JUSTICE SOUTER TO RETIRE (SLIDESHOW, VIDEO)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - JUSTICE SOUTER TO RETIRE (SLIDESHOW, VIDEO) stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS


First Posted: 04-30-09 09:45 PM   |   Updated: 05- 1-09 02:44 AM

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
Is Souter Staying

Scroll down for slideshow and video

UPDATED

Justice David Souter has decided to retire from the Supreme Court when the current term ends, according to several reports.

NPR, which was first to break the news, reported:

Souter is expected to remain on the bench until a successor has been chosen and confirmed, which may or may not be accomplished before the court reconvenes in October.

Reached at home, Supreme Court spokesperson Kathy Arberg repeatedly declined comment to Huffington Post on the report of Souter's resignation. Asked specifically if the report of Souter's planned resignation was inaccurate, Arberg repeated, "All I can tell you is no comment."

NPR's Nina Totenberg adds that Souter 69, has informed the White House of his decision and reports that President Obama is expected to appoint a woman:

At 69, Souter is nowhere near the oldest member of the court, but he has made clear to friends for some time now that he wanted to leave Washington, a city he has never liked, and return to his native New Hampshire.

For more about Obama's potential Supreme Court picks, click here.

NBC News reports:

According to various government officials, Justice David Souter plans to retire either at the end of this court term or once President Obama's choice to replace Souter is confirmed by the Senate. Look for more on the Souter retirement news tomorrow morning on TODAY.
Story continues below

Watch MSNBC's report on the planned retirement:

Click through this slideshow:

Earlier on Thursday, the Associated Press had the legal word buzzing with a story that hinted at Souter's retirement due to the fact that he has yet to hire any law clerks compared to the other eight justices who have each hired their four clerks.

Why does this matter? Under the scenario that counts, Souter, 69, would not be hiring clerks because he isn't planning to be in Washington in the fall. A retirement would give President Barack Obama his first chance to nominate a justice and the next few months would bring Senate confirmation hearings.

If Souter does indeed retire, all eyes will turn to President Obama and who he selects to fill that vital seat on the Supreme Court.

The move comes as a surprise since the most often-cited candidates for retirement have been Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 76, who is undergoing chemotherapy, and John Paul Stevens, 89.

The AP points out that Ginsburg has said she plans to serve into her 80s and Stevens has expressed no intention of leaving.

Souter came close to retiring out of despair with the infamous 2000 Bush vs. Gore decision which ended the Florida recount, in which he dissented along with three other justices.

According to Jeffrey Toobin's book, "The Nine," Souter was crushed by the decision and often wept when he reflected on it:

David Souter alone was shattered. He was, fundamentally, a very different person from his colleagues. It wasn't just that they had immediate families; their lives off the bench were entirely unlike his. They went to parties and conferences; they gave speeches; they mingled in Washington, where cynicism about everything, inluding the work of the Supreme Court, was universal. Toughened, or coarsened, by the their worldly lives, the other dissenters could shrug and move on, but Souter couldn't. His whole life was being a judge. He came from a tradition where the independence of the judiciary was the foundation of the rule of law. And Souter believed Bush v. Gore mocked that tradition. His colleagues' actions were so transparently, so crudely partisan that Souter though he might not be able to serve with them anymore.


Souter seriously considered resigning. For many months, it was not at all clear whether he would remain as a justice. That the Court met in a city he loathed made the decision even harder. At the urging of a handful of close friends, he decided to stay on, but his attitude toward the Court was never the same. There were times when David Souter thought of Bush v. Gore and wept.

Souter, nominated by the first President Bush in 1990, disappointed conservatives with his more-liberal interpretations of the Constitution. His decision in Casey vs, Planned Parenthood case, in which he upheld the Roe v. Wade decision that gave women the right to choose, also provided a clear indication of his thinking.

Here is a list of Justice Souter's decisions.

Souter graduated Phi Betta Kappa in 1961 from Harvard, majoring in philosophy.

More details to come...


Get HuffPost Politics On Facebook and Twitter!

Scroll down for slideshow and video UPDATED Justice David Souter has decided to retire from the Supreme Court when the current term ends, according to several reports. NPR, which was first to break...
Scroll down for slideshow and video UPDATED Justice David Souter has decided to retire from the Supreme Court when the current term ends, according to several reports. NPR, which was first to break...
Loading...
 
 
Comments
2076
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (41 pages total)
- Blaster I'm a Fan of Blaster 4 fans permalink

ITS A OBOMANATION OUT THERE?????????

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:14 PM on 05/03/2009

Do you think that Bill Clinton would be a good Supreme Court Justice? I do.

Zan-Gah

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:29 PM on 05/01/2009
- Wake-up I'm a Fan of Wake-up 50 fans permalink
photo

I don't think he can... he lost his Law License... remember, he broke the law and was impeached?

Besides, I'm sure he and Hillary would love the grilling!! HAHA

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:09 PM on 05/01/2009
photo

As I have aged, my opinion of the Supreme Court has undergone a lot of change. While it may seem like poetic justice (no pun intended) that so many "conservative" appointees have in time voted in seemingly more liberal terms than those who put them there would have wanted (O'Connor, Ginsburg, Souter), it becomes apparent that the Justices are indeed mostly independent from political bias and ideals. This is as it should be; their focus is on constitutionality of law, which requires an unbiased approach. While such decisions are not always popular, and the Justices--being human do make bad calls from time, public opinion does change toward them over time. The fact that Justice Souter did vote against the decree leading to the coronation Geo. Bush II demonstrates an independence; we can hope that the more conservative Justices will mature into making all their decisions politically non-biased.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:09 PM on 05/01/2009

Clarence Thomas has been getting eat on!!! Ginsburg smiles nervously as she hears his stomach growl.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 PM on 05/01/2009
- Golfer59 I'm a Fan of Golfer59 11 fans permalink
photo

Uncle Tom....oops Justice Thomas might have just farted.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 PM on 05/01/2009
- swo68 I'm a Fan of swo68 14 fans permalink

You throw a racial slur at him because you do not like the way he behaves?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 05/02/2009
photo

guess he doesn't want to face 911 Truth and the Bush Cheney indictments that are invevitably going to come forward. Wonder what he knows.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:18 PM on 05/01/2009
photo

Well damn, hasn't this been a week of political surprises! First Specter switches parties, now Souter's retiring?! Well, kudos to him for holding out until the Bush administration ended.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 05/01/2009
- shedances I'm a Fan of shedances 41 fans permalink
photo

Too bad it wasn't Clarence Thomas leaving ... or Scalia!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 05/01/2009
- Antacid I'm a Fan of Antacid 8 fans permalink

They were appointed precisely because they didn't have anything other than contempt for the law if it clashed with their beliefs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:01 PM on 05/01/2009
- Wake-up I'm a Fan of Wake-up 50 fans permalink
photo

Based on what?

These are the ones that "apply" the Constitution vs. Souter and your lefty's how believe their job is to "Mold, Adapt, Compare to international law, etc" and other nonsense such as:

"The Constitution is a living breathing..." Souter - don't let the door hit you on the @ss on the way out!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 05/01/2009
- whoknew42 I'm a Fan of whoknew42 20 fans permalink
photo

HELLO!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:17 PM on 05/01/2009
- whoknew42 I'm a Fan of whoknew42 20 fans permalink
photo

btw - I was agreeing with shedances - not Wake-up. The Constitution hasn't been followed for years!! Don't think the right-wingers haven't used it to misinterpret the law - cause they have!! Our civil rights have diminished significantly during the last administration, and the right-wingers allowed it - all in the name of "protecting our country". They allowed wire-tapping of its own citizens! Racial-profiling became the norm! Big brother watched everything we did, and they had absolutley no problem with it! Where was the constitution then??

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 PM on 05/01/2009

What a loss for the Court. I know it sounds geeky to have a "Favorite Supreme Court Justice," but he is mine. He's a thoughtful, independent man. I really think that his decisions arose from legal scholarship and reason more than personal ideology.

I hope history remembers him as the great justice he was, not just a member of the "liberal block" and/or the justice that "turned" on the Republicans. It isn't a Supreme Court justice's job to push an agenda; rather, the job is about thoughtfully applying constitutional and federal law to make decisions about complex issues. I think Justice Souter did his job very, very well.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:54 AM on 05/01/2009
- lbjranch I'm a Fan of lbjranch 3 fans permalink

Great job on Kelo Souter. Hope your precious farm doesn't get ripped away from you via eminent domain and replaced by a strip mall.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:49 AM on 05/01/2009

The real question is what can be done for forcibly get rid of the neocon judges like Roberts, Thomas, Scalia? Something should be done while Obama is in office to help right the ship of state and set it on a true course of truth and justice again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:33 AM on 05/01/2009
- Wake-up I'm a Fan of Wake-up 50 fans permalink
photo

Well, you have this one backwards... Souter and the other left - World Court judges are the real dangerous ones... the kind that take away rights.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 05/01/2009
- dianhow I'm a Fan of dianhow 84 fans permalink
photo

Wake
Left right or judges ? As long as they are fair minded. Judges have been known to surprise many with their decisions. .Neocon judges to me, are dangerous.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 05/01/2009
- lbjranch I'm a Fan of lbjranch 3 fans permalink

"Forcibly get rid of..." Supreme Court justices? Have you ever, even once, read the Constitution? It's scary how uninformed people are.

The U.S. Constitution: there's an app for that.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:52 AM on 05/01/2009
- dianhow I'm a Fan of dianhow 84 fans permalink
photo

Yes Quite alarming.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:58 AM on 05/01/2009
- dianhow I'm a Fan of dianhow 84 fans permalink
photo

We do not ' forcibly get rid ' of neocons judges. Its a Lifetime appointment.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:55 AM on 05/01/2009
- Antacid I'm a Fan of Antacid 8 fans permalink

So, how can we arrange for Scalia to fall down a flight of stairs?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:03 PM on 05/01/2009
photo

I always get queasy when my colleagues on the left start running extra-democratic solutions up the flagpole. This is our system. Justices appointed for life. Including the ones we like. Because he did not have to look over his shoulder, Justice Souter, who was appointed by GHWB, was able to evolve in his opinions and moved well toward the center. He was quite disdainful of the the termination of the recount and expressed that in his dissent.

Leave the system alone. Work on the participants.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:11 PM on 05/01/2009
- kinaz I'm a Fan of kinaz 6 fans permalink

As long as the new judge makes decisions based on their compliance with the constitution vs. precedence (what some other random judge ruled) I will be happy with the decision.

Prior decisions, however, do not bind the Supreme Court in a meaningful way. Precedent is a guidepost, not an endpoint. It is the interpretation of constitutional terms by particular justices in a particular context at a particular time. The interpretation may fit well with core sources of law and may provide insights to applying constitutional commands. But it also may have weak enough legal underpinning that it proves to be a fringe that ultimately will be cut out of the law, not a strand that weaves integrally into the law.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1558781/posts

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:29 AM on 05/01/2009
- roquelaure I'm a Fan of roquelaure 3 fans permalink

Wow! Obama is going to get to appoint a lot more judges than I expected. I think the nakedly partisan ones will have to die before they give him the opportunity to replace them, tho.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 AM on 05/01/2009
photo

Obama ought to place Al Gore on the Supreme court. This would be poetic justice

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:21 AM on 05/01/2009
- festry548 I'm a Fan of festry548 7 fans permalink
photo

OMG YES!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 05/01/2009

what about Hillary?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 AM on 05/01/2009
photo

You're kidding right? 2 wars, North Korea, Iran, Israel, Cuba, and a host of other issues, and we're going to swap out the SoS to fill a seat on the bench?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:22 AM on 05/01/2009
- Copeword I'm a Fan of Copeword 7 fans permalink
photo

What about Bill?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:47 AM on 05/01/2009
- dianhow I'm a Fan of dianhow 84 fans permalink
photo

Hillary's name came up on the news last night. . There is only one woman on the court now It would ne nice to have a balance on the high court. But as long as the judge is fair minded and does not try to legislate from the bench - I will be satisfied. Bush's Justice Roberts is young- will be there a long long time.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 05/01/2009

The only position I want too see Hillary in, every other place she just seems waiting for the President's job. Biden would make a better SOS and a good President in training for the Vice job.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:53 AM on 05/01/2009
photo

Hopefully Obama has resolved the paradox of his vetting process. It's both more extreme than anything Bush considered, and at the same time, it has produced a number of embarrassing withdrawals.

I wonder if he will select a non-judge. That would be interesting. 2 law school deans are supposedly in the mix.

For those who are waiting for Scalia, Roberts, Alito, Thomas exits, check their ages. Except for Scalia who is in his early 70s - but pretty feisty - the rest are relatively young. The good news is that Justice Thomas who has yet to ask a single question from the bench in 17 years has at least another decade to give it a try...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 AM on 05/01/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last » (41 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect