'Star Trek' Opens HUGE

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - 'Star Trek' Opens HUGE stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

CHRISTY LEMIRE | May 10, 2009 06:53 PM EST | AP

Compare other versions »
I Like ItI Don’t Like It
In this film publicity image released by Paramount Pictures, Zachary Quinto stars as Spock in a scene from, "Star Trek." (AP Photo/Paramount Pictures)

LOS ANGELES — "Star Trek" beamed itself up to the top of the box office, earning $76.5 million in its opening weekend.

Paramount Pictures had estimated that the movie would make about $50 million for the weekend, but figured that strong reviews helped carry it to the bigger opening.

Director J.J. Abrams' reboot of the beloved sci-fi franchise made $72.5 million from Friday through Sunday, plus $4 million just in pre-midnight screenings Thursday, the studio said Saturday. That cumulative figure includes a record $8.2 million in IMAX showings.

"Star Trek," which reveals the back stories of Capt. Kirk, Mr. Spock and the rest of the crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise, is an unusual blockbuster that pleased critics, too, receiving 96 percent positive reviews on the Rotten Tomatoes Web site.

"Last year 'The Dark Knight' and 'Iron Man' both were embraced by critics as incredible filmmaking as well as big action-adventure movies. This one has been even better reviewed," said Paramount vice chairman Rob Moore. "You look at the level of critical response and the audience reaction, we definitely feel like the movie is set to play into Memorial Day and into the summer."

Moore said he expected the movie, which had a $140 million budget, should gross over $200 million total this summer, even with competition like "Terminator: Salvation" coming on May 21 and "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" arriving in theaters July 15.

Abrams got it right, he said, by appealing to both hardcore "Star Trek" fans as well as moviegoers who may not have been familiar with the 1960s television series and the many movies and TV spin-offs it spawned. It stars Chris Pine as Kirk and Zachary Quinto as Spock, and features an appearance by Leonard Nimoy as an older version of the half-Vulcan, half-human Spock.

"It just shows you how talented he is and what a great movie he made," Moore said.

Story continues below
advertisement

"Star Trek" also beat the $6.3 million record "The Dark Knight" set in its opening weekend on IMAX screens last year.

"The DNA of this movie and the DNA of the `Star Trek' franchise work perfectly together and are very much a complement to what IMAX has accomplished," said Greg Foster, chairman and president of IMAX Filmed Entertainment. "IMAX was a company that had a sort of older-school, older-fashioned approach to things and we hipped it up and reinvented ourselves, if you will. That's precisely what J.J. Abrams and Paramount did with 'Star Trek.'"

The fact that the "Star Trek" haul improved from $26.8 million on Friday to $27.4 million on Saturday is a good sign, said Paul Dergarabedian, box-office analyst for Hollywood.com.

"Sometimes you will see a movie drop big-time," Dergarabedian said. "What this 'Star Trek' is going to have is legs, a rare commodity in this world where every week there's a new blockbuster."

As expected, last week's top film, "X-Men Origins: Wolverine," came in at No. 2 with $27 million. The prequel to the "X-Men" franchise, starring Hugh Jackman as the mutant who slices and dices his enemies with his metal claws, has made nearly $129.6 million in two weeks.

"It's the same weekend drop as ('X-Men: The Last Stand'), the last one. That tends to be what fan-based movies do," said Chris Aronson, senior vice president of domestic distribution for 20th Century Fox. "To have $130 million in the first 10 days is sensational. We think we withstood the attack of 'Star Trek,' if you will, and will settle into a long, successful run."

The week's other new wide release, the stoner comedy "Next Day Air," came in at sixth place with $4 million.

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to Hollywood.com. Final figures will be released Monday.

1. "Star Trek," $72.5 million.

2. "X-Men Origins: Wolverine," $27 million.

3. "Ghosts of Girlfriends Past," $10.45 million.

4. "Obsessed," $6.6 million.

5. "17 Again," $4.4 million.

6. "Next Day Air," $4 million.

7. "The Soloist," $3.6 million.

8. "Monsters vs. Aliens," $3.4 million.

9. "Earth," $2.5 million.

10. "Hannah Montana: The Movie," $2.4 million.

___

On the Net:

http://www.hollywood.com/boxoffice

___

Universal Pictures, Focus Features and Rogue Pictures are owned by NBC Universal, a unit of General Electric Co.; Sony Pictures, Sony Screen Gems and Sony Pictures Classics are units of Sony Corp.; DreamWorks, Paramount and Paramount Vantage are divisions of Viacom Inc.; Disney's parent is The Walt Disney Co.; Miramax is a division of The Walt Disney Co.; 20th Century Fox, Fox Searchlight Pictures and Fox Atomic are owned by News Corp.; Warner Bros., New Line, Warner Independent and Picturehouse are units of Time Warner Inc.; MGM is owned by a consortium of Providence Equity Partners, Texas Pacific Group, Sony Corp., Comcast Corp., DLJ Merchant Banking Partners and Quadrangle Group; Lionsgate is owned by Lionsgate Entertainment Corp.; IFC Films is owned by Rainbow Media Holdings, a subsidiary of Cablevision Systems Corp.

LOS ANGELES — "Star Trek" beamed itself up to the top of the box office, earning $76.5 million in its opening weekend. Paramount Pictures had estimated that the movie would make about $50 milli...
LOS ANGELES — "Star Trek" beamed itself up to the top of the box office, earning $76.5 million in its opening weekend. Paramount Pictures had estimated that the movie would make about $50 milli...
Loading...
 
Filed by Katherine Thomson
 
Comments
285
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
- markinaz I'm a Fan of markinaz 3 fans permalink

It was only ok. Could never shake the feeling that this film was more BIG SUMMER SCI-FI BLOCKBUSTER with a star trek tie in than a real Star Trek movie. On the other hand, I would probably go see a sequel if one came out.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:50 PM on 05/12/2009
photo

One of the great things about this movie was the fact that I didn't know all the actors. Everything was fresh. There were not people I have seen a gazillion times in different dramas. Verisimilitude was stunning. The fresh faces make it more enjoyable. The writing was very, very good, as tightly crafted as any of the best comic books. Everything was done to great effect. I almost never go to see movies twice, but I think I will of this one. Superb.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:49 AM on 05/12/2009
photo

My favorite, was the actor that played Bones. He nailed it. Love Dr. McCoy. Epic PASS!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:05 PM on 05/11/2009
- wilray I'm a Fan of wilray 71 fans permalink
photo

Hers is something that I just want to share with you. Even though I do more guesstimates rather than estimates, the weekend report at Box Office Mojo is in agreement with my guesses. Star Trek is doing phenomenally. BOM is also in agreement with my feelings regarding the promo line "This isn't your father's Star Trek." The franchise should lose it and quickly. An amazing thing has happened at imdb.com. Okay first Star Trek is at #59 of the top 250 movies. But that's not what I'm talking about. Okay, you have to be a member at imdb. to vote. And the rankings are fluid and are not about Box Office. That's why the top two slots tend to fluctuate between The Shawshank Redemption and The Godfather. They also have what they call a movie meter, which I think registers popularity based on page views. Accordingly all of the Star Trek franchise is showing tremendous interest or increase in popularity. Some at almost 500%. Strictly for comparison, Star Wars is barely breaking in the double digits, and Harry Potter is doing some negative numbers. Of course, this is only a weekly view. For me the telling factor is that the new movie is actually sparking interest in the entire franchise.
http://www.imdb.com/chart/top?tt0796366

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:13 PM on 05/11/2009
photo

You must be in the biz. This movie is going places.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:52 AM on 05/12/2009
- wilray I'm a Fan of wilray 71 fans permalink
photo

No I'm not in the biz. I went saw it again yesterday with two friends; One had already seen it. I thought my favorite character would be the young Spock because I think they got the perfect guy to play him. But my favorite character is actually Chekhov. And I guessed correctly that he was actually Russian; his parents moved to the United States when he was several months old. Although Walter Koenig was born in the U. S. his parents immigrated from Russia also.

I'll forgive the opening sequence being a plot error cause it was killer, but I do have a question regarding a later sequence. Does the Iowa terrain look like that. What was the young Kirk driving towards. i mean it was totally flat and then all of a sudden this canyon. appears. That couldn't be the continental divide could it. BTW, personally, I think this is the best Star Trek movie ever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:54 AM on 05/13/2009
- keerod76 I'm a Fan of keerod76 3 fans permalink

Will see it tomorrow. Can't wait.

http://balmer.typepad.com/jester/
The Dark Clown of Comedy

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:32 PM on 05/11/2009
- wilray I'm a Fan of wilray 71 fans permalink
photo

For me the biggest plot hole was the whole Uhura-Spock thing. However, it did make more sense when Sarek finally 'fesses up. BTW, in the old Star Trek Alternate Reality (old S.T.A.R), Spock's mother help to invent the universal translator. How does this play out for new S.T.A.R.?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:07 PM on 05/11/2009
photo

Wow, you're deep into this.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:55 AM on 05/12/2009
- plooger I'm a Fan of plooger 14 fans permalink

* * SPOILER ALERT * * That's what I don't get about all the rave reviews for this movie. The alternate reality twist makes the whole damn thing pointless, since, contrary to advertising and hype, it's NOT an "origins" movie but a movie depicting a completely different reality -- and a somewhat unbelievable one, at that, given the movie proposes that Kirk would be minimally changed by the loss of his father at birth. The time travel plot mechanism is overused, and I was disappointed with its application here.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:46 AM on 05/12/2009
- wilray I'm a Fan of wilray 71 fans permalink
photo

New Trek goers, Old trek die-hards. Don't fight it. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:44 PM on 05/11/2009
photo

I am no Trekkie...­...I have seen the orignal and the Next Generation, but do not own any of the episodes or movie spin offs on video or DVD, and I did not watch Deep SPace Nine, Voyager or Enterprise­......I went Saturday night with my friend Paul, who is a big Trekkie. Both of us enjoyed the film. It was way better than any other the films, which isn't saying a whole lot since Part 2 nd Part 4 were, in my opinion, the only decent ones. Compare it to Star Trek: The Motionless Picture or Part 5, which was Ed Wood-esque in its awfulness. Watch the lame Generations movie that had the old and the Next Generation cast and you will see the difference. Even watch some of the really lame season three episodes of the original, if you Trekkies want to delude yourselfs that such a pristine show is being soiled. It has been soiled over the many years.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 PM on 05/11/2009
- Faxus I'm a Fan of Faxus 12 fans permalink
photo

Contrary to what has been written by some critics, this new Star Trek movie is not a prequel. I think this has some fans confused because they appear to be worried about the familiar Star Trek universe that came later, which we all are familiar with. This movie is all about Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations. Non fans of Star Trek shouldn't get all bent out of shape, it's not like a cult or anything, just ordinary people looking for some hope for the future.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 PM on 05/11/2009
photo

By definition, it is an alternate reality that began at a point of time of prequel chronology; for this reason, it is both a prequel and an alternate reality which was birthed from the prequel. Is there a futurequel? Well, without a certain plot point from the future, the prequel could not have happened. So, what would you call that?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:03 AM on 05/12/2009
photo

Radio clown Alex Bennett was ranting all morning this morning about how bad this movie was. His attacks all centered along two issues: (a) it was just a lot of Hollywood eye candy with an unsophisticated story line and (b) it wasn't faithful to the facts of the original series.
What a pile of nonsense. First, because Star Trek was NEVER known for its sophisticated, clever character development and story lines. Second, why should it be faithful to the original story? Who cares (other than the bitter Trekkies who were so well mocked on the onion.com last week?)

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:36 PM on 05/11/2009
photo

I find it rather odd that when Wolverine bowed last weekend to a mid $80M gross, there wasn't a lot of hub-bub about it as a financial hit, just some griping that it would have made more had the workprint not leaked on to a file sharing network a few weeks before the release. Now Star Trek rakes in a very respectable $72M (albiet less than Wolverine's opening) and it's praised as a HUGE success.

Granted, the last 2 or so Trek films didn't do all that well at the BO, and the studios may have thought they were going to have to slowly woo back the fans they lost over the years...bu­t prequels are all the rage these days; there was a lot of curiosity around this project; and lets face it, hard core Trek fans hadn't drifted THAT far away, and were bound to check out any new Trek property in droves.

I don't know...may­be I'm overthinking it, but it seems to me that Studios are VERY reluctant to ever own up to the fact that "leaks" aren't nearly the cause for alarm on the scale that they pretend. An $80M opening for a film that gets leaked is just "Ok" and is cause for a little grousing, whereas a $72M opening for an unleaked film is a HUGE success...­.? Whatever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:00 PM on 05/11/2009
- Changeling I'm a Fan of Changeling 22 fans permalink
photo

area--

It's a huge deal because no one expected anything from Trek. After 5 series, each with progessively dwindling ratings and with the last two movies that were so bad that only the most stalwart fans...the fans that'd watch Star Trek: Sponge Bob showed up. The franchise was thought done with good reason.

A prequel wasn't done in this case because it's "all the rage" It was done in such a way so it reopens the entire universe. Jettisons any of that 700 hours of canon that they don't want to use. That canon that makes audiences feel like they're mising ourt when they hear the references. Feeling like you have to grow up with it to ever get it.

An opening under 50 would have meant that only those stalwarts showed up.....76? It means a LOT more than that took an interest. What's more? Saturday's BO was higher than Friday's..­.yesterday­s is expected to exceeed Saturday's.

Word of mouth seems to be driving this film on. That same word of mouth has tanked Wolverine.

Wolverine had no record of poor performanc­e...no signs of dwindling fandom....­no stifing continuity. In short, no reason to fail.

People are actually INTERESTED in Trek again in the face of so many reasons not to be....that­'s what makes this a big deal.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:27 PM on 05/11/2009
- wilray I'm a Fan of wilray 71 fans permalink
photo

According to Box Office Mojo, Star Trek's weekend total will clock in at almost 148 mil. Read the report Star Trek is breaking records.
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=2585&p=.htm

An even more telling figure is how it is ranked by Box office mojo members - A for Star Trek, B for Wolverine. The same thing at imdb.com Star Trek is currently listed at #59 of the top 250 movies., Wolverine doesn't even register. At rottentomatoes.com, Star Trek gets a tomato @ 95%, Wolverine gets a rotten tomato @ 36%. If Wolverine dies at the box office, it won't be because of leaked copies.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:05 PM on 05/11/2009
- BDAinVA I'm a Fan of BDAinVA 2 fans permalink

As a person who grew up watching Star Trek re-runs and then watching TNG and even Voyager, I thoroughly enjoyed the movie. I also know some people who never saw an episode of the original Star Trek and liked the movie too. So Abrams did a fine job of appealing to both Star Trek fans and newbies, a very hard thing to do. Kudos to him. I am very much looking forward to the next installment!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 AM on 05/11/2009
- wilray I'm a Fan of wilray 71 fans permalink
photo

I saw the new movie for the first time last night. I say 1st time cause I am definitely seeing it again soon. We got to the theater on time, which meant we were late for the good seats. My seat was way too far forward, and way too far left.

I never knew you could say "Live long and Prosper" in a way that sounded like "Go eff yourself."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:20 AM on 05/11/2009
- plooger I'm a Fan of plooger 14 fans permalink

> I never knew you could say "Live long and Prosper" in a way that sounded like "Go eff yourself."

Hilarious! Too true. Some of that human emotion definitely seeped into that response.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:51 AM on 05/12/2009

Just forget about all of the ST emotional baggage and such; go see it because its a damn good flick.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:03 AM on 05/11/2009
- Faxus I'm a Fan of Faxus 12 fans permalink
photo

This is a great new Star Trek movie and a novel but still acceptable way of reinventing the genre that will keep trekkies happy and hopefully attract new fans. On the other hand, there's nothing about this movie that would preclude a new Star Trek TV series or even a Star Trek Next Generation, DS9 or Voyager movie. I hope Paramount doesn't let this one shrivel on the vine as it has in the past...

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:02 AM on 05/11/2009

Sorry to disagree & boy will I get flamed for this.

Up front, I have not seen the movie.

I see this as the complete annihilation of 40+ years of Star Trek & the creation of STAR WARS TREK.

You can not wipe out Vulcan, kill Spock's mother and have the Star Trek Universe be the same. The way I see it the only series that is Star Trek now is Enterprise and this movie.

TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY, 10 movies, countless comics, books, novel & god know what else now don't exist. They can't!! The whole point of time travel in sci fi is the quest to CHANGE the future.

Example - who's ancestors may have been on Vulcan at the time? No future Picard, Sisko, Janeway???? ST III can't exist now. I could go on & on.

It's only my opinion. So please if you love this movie enjoy it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 AM on 05/11/2009
- Faxus I'm a Fan of Faxus 12 fans permalink
photo

You have not seen the movie, and I don't want to spoil it for you and others, but I suggest you see it and all will be repeatedly explained by Spock and then you will understand.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:42 AM on 05/11/2009

Dude,
You are taking this WAAAYYY too seriously. Its a great film that has breathed life into a great franchise. Like it or not, this is the turn the franchise has taken and it could have been a lot worse. You sound like you are drinking the same Haterade that the far fight drinks. Careful, that stuff will rot your guts outs.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:27 PM on 05/11/2009
photo

I've got a good counselor I can recommend. I think you need it.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:38 PM on 05/11/2009
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last » (7 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect