New York Times Price Hike: Daily, Sunday Edition Prices Both Go Up

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - New York Times Price Hike: Daily, Sunday Edition Prices Both Go Up stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

MICHAEL LIEDTKE | 05/ 5/09 06:28 PM | AP

I Like ItI Don’t Like It

The New York Times is raising its newsstand prices for the third time in less than two years as a severe advertising slump forces readers to shoulder more of the costs of producing newspapers.

With the latest changes announced Tuesday, individual copies of The New York Times on Mondays through Saturdays will have doubled to $2 since July 2007.

The upcoming increase, effective June 1, will boost the Times' weekday price by 50 cents, or 33 percent, from the current price of $1.50. The Times, which has the third-highest U.S. circulation on weekdays, increased the weekday price by 25 cents during each of the previous two summers.

The New York Times also is raising the price for its Sunday edition, which is the nation's top-selling newspaper on that day. Sunday's national and Northeast editions will cost $6, an increase of $1. In the New York area, it will cost $5, also a dollar more.

Home delivery rates aren't changing for now. That means most of the Times' readers won't be affected by the June 1 increases because home delivery accounts for nearly two-thirds of the newspaper's weekday circulation and more than 70 percent of the Sunday circulation.

But the Times isn't ruling out an increase later this year, newspaper spokeswoman Diane McNulty said. The Times had raised its home delivery prices around the same time it increased newsstand prices in 2007 and 2008.

Raising the prices of newspapers is risky because it threatens to drive away readers, particularly as the Times and most other newspapers give away their stories on the Internet. The recession also has made many consumers more frugal.

But many newspapers have shown willingness to see circulation fall as long as they keep the readers most coveted by advertisers.

Story continues below
advertisement

Among other things, the Times and other newspapers have been cutting back on discounted and third-party sales. The thinking is that readers willing to pay higher prices could end up being more valuable to advertisers because they are presumably more affluent and more engaged with newspapers.

The average sales of 395 daily U.S. newspapers, including the Times, tracked by the Audit Bureau of Circulations fell 7.1 percent from last year during the six months ending in March, the biggest decline on record.

The New York Times' weekday circulation averaged 1.04 million during the six months ending in March, a drop of more than 3 percent from last year. Before the 2007 price increase, the Times' weekday circulation stood at 1.12 million.

Although many factors are behind the circulation drop, both USA Today, the nation's largest weekday newspaper, and The New York Post have blamed higher prices for recent declines in their circulation.

Despite the erosion, the circulation revenue of the Times and other newspapers is still higher that a year ago because the remaining readers are paying more. Higher prices helped lift the first-quarter circulation revenue at The New York Times Co. and McClatchy Co., which owns The Miami Herald and 29 other daily newspapers.

The flurry of price increases underscores just how much the shifting financial landscape has shaken newspaper publishers.

For decades, newspapers were able to rely on steady increases in their ad revenue to cover most of the cost for gathering the news, printing the information and then distributing the copies. A reliable flow of advertising is one reason the Times was able to go from 1999 to 2007 with just one increase in the cover price of its weekday edition.

But ad revenue has been crumbling throughout the newspaper industry for the past three years, forcing newspapers to lay off workers, reduce wages and look for new ways to make money.

So far the revenue gains from higher prices haven't been nearly enough to overcome the advertising drought.

The New York Times Co., which also owns The Boston Globe and 16 other daily newspapers besides its flagship publication, lost $74 million during the first three months of the year as its ad revenue plunged 27 percent from last year. Circulation revenue edged up by 1 percent.

With its newspaper prices rising and ad sales sagging, circulation accounted for 38 percent of the Times Co.'s first-quarter revenue. Most newspaper publishers still rely more heavily on advertising.

The advertising downturn has sent seven publishers with daily newspapers into bankruptcy protection since December and triggered the closure of the Rocky Mountain News in Denver.

The New York Times is raising its newsstand prices for the third time in less than two years as a severe advertising slump forces readers to shoulder more of the costs of producing newspapers. With t...
The New York Times is raising its newsstand prices for the third time in less than two years as a severe advertising slump forces readers to shoulder more of the costs of producing newspapers. With t...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
107
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
- Rog49Thomas I'm a Fan of Rog49Thomas 192 fans permalink

time perhaps to revisit one's micoeconomic's textbook

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:25 AM on 05/06/2009
photo

I quit reading the Times when they keptblurring the lines between the news pages and the opinion pages.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 PM on 05/05/2009
- SoCalNick I'm a Fan of SoCalNick 84 fans permalink
photo

Am I the only one to notice that the PeaBrains learned a new word and now they say LIBERAL in every post about EVERYTHING that they do not understand?

I wonder if they still don't know THEY LOST!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 PM on 05/05/2009
- ebanks84 I'm a Fan of ebanks84 109 fans permalink

LIBERAL is their code word for everything that is wrong with America. They refuse to accept the real word REPUBLICAN as being what ails us:)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:15 PM on 05/06/2009

It's not about losing anything. Why is it that liberals can't get over the election?

On this same website, we have another story about another liberal paper that is failing. Do you not see a pattern?

Our local paper, the S.D. Union Tribune, was once a thriving paper. Then they started down the path of biased, liberal coverage and they are suffering huge losses and are looking to sell. It's the same story all over this country. There is nothing wrong with a liberal perspective as long as the analysis is objective to both sides, but you don't usually see that with papers like the NY Times.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:48 PM on 05/06/2009
- TFlint I'm a Fan of TFlint 40 fans permalink
photo

In the past, newspapers would make more money if they gave them away free. Circulation is expensive and advertising pays for it. But now there's a new twist. Dwindling advertising, so for the first time in the history of the newspaper, readers have to pay their fair share. What's wrong with that?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:55 PM on 05/05/2009
- ohiomark I'm a Fan of ohiomark 122 fans permalink

Overheard in the NYT boardroom:

"Readership is way down and we are bleeding cash, what should we do?"

From the other end of the table.....­..."Let's raise the price again"

"Brilliant!!!, that will solve all our problems!!!"

More proof that liberalism always generates the exact opposite of it's stated intent.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:36 PM on 05/05/2009
- pittmom I'm a Fan of pittmom 4 fans permalink

go somewhere else OK?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 PM on 05/05/2009
photo

It must be sad to have not a clue.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:13 PM on 05/06/2009
- Bystander I'm a Fan of Bystander 8 fans permalink

As if we needed more evidence that the NYT doesn't understand basic economics either.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:31 PM on 05/05/2009

And all those folks on Wall Street do? You know, the one's getting all that bailout money from the taxpayers.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:33 AM on 05/06/2009
- Bystander I'm a Fan of Bystander 8 fans permalink

Paid to them by whom???? Guess you didn't read the 1100 page porkulous bill either.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:24 AM on 05/06/2009
photo

Won't that just expedite their ultimate demise?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:00 PM on 05/05/2009

Yes.NY,and California are victims of Liberal Democratic law.They are bankrupt from Statist social programs like Rent Control-Energy Price Controls,and a slew of other social programs that have left NY with a welfare state inside of the one created by the government­.They have no choice ,but to raise the cost of living,and taxes past the nosebleed level.I hear that 40,000 wealthy citizens pay over 50% of the entire operating budget of the 8 million people that live their.When high taxes drive out the wealthy the state will collapse,and California is next.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 PM on 05/05/2009
- SoCalNick I'm a Fan of SoCalNick 84 fans permalink
photo

WOW the vastness of your NON Knowlege is stunning.

You must be from one of those states that California and New York supports because you state does not generate enough tax revenue to support itself and takes more from the Fed than it puts in each year. Its ok just don't be so openly jealous MMkay

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 PM on 05/05/2009
- JackNasty I'm a Fan of JackNasty 69 fans permalink
photo

Maybe the NYTimes can make enough money to hire another Judith Miller.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:59 PM on 05/05/2009
- corwin I'm a Fan of corwin 3 fans permalink

Rove ,you crafty Devil.YiOu­'re winning after all.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:52 PM on 05/05/2009
- hmsbeagle I'm a Fan of hmsbeagle 13 fans permalink
photo

oh yes murdoch is got to be licking his chops ..the liberal mouthpiece going down the drain .

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 PM on 05/05/2009

Three words: Cancel My Subscription

Three more words: I Have Internet

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:36 PM on 05/05/2009
photo

this. paper.is.dead

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:35 PM on 05/05/2009
- MED1025 I'm a Fan of MED1025 13 fans permalink
photo

Six bucks? - I'll read it on line.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 09:34 PM on 05/05/2009
- markinaz I'm a Fan of markinaz 6 fans permalink

Insane.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:52 PM on 05/05/2009

Good Luck, LOL

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:48 PM on 05/05/2009
- jordan3189 I'm a Fan of jordan3189 20 fans permalink

Funny listening to all the whining about the cost, but the same people want all the union workers to be paid $100,000.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:39 PM on 05/05/2009
Page: « First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last » (5 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect