iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bank Of America Needs $34B In Capital

STEPHEN BERNARD   05/ 6/09 01:56 PM ET   AP

Bank Of America

NEW YORK — Bank of America Corp. stock rose Wednesday as investors appeared comforted by reports that the bank has the means to cover a potential $34 billion shortfall in capital.

"Investors have figured out Bank of America has plenty of options and earnings capacity" to handle any shortfall the government may say they are facing, said Gary Townsend, president and chief executive of private investment group Hill-Townsend Capital Inc., based in Chevy Chase, Md.

Shares of Bank of America rose $1.14, or 10.6 percent, to $11.99 in early afternoon trading.

According to New York Times and Wall Street Journal reports, the government is expected to announce Thursday that the Charlotte, N.C.-based bank needs $34 billion in capital based on the results of its "stress tests" on 19 of the nation's largest financial firms. The New York Times quoted a bank executive, while the Journal report cited unnamed people familiar with the situation.

The stress tests are being used to determine how banks would fare if economic conditions worsened. Any banks that are deemed to need more capital based on potential future losses will be required to address the capital situation immediately, to ensure they have the necessary protection if the economy worsens.

Banks will have an opportunity to raise the funds on their own before the government steps in to help support them.

For Bank of America, the $34 billion shortfall could be covered in multiple ways, including converting into common stock a portion of a $45 billion investment it received from the government as part of the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Bank of America has been among the hardest hit banks by the credit crisis and ongoing recession.

Bank of America's chief administrative officer, J. Steele Alphin, said in the New York Times report that the bank would have plenty of options to raise capital before it would need to convert taxpayer money into stock.

A spokesman from Bank of America declined to comment on the New York Times report, saying the bank has been told by regulators it cannot talk about the stress test results until after they are announced Thursday. The Treasury Department also declined to comment.

Currently, the government holds preferred shares in Bank of America for its $45 billion investment. Preferred shares are essentially a loan that pays out a hefty dividend. By converting that investment to common stock, it would expand Bank of America's equity base to help lessen the blow if loan losses continue to pile up amid the ongoing recession. Bank of America would also see the dividend payments to the government eliminated, freeing up more cash to cover potential losses.

At the same time, a conversion to common stock would leave the government as one of Bank of America's largest shareholders, a move that might not be welcome by investors or the board of directors.

Other options for Bank of America include selling some of its assets to raise the necessary capital or a traditional common stock offering.

Very few banks have been able to complete traditional common stock offerings amid the credit crisis, though with a recent surge in the market in the past two months, investors are becoming more receptive to the idea. Goldman Sachs Group Inc., which is one of the other banks being reviewed by the government and considered one of the strongest amid the market turmoil, raised capital in a stock offering last month.

Bank of America could also shed assets, such as a portion of its stake in China Construction Bank. A lockup provision expires Thursday that would allow Bank of America to sell about a third of its stake in the Chinese bank, which could fetch about $8 billion, according to the Journal report.

Bank of America has also been under intense scrutiny in recent months for its acquisition of New York-based investment bank Merrill Lynch & Co. As part of the $45 billion Bank of America received from the government, $20 billion came in January to help cover mounting losses at Merrill after Bank of America showed trepidation about completing the deal.

Last week, amid shareholder unrest about the Merrill deal, investors voted to split the roles of chairman and chief executive, stripping Ken Lewis of the chairman's position. He still remains CEO.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

NEW YORK — Bank of America Corp. stock rose Wednesday as investors appeared comforted by reports that the bank has the means to cover a potential $34 billion shortfall in capital. "Investors ha...
NEW YORK — Bank of America Corp. stock rose Wednesday as investors appeared comforted by reports that the bank has the means to cover a potential $34 billion shortfall in capital. "Investors ha...
Filed by Nicholas Sabloff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,174
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (32 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:13 AM on 05/07/2009
BOA stock rose 10% in one day.
Does anyone know how you can tell ahead of time that this sort of thing will happen?
12:15 AM on 05/07/2009
Not unless you want Martha Stewart's old cell.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolab
Just another hostage of the poopy heads
11:14 PM on 05/06/2009
Bill Frey (Greenwich FInancial) is representing a class of investors who bought mortgage backed securities (MBS) from Countrywide that had a specific repurchase clause that if Countrywide modified these loans, they would have to buy them back at full face value.

(And of course we know that PennyMac --owned by BlackRock, principal asset manager for the Fed handling AIG and Bear Stearns assets)-- and its team of former Countrywide executives -- is buying these delinquent mortgages for 38 cents on the dollar from "the government" and modifying them now.)

When B of A arbitrarily agreed to settle with the state Attorney General to modify $8.4 billion in mortgages, they basically broke the terms of the said contracts on these mortgage backed securities.
_____________

Countrywide, the nation's biggest lender as the mortgage crisis hit, agreed in October to modify mortgages for about 400,000 homeowners to settle allegations of predatory lending.

Countrywide was bought by Bank of America in July. In the class action filed in December, or group lawsuit, the Greenwich, Connecticut-based hedge fund demanded a declaration that “Countrywide must purchase at par every mortgage loan that it sold to any of the 374 securitization trusts,” David Grais, a lawyer for the fund said in an e-mailed statement.

Grais said Countrywide could owe the trusts $80 billion.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aOaEM25JlUqk&refer=us
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolab
Just another hostage of the poopy heads
11:20 PM on 05/06/2009
Greenwich Financial (Bill Frey) is one of the "predators" named by Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America (NACA) who refused to work with NACA to modify loans in danger of foreclosure.

NACA ACCOUNTABILITY CAMPAIGN Executives of financial institutions have amassed huge fortunes on the backs of hardworking American families. While living in their many luxurious homes, they have refused to restructure mortgages that would allow families to stay in their homes. We need to make them accountable for their actions. Join the fight. While NACA has agreements with many lenders to make mortgages affordable, the below executives refused.

The list of predators includes: HSBC, Barclay's, Credit Suisse (all foreign bank owners of the Fed and all received TARP money) -Safra Katz, Brendan Mcdonagh (HSBC), Robert Shafir (Credit Suisse), Robert Diamond (Barclay's)

PIMCO (asset manager for the GSEs -- Alan Greenspan senior consultant), Bill Gross and Mohamed El-Erian

Carrington Management Services - Bruce Rose

Freddie Mac (!) - David Moffett

Fortress Investment - Wesley Edens

National City Bank - Peter Raskind (PNC took TARP money and bought National City in October, The Pittsburgh bank revealed plans to scoop up struggling regional bank National City for about $5 billion in stock . At the same time, it said it would sell $7.7 billion of equity to the treasury.)

Greenwich Financial - William Frey (managing director Andrew Szabo is from Lehman and UBS

American Securization Forum - Jason Kravitt and Ralph Daloisio

https://www.naca.com/index_main.jsp?language=null
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martampa
09:15 PM on 05/06/2009
B of A should make this PDQ after raising all the customers interest rates to twice what the rates were. Even the mob wouldn't do that.
CarmanK
democrat, retired tax acct
07:50 PM on 05/07/2009
The MOB would do it, but they couldn't do it legally. The Bank of america seems to be able to do almost anything "legally" even to the point of charging usurious interest rates on credit cards and gauging the American consumer for every obscure fee, it can think up. Senator Dodd said he would address this issue. He needs to do it now. Credit card reform has to be in concert with all this bank bail out, or the american taxpayers and consumers will be screwed once again by its government in favor of the financial sector.

But then again, we already know we can't count on the BANKER's DOZEN-Baucas, Bennet, Byrd, Carper, Dorgan, Johnson, Landrieu, Lincoln, Pryor, Specter, Tester and Nelson to help him out. So perhaps, some of thpse Republicans who want to restore their credibility will stand up for the American public. Doubtful, but hopeful anyway.
07:35 PM on 05/06/2009
Whew!

Well, personally I am SO glad that B of A is doing well. I'm losing my house and lost my income and all my friends are, too.

But B of A will be A-OK! Yay!

I guess my 20% credit card, ginormous mortagage interest/fees/payments, $20 "checks", 40$ "overdraft fees" and countless other payments (transaction fees, over limit fees, pinstriping) help keep them afloat.

NOT TO MENTION THE MOTHERF---ING BAILOUT BILLIONS!!!!

What will B of A do for me? ABSO-F-ING-LUTELY NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Viper
Former repub, still repenting
09:24 PM on 05/06/2009
First, I'm sorry. And I have come close more than a few times to losing everything.

Well some one loaned you the money that allowed you to have a house you lived in and now they and you will both lose money on that investmnet... on average they will lose at least twice as much and they did not get to live in the house. That money you borrowed .. well the builder/sellers, mortgages brokers, property appriasers, the people supplying the aplliances and etc...all got paid in full.... The bank did not.

They did not get bailout money, like you they got a loan and pay interest on that loan and they secured that loan with assets whihc iof they dont payback they will lose.

They need cash to make up for a drop in assets caused by Americans not being able to pay their debts... because we borrowed money to buy foreign goods made with slave labor wages causing the outsoutcing of our higher paying jobs and drop in real wages in the U.S.

.Banks loaned money they should not have.... people bought things they should not have... the government failed its oversight function and wasted money in iraq. But w/o this credit bubble ... we would have lost 14% of our economy over the last ten years and be where we are now... just a few years earlier.

A non producer economy is not sustainable. Ours was not!

Regards
10:03 PM on 05/06/2009
V

In order for these boards to have any sort of legitamacy we all depend on those posting to make some sort of attempt at telling the truth. You on the other hand come here and spout totally made up fabrications.

You made a statement as fact earlier........and you have yet to show any proof of any kind to support that statement............you cant show any..........BECAUSE YOU MADE IT ALL UP.

I was on the Dan Sol in article thread the day you claimed to have made all this money in the stock market.........Turned out that Dan Sol in himself was reading the thread and he challenged you to send him your investment statements so he could verify the truth of what you said...........and you disappeared........never to be heard from again on that thread. Da n Soli n himself then posted that he had noticed people claiming to have made all this money in the market when in fact they had not.....he was talking about you.

I intend to challenge you from now on. You can no longer come here and fabricate untruths

.
photo
Star2000dancer
Pay it forward, the movie..
07:23 PM on 05/06/2009
We The People should get to read , see & vote on every bailout. Not to mention we should've got the bail out 1st.
Plus why on earth are we getting Czars? I use to feel like I was in Nazi Germany with Bush, now I feel like I'm in Soviet Russia.
photo
Star2000dancer
Pay it forward, the movie..
07:15 PM on 05/06/2009
NO! And No more bailouts for Wall Street. No more legalized casino ofmanipulating the stock market to suck every dime investors put in, I watch the market & it's as obvious as it was in the comedy "trading Places". Everyone needs to get out of the stock market & stop letting them sucker you in like carnies at a carnival.
07:00 PM on 05/06/2009
photo

I hate this kind of thuggery, irrespective of the fact whether its Government or the Corporate Sector. The more we try and meddle with the Corporation by pushing government officials in, the more mess we'll have on our hands. I like the NO MORE BAILOUTS RULE, because we're BROKE!

Being an Obama supporter we must apply the same standards to his administration as we do to the Republican Administrations.

If a Republican administration, staffed with cronies from Goldman Sachs and Citibank, were cutting special deals for its political allies, I suspect we"d be hearing fewer FDR analogies and more nouns ending with the suffix "gate."

Take Obama"s "car czar," Steven Rattner. According to ABC"s Jake Tapper, Rattner is accused of threatening to use the White House to smear a Chrysler creditor if it refused to back the administration"s Chrysler bankruptcy plan. He"s also connected to a massive pension-fund scandal involving the investment firm he used to run. It"s alleged that Rattner"s firm bought the less-than-worthless DVD distribution rights to the achingly awful film Chooch " produced by the brother of an official in the New York comptroller"s office " as a thinly veiled bribe to gain access to New York pensions funds.

Talk about CHANGE!!
07:29 PM on 05/06/2009
Exactly..........great post JACOB.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Palmz
You can't just make stuff up....
06:40 PM on 05/06/2009
Letter received today 6-May-09 from BofA.

Amendment to your CCA:
Effective on June 1, 2009, the transaction fee (FINANCE CHARGE) we assess on each of the transactions identified below will be equal to 4% of each such transaction (Fee: min. $10):

ATM Cash Advances
Balance transfers
Bank Cash Advances
Cash Equivalents
Check Cash Advances
Direct Deposit Cash Advances
Wire Transfer Purchases

Yeah.......i just closed the account!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Candw1
middle of the road
06:46 PM on 05/06/2009
That was a mistake........it will affect your credit score.........
10:31 PM on 05/06/2009
"That was a mistake........it will affect your credit score........."
Not that much. Fear of harming your credit score should not keep you from standing up to financial bullies. Unless you plan on asking for a large loan or mortage in the near future, I doubt it will have any significant effect on your financial situation, except to free you from the bank's financial abuse.
06:17 PM on 05/06/2009
All you are to BofA is a number and that's how it always been. No customer service at retail level and escalation sucks!

Move your money-
06:14 PM on 05/06/2009
We got our few nickles out of there!
05:59 PM on 05/06/2009
I'm very surprised to read that investors are responding positively by Bank of America's reassurances. I'm not.
When I heard about the $34 billion shortfall this morning, my first thought was to check to make sure I wasn't counting on any BoA credit cards. Although I am in the habit of paying off my charges each month, I do use credit cards routinely. Just the barely used VISA card was BoA, so I just need to find a replacement for that.
And I have no plans on investing in BoA stock any time soon.
Viper
Former repub, still repenting
09:29 PM on 05/06/2009
Because when we read the report, it turned out they did not need 34 billion. They just need to shift long term investments into current assets such as investments in foreign banks which they can sell and cover the additional cash they would need in a worse case senario. They dont need it now. Accounting wise their assets remain the same...

Regards
10:06 PM on 05/06/2009
I'm still waiting for your link to the statement you made earlier.

"These assets have increased 500% since the beginning of the year".

Where is the link ............?
10:37 PM on 05/06/2009
Viper: Do you work for BoA?
These rationalizations and twisted accounting practices sound just like the same derivative hocus pocus which created this mess in the first place.
05:01 PM on 05/06/2009
I have heard so many people unhappy with this bank - they are horrible! switch accounts to a local bank or credit union .....anyone but B of A - that would teach them real quick.
TIME TO SHUT THESE GUYS DOWN. ENOUGH! WHAT THE *&^% KIND OF EXECS ARE RUNNING THIS SHOW?? shut them down. DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH B OF A.
Viper
Former repub, still repenting
09:31 PM on 05/06/2009
Did you actually read the story... they dont need more capital input, just sell some investments in foreign banks if they have to raise the money, if and when a worse case senario occurs..


Regards
10:19 PM on 05/06/2009
So now you claim to have stock in BOA...................
04:58 PM on 05/06/2009
NO MORE MONEY BAIL OUTS OF BANKS - WALLSTREET.
LET THE BANK FILE FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY just like the car company.
04:46 PM on 05/06/2009
What about the profits being held off-shore by B of A subsidiaries? Time to bring the money home, pay the tax on it, and use it to run the business. Isn't that the way it's supposed to work?
albar
Republicans gathered in their political graves
05:52 PM on 05/06/2009
it's in the making. patience, my friend
04:16 PM on 05/06/2009
really, everyone should have their homes free & clear-- then everyone will have assets to use to move the economy.. instead of all these non-sensical bailout plans that are all white elephants-- it doesn't get to t he core of the problem..

the banks got t heir money already-- enough!
04:24 PM on 05/06/2009
If people own their houses outright, they will not have assets to use to "move" the economy. In order for your argument to work, the homeowners will have to take out another line of credit to pay for whatever they are trying to do to "move" the economy.
Viper
Former repub, still repenting
04:53 PM on 05/06/2009
The banks got loans for the use to make up for the drop in asset values because of home owners defaulting on their loans.

The banks are paying the money back and interest ... unlike many of us home owners...


regards
06:02 PM on 05/06/2009
Viper: Do you work for BoA?
These rationalizations sound just like the same derivative hocus pocus which created this mess in the first place.
07:01 PM on 05/06/2009
if these banks weren't so greedy with interests-- people won't be defaulting on their loans.
it's a double edged sword.