Is the recession suffocating American innovation?

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - Is the recession suffocating American innovation? stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

DEB RIECHMANN | 05/ 4/09 08:25 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It
FILE - This is an undated photo from the 1940's of William Hewlett, left, and David Packard, who co-founded Silicon Valley electronics company Hewlett-Packard Co. in 1938, running it out of their Palo Alto, Calif., garage at the end of the Great Depression. (AP Photo/HO/Hewlett Packard, File)

WASHINGTON — Got a bright business idea? Take a number.

Americans haven't stopped dreaming up newfangled gizmos or sketching engineering marvels on the back of cocktail napkins. But tight credit and business cutbacks have slowed the pace of getting the latest U.S. innovations to market.

Venture capital investments have plummeted. Lenders aren't lining up to fund business startups. New patent applications are down at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, creating a budget crisis at the agency, which depends on money from fees to keep operating.

If patent fee revenue continues at its current rate, the office will end the budget year collecting roughly $100 million below projections.

That puts the patent office in a Catch-22. After several years of hiring more than 1,200 patent examiners a year, the office has suspended hiring, trimmed overtime and made other reductions. This comes as the office and its 6,000 examiners are struggling to whittle down a backlog of 770,000 new, unexamined applications.

"Innovation is the way America generally gets out of downturns," said Robert Budens, president of the Patent Office Professional Association. The group represents 4,000 examiners and other patent professionals, many of whom worry the recession will mean layoffs before the end of the year.

"At the Patent Office, we're one of the key drivers of stimulating innovation and for us to get to the point where we might have to furlough or have a reduction in force would just be horrible," he said.

So far, companies that spend the most on innovation have resisted the temptation to raid their research and development budgets. They're opting to ride out the recession with an eye to future sales, according to Booz & Co., which surveys the world's 1,000 largest, publicly traded, corporate research and development spenders.

Story continues below
advertisement

Although those budgets often are set months in advance, recent data that Booz collected on about 400 of the companies shows that research spending rose 2 percent from the first quarter of 2008 to the fourth quarter.

"The recession has caused us to be very conservative in a lot of areas, but research and development is not one of them," said James Norrod, president and chief executive officer of Segway Inc., the Bedford, N.H.-based maker of two-wheeled, standup vehicles. "We think that R&D is really the life blood of the company. We haven't cut back. We have actually added people in that area."

Matthew Sampson, an intellectual property lawyer at McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff in Chicago, says business hasn't slowed yet, but patent work usually lags during economic downturns.

"I'm actually a little bit nervous about next year," Sampson said.

Businesses, however, have begun cherry-picking the ideas they want to shepherd through the expensive patent process. Seed money to nurture innovation also is drying up.

Venture capitalists invested just $3 billion in the first quarter of the year _ down 47 percent from the fourth quarter of 2008 and the lowest level since 1997, according to the National Venture Capital Association. Bank loans and "angel capital" _ money that friends and families and wealthy individuals cough up to support innovation they personally believe in _ also are contracting.

"If banks stop lending in general, lending for small innovative technologies dries up completely," said Jere Glover, a Washington business attorney who directs the National Small Business Association's technology council. "Banks are more likely to make loans to a company that has bricks and mortar, land and property."

Basement inventors are really feeling the pinch.

"A lot of independent inventors get their start by floating their expenses on charge cards and of course charge card credit lines have been greatly restricted," said Ronald Riley, the man behind numerous patents including those related to the automated industrial monorail and the treadmill.

"For independent inventors, at least until they achieve some commercial success, the money for patenting comes out of discretionary income. It doesn't mean they're not inventing, it just means they're just not going to file until things improve," said Riley, founder of the Professional Inventors Alliance.

It costs roughly $10,000 to obtain and hold a patent, although fees vary depending on the type of application and are adjusted downward for individual inventors, small business and nonprofits.

A $1,090 fee is paid when an application is filed and $1,510 more is due when a patent is granted. Maintenance fees of $980, $2,480 and $4,110, which maintain a patent holder's legal protection for the life of a patent, are due at 3 1/2 years, 7 1/2 years and 11 1/2 years, respectively.

Some penny-pinching patent holders have stopped paying their maintenance fees, choosing to let their rights to a patent expire early on innovations not critical to profits down the road. In addition, fewer patent seekers are paying fees to obtain more extra time to respond to questions from the patent office.

"Companies and law firms are saying, `We cannot afford to pay for an extension,'" said John Doll, the office's acting director. "They're given three months in which to respond and then you have the opportunity to buy an additional three months. A lot of the companies that I've talked to say, `We simply are not authorizing any extensions of time. If the law firm wants to respond later, they will pay for the extension, not the company.'"

Some companies are in such dire straits that innovation is just not an option for them, but more and more companies are recognizing how critical innovation is, said Scott Anthony, president of Innosight, a management and innovation consulting company in Watertown, Mass., and author of several books on the subject.

"Some people say, `I cannot afford to innovate.' What they are really doing is sowing the seeds of their own destruction," he said.

Anthony notes that many innovative companies were started during economic downturns.

Hewlett-Packard formed in a California garage at the end of the Great Depression. Digital Equipment was born during a recession in the 1950s. During an economic downturn in the 1970s, 23-year-old Carol Wior started a garment business with $77 and three sewing machines in her parents' garage.

Thirty-seven years later, the maker of the patented "Slimsuit" and her company's 200 employees in Bell Gardens, Calif., are working through the recession on a new undergarment and swimsuit concept. "I think you'd be a fool if you didn't tighten up a little bit," Wior said. "We're being more careful, but I'm not tightening up when it really comes to marketing and product development."

___

On the Net:

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: http://www.uspto.gov/

Patent Office Professional Association: http://www.popa.org/

National Venture Capital Association: http://www.nvca.org/

National Small Business Association: http://www.nsba.biz/

Professional Inventors Alliance: http://www.piausa.org/

Booz & Co.: http://www.booz.com/

WASHINGTON — Got a bright business idea? Take a number. Americans haven't stopped dreaming up newfangled gizmos or sketching engineering marvels on the back of cocktail napkins. But tight credi...
WASHINGTON — Got a bright business idea? Take a number. Americans haven't stopped dreaming up newfangled gizmos or sketching engineering marvels on the back of cocktail napkins. But tight credi...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
44
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Financial institutions reaped 40% of profits earned this last decade. How could they possibly justify these premiums? What roll do they serve? Their purpose is to route capital into investments which expand the productive capacity frontier.

They no longer do anything of the sort. Off with their heads.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:19 AM on 05/06/2009

Oops. Typo. Reaped should have been raped.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 AM on 05/06/2009

Innovation is driven by what the market is asking for, which problem needs to be solved first.
So always listen carefully to your customers and business contacts, they will put you on the path of innovation. To protect your innovation you could consider taking a patent.
__________­__________­__________­__________­__________­__________­__________­________
http://www.industrial-automation-hands-on.com/small-business-website-development.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:27 PM on 05/05/2009
photo

Actually, when you get down to it, the current economic collapse is probably attributable to the lack of true innovation in this country, not the other way around. Corporations and Wall Street aren't interested in research -- they're interested in bleeding the market dry. Instead of spending on research and development, they created derivatives. How's that for innovation?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 05/05/2009
- loki I'm a Fan of loki 132 fans permalink
photo

I have to admit, it has stifled spam.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:39 AM on 05/05/2009
- elsellel I'm a Fan of elsellel 2 fans permalink

Um, I think most EVERYTHING is stifled right now... unless you're dealing in prescription meds or food production­... and, well, the toilet paper industry (too bad we can't all make toilet paper for a living).

Oh, oh... elitism, sociopathism, and idiocracy still reign supreme too... can't leave those out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:09 AM on 05/05/2009
- iridium53 I'm a Fan of iridium53 56 fans permalink

So what? The number of patents are going down. Small businesses are failing at an increased rate.

Once must judge the Obama Administration by their actions - not their words, which have become meaningless.

By their actions, not their words, the only thing the Obama Administration is interested in is the Banksters.

Not one of those executives have been touched. He's shoveled an incredible amount of money at the banks, and continues to. While he orchestrates the bankruptcy of the car companies - to some extent caused by the bankers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:29 PM on 05/04/2009
photo

you're blind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:46 PM on 05/04/2009

O blind wandering girl ... you look into the pool and see a sheep looking up at you

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:26 AM on 05/05/2009
- TJCole I'm a Fan of TJCole 163 fans permalink
photo

We had to Nationalize these corrupted major banks, and if we had, we could be giving low interest loans to Stimulate innovation and the economy..!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:24 PM on 05/04/2009

If there is money to be made in some innovation product, there will be people doing it.

Forcing banks to lend out money for "innovation" is not the answer. Think !!

If the banks are not lending to some innovative company which has a product that has a great market, there WILL be investors to take it to market. If there is a chance of profit, there will be capital for it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:37 AM on 05/05/2009

"If there is money to be made in some innovation product, there will be people doing it.

Forcing banks to lend out money for "innovation" is not the answer. Think !!

If the banks are not lending to some innovative company which has a product that has a great market, there WILL be investors to take it to market. If there is a chance of profit, there will be capital for it."

I'm sorry, but that's a tragically ignorant perspective. The fact is, though they got rid of Spitzer before he could start doing some actual good, the Spitzer reforms crippled the capital flows which facillitated actual innovation- i.e. stock option reforms, pre-IPO research, etc. Riders snuck into the homeland security bills created tax incentives for corporations *not* to reinvest their earnings domestically into capacity and R&D.

It's as if Policy makers made decisions designed specifically to neuter american industry.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 AM on 05/06/2009
- cjt1957 I'm a Fan of cjt1957 19 fans permalink

And Now that Obama wants to double tax companies with off shore interests, it will get worse...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:11 PM on 05/04/2009
photo

WTH does that have to do with inventions?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:37 PM on 05/04/2009
- cjt1957 I'm a Fan of cjt1957 19 fans permalink

Money for R&D

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 AM on 05/05/2009
- TJCole I'm a Fan of TJCole 163 fans permalink
photo

If we Nationalized these corrupt major banks then we could be giving, low interest loans to Stimulate the economy and innovation­...rather than trying to raise the dead, who are just a bunch of blood sucking usurious predatory zombies...­!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:48 PM on 05/04/2009
photo

Innovation was on the decline long before the current recession. It's been on the skids since at least the 1960s.

http://www.scientificjournals.org/journals2007/articles/1032.htm

http://www.ieeeusa.org/policy/reports/InnovationHearing0705.pdf

Before you think something along the lines of "Oh, come on, what about things like cell phones?" Think again:

Has anyone seen the original "Sabrina," circa 1954, starring Audrey Hepburn, William Holden and Humphrey Bogart? Remember that phone Humphrey had in his car? That was a cell phone. Making them smaller and cheaper isn't scientific innovation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:17 PM on 05/04/2009

To you a small cell phone is a magical device?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:28 PM on 05/04/2009

It's not a magical device, but he is right, cell phone technology was invented in the 1960s, with the technological foundations being laid in the decade of "Sabrina". That it didn't mature until the 1980s was a matter of integration, not one of basic technical understanding of the problem which had been achieved decades earlier.

A lot of what you see today is technological evolution, not revolution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:45 AM on 05/05/2009
photo

I see your handle is derived from your own experience.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:08 PM on 05/05/2009
photo

Okay, now that I've got the snark out of the way -- I don't believe in magic, and I don't think cell phones are magical devices. I was using cell phones as an example of, as KillTheMessenger puts it, the mistaking of technical "evollution" for real technical innovation in this country. Most of the technological "innovations" of the last 50 years or so have been improvements on existing technology, not innovations.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:10 PM on 05/05/2009

comparing reality to the movies is like comparing the state of this nation to the Obama administration ... oh wait ... never mind.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:38 PM on 05/04/2009

The movie wasn't much off.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_mobile_phones

In any case, nothing would have stopped a rich person in 1956 to install a two way radio system with one or two privately operated base stations and a personal dial operator to make an effective (albeit quite exclusive) car phone system. You can bet your life on it that some people and companies had it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:52 AM on 05/05/2009
photo

No indoor plumbing or air-conditioning for your ungrateful self.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:39 PM on 05/04/2009
- Tom95134 I'm a Fan of Tom95134 54 fans permalink
photo

Venture capital has been on the down-slope for a number of years. The money dried up after the dot-com bomb and was only starting to recover a bit as investors saw that Bush was destroying any chance for the Republicans to win in 2008. And then there was the Bush created banking crisis. What can anyone expect? President Obama is trying but there is only so much you can do when the opposition party (again Republicans) setting on their hand and being obstructionists to everything he tries.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 PM on 05/04/2009
photo

Turn Off the Faucet to Wall Street and turn On the Faucet to Main Street!
__________­__________­__________­__________­__________­______

Progress for 99% of Americans on Main Street has been strangled by Wall Street Rates and Policies!

Seven Months of $12.8 Trillion (per Bloomberg) to Wall Street and credit flow to Main Street Declines!

$12,800,000,000,000 to Wall Street and Still No Credit Flows for Research and Business Innovations

300% Increase in Pay for Top 1% from 1980-2008!
20% Decrease in Pay for Other 99% from 1980-2008!

1980 WS Executives made 20 times average Worker
2008 WS Executives made 400 times average Worker
NOW Canada Executive made 20 times average Worker
NOW Britain Executives made 22 times average Worker
NOW Japan Executives made 11 times average Worker

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 05/04/2009

Got a bright business idea that requires manufacturing? Hook up with low cost China. Otherwise your product will not survive the competition.

Got a bright business idea that requires obfuscating financial risk of novel debt instruments and then selling them? Go to Wall Street. You have a friend in the White House.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 PM on 05/04/2009
photo

Sad but TRUE!

Summers Speaking Fees from Hedge Fund Clients $8,000,000!

Geithner lunch and socialize with the "STARS" of Wall Street!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:53 PM on 05/04/2009
- LynnW49 I'm a Fan of LynnW49 23 fans permalink
photo

"tight credit", NOT the Bush recession is stifling innovation. Meanwhile, the banks raise interest rates on credit cards and do not lend money. The banks are stifling innovation and should be kicked in their pin-striped butts. No more money for these people until they show some decency, obey the purpose of the bailouts, lower CC rates, and make affordable loans. Even then. . .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:21 PM on 05/04/2009
- Prakosh I'm a Fan of Prakosh 202 fans permalink
photo

TIght credit is the Bush recession!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 AM on 05/05/2009
- Sundialsvc4 I'm a Fan of Sundialsvc4 141 fans permalink

As long as the banking system remains hammerlocked by a couple-dozen so called "mega-banks" who obviously have Congress in their pocket ... venture capitalists, like many other wise investors, know to sit tight. As long as the bank is a casino that's being run by a crooked gambler, and as long as he's also got the policemen in his pocket... you wait. The ideas will still be there.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:31 PM on 05/04/2009

Venture capitalist are "wise investors"? I can tell you never had to deal with them.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:39 PM on 05/04/2009

They're referred to as "vulture capitalists" for a reason.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 PM on 05/04/2009
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect