FDA To Allow 'Morning-After' Pill For 17-Year-Olds

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - FDA To Allow 'Morning-After' Pill For 17-Year-Olds stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR | 04/23/09 10:54 AM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
FILE -- This undated image provided by Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. Aug. 22, 2007 shows the packaging for the "Plan B" pill. The Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday it would accept, not appeal, a federal judge's order that lifts Bush administration restrictions limiting over-the-counter sales of "Plan B" to women 18 and older. (AP Photo/Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc., File)

WASHINGTON — Women's groups cheered the government's decision to allow 17-year-olds to buy the "morning-after" emergency contraceptive without a doctor's prescription, but conservatives denounced it as a blow to parental supervision of teens.

The Food and Drug Administration said Wednesday it would accept, not appeal, a federal judge's order that lifts Bush administration restrictions limiting over-the-counter sales of "Plan B" to women 18 and older. U.S. District Judge Edward Korman ruled last month in a lawsuit filed in New York that President George W. Bush's appointees let politics, not science, drive their decision to restrict over-the-counter access.

Women's groups said the FDA's action was long overdue, since the agency's own medical reviewers had initially recommended that the contraceptive be made available without any age restrictions.

Korman ordered the FDA to let 17-year-olds get the birth control pills. He also directed the agency to evaluate clinical data to determine whether all age restrictions should be lifted.

The FDA's latest action does not mean that Plan B will be immediately available to 17-year-olds. The manufacturer must first submit a request.

"It's a good indication that the agency will move expeditiously to ensure its policy on Plan B is based solely on science," said Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which filed the lawsuit.

Conservatives said politics drove the decision.

"Parents should be furious at the FDA's complete disregard of parental rights and the safety of minors," said Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America.

Story continues below
advertisement

Plan B is emergency contraception that contains a high dose of birth control drugs and will not interfere with an established pregnancy. It works by preventing ovulation or fertilization. In medical terms, pregnancy begins when a fertilized egg attaches itself to the wall of the uterus.

If taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex, it can reduce a woman's chances of pregnancy by as much as 89 percent.

Critics of the contraceptive say Plan B is the equivalent of an abortion pill because it can prevent a fertilized egg from attaching to the uterus. Recent research suggests that's possible but not likely.

The battle over access to Plan B has dragged on for the better part of a decade, through the terms of three FDA commissioners. Among many in the medical community, it came to symbolize the decline of science at the agency because top FDA managers refused to go along with the recommendations of scientific staff and outside advisers that the drug be made available with no age restrictions.

"The FDA got caught up in a saga, it got caught up in a drama," said Susan Wood, who served as the agency's top women's health official and resigned in 2005 over delays in issuing a decision. "This issue served as a clear example of the agency being taken off track, and it highlighted the problems FDA was facing in many other areas."

The treatment consists of two pills and sells for $35 to $60. Women must ask for Plan B at the pharmacy counter and show identification with their date of birth. The drug is made by a subsidiary of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, an Israeli company. It does not prevent sexually transmitted infections, such as HIV/AIDS.

Supporters of broader access argued that Plan B is safe and effective in preventing unwanted pregnancy and could help reduce the number of abortions.

Opponents, including prominent conservatives, counter that it would encourage promiscuity and might even become a tool for criminals running prostitution rings, as well as for sexual predators.

Early in the Bush administration, more than 60 organizations petitioned the FDA to allow sales without a prescription. But according to court documents, the issue quickly became politicized.

In 2003, a panel of outside advisers voted 23-4 to recommend over-the-counter sales without age restrictions. But top FDA officials told their subordinates that no approval could be issued at the time, and the decision would be made at a higher level. That's considered highly unusual, since the FDA usually has the last word on drug decisions.

In his ruling, Korman said that FDA staffers were told the White House had been involved in the decision on Plan B. The government said in court papers that politics played no role.

In 2005, the Center for Reproductive Rights and other organizations sued in federal court to force an FDA decision.

The following year, the FDA allowed Plan B to be sold without a prescription to adults. But the controversy raged on over access for teens.

___

AP Medical Writer Lauran Neergaard contributed to this report.

___

On the Net:

FDA's Plan B page: http://tinyurl.com/ch3ys6

WASHINGTON — Women's groups cheered the government's decision to allow 17-year-olds to buy the "morning-after" emergency contraceptive without a doctor's prescription, but conservatives denounce...
WASHINGTON — Women's groups cheered the government's decision to allow 17-year-olds to buy the "morning-after" emergency contraceptive without a doctor's prescription, but conservatives denounce...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
5
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

Okay....I know this isn't going to be a popular stance to take but as an Obstetric/­Gynecologi­c nurse that moonlights as a school nurse to high-school aged kids, I believe that this is a manifestation of us as a culture NOT wanting to talk openly to our youth about intimacy and their bodies because we believe that our kids (a) aren't curious, (b) aren't active, or (c) are too young to deal with such a weighty topic.

The kids that I care for in my OB clinic are starved for information above all else. What better person to engage these youngsters during such a profound time than mom and dad? Or dad.....or mom....or mom and mom...or dad and dad......it doesn't really matter!

The overwhelming response I get from parents when they are confronted with a teen pregnancy or STD is "why didn't you come and talk to me" or something along those lines. I fear that the FDA allowing the use of this drug in a younger subset of the population is simply a by-product of us waiting too long to have that important talk with our young ones.

Let your kids know that you care....'cowboy up' and talk to them about all the options that you believe are best. If you don't, Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian or Beverly Hills 90210 will.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:23 PM on 04/23/2009

So now instead of a 14-,15-, or 16-year-old having to find an 18-year-old, they only have to find a 17- year-old. And we won't even address fake IDs.
What needs to happen is that we as parents need to pull our heads out of the sand and realize that our little darlings may be sexually active. I took my daughter to the gynecologist and gave her the option of having me stay in the room or leave. I told her if she is going to have sex she needs to use birth control because I'm not taking care of a baby and I'm not paying for an abortion. Her body, her decision. Just like she decided against the HPV vaccine...she wants to wait until there's a little more data.
And, having gone through chemically-induced menopause, I have serious doubts about hormone-loading of any kind. Especially in girls whose bodies are still trying to figure out what they are supposed to be when they grow up.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 04/23/2009
photo

You are on FIRE eddrky! Can you come to my hospital and talk to the dozens of scared kids and freaked-out parents that I see on a weekly basis when I get to share the news with the family?

It's heart-wrenching because time and again these young girls are simply starved for information (that's the conversation I get to have when the parent's are asked to leave)....just one little (albeit possibly uncomfortable) conversation is all it takes...and the benefits are priceless!

And...you're 100% right on about not giving your child the HPV vaccine. Just my opinion....

I'm so glad to know that there are moms out there like you who are not afraid to deal with the here-and-now and educate our young girls. Kudos to you! You should be applauded and I admire your willingness to share on this post.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 PM on 04/23/2009
- CDMelty I'm a Fan of CDMelty 2 fans permalink

The FDA exists to approve medicines based on safety and science, not morality. If the conservatives want the pills banned on moral grounds, the FDA is not the agency for them to attack. They should try to pass legislation against it. The FDA is supposed to be an objective scientific agency.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:52 PM on 04/23/2009
- tnfit78 I'm a Fan of tnfit78 14 fans permalink
photo

It's official: There's got to be a morning after!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:47 PM on 04/23/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect