Obama's high court choice could be Hispanic, woman

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Obama's high court choice could be Hispanic, woman stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MARK SHERMAN and BEN FELLER | May 1, 2009 09:45 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
President Barack Obama, in a unexpected visit to the White House pressroom Friday, May 1, 2009, tells reporters that he just got off the phone with Supreme Court Justice David Souter and they talked about Souter's retirement. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama pledged Friday to name a Supreme Court justice who combines "empathy and understanding" with an impeccable legal background to succeed liberal David Souter, whose abrupt retirement announcement set off speculation the next justice could be a woman, a Hispanic or both.

Obama, who will be making the first high court nomination by a Democrat in 15 years, pointedly referred to his plan to have "him or her" on the bench in time for the Supreme Court's session that begins the first Monday in October.

"I will seek someone who understands that justice isn't about some abstract legal theory or footnote in a case book. It is also about how our laws affect the daily realities of people's lives," said the president in a surprise appearance in the White House Press Room moments after speaking with Souter by telephone. Word of the impending retirement had leaked Thursday night.

Obama promised to consult with Republicans and Democrats alike on his choice to replace Souter.

Souter's retirement after almost two decades of unpredictable decisions gives Obama an early chance to place his stamp on the nine-member high court, possibly by naming a minority _ a second black or the court's first Hispanic _ or a second woman, as well as to affirm if not strengthen its support for abortion rights. As a candidate for the White House, he said he would not use a litmus test for nominees, but observed that he thought the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that gave women the right to end their pregnancies was correctly decided.

Souter, 69, was named to the court in 1990 by the first President Bush, a Republican. But on abortion as well as other issues, the New Hampshire native quickly proved himself to be less than the strong conservative the GOP had expected. In 2000, he was one of four dissenting justices on a ruling that declared President George W. Bush the winner of the disputed national election.

Democrats, who control 59 seats in the Senate, will be in a strong position when Obama's nominee arrives for confirmation proceedings.

Officials disclosed that even before he took office, Obama, a former constitutional law professor, offered guidance to transition aides assigned to the judicial selection process _ and personally offered names of people whom he would seriously consider for the high court.

Story continues below
advertisement

Some of the names that have been circulating outside the White House include recently confirmed Solicitor General Elena Kagan, U.S. Appeals Court Judges Sonia Sotomayor, Kim McLane Wardlaw, Sandra Lea Lynch and Diane Pamela Wood, and Leah Ward Sears, chief justice of the Georgia Supreme Court.

Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, Harvard Law professor Cass Sunstein and U.S. District Judge Ruben Castillo of Chicago have also been mentioned.

While Obama ticked off many criteria, spokesman Robert Gibbs emphasized only one in a later briefing: a broad background in life outside campus classrooms and judges' chambers.

Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, who will preside over confirmation hearings as chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said he hoped Obama would consult with lawmakers in both parties, then issued something of a gentle challenge to Republicans. "In exercising their important roles in the confirmation of the next Supreme Court justice, I hope that all senators will take this opportunity to unify around the shared constitutional values that will define Justice Souter's legacy on the court," he said.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, in a written statement of his own, said, "I trust the president will choose a nominee for the upcoming vacancy based on their experience and evenhanded reading of the law, and not their partisan leanings or ability to pass litmus tests."

Souter, who is expected to return to his native New Hampshire, is the youngest of three members of the court who have figured in retirement speculation in recent years. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 76 and recently underwent cancer surgery. Justice John Paul Stevens is 89, the oldest member of the court.

But one of the ironies confronting Obama is that even replacing all three would not allow him to fundamentally alter the court's makeup on key cases in which there often are four judges predictably on one side, four on the other, and Justice Anthony Kennedy in the middle, in effect the deciding vote.

Souter's retirement triggered a swift round of speculation about Obama's intentions, as well as the usual prodding from all points on the political spectrum.

Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, a Republican who turned Democrat earlier in the week, said the court "could use some diversity along a number of lines," including African-Americans and Hispanics.

The current court has one black justice, Clarence Thomas, and Ginsberg is the only woman. There has never been a Hispanic on the Supreme Court.

The nation's first black president, Obama made no mention of using race or gender as a consideration.

But in urging the Senate to act promptly on his selection, he said he hoped "we can swear in our new Supreme Court justice in time for him or her to be seated" by early October. Spokesman Gibbs said Obama intended to have a nomination before the Senate "well before the end of July."

Souter's formal resignation letter was brief.

"Dear Mr. President. When the Supreme Court rises for the summer recess this year, I intend to retire from regular active service as a justice." He signed it: "Yours respectfully, David Souter."

In his remarks, Obama said he intended to seek "somebody with a sharp and independent mind and a record of excellence and integrity."

At the same time, he said, "I will seek someone who understands that justice isn't about some abstract legal theory or footnote in a case book. ..... I view that quality of empathy, of understanding and identifying with people's hopes and struggles as an essential ingredient for arriving at just decisions and outcomes."

In the past two vacancies, Republicans were able to win confirmation for Chief Justice John Roberts as well as Justice Samuel Alito with solid GOP support. Democrats were divided on both, some voting in favor of one or the other, while others heeded the pleas of outside liberal groups and opposed confirmation.

Roberts said of his colleague's upcoming departure: "His desire to return to his native New Hampshire is understandable, but he will be greatly missed in our deliberations."

As word of Souter's retirement spread, conservative groups seemed to be laying the groundwork for a fight.

"Obama's own record and rhetoric make clear that he will seek left-wing judicial activists who will indulge their passions, not justices who will make their rulings with dispassion," said Ed Whelan, president of the conservative Ethics and Public Policy Center.

___

Associated Press Writers Jesse J. Holland, David Espo and Jennifer Loven contributed to this story.

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama pledged Friday to name a Supreme Court justice who combines "empathy and understanding" with an impeccable legal background to succeed liberal David Souter, w...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama pledged Friday to name a Supreme Court justice who combines "empathy and understanding" with an impeccable legal background to succeed liberal David Souter, w...
Filed by Rachel Weiner
 
Comments
111
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)

quit speculating. Obama is hell bend and focus on pleasing the Hispanic community. The hell with the rest of us. He feels as though if he can solidify this voting block he is assured a second term. He's forgetting about White & Blacks. If he looses 5% from each group he can write a second term off.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:28 PM on 05/02/2009

choose a Hispanic, choose a black, choose a Martian...­.but choose a JURIST who will make decisions based on the existing law.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:30 AM on 05/06/2009

Just a reminder to all that the President is obligated to nominate someone to fill
vacant post on the SC. And because the President is a politician expect his decision
to be political. Being that he is only a few months into his term there is the real
possibility that he will have this opportunity again. And again.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:13 PM on 05/02/2009
- Hugh-Gee I'm a Fan of Hugh-Gee 3 fans permalink
photo

All this talk about which ethnic group or sex (not "gender"; "sex" is the correct word) Souter's replacement should be is short-sighted and irrelevant.

Very likely, this won't be Obama's only pick. He may well pick four SC justices, to replace Souter, Breyer, Stevens, and Scalia (assuming Obama serves two terms). There will likely be plenty of opportunities to pick justices that increase the diversity on the Court.

He should pick brilliant jurists of excellent reputations who (roughly) fit his and the Senate's ideological expectations. And his picks should be (relatively) young.

Outside of those guidelines, the field should be open.*

*For those who'd cry, "But you didn't say they should follow the Constitution," as some did after Barack's brief appearance in front of the press yesterday: it's inherent in the job. It's part of the "brilliant jurists of excellent reputations" requirement, and should go without saying, just as he shouldn't have to say that he's going to pick a human being, or a US citizen.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:58 PM on 05/02/2009
- Thundrdrum I'm a Fan of Thundrdrum 8 fans permalink
photo

I, too, would like to see another woman on the court--the vast majority of our laws have been laid out by rather old, white men without a fresh perspective among them (I'm including Thomas in that group). I'd also like to see an age limit imposed--just not seeing the wisdom of having 80-year-olds who aren't allowed to drive cars interpreting federal law.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:10 AM on 05/02/2009
- chitown8 I'm a Fan of chitown8 91 fans permalink
photo

I will say this again the Us Government owes this woman for her service and sacrifice she has made.

Joan Humphrey Lefkow (born January 9, 1944) is a United States district court judge for the Northern District of Illinois. She was nominated by President Bill Clinton on May 11, 2000 confirmed by the United States Senate on June 30, 2000. Lefkow received her commission on July 11, 2000.
Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree at Northwestern University law school in 1971. From 1982 to 1997 she was a United States magistrate, and from 1997 to 2000 a U.S. Bankruptcy Judge for the Northern District of Illinois.

On April 24, Judge Lefkow ruled that the Creativity Movement had failed to stop using the name "World Church of the Creator" and should be fined $1,000 a day until it complied.3

On April 6, 2005, Hale was sentenced to a 40-year prison term for soliciting an undercover FBI informant to kill Judge Lefkow.

On February 28, 2005, Lefkow returned home to find the bodies of both her husband and mother dead in the basement of her North Side home.
Lefkow and her children were again placed under the protection of the United States Marshals Service.

On May 18, 2005, Judge Lefkow testified before the U.S. Congress on the problem of providing security for judges, placing some of the blame for the attack on her family on rhetoric against judges issued by persons such as Pat Robertson.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:08 AM on 05/02/2009

This is potentially a decades-long decision. I hope Obama is strong enough to ignore the clamor for a token justice and to decide on the basis of whom he thinks best matches his own judicial philosophy and intellect. I am leery of an ad hoc, okay it is time for a Latina. because that would make 6 catholics on the court. And I have been very unhappy with the current sitting 5.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:51 AM on 05/02/2009
photo

it IS time for a latina/latino. it's long overdue. thank god this didn't happen under the last administration. they would have given us a hispanic "clarence thomas," or a torture promoting war criminal like alberto gonzales. the court needs more estrogen, too, regardless of race.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 AM on 05/02/2009
photo

So, you are saying that the Supreme Court should just be a robot interpreting the constitution. How stupid! The constitution is a fluid document to be interpreted in the context of the present time. Period.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 AM on 05/02/2009
- QBlogger I'm a Fan of QBlogger 4 fans permalink

I believe Leah Sears would be a more ideal choice. Although she is African American, Judge Sears has a very progressive record, and is known for being very independent of mind. No disrespect to Sotomayor, but Judge Sears has such scholarly aptitude that not appointing her would be the height of stupidity.

LEAH SEARS: Remember that name.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 PM on 05/01/2009
photo

Who is Obama scoring in the White House, I know you wonder?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:15 PM on 05/01/2009
photo

I would like to see a Mexican woman not a Mexican man (too mucho).

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:08 PM on 05/01/2009
- margardner I'm a Fan of margardner 10 fans permalink

Si Se Puede!

Latina para Obama,
y apoyo su seleccion de una Latina en la posicion de juez suprema.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:34 PM on 05/01/2009

I really dislike identity politics. Nonetheless, because a U.S. Supreme Court Justice is chosen for life, or until the justice decides to retire, it is incumbent (no pun intended) on President Obama to choose a woman.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:44 PM on 05/01/2009

Neither race nor gender should play any part whatsoever in Obama's selection. We need the best. Period. Elena Kagan, Cass Sunstein, and Harold Koh are the sharpest--hands down. The rest don't hold a candle to any one of them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 PM on 05/01/2009

Elena Kagan would be the ideal choice.
She served in the Clinton Administration so she has the experience of working in government.
She was Dean of the Harvard Law School , where she was well-regarded by all.
She was easily confirmed as Solicitor General by the same Senate that would confirm her as SCOTUS justice.
Seems a perfect choice in all areas.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:31 AM on 05/02/2009
- hopefullee I'm a Fan of hopefullee 2 fans permalink
photo

I also think a woman should be appointed. I was just reading about how Justice Ginsburg dislikes being to only woman on bench. One woman out of nine justices is pretty bad, considering that women make up just over 50% of the population.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:23 PM on 05/01/2009
- whatthel I'm a Fan of whatthel 259 fans permalink
photo

I'm a man and I think the pick should be a woman. The court makeup should start reflecting the diversity of our country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 PM on 05/01/2009
- AlsoSarah I'm a Fan of AlsoSarah 76 fans permalink
photo

I would certainly like to see a woman and/or a minority judge seated. I think is is certainly appropriate.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:40 PM on 05/01/2009
- samuelberg I'm a Fan of samuelberg 6 fans permalink

I would certainly like to see a woman and/or a minority judge seated. I think is is certainly politically correct.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:56 AM on 05/02/2009
Page: 1 2 3 Next › Last » (3 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect