Police: No evidence against dad of 'Slumdog' star

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Police: No evidence against dad of 'Slumdog' star stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

AIJAZ ANSARI | April 22, 2009 04:39 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
This Sunday, April 19, 2009 photo shows 'Slumdog Millionaire' actor Rubina Ali, left, leaving the police station along with her father Rafiq Quereshi, right, in Mumbai, India. Rafiq Quereshi was questioned by the police again on Monday regarding allegations that he tried to sell his daughter Rubina. (AP Photo/Gautam Singh)

MUMBAI, India — Indian police said Wednesday they have so far found no evidence that the father of a child star in the Oscar-winning film "Slumdog Millionaire" tried to sell the 9-year-old girl to an undercover reporter.

Police opened an investigation following a complaint from Khurshid Begum, the estranged mother of "Slumdog Millionaire" star Rubina Ali, after News of the World reported the father planned to put her up for adoption. The British newspaper said the deal was allegedly offered to one of its reporters posing as a sheik from the Mideast.

But officers said so far they found nothing to back the claim of the British tabloid that the father, Rafiq Qureshi, offered to give up Ali for adoption in exchange for some $400,000.

"We have interrogated Rubina's father at length and have not found any evidence against him indicating that he was trying to sell Rubina," said senior police officer Nishar Tamboli.

However, he said the investigation was still going on.

Rahim Sheik, the police officer leading the probe, said television footage of the incident obtained by Mumbai police also did not incriminate Qureshi.

It was not immediately clear if police had access to footage beyond that posted on the Web site of the newspaper.

The newspaper _ owned by News International Ltd., the main British subsidiary of News Corp., which also owns "Slumdog" distributor Fox Searchlight Pictures _ said the father was demanding millions of rupees for the girl.

Story continues below
advertisement

The newspaper quoted Qureshi as saying that Hollywood was to blame for forcing him to give her up for adoption.

"We've got nothing out of this film," Rafiq Qureshi was quoted as saying. "I have to consider what's best for me, my family and Rubina's future."

Qureshi has denied the report, saying he had been lured to a fancy Mumbai hotel by someone claiming they were moved by Rubina's story and wanted to help her.

The accusations further complicated the lives of the families of the slum-dwelling child stars, who have come under intense scrutiny since the movie skyrocketed to Oscar-winning fame and grossed more than $300 million worldwide.

Following the success of the rags-to-riches tale, some criticized the filmmakers for failing to share the wealth with Mumbai's millions of slum dwellers. Others accused them of exploiting two of the child stars, Rubina and Azharuddin Mohammed Ismail, 10, who grew up in a wretched Mumbai slum.

The filmmakers' initial efforts to help their families were thwarted by media attention, the changing demands of relatives and the film's runaway success. Sudden fame and relative fortune also complicated relations between the actors and their neighbors.

The filmmakers feared if they gave the families a lump sum, the money would be squandered or extorted. Instead, they set up a trust fund for the two children that was supposed to provide them with a good education, adequate housing and social support.

Last week they also announced a donation of $747,500 to a charity devoted to improving the lives of street children in Mumbai.

Filed by Katherine Thomson
MUMBAI, India — Indian police said Wednesday they have so far found no evidence that the father of a child star in the Oscar-winning film "Slumdog Millionaire" tried to sell the 9-year-old girl ...
MUMBAI, India — Indian police said Wednesday they have so far found no evidence that the father of a child star in the Oscar-winning film "Slumdog Millionaire" tried to sell the 9-year-old girl ...
 
Comments
10
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- mlaiuppa I'm a Fan of mlaiuppa 37 fans permalink
photo

Well, of course they didn't find any. They don't want to.

They asked the Father. What did they think he was going to say?

They asked the girl. What did they think she was going to say? Even if she knew, did they think she would admit her Father was going to sell her?

It's saving face. The Police are saving face for all of India now that this is international news. But hopefully the girl will now be safe since the Dad now knows that he's in the spotlight and he'll be caught if he tries it again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:23 AM on 04/23/2009

how much does dakota fanning make per movie?

why is it outrageous that they get sent to boarding school, & their rightfull salaries are put in trust?

this movie will ultimately gross 1 bill.

whatever happened to residuals?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:14 PM on 04/22/2009
- Fernando I'm a Fan of Fernando 29 fans permalink
photo

You mean a tabloid lied? Surely, you jest.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 04/22/2009
- ywcachieve I'm a Fan of ywcachieve 105 fans permalink

This accusation started with British tabloid lies. The British lying media.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:13 PM on 04/22/2009
- Fernando I'm a Fan of Fernando 29 fans permalink
photo

Sorry to correct you, but "British lying media" is a redundancy : D

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 04/22/2009
photo

This British Lying Media is also owned by RupertFaux­NewsMurdoc­h... who also owns all the distribution rights for the movie in the US... Coincidence? I think not.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:09 PM on 04/22/2009
- SuesW I'm a Fan of SuesW 11 fans permalink

People who are extremely poor will do pretty much anything to survive, and maybe give their cihldren a better life? This is shocking news? Not sure if this dad did what he was accused of but why focus on him - why not focus on the rich people who go into other countries and basically purchase children? Hard to condemn someone who is poor beyond anything we can imagine. Then again - let's all give Madonna and all the other rich white people who go in and "save" these children. Uh huh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:04 PM on 04/22/2009
photo

A fabrication derived from true banter and bartering with the studio and the dad. Fabrication in tabloid = control over dad's ambition - and puts India on world alert - "stop selling your children..."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:38 PM on 04/22/2009

"Some criticized the filmmakers for ... Others accused them ..."

Who? Bloggers? Anybody knowledgeable? You? One person? Two people?

"Some" and "others" is journalistically irresponsible without sourcing at some meaningful level.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 04/22/2009
- amdezurik I'm a Fan of amdezurik 34 fans permalink

what, no instant condemnation and insults hurled at the dad?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:03 PM on 04/22/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect