Then there is the wide spectrum of Democratic donors and supporters who simply don't understand the problems of blue-collar life."

The new, more aggressive, calling-out-Democrats strategy may, in the end, not be enough to turn the tide. The print title of Frank's op-ed, after all, was "Card Check Is Dead." Webb and Feinstein's office both declined to elaborate on the Senator's prior statements. Lincoln's office did not return requests for comment. The sixtieth Senate vote needed to cut off debate on EFCA -- in its current form -- is likely to come only after another round of elections.

But labor still seems invested in going down swinging -- it held 400 events across the country during April's congressional recess and is lining up lobbying efforts for Congress now that it is back in session.

"As Keynes said in 1938 to President Roosevelt during the Great Depression, the growth of collective bargaining rights is essential to restoring economic prosperity," Vale summarized.

Get HuffPost Politics on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

Whether out of despair, frustration, or the political calculus that more sheer aggression is needed, labor officials and progressives are taking a far more forceful tone in their advocacy for the Empl...
Whether out of despair, frustration, or the political calculus that more sheer aggression is needed, labor officials and progressives are taking a far more forceful tone in their advocacy for the Empl...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
USA1776
04:18 PM on 04/22/2009
Feinstein needs to get her act together.
02:49 PM on 04/22/2009
I guess there won't be anyone claiming that "children should not be at protests when they do not comprehend what they are protesting" comments from any of you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amdezurik
02:53 PM on 04/22/2009
nope that was the hate-wings claim until they taught their kids how to teabag rich folks...
02:36 PM on 04/22/2009
right now as I write , AT&T workers in ST Louis are being threatened by CWA because they do not want to go on a union instigated strike ..... where is the choice , where is the transparency... why are the Teamsters in Chicago ( hard to believe) taking 7 truck drivers to court to fine them $40,000 each becasue they didn't want to strike and they wanted to leave the union ... where is the choice EFCA... and then there is the SEIU thuggery
01:56 PM on 04/22/2009
The plain truth is Democrats in Congress don't want this bill to pass. It was easy for Dems to rally around EFCA when Bush was in power, because Bush obviously would have vetoed it. Now that Barack Obama is in the White House the veto is off the table. So now, once it has passed Congress, EFCA would become the law of the land, and then Congressmen would have to explain to angry voters why being harassed by card-wielding union thugs is preferrable to secret ballots, and they would also have to justify the harmful effects on local businesses. Dems are deeply fearful of that scenario. That is why they NEVER wanted EFCA to actually be implemented.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:37 PM on 04/22/2009
This will only pass if Dems want it to pass.

By the way , punk those 2 Senators from Arkansas who are lying about the facts and saying this act will end secret ballots. Lies were contained in literature (paid by taxpayers) the two sent their constituents.

Of course, this is where WalChineseMart is from.
02:11 PM on 04/22/2009
The Senators are not lying about EFCA killing secret ballots. I can't think of one reason why unions would even bother with secret votes when they could just collect signed cards instead. Can you? If so, please share it with us.
photo
longtalldrink
Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you wan
12:53 PM on 04/22/2009
I thought Jim Webb was for the blue collar workers? I know he wore his son's combat boots all through the election cycle to show sympathy toward the Iraq soldiers. All show and no tell? Yes, the unions helped a lot of Dems get elected, but the spinless Dems have short memories.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeorgeP922
12:38 PM on 04/22/2009
The DNC better step into this and put people in line.

We really need to draw a line in the sand, our party can not be one of political expediency.

We might have the majority, but the majority means nothing when your lead is offset by spineless officials addicted to lobbyists.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
teron678
A Pessimistic Optimist
12:18 PM on 04/22/2009
EFCA ... needs support to pass ..... might pass the house vote .. but i doubt it will pass the Senate .... lots of Demos are backpedaling ...

Things like Healthcare, Energy reform will be easier to pass than EFCA ..... as far as i can see
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GeorgeP922
12:41 PM on 04/22/2009
If we can't pass EFCA, which costs our government 0.00$ cash, then FORGET about healthcare, forget about energy, done forget it.

EFCA's only downside is lobbyists and gop ideology (which is to hate ALL organized labor).

You want to change healthcare, we nee to get ready to spend XXX billions of dollars, first, then get past the Republicans and lobbyists.

The only thing the Democratic party needs to fear, is fear itself.

That is our incessant fear of Republicans, and lobbyists.
11:48 AM on 04/22/2009
This needs to pass. We need a strong middle class in this country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
claudiam
Proud Arizona Democrat
11:47 AM on 04/22/2009
I am glad that they are speaking out. Team Obama should support the unions that dramatically helped him get elected. There is absolutely nothing wrong with supporting unions. Working people can't trust the owners/business people in the front office to look out for their well being. Workers must have the freedom to organize. claudiatucsonaz
12:32 PM on 04/22/2009
Workers do have the freedom to organize. There are a bunch of laws helping them.

Just curious, really, do you insist on union workers when you,,,,,shop, travel, hire an electrician, get your car fixed, do you drive an American, union made car?
Also, what industries and businesses and stores do you want to get unionized?
DontJustFollow
Ask not what your country can do for you...
12:33 PM on 04/22/2009
why are the unions afraid of the secret ballot? I support unions and hire union subs when ever possible - I just don't understand their objection to secret ballot voting -
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patriot86
Compassion is the basis of all morality.
12:48 PM on 04/22/2009
You can still have the secret ballot with this legislation. There is worker intimidation by employers in the current system which allows employers to stop unionization cold...we need to change the law.
03:19 PM on 04/22/2009
This is why its called the Employee Free Choice Act. Currently the business decides whether the vote will happen by secret ballot or card check, under EFCA the employees would make that choice. Hardly seems threatening to me.
11:44 AM on 04/22/2009
Stern Considers Alternatives to EFCA

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/04/20/stern_considers_alternatives_t.html?wprss=44


The Birth of The Employee Free Choice Act Labor Reform Movement

http://cleveland.indymedia.org/news/2009/04/37406.php