iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bankruptcy Bill Watered Down, Still Fiercely Opposed By Banks

First Posted: 05/28/09 06:12 AM ET Updated: 05/25/11 02:15 PM ET

Durbin

After weeks of negotiations between Senate Democrats and major players in the financial industry, a compromise bankruptcy reform deal has been reached, Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said on the Senate floor Monday night. Whether it will pull 60 votes, the number needed to overcome a GOP filibuster, is a question that will be answered later this week when the Senate takes up Durbin's amendment to the House-passed bankruptcy bill.

In order to garner the support of conservative Democrats and a few Republicans, the proposal has been watered down. The bankruptcy legislation will still allow homeowners to renegotiate mortgages in bankruptcy - the so-called cram down provision - but only under strict conditions. The banking industry has lobbied fiercely against cram down, but Durbin said on the Senate floor Monday night that the compromise was supported by Citigroup, which has been at the negotiating table.

"In the past, some of my colleagues understood the need for action but have been uncomfortable with the original language. Let me be clear: this amendment is different," said Durbin. "The amendment I'm going to offer will make a modest change in the bankruptcy code with a lot of conditions. It won't apply across the board. This amendment limits assistance in bankruptcy to situations where lenders are so intransigent that they are unwilling to cooperate with the foreclosure prevention efforts already underway - Obama's homeowner assistance and stability plan and the Congressionally-created HOPE For Homeowners, which this bill will greatly improve."

If banks refuse to take part in either of those programs, which allow homeowners to renegotiate mortgages under certain conditions, then a bankruptcy judge would be able to reduce a homeowner's monthly payment.

Durbin didn't release any further details. The compromise, which he said is also supported by the Center for Responsible Lending, AARP and the Leadership Council on Civil Rights, is being shared with wavering members and staff leading up to the vote.

Meanwhile, the banking lobbyists are furiously lobbying against it and Durbin acknowledges it will be difficult to "muster the votes, although I know it will be hard."

It is "hard to imagine that today the mortgage bankers would have clout in this chamber but they do," said Durbin. "They have a lot of friends still here. They're still big players on the American political scene and they have said to their friends, stay away from this legislation."

While Citigroup, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and other major banks were negotiating with Durbin and his allies, the major bank lobbies were whipping up opposition to it.

"The groups that are leading the charge against me on this are familiar names on Capitol Hill. The Mortgage Bankers Association, the people who brought us this wonderful subprime mortgage crisis," said Durbin, adding, "the Financial Services Roundtable, the biggest names in financial services in this nation, the ones that have had their hands out for federal money, opposed this idea of helping people facing foreclosure. And the American Bankers Association. What a disappointment. What a disappointment that a great association like that, representing so many good banks, would not even sit down at the table to discuss this provision. It's a source of great disappointment to me because as a congressman and senator I work with them on so many issues."

The ABA left the negotiating table several weeks ago and has been furiously lobbying against the bill.

"I've never found them more unyielding and unreasonable than on this issue. They say, 'Don't worry about it, Senator. We're experts, we're going to handle it. Don't tell us what we need to do.' Well, many of those same banks are the first in line when it comes to federal money," said Durbin.

Eight years ago, Durbin said, he introduced an amendment that would have prevented predatory lenders from recovering damages in bankruptcy court. Then-Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Texas) fought back, arguing that the amendment would put the subprime mortgage industry out of business. It failed by one vote.

"This will be another test," said Durbin. "Who's going to win this debate? The mortgage bankers and the American Bankers Association, or the consumers across this country?"

Ryan Grim is the author of the forthcoming book This Is Your Country On Drugs: The Secret History of Getting High in America

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 433
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
10:19 PM on 04/28/2009
To SDS,

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but don't whine that people don't like you when you admitted that you work in FORECLOSURE law. You may as well have said you were an IRS Auditor.....people are going to have a negative reaction to that, and it definitely skews how objectively people see your opinions.

Now you are marked forever in HP.
BitterRoot
Truth - - Not Obloquy!!
04:22 PM on 04/28/2009
I have had one abiding principle for most of my adult life: if the insurance companies are for it, I'm against it. I live in California where we have a flood of deceiving and obfuscatory "intiatives" on our ballots every election, and that seemed like the sanest course to follow. I guess now I'll have to apply the same principle to banks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:59 PM on 04/30/2009
If banks, insurance companies, mega coporations [i.e. Exxon], Big Pharma are for it; the rest of us are against it! Enough said.
yappnmutt
humping legs for liberty
04:06 PM on 04/28/2009
congress is making it clear who their constituency is and you keep voting for them. democrat or republican makes no difference. they aren't speaking in terms of how to help the consumer, the middle class but how to help the banking industry suffer the least harm.

vote against the incumbent in the primary and the general election and keep voting that way until they get it. i have since 1980.
03:31 PM on 04/29/2009
That would mean I would have to vote against Dick Durbin...that is not going to happen.
06:48 PM on 05/02/2009
True. Worse, the banksters and insurance mafia use our own taxpayer money against us to buy congress.
04:03 PM on 04/28/2009
Can GM get a cram down on the 30 billion they owe taxpayers? We all know the current market value is effectively zero. What's good for the goose is good for the gander, right?

Of course, we 'prudently' invested tens of billions knowing that no private investors would risk another dollar on them, so OF COURSE we're entitled to full reimbursement.

-boggle-
03:58 PM on 04/28/2009
I thought the article was about the bankrupcy plans for the financial institutions - too big to manage and too big to fix any other way. but then I read it, and .... it was something else. Never mind.
03:54 PM on 04/28/2009
Maybe they can include a Political Bankruptcy provision in the bill and it will get support from republicans.
03:55 PM on 04/28/2009
I think it would apply equally to all of those in congress.
03:51 PM on 04/28/2009
The banking industry has lobbied fiercely against cram down, but Durbin said on the Senate floor Monday night that the compromise was supported by Citigroup, which has been at the negotiating table.


Do you guy's govern anymore. is there anybody left in washington that can truly say that they work for the American people. why don't you just come out and tell us that this is the best that our corporate banking industry will give the American people. i can understand that some will see this as help but in my view the majority will be left in the dark due to the conditions. let's face it, the conditions always relate to the worse case.

what we need is a counsel of citizens that sit at the table to oversee the negotiating with these crooks.
they shouldn't even be at the table. it's like negotiating a deal with the devil. this has to end if the American people are going to a chance.
03:50 PM on 04/28/2009
We need to take some of our righteous anger that has been directed at the torture issues and funnel them toward legislators who are still allowing banks to control Washington'. We need to write to senators who have shown themselves weak on this issue (i.e. Tester, Lincoln, Bayh, Nelson) and make it clear we expect them to stand up to these greedy b*^#(*ds. I've written my letters to Congress & to the WH. Creditors are not powerless in a bankruptcy proceedings. Banks are well represented by very competent counsel to protect their rights and make sure that people seeking bankruptcy protection are not trying to pull a fast one. No one wants to go bankrupt. Having that on your credit is generally sufficient punishment enough for a middle class family. People find themselves in these situations often through no fault of their own - factories closing, sudden health crises, accidents, etc. Bankruptcy judges are in the best position to hear advocates on both sides present credible evidence and find a solution works in the best interest of all sides, ensuring revenue flows from the property to ensure property values don't further nosedive and cause further economic collapse. Modifications help the nation and are patriotic. Given the massive amount of assistance the banks have received after making very poor choices in investments, it is hardly a stretch to think they should be expected to extend a small modicum of similar assistance to the average homeowner.
04:22 PM on 04/28/2009
From below

These people came to me wanting to buy a house. If they qualified for a loan and I didn't broker it for them, I wouldn't have been doing my job.

No client of mine ever left his/her initial signing (long before closing) without a clear understanding of exactly what they were signing up for.

I take offense at you calling me a con man. I worked my backside off helping people buy their first homes. I explained everything to them. They knew exactly what they were getting into.
04:32 PM on 04/28/2009
You said you were getting "deadbeats" homes on paperwork you knew to be false. ANY job should be done honorably. You are one of the greedy brokers who got the country into this mess. You knew you would get a bigger bonus by pushing these ridiculous mortgages on people. You weren't working your backside off to help THEM, you were lining your own pockets. And now you have the gall to represent them and come on boards like this and denouce the very procedures there to protect them. If I knew your state bar number I would report you.
04:34 PM on 04/28/2009
YOUR words, not mine: When I did mortgage loans, I thought it was insane that I was able to get 100% no doc loans for complete deadbeats. I did it anyway. It was my job. I did it to the best of abilities. It was my job.


Sorry, "just following orders" doesn't work for torture and it doesn't work for conning people into doing something you knew to be "insane."
photo
dollbaby
Spice...."The Toughest Fighter."
03:50 PM on 04/28/2009
I never understood this about bankruptcy............business can file for bankruptcpy in order to resturcture, for ecample Filene's basement is filing for bankfuprcy protection agian, it did so 10 years ago. But the ordinary consumer has very few such rights. Business does this all the time but piches a hissty if any rights are offered ot the consumer.
04:26 PM on 04/28/2009
An individual can file for a chapter 7 every eight years. An individual can file a chapter 13 almost whenever he or she wants. (but they may not receive a discharge)
03:48 PM on 04/28/2009
There is something SO wrong about lobbyists having such power over the people WE voted for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ran6110
Mac, iPhone & iPad developer.
03:44 PM on 04/28/2009
It's funny, we elected all of the politicians in Washington and not one of them watch out for or care about the american voter!

Shouldn't meetings and 'negotiations' like this be public or at least have the transcripts published?

It just appears that everyone but the taxpayer has a say in what happens! And no one there speaks for us!

Just saying...
03:44 PM on 04/28/2009
"SDS" may not have client right now, but I do. so since he is so anti-"deadbeat" and relies so heavily on the "mortagage laws" (what a joke)
I will let "him" respond to the fact that once a homeowners misses a payment on their moratage they are in default and their note can be called, EVEN if they catch up. So, from then on, the homeowner gets to live in fear that the lender can call in their mortgage note at anytime.
Try explaining how "fair" that is to a single working mom, that already has plenty of stress.
every month they send her a foreclosure notice. even though she is current, now.

I am suppose dto know if they relly will foreclose. I can't reassure her. can you SDS??
03:54 PM on 04/28/2009
The cram down would be great for business. It would give a great incentive for anyone in negative equity to file a chapter 13.

But just because it benefits me doesn't mean I am going to look the other way and not say what I believe.
04:24 PM on 04/28/2009
Sir, you have already admitted that you were one of the brokers who was actively creating the toxic mess we are in right now by promoting mortgages you knew were a problem. I'm sure you got great bonsues that now permit you to be "self-employed" and now squeeze those people who can least afford it to provide them with "representation" during a process that you don't have any belief in. If not financially, you are certainly morally bankrupt, and your opinions on anything have about the same value as Al Capone's.
03:55 PM on 04/28/2009
With banks awash in NON-performing loans, do you really think they're going to start persecuting performing loans?

Do you honestly think banks want ANOTHER foreclosure property on their hands, vandalized by the bitter former owner?

You're raging into the abyss, my friend.
03:41 PM on 04/28/2009
This is where Evan Bayh makes his money
Work for the banks in exchange for campaign contributions

Who are the Blue Dog's working ofr Banking interests ??
Can/Will Obama intervene ?

He did with Credit cards
03:39 PM on 04/28/2009
We shouldn't be watering down our VALUES or PRINCIPLES. We should be indicting, convicting and imprisoning in hard labor camps or hanging the bankers ! They should be publicly demised of all functions, titles, honors and assets. Their families should be left with nothing. This is what justice is about. STOP rewarding them with special care ! They threw the world into a SHOCK so that they could once again rob us blind. Get them now and put an end to the SHOCK DOCTRINE they espouse and perpetrate. Kill that way of doing business before it kills US and the rest of HUMANITY.
03:39 PM on 04/28/2009
Wow, no double standard for the banks eh. They got hundreds of billions of OUR tax dollars to keep their sorry asses afloat no questions asked , and now they are all bent out of shape that homeowners might have some say in renegotiating their loans. If it wasn't for the tax dollars contributed by homeowners the banks wouldn't even EXIST! Oh and by the way Mr Bank, you're welcome.
03:52 PM on 04/28/2009
The Dems see Obama trying to rewrite the TARP agreements after the fact, and figure that they should be able to rewrite people's mortgages as well.

Every time you hear Obama or Durbin complain about banks taking TARP funds, a little alarm bell should go off in your head to remind you that many of these banks were FORCED to take the money, and that there is currently NO WAY for them to pay it back, because Geithner will not allow it.
04:20 PM on 04/28/2009
They were forced to take the money to be forced to keep lending. The government knew that the banks were all going to act in their own self-interests and stop lending after the collapse. By forcing the capital on the banks the banks could not use capital ratios as an excuse to tighten lending (or not as much atleast), which would have created an even worse downward spiral. But again, the banks don't operate from the same macro-perspective as the government so hence the forced capitalization.