iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Chrysler succumbs to bankruptcy after struggle

TOM KRISHER and STEPHEN MANNING   04/30/09 10:43 PM ET   AP

Chrysler Bankrupt

DETROIT — After months of living on government loans, Chrysler finally succumbed to bankruptcy Thursday, pinning its future on a top-to-bottom reorganization and plans to build cleaner cars through an alliance with Italian automaker Fiat.

The nation's third-largest car manufacturer filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in New York after a group of creditors defied government pressure to wipe out Chrysler's debt. The company plans to emerge in as little as 30 days as a leaner, more nimble company, with Fiat potentially becoming the majority owner in the future. In return, the federal government agreed to give Chrysler up to $8 billion in additional aid and to back its warranties.

"It's a partnership that will give Chrysler a chance not only to survive, but to thrive in a global auto industry," President Barack Obama said from the White House.

Chrysler said it will close all its plants starting Monday and they will stay closed until the company comes out of bankruptcy. At least three Detroit-area factories sent workers home Thursday after suppliers stopped shipping parts over fears they would not be paid.

CEO Robert Nardelli announced he would step down when the bankruptcy is complete and take a post as an adviser with Cerberus Capital Management LP, which will give up its 80 percent ownership of Chrysler under the automaker's plan. Vice Chairman Tom LaSorda, who once ran the company when it was owned by the German automaker Daimler, said he would retire.

"A lot of us are scared," said Steve Grabowski, 33, who has worked at a Warren, Mich., parts stamping plant for seven years and was sent home Thursday. "We knew something like this was going to happen, but we didn't think it would be so soon."

Chrysler's bankruptcy filing is the latest step in a drastic reordering of the American auto industry, which has been crushed by higher fuel prices, the recession and customer tastes that are moving away from the gas-guzzling SUVs that were once big money makers.

Lee Iacocca, the retired chairman and CEO who led Chrysler through a government bailout in the late 1970s, said it was a sad day.

"It pains me to see my old company, which has meant so much to America, on the ropes," he said in a written statement. "But Chrysler has been in trouble before, and we got through it, and I believe they can do it again."

The government has sunk about $25 billion in aid into Chrysler and rival General Motors Corp.

GM faces its own day of reckoning on June 1, a date the administration has set for it to come up with its own restructuring plan. GM has announced thousands of job cuts, plans to idle factories for weeks this summer and has even offered the federal government a majority stake in the company as it races to meet the deadline.

Like at Chrysler, debt may be the stumbling block. GM has asked its unsecured bondholders to exchange $27 billion of debt for a 10 percent stake in the automaker. The creditors balked, saying that would leave them with just pennies on the dollar and they deserve a majority stake if they give up their claims.

When Chrysler emerges from bankruptcy, the United Auto Workers union will own 55 percent of the automaker and the U.S. government will own 8 percent. The Canadian and Ontario governments, which are also contributing financing, would share a 2 percent stake.

Under the deal, Chrysler would gain access to Fiat's expertise in small, fuel-efficient vehicles. The U.S. automaker eventually wants to build cars that could get up to 40 mpg, far more economical than its current fleet focused on minivans, Jeep SUVs and the Dodge Ram pickup.

In exchange, Fiat would initially get 20 percent of the company, but its share could rise to 35 percent if certain benchmarks are met, and Fiat said Thursday it could get an additional 16 percent by 2016 if Chrysler's U.S. government loans are fully repaid. Fiat would also get access to the North American market through Chrysler factories and dealerships.

Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne said he planned to spend time meeting Chrysler employees and touring its plants over the next few weeks.

He said Fiat was preparing for Chrysler to "re-emerge quickly as a reliable and competitive automaker." Fiat also plans to reintroduce brands like Alfa Romeo in North American markets.

First, though, bankruptcy court Judge Arthur Gonzalez will have to sort out the issue of Chrysler's creditors, who hold $6.9 billion of the company's debt. The company's first hearing is set for Friday.

The Treasury Department's auto task force had been racing for the past week to clear the hurdles that led the government to reject Chrysler's initial survival plan one month ago. Along with the Fiat deal, Chrysler adopted a cost-cutting pact with the UAW on Wednesday.

Four of the largest banks holding 70 percent of Chrysler's debt agreed this week to a deal that would give them $2 billion. But a collection of hedge funds refused to budge, saying the deal was unfair and would only return a small fraction of their holdings.

When the hedge funds refused a sweetened offer Wednesday, Chrysler and the government resorted to bankruptcy.

Obama chastised the funds for seeking an "unjustified taxpayer-funded bailout."

One lender, OppenheimerFunds Inc., said it rejected the government offer because it "unfairly asked our fund shareholders to make financial sacrifices greater than the sacrifices being made by unsecured creditors."

Later Thursday, one of the hedge funds that had been a holdout issued a statement agreeing to the offer.

"We believe that this is in the best interests of all Chrysler stakeholders, and our own investors and partners," said the statement from Perella Weinberg Partners. The fund said it was working "to encourage broad participation in the settlement."

The White House said Chrysler could comes out of "surgical" bankruptcy in 30 to 60 days. Under normal circumstances, it would be difficult to complete such a large bankruptcy so quickly.

But John Pottow, a University of Michigan professor who specializes in bankruptcy, said the government's level of involvement is much greater than a typical corporate bankruptcy.

"If you have the president of the United States who wants something to happen, I think anything's possible in bankruptcy protection," he said.

The Fiat deal and bankruptcy cap a disastrous time for Chrysler.

The Auburn Hills, Mich.-based company lost $8 billion last year and its sales through March were down 46 percent compared with the same period last year, leading some auto industry analysts to question whether Chrysler can survive even in bankruptcy.

But company executives told reporters Thursday that Chrysler vehicles with Fiat's fuel-efficient technology should reach showrooms in 18 months.

Vice Chairman Jim Press said Chrysler has cut expenses to operate profitably at a lower sales volume, and he said it would be able to take advantage of Fiat's distribution network to sell more vehicles globally.

Also, the company has new products coming out such as the new Jeep Grand Cherokee, which debuts in early 2011.

Press said the company predicts that small-car sales will rise dramatically around the time the Fiat products hit the U.S. market.

"The real volume pickup opportunity for smaller cars is going to start to ramp up about two years from now," he said.

Despite the turmoil with Chrysler and GM's looming deadline, Obama urged consumers to keep buying cars.

"If you are considering buying a car, I hope it will be an American car," he said.

___

Manning reported from Washington. Associated Press writers David N. Goodman in Warren, Mich., and Kathy Barks Hoffman in Lansing, Mich., contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

DETROIT — After months of living on government loans, Chrysler finally succumbed to bankruptcy Thursday, pinning its future on a top-to-bottom reorganization and plans to build cleaner cars thro...
DETROIT — After months of living on government loans, Chrysler finally succumbed to bankruptcy Thursday, pinning its future on a top-to-bottom reorganization and plans to build cleaner cars thro...
Filed by Julie Satow  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,018
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
01:01 AM on 05/03/2009
Yep ; the liberals brought Asian Vehicles here
and yrs later America is screwed.
Great
Please Note... They should have never been here in the first place
The little 3 Honda Toyota Nissan ...Please go home
From now on Liberals can drive American
01:31 AM on 05/03/2009
conservatives bought Mercedes and BMW. Nice try.

GM, for and Chrysler kept making sport utility vehicles because conservatives gave them a tax break for them.

Conservatives lowered barriers for international trade, making imports cheaper.
10:20 PM on 05/02/2009
I wonder how much that oft-depicted Chrysler window cost the company. The window is a glaring symbol of excess to me. It sums up the whole problem with the top level of the company.
06:32 PM on 05/02/2009
The hedge fund and bond holder can make more money

by bankruptcy

because the insured their bets with

Credit Default Swaps from AIG,

paid off by Taxpayers.

http://www.businessweek.com/lifestyle/content/apr2009/bw20090424_731357.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_top+story
01:30 AM on 05/02/2009
Well, at the very least, this should be interesting. I pray that we won't be seeing any Roman taxis (see: Fiat Multipla) around in the States. Also, I pray that the Fiat changing of hands will be prudent with the labor unions, unlike many other Italian companies (see: Alitalia). However, Fiat has come around in Europe, and it's becoming a higher standard of quality for work-a-day cars. Most of America doesn't need large pick-ups or SUVs to transport them back and forth to their office jobs. Plus, their head is an Italio-American after a strange chain of events left him in charge, and he has brought the company back from the depths. At least, as far as Italian companies go.

Trust me, I'm married to an Italian. I've seen how they (as a country doing business/government) work.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MerrieWay
11:57 PM on 05/01/2009
Chrysler imported the French 'Simca' a tiny car, back in the 70's. Simca was affiliated with Fiat and Chrysler divested its European interest in 1978.

The Simca was basically a 'homely' little car, hatchback design. Chrysler apparently had been on the right track at the time, but the public wouldn't have it. Sleeker, bigger, bells and whistle cars were the show-stoppers.

I know firsthand, because of my stint as a national auto show model –narrator for Simca. In order to get a crowd around it, I had to do everything but stand on my head. I even wrote a song to the tune of “Bonnie and Clyde” dressed up like a gun moll and sang my Simca heart out. But, I made my mark creating a mannequin routine to get attention. Not only did my act wow the crowds, but Chrysler’s top brass put me in TV commercials, as well.

Now Chrysler's come full circle. The little Fiat concept is back to save Chrysler? Bail outs couldn’t. Maybe the current fuel fiasco will add to the appeal. And maybe a brainy designer, 'a la' John De Lorean can make 'homely' cool.

How many Americans drive Fiats? Vision folks, let's get with it. Hopefully President Obama’s vision that Fiat will give Chrysler a global presence becomes a reality. Automakers could have had a sleek little Simca...tooling down the freeways - today.
Being bred and raised in the Motor City. Admittedly, MerrieWay holds a soft spot for automobiles.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MerrieWay
11:49 PM on 05/01/2009
Chrysler imported the French 'Simca' a tiny car back in the 70's. Simca was affiliated with Fiat.
It was basically a 'homely' little car. Chrysler apparently had been on the right track at the time, but the public wouldn't have it. Sleeker, bigger, bells and whistles were the show-stoppers.

I know first hand,because of my stint as a national auto show model -narrator. In order to get a crowd around, I had to do everything but stand on my head, creating a mannequin routine to get attention. Not only did my act wow the crowds, but Chryler's top brass put me in TV commericals, as well.

Now we've come full circle. The little Fiat concept is back to save Chrysler? Bail outs couldn't . Maybe the current fuel fiasco will add to the appeal. And, hopefully a brainy designer, 'a la' John De Lorean can make 'homely' cool.

How many Americans drive Fiats? Vision folks, let's get with it. Hopefully President Obama 's vision that Fiat will give Chrysler a global presence becomes a reality. Automakers could have had a sleek little Simca...tooling down the freeways - today.

Admittedly, MerrieWay holds a soft spot in my heart for automobiles - being bred and rasied in the Motor City.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AirForceWx1701
08:19 PM on 05/01/2009
Well, on the positive side, if they were worried about Fiat's previous reputation in the US [FIAT= Fix It Again, Tony], they could always revive the Plymouth name for the Fiat models. Plymouth originally was the budget/economy brand of Chrysler way back before it became known for utterly redundant fleet-car versions of Chryslers and Dodges..
08:14 PM on 05/01/2009
Wall Street caused the problem not the UAW
1. High gas prices made car sales fall of a cliff. The $4 gas was directly the result of Hedge fund speculators.

2. Frozen credit caused car sales to stay low. Car buyers can not get the loan to buy. GM moved 20% of their cars through leases. GM ceased leases because no credit available to them. Frozen credit was caused by Wall Street Fraud on false AAA risk on subprime loans.

3. The frozen credit caused the deep recession. Traditionally, the auto industry is highly impacted by recessions. Again Banksters RICO criminals caused the frozen credit

4. Wall Street ownership of Obama ment the 12 billion of government money to end the credit freeze, went almost exclusively to the Banksters. Everyone else got crumbs... not enough to unfreeze credit.

5. Wall Street (Geithner & Summers) actively promote unfair trade agreements. Geithner said China is not under valuing their currency last month. As long as Unfair trade is protected by the Wall Street power brokers, all America's manufacturing will fail in time.

Geithner chose Rattner (Wall Street Gekko type with political asperations) and Rattner gave 35% of Chrysler to FIAT for zero money. Geithner is personal friends with Fiat. Geithner depends on generating campaign donations to buy influence and it looks like he refilled the DNC's ATM machine with Fiat donars.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AirForceWx1701
08:30 PM on 05/01/2009
I agree with you for much of it, but I know as far as GM goes, management concentrated far too much on SUVs and trucks; has there been an exciting product from GM in the last 10 years, besides the Pontiac G8, the Caddy CTS, the Solstice/Sky twins, and the Corvette/XLR? Their mainline cars, such as the Impala, Grand Prix, and all of the domestic Buicks have been the most boring, mediocre vehicles, all in the name of maximizing $$ from SUVs [that and laziness and myopia]. But your general point, that the UAW is not to blame, I agree with 100%.
09:21 AM on 05/01/2009
"Ummmm... Some people and business still need larger vehicles"


Yes, trucks will still be produced for industrial purposes as will specific-purpose vehicles for consumer needs.

But enormous petroleum-consuming status symbols should not.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:21 AM on 05/01/2009
So, government will limit what we purchase? If I want a H1, would I have to justify that purchase, before I would be allowed?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Clayton139
GOP-R's Are 4Rich, Corporations NOT People!
04:46 PM on 05/01/2009
What in the world do you ne an H1 Hummer for ? Satus !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Clayton139
GOP-R's Are 4Rich, Corporations NOT People!
04:47 PM on 05/01/2009
Need ! - (:}
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Clayton139
GOP-R's Are 4Rich, Corporations NOT People!
04:45 PM on 05/01/2009
Enormous petroleum-consuming status symbols should not.
________________________________________________

Well Put ! ! !
01:40 AM on 05/01/2009
While we are pointing fingers let's not let the government excape unscathed . NAFTA and the Fast Track went a long way in the process of crippling not only the auto industry but every other industry in this country that produces a product. Lot's of bills proposed by both the right and left requiring GM and the others to expend considerable amounts of money on lobbyists to fight them. I'm always amazed when people start complaining about the wages UAW workers have bargained for over the years. It's only a very tiny fraction of what GM has been paying their salaried management people (from mid management on up). The majority of whom do very little to nothing to deserve the pay. The kicker was Roger B. Smith in the mid 80's who retired w/ an enormous severence package (billions) and stocks and bonds : effectively robbing the company . All the money GM has PD away on frivolity could have paid for the R&D and implementation of a hydro electric cars by 1981 many times over. Short sited, ill managed and badly directed (by the board). The government has had a love hate relationshipp with the auto industry and more often than not has been no friend to labor. Everything is connected !
12:22 AM on 05/01/2009
My question is that if the UAW owns 55% of Chrystler and I am a UAW member : and I have a problem w/ the company : who do I go to for representation ? Wouldn't it seem more likely that the UAW is going to rule more in favor of the company as it now has a financial stake ? Isn't that a conflict of interests ? Or maybe the plan is to squeeze the union shop out altogether. I've been to Saturn and I've been to NUMI and it's not good : they have "company unions" ! Company unions aren't concerned about workers rights but only in what the company wants ! The UAW has been edging in this direction for some time : It is no longer a union in the traditional sense but rather a sell out union ! What will happen to the pensions people have given their lives to obtain ? Fiat ? Fiat is like the Chrystler of Europe : isn't that throwing good money after bad ? I doubt that Obama's Recovery Act Stimulus package will put more people back to work than will be lost in the Auto Industry downfall ! I can hear them singing now as they march on Washington: "which side are you on " ?
10:33 PM on 04/30/2009
This is great. They got a couple gazillion in tax payers dollars which went down the drain or rather, in somebody's pant pockets and, if they're filing bankruptcy, most likely, that money is going to the lawyers to pay the over-inflated legal fees associated with the bankruptcy process. Gotta love it!
09:22 PM on 04/30/2009
I'm back...looks like the beer didn't help....I'll say goodbye til manana...
photo
PerfectSense
Think - before Progressives outlaw thinking.
09:03 PM on 04/30/2009
"This is not a sign of weakness," Obama said. "I have every confidence that Chrysler will emerge from this process stronger and more competitive."

Ha Ha - Liberals will believe anything. Get ready for years and years of additional Federal "loans" to Chrysler that wll not be repaid.
09:20 PM on 04/30/2009
actually he said "i have eery confidence,"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:23 AM on 05/01/2009
No, he said every. I watched three times, because I couldn't believe what I was hearing. It sounded exactly like the speech made when Chrysler crashed the first time, and when AMC died after that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jadamind
11:18 AM on 05/01/2009
he was assuming the Chrysler execs were intelligent
07:46 PM on 04/30/2009
Imagine in US the auto cos have to borrow technology from europe to build small cars ...the GM F Chrysler invested very little $ in research for efficient cars ...they went for the big hummers, SUV to satisfy the demand from equally spoiled buyers (us the citizens) ...they made huge profits ...but at the end the oil prices caught up with them .. Even now Japan, Korea is light years ahead in manufactring better cars, efficient cars and they will again lead in electric cars ..just look at Subaru, Mitsibishi, Nissan etc No wonder GM F Chrysler all close to bankruptcy ...