Militants Burn NATO Fuel Tankers In Pakistan

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Militants Burn NATO Fuel Tankers In Pakistan stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

NAHAL TOOSI | April 23, 2009 02:44 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
A Taliban militant holds his weapon as a TV camera man films outside the mosque where tribal elders and the Taliban met in Daggar, Buner's main town, Pakistan, Thursday, April 23, 2009. A meeting between tribal elders and the Taliban on Thursday in Daggar ended without any indication that the Taliban would withdraw. Pakistani paramilitary forces rushing to protect government buildings and bridges in a Taliban-infiltrated district just 60 miles from the capital were met with gunfire Thursday that killed one police officer, authorities said. (AP Photo/Mohammad Sajjad)

ISLAMABAD — Gunmen attacked a Pakistani paramilitary force sent to a Taliban-infiltrated district just 60 miles from the capital Thursday, killing a police officer and feeding growing doubts about the government's peace deal with extremists in the area.

A meeting between Taliban representatives and tribal elders ended with the militants making some concessions but no pledge to withdraw from Buner, where they have established bases since crossing over from their stronghold in the neighboring Swat Valley.

Swat's Taliban appear to be emboldened after their bloody, two-year campaign in the valley led the government to agree to a peace accord that imposes Islamic law in a wide swath of the northwest bordering Afghanistan.

There were reports Thursday that fighters from the Swat Taliban also have entered another neighboring district, Shangla, said a security official who agreed to discuss the situation only if not identified because he was not authorized to speak to journalists.

Militants have made no secret of their desire to see Islamic law imposed across the country, and as they edge closer to Islamabad, unease about the peace deal is growing in Pakistan and in the West. The U.S. is especially concerned because it considers stability in Pakistan _ and rooting out its militant sanctuaries _ critical to success in the Afghan war.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told American lawmakers in an unusually blunt statement Wednesday that Pakistan's leaders were "basically abdicating to the Taliban." On Thursday, however, she said the Pakistani government appeared increasingly aware of the threat.

U.S. special envoy Richard Holbrooke talked to Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari by telephone Thursday, but the president's office would not say if Swat or Buner were discussed. The chairman of the U.S. military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, was visiting Pakistan.

As reports filtered out about Taliban fighters moving into Buner _ that they were patrolling roads, broadcasting radio sermons and ordering barbers to stop shaving beards _ the government sent six platoons from the paramilitary Frontier Constabulary to the district this week.

Story continues below

Government official Syed Mohammed Javed confirmed the deployment but would not comment on the troops' purpose. Javed did not specify the number sent; a platoon typically has 30 to 50 members.

The troops were dispatched Wednesday, Javed said. Unidentified gunmen opened fire on one of the convoys Thursday, killing an escorting police officer and wounding another in the Totalai area, said Hukam Khan, a police official.

How much force the government was willing to display remained unclear, especially after the army's spokesman, Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas, insisted the situation in Buner was not as dire as some felt. He said militants controlled less than 25 percent of the district, mostly its north.

"We are fully aware of the situation," Abbas said. "The other side has been informed to move these people out of this area."

Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani insisted no group would be allowed to challenge the authority of the government, but a few lawmakers _ including some who initially backed the peace deal with the Swat Taliban _ said the administration had to do more to contain extremists.

"If the other party is not able to give us peace and expanding themselves to Buner and Shangla, then it is the government's duty to use its full strength to stop their expansion," said Haji Mohammad Adeel, a top member of the party that leads the provincial government in the northwest and entered into the accord in the first place.

The provincial government agreed to the peace deal in February, but the president signed off on it only last week, under strong pressure from the national legislature.

The accord covers Swat, Buner, Shangla and other districts in the Malakand Division, an area of about 10,000 square miles (25,900 square kilometers) near the Afghan border and the tribal areas where al-Qaida and the Taliban have strongholds.

Supporters have said the deal takes away the militants' main rallying call for Islamic law and will let the government gradually reassert control _ a theory yet to be seriously tested.

Analysts said Buner is a wake-up call for a Pakistani government that has often seemed weak-willed in dealing with insurgents. But, they said, Islamabad is not in danger now.

"The military is going to be the major impediment" to taking the capital, said Hasan Askari-Rizvi, a leading political analyst. Still, he said, sympathizers in the capital could use the Buner advance as a rallying cry to cause unrest.

More than a half million people live in Buner.

On Thursday, the bazaar in Buner's main town of Daggar and the road into the district were almost deserted, a visiting AP Television News reporter found. Police and government officials in Buner appeared to have either fled or were keeping a low profile, and there was no sign of Frontier Constabulary troops in the town.

The meeting of tribal elders and the Taliban in Daggar ended without notice the militants would leave.

A Taliban leader who goes by the name "Commander Khalil" said the militants agreed to stop patrolling in Buner, though they would keep armed guards in their vehicles.

"We are here peacefully preaching for Sharia (Islamic law). We don't want to fight," Khalil told an Associated Press reporter by phone.

Another Taliban leader, Maulana Muhammad Bashir, said the militants agreed not to target people who had opposed them in the past in Buner _ a key demand of local leaders, some of whom had raised tribal militias to fight the Taliban.

Javed Khan, a top administrator in Buner, said the Taliban agreed to not exhibit weapons or interfere with government offices. The militants also promised to leave aid groups alone and return seized government vehicles, he said.

Officials hope to avoid a replay of the Swat conflict in Buner. In Swat, some two years of clashes between the Taliban and security forces killed hundreds and caused up to a third of the one-time tourist haven's 1.5 million residents to leave their homes.

___

Associated Press writers Munir Ahmad and Zarar Khan in Islamabad, Riaz Khan in Peshawar and Robert Burns in Washington contributed to this report.

ISLAMABAD — Gunmen attacked a Pakistani paramilitary force sent to a Taliban-infiltrated district just 60 miles from the capital Thursday, killing a police officer and feeding growing doubts abo...
ISLAMABAD — Gunmen attacked a Pakistani paramilitary force sent to a Taliban-infiltrated district just 60 miles from the capital Thursday, killing a police officer and feeding growing doubts abo...
Filed by Nick Sabloff
 
Comments
52
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
- den1953 I'm a Fan of den1953 58 fans permalink
photo

Thank you Republicans for starting WW#3 this is what happens when you stick your nose in other peoples business for the all mighty oil. Reagan had to get involved with tearing down the Russians great move help Northern alliance kick Russia out of a foreign country that had no interest in it. Then comes Bush #1 he's sleeping with the Saudi's ends up pissing Bin Laden off for putting air bases in Saudi Arabia. Which in turn causes a attack on World Trade Center and kills 3,000 of our own innocent people which in turn leads us to attack Bin Laden back in the country that we helped him oust the Russians.In turn along come's Bush junior to invade Iraq because he felt obligated to oust Saddam for pissing off his father. Have any Republicans learned from this useless crap yet? Bush has failed to keep his eye on the real security of this country now we have the Taliban trying to take over a country with nukes well America get ready for a bumpy ride because this comming year is going to be interesting if we all make it that far!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:37 AM on 04/24/2009

errr ..... excuse me folks. Nuclear weapans anyone? The headline on the front page is "PAKISTAN NEARING COLLAPSE" in block capitals. Shouldn't we be a little bit concerned that people we are told are ruthless terrorists (the Taliban) seem to be about to take over a nuclear power?

Perhaps it doesn't worry anyone else because there only seems to be one mild comment to Pakistan's nuclear weapans, buried deep in a comment on a comment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:07 AM on 04/24/2009
- dmyron I'm a Fan of dmyron 8 fans permalink

A newer gentler Taliban..... I am moved.....to wretch in disgust.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:23 AM on 04/24/2009
- dmyron I'm a Fan of dmyron 8 fans permalink

The only intelligent comment I have heard from Cheney in regard to the activities of the "fundamentalists" was that they were attempting to institute a caliphate from the Atlantic to the Pacific.The countries of Asia need to take note. They are making headway in that endeavor.Only a
coalition of countries in the region can hope to waylay that undertaking. It appears China would rather
take a hands-off posture than address this issue.They too may rue the day..........I do not believe
we can be alarmist enough!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:44 AM on 04/24/2009
photo

Cheney doesn't get any credit for making those comments. The notion of a global Islamic caliphate has been common knowledge for decades. In fact, it's been a primary component of any serious study of Islamic history for hundreds of years and it figures prominently in our own nation's history, because our forefathers had to deal with like minded radicals and zealots early on.
Cheney is just parroting what he learned from others, and taking the credit.
With regard to China, one needs to remember that China moves in a purposeful and deliberately slow fashion, with an emphasis on long term planning.
The radical Islamic nations are dependent and will remain dependent on China and Western nations for much of the technology that they utilize, even while adamantly claiming to reject everything of a modern nature, thus underscoring their core hypocrisy, like any religious movement.
China will simply position themselves so as to be able to place a chokehold on the financial and geopolitical future of these rogue states, something our own business community is too greedy and too stupid to do, and thus China will protect itself.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:05 PM on 04/24/2009
- mick7191 I'm a Fan of mick7191 36 fans permalink
photo

Don't they have an army? I thought they had an army? This is a bad, bad thing.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:32 AM on 04/24/2009
photo

Tell me again why Texas is part of the United States?
I forget.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:55 AM on 04/24/2009
photo

Taliban courts Texas.
Goddam Texas should be given to the Taliban, the border sealed off and they can start a civil war between them and the Christiban.
Meanwhile in Pakistan I betcha India will be the first to drop a nuke, not us.
They won't stand for the Talibanization of their neighbor the North, especially after the Mumbai attacks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:48 AM on 04/24/2009
photo

I just don't see Musharraf negotiating land to the Taliban.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:33 PM on 04/23/2009
- CubFanHere I'm a Fan of CubFanHere 21 fans permalink
photo

Dude, where you been? Musharraf hasn't been in power since August of 2008. The country is now run by Asif Ali Zardari - and apparently he's more incompetent than Musharraf - never thought I'd say that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 PM on 04/23/2009
- PSM42 I'm a Fan of PSM42 20 fans permalink
photo

Who runs Pakistan? We do. Through Zardari. Aka Mr. Ten Percent. More corrupt than Ch. en. ey. If you can believe such a thing.

But China and Saudi Arabia (???) have lobbies too.

Peter Dale Scott with Tariq Ali - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SCPlYe1IPs

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:00 AM on 04/24/2009
photo

Actually Pak has been dealing with them for many years. Going back to the 80's with The Soviet war. Pak "gave" Peshawar, to The Mujahideen as a safe haven. The Taliban are the grand son's of The Muj.
Had Pakistan used it's money to fight it's real enemy rather than India, much of this would not have taken place.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 AM on 04/24/2009
- brklynivn I'm a Fan of brklynivn 18 fans permalink

The Taliban and China are not friends, neither are India and the Taliban, it's as much their problem as ours.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 PM on 04/23/2009
- Moxo I'm a Fan of Moxo 12 fans permalink

The Curse of Bush strikes Pakistan! Pity we didn't deal with the Taliban when we had the chance, huh.

Saddam is laughing his head back on!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:22 PM on 04/23/2009

that is why the Chinese are considered to be best buddies for the Pakistanis. Unfortunately, the Pakistanis don''t know their true importance----------sacrificial beast in the honor of Mao.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:55 PM on 04/23/2009

EVERYONE-----------the only country that is smiling right now is -CHINA. They've got us by the balls and wallet. The military and intelligensia need to realize that the Soviet Union , with all the bad the bond movies portrayed , never came close to defeating USA. Why? They were really always broke. They had an artificial economy that eventually collasped. China , on the other hand , is 2
TRILLION Dollars flush.They hate the west, but are beyond smart as how to deal with their hated ones. Pakistan is but a small but important rook that would have to be sacrificed for the grand design.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 PM on 04/23/2009
photo

The Chinese don't hate the west. Stupid and ridiculous to say so.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:34 PM on 04/23/2009
- rudyinbama I'm a Fan of rudyinbama 26 fans permalink

China will definitely NOT be happy if Pakistan falls to the Taliban loonies.
And India is probably aiming it's nukes right now.
The possible scope of this is beyond anything we've dealt with since WWII.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:40 AM on 04/24/2009

I don't know why the US is dillydallying around the ultimate threat to the entire world.These nukes have to be taken out. Sooner or later a military coup is going to come and in all the confusion and chaos some warhead is gonna go missing. Also, if all the eyes are on the active weapons, some radioactive waste may be stolen and a dirty bomb may eventually be exploded in a western city or in India. Can you imagine the impact on the world order and economy? I remember reading a story in my childhood ---it is too long to go into in now, but the moral of the story was---don't leave a razor in the hands of a monkey.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:42 PM on 04/23/2009

We will soon be sending troops into Pakistan. It will be Obama's Third WAr.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:12 PM on 04/23/2009
- loria I'm a Fan of loria 158 fans permalink
photo

It is really too bad Bush decided to wage that second war that took our eyes off Afghanistan, bin Laden and Taliban. Every day we find that the mess left by the last administration is far beyond what we coud have imagined.

But, just go ahead and keep defending Bush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:42 AM on 04/24/2009
- javaman I'm a Fan of javaman 5 fans permalink

it goes down like this...

taliban takes over gov't and nukes. India launches ground and air invasion in the east. The US launches ground and air invasion in the west. Taliban, unable to handle a conventional war launches nuke into India. India responds in like. India asks for truce pending taliban stopping offensive. While this goes on, US stages secret war in the Swat region and "cleans" out the strongholds. Taliban cries Genocide. India takes that as a deal breaker and launches final assault with low grade nukes. Pakistan glows. Taliban is cut off at the head, the world goes crazy. Massive demonstrations world wide take place, various groups now sympathetic to the Taliban stage bombings and suicide attacks. Nations begin to take sides. World War 4. (World War 3, as everyone knows was the Cold War)

Life as we know it becomes very very very different. Protests in the US by rightwing nuts blaming Obama for this war, erupt nation wide. Small armed conflicts occur in various states, which are quickly put down, but give rise to domestic terrorism ala timothy mcvay. The era, what I like to call, Cleaning House begins.

I write neo-future sci-fi, can you tell? LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:18 PM on 04/23/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect